HC asks Delhi govt to give 2 months' notice to mohalla clinic staff before termination
The high court's order came while dealing with a petition by AAMC staff, who were hired on a contractual basis by the previous Aam Aadmi Party government, seeking directions against their termination and replacement with other contractual employees.
Justice Prateek Jalan disposed of the petition with the direction, "In the event the respondents (Delhi government) propose to terminate the petitioners' engagement before March 31, 2026, on the ground that new manpower has been engaged..., they are directed to give two weeks' notice to the concerned... (staff)," the court said in its August 6 order.
The court passed a similar order on Tuesday on a plea by doctors, who were engaged on a contractual basis to work in AAMCs and their engagement was extended from time to time between 2016 to 2015, seeking to restrain the authorities from illegally terminating them.
In the present case, the petitioners are working as pharmacists, mohalla clinic assistants and multitask workers on a contractual basis in AAMC under the Delhi government. They sought directions against their termination and replacement with other contractual employees.
Advocate Amar Nath Saini, representing the staff members, submitted that there was a distinction from the case of the doctors, as some of the petitioners have been telephonically instructed not to report to duty.
The counsel for the Delhi government submitted that no decision has been taken by the authorities to dispense with the services of any of the employees of AAMC.
The issue comes in the wake of the recent decision to phase out mohalla clinics in areas where Ayushman Arogya Mandirs, which also offer primary healthcare, are being operationalised under the new BJP government.
As of August 2023, 533 mohalla clinics were operational in Delhi.
However, at least seven have already been converted into Arogya Mandirs under the Centre's Ayushman Bharat scheme.
Following a protest on May 17 by AAMC staff, Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta had assured that existing paramedical and support staff would be adjusted within Arogya Mandirs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
HC pulls up Centre, Delhi for ‘passing the buck' on Sainik Farms regularisation
The Delhi High Court has once again pulled up the Delhi government and the Centre over the delay in any decision on regularisation of Sainik Farms in South Delhi. The Delhi High Court has once again pulled up the NCT government and the Central government over the regularisation of Sainik Farms in South Delhi.(Representational) During a hearing on Wednesday, a bench of Chief Justice D K Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela observed the authorities were not taking any final decision on the issue and just "passing the buck", which ultimately "stops at the court". "The basic question remains as to what the central government in consultation with the state government is doing for regularising these colonies. You have to make a final decision. It appears again that everybody is trying to pass the buck and as happens in these matters, the buck ultimately stops at the court," the bench observed. During Wednesday's hearing, the court asked why the authorities had not been able to bring a simple legislation to mitigate the problems of the residents. "First and last thing we want to know is: what is it that you are doing about these colonies? We can't be more clearer than this. They have been hanging fire without being able to lay a brick even for repairs and yet you are continuing to let them live the way they are for the last 10-15 years," the bench said. Delhi HC added, "You know very well why they are existing, how they are existing till now. None of the government will do anything to mitigate the problems." The bench also called on officers in the Union Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Delhi government, Delhi Development Authority (DDA) and Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) to sit together to decide on the fate of its residents who had petitioned the high court. The Delhi high court had previously rapped the Delhi NCT government in March for its failure to indicate a timeline to regularise the Sainik Farm colony. South Delhi's Sainik Farms is an unauthorised colony. The area has remained in the unauthorised status since the 1980s. An unauthorised colony in Delhi refers to residential areas which have come up but on land that's not been approved for residential use in Delhi's master plan. Due to this, these colonies often face infrastructure issues. As reported by The Indian Express, Delhi has around 1,800 unauthorised colonies, of which 1,731 have been slated for re-development work under the Pradhan Mantri-Unauthorised Colonies in Delhi Awas Adhikar Yojana (PM-UDAY). However, Sainik Farms, along with Mahendru Enclave, and Anant Ram Dairy, was excluded from this list over land use violations. (With inputs from PTI)
India.com
8 hours ago
- India.com
Delhi HC Reserves Verdict On Tahir Hussain's Bail Plea In Ankit Sharma Murder Case
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday reserved its order on the bail plea of Tahir Hussain, who is an accused in the Ankit Sharma murder case. He has been in custody for the last five years, and the other two accused are on bail. This is the fifth bail application of accused Tahir Hussain. Intelligence Bureau staffer Ankit Sharma was allegedly murdered in February 2020 during the North East Delhi Riots. Hussain is also an accused in the larger Conspiracy of the Delhi riots case of 2020. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna reserved order after hearing submissions by the counsel for the accused Tahir Hussain and the Delhi police. Advocate Rajiv Mohan, alongwith Tara Narula and Shivangi Sharma, appeared for Hussain. It was argued that the accused has been in judicial custody since 2020. Two accused, namely Haseen Mullaji and Sameer Khan, are enlarged on bail. This case is at the stage of Prosecution evidence before the trial court. Investigation officer's examination and cross-examination are pending. It was argued by the counsel for the accused that the Trial Court dismissed the fourth bail application wrongly, observing that there was no change in circumstances since the previous dismissal. There is a material change in circumstances in favour of the accused. Counsel for the accused also submitted that three eyewitnesses have not supported the case of the Prosecution. "The evidence of the complainant has been recorded. He did not identify the Complaint on the basis of which the FIR was lodged. All public eye witnesses have been examined," it said. It was also argued that there is no apprehension of interference with the trial, as there are no allegations of influencing the witnesses. Advocate Rajat Nair opposed the bail application on behalf of the Delhi police. Delhi police said that Tahir Hussain has been identified by eyewitnesses. One eyewitness recorded a 29-second video of the mob dragging the deceased Ankit Sharma from the side of Tahir Hussain's house and throwing him over an iron fence, into the drain. It was also argued that a witness identified Tahir Hussain as a member of the mob armed with dandas, petrol bombs and stones, instigating them. Police said that there is apprehension of the accused fleeing from justice and tampering with evidence.
Indian Express
12 hours ago
- Indian Express
‘Will look into it': CJI Gavai to examine plea on vaccination, sterilisation of community dogs in Delhi
Chief Justice of India B R Gavai on Wednesday agreed to look into a plea related to the vaccination and sterilisation of community dogs in Delhi as per the Animal Birth Control (Dogs) Rules. The plea by an organisation, Conference for Human Rights (India) in 2024, challenged the Delhi High Court's August 2023 order following its Public Interest Litigation (PIL), which had sought directions for the sterilisation and vaccination of community dogs. The high court had disposed of the PIL without issuing any specific directions, following which the organisation moved the apex court where a bench of Justices Gavai and K V Viswanathan issued notice to the Centre and Delhi Government on July 8, 2024. On Wednesday, the counsel for the appellant organisation told the CJI-led bench that the respondents were yet to file their counter-affidavit despite being given a last chance to do so as per the order dated May 13, 2025. Apparently referring to the August 11 order of the bench presided by Justice J B Pardiwala — which directed authorities in Delhi-NCR to relocate stray dogs from streets to shelters — the CJI then said that another bench has already passed an order concerning strays. The counsel appearing for the appellant pointed out that in May 2024, another bench of the Supreme Court, led by Justice J K Maheshwari, had sent back petitions raising the stray dog issue to high courts saying 'there cannot be any indiscriminate killings of canines and the authorities have to take action in terms of the mandate and spirit of the prevalent legislation(s) in place.' 'There is no gainsaying in the fact that exhibiting compassion to all living beings, is the enshrined Constitutional value and mandate, and casts obligation on the authorities to maintain,' the bench had added at the time. The CJI then said, 'I will look into it.' Meanwhile, following the August 11 order of the top court, NGOs that have tied up with the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) appear to be clueless about its implementation amid a lack of dedicated shelters in the National Capital.
