logo
Why over half of US office workers are considering a switch to skilled trades

Why over half of US office workers are considering a switch to skilled trades

Time of India2 days ago

Burnout and AI fears drive US white-collar workers toward blue-collar careers. (AI Image)
A growing number of office workers in the US are rethinking their career paths, with more than half now considering switching to skilled trades. This surprising trend highlights a shift in how workers view traditional white-collar jobs, as burnout, job insecurity, and the rise of artificial intelligence prompt many to seek more fulfilling and stable employment.
For decades, a college education was seen as the key to landing a well-paying, secure job. However, that promise no longer holds true for many Americans. Despite spending thousands of dollars on higher education, numerous white-collar workers find themselves underpaid, overworked, or even unemployed. According to a recent survey by TRADESAFE, 55% of US office employees are seriously contemplating leaving their current roles in favor of blue-collar jobs.
Burnout and job insecurity fuel the desire for change
One of the main reasons for this career reconsideration is burnout. TRADESAFE's survey found that 57% of white-collar workers in the US report feeling burned out or highly stressed. Another study by Moodle, conducted through Censuswide, reveals an even higher burnout rate of 66% among American employees. The heavy workload, routine tasks, and excessive administrative red tape contribute to this widespread dissatisfaction.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Buy Brass Idols - Handmade Brass Statues for Home & Gifting
Luxeartisanship
Buy Now
Undo
Many workers also feel their current jobs lack meaning or purpose. As reported by the Your Tango, about one-third of white-collar employees say their work feels unfulfilling and that much of their day is spent 'pretending to be busy.' Despite this dissatisfaction, 45% admit feeling social pressure to stay in their current careers, with 68% of Gen Z workers feeling the strongest pressure. Financial stability and lack of skills for trade jobs are among the top reasons people remain in white-collar roles.
Adding to these challenges is the growing influence of artificial intelligence. Over half of Americans fear losing their jobs to AI, and 61% of Gen Z white-collar workers feel vulnerable to automation. Resumes are increasingly screened by algorithms, and many entry-level office positions are disappearing. In contrast, skilled trades such as plumbing, carpentry, and electrical work remain less susceptible to automation, making them more appealing to workers worried about job security.
Key statistics driving US white-collar workers toward skilled trades
Topic
Statistic / Insight
Source
Percentage of white-collar workers considering switch to skilled trades
55%
TRADESAFE survey
Burnout rate among white-collar workers in the US
57%
TRADESAFE survey
Burnout rate among all US employees
66%
Moodle/Censuswide
Gen Z white-collar workers considering switching
59%
TRADESAFE survey
Gen Z white-collar workers feeling vulnerable to AI
61%
TRADESAFE survey
Percentage of white-collar workers feeling social pressure to stay
45% (68% for Gen Z)
TRADESAFE survey
Percentage of white-collar workers finding their jobs unfulfilling
33%
TRADESAFE survey
Percentage of Americans feeling envious of skilled trades
50%
TRADESAFE survey
Percentage who believe society values trades more now
68%
TRADESAFE survey
Satisfaction among blue-collar workers
43% very/extremely satisfied
Pew Research
Blue-collar workers dissatisfied with pay
33%
Pew Research
Changing perceptions and the allure of skilled trades
The perception of blue-collar work has evolved significantly. Once stigmatized, skilled trades are now viewed as respectable and valuable careers. Fifty percent of Americans surveyed admitted feeling envious of those working in trade jobs, and 68% believe society is starting to value hands-on work more than office roles.
Many white-collar workers appreciate the physical activity, job security, and clear purpose associated with trades.
Certain professions, including chefs, firefighters, electricians, and carpenters, are particularly admired. As reported by the Your Tango, these roles offer a sense of stability and fulfillment that many office workers currently lack. However, the grass is not always greener on the other side.
Data from the Pew Research Center shows that only 43% of blue-collar workers feel very satisfied with their jobs, and many express concerns about pay and respect.
A sign of broader workforce dissatisfaction
Given the current economic climate and labor market challenges, dissatisfaction spans all job types. Whether white-collar, blue-collar, or somewhere in between, many workers feel undervalued and unfulfilled.
The trend of white-collar employees considering a move to skilled trades reflects a broader search for meaningful work and security.
As quoted by the Your Tango, 'most people have stayed in their white-collar roles because they need the income or financial stability or because they lack the skills or training for a trade job.' This complex mix of factors drives a significant portion of the US workforce to rethink their career trajectories. The coming years may see a continued shift as more workers pursue hands-on, trade-based professions to escape burnout and uncertainty in office environments.
Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Elon Musk's apology to Trump was a good business decision
Why Elon Musk's apology to Trump was a good business decision

First Post

time37 minutes ago

  • First Post

Why Elon Musk's apology to Trump was a good business decision

Last week, Tesla CEO Elon Musk claimed that Donald Trump, whom he endorsed for president and gave hundreds of millions of dollars in campaign contributions, was part of the files linked to Jeffrey Epstein. This week, Musk has backed down, saying his posts against Trump 'went too far'. Post the apology, Tesla shares rose, and Musk's net worth increased by $191 million read more Tesla CEO Elon Musk has backtracked this week, apologising and saying his posts against Donald Trump 'went too far'. AP Last week, Elon Musk made a serious allegation against US President Donald Trump. The Tesla CEO and richest man in the world claimed that Trump, who he endorsed for president and to whom he gave hundreds of millions of dollars in campaign contributions, was part of the files linked to Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein, the disgraced financier and convicted sex offender, killed himself in prison in 2019. However, Musk quickly backtracked this week, apologising and saying his posts against 'went too far'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Musk's apology also came ahead of a major product launch for Tesla next week. But how did the feud escalate? And how has his apology has been good for business? Let's take a closer look How the feud escalated It began with Trump and Musk having a fallout over the Republican president's 'big, beautiful bill'. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it,' Musk wrote on X on June 3. Trump, two days later, during a meeting in the Oval Office with Germany's new leader, said he was 'very disappointed' with Musk's comments. 'Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here,' Trump said. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore.' 'He hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that will be next,' Trump said. 'But I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot.' 'False,' Musk hit back immediately on X even as Trump continued to speak. 'This bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD When Trump further said he would have 'won Pennsylvania easily' without Musk's help, The Tesla CEO responded immediately. Musk, remember, spend hundreds of millions of dollars to elect Trump including a $1 million a day giveaway in Pennsylvania. Musk responded that Trump would have lost the election without him and that the Democrats would control both the House and the Senate. Donald Trump said he was 'very disappointed' with Elon Musk. Reuters 'The Big Ugly Bill will INCREASE the deficit to $2.5 trillion!' Musk added. Musk then put up a poll asking his followers if it was time to create a new political party – one that represented the 80 per cent of Americans in the middle. Musk then pointed out that he would be around for a lot longer than Trump. 'Oh and some food for thought as they ponder this question: Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years…' Trump then launched an all-out assault on Musk. 'I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' Trump wrote on social media. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump also threatened Musk's government subsidies and contracts. He wrote, 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' 'Such an obvious lie. So sad,' Musk responded. Then came the big bombshell accusation. Musk claimed Trump appeared in the Jeffrey Epstein files . 'Files linked to the investigation of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein have emerged as a point of fixation for Trump and his allies and right-wing media figures,' Musk wrote. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: Donald Trump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public.' 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out,' Musk added. On June 6, the White House claimed that the two men were said to have a phone call to clear the air. However, Trump, in his usual fashion put paid to that telling ABC he was 'not particularly' interested in speaking to Musk. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'I'm not even thinking about Elon. He's got a problem. The poor guy's got a problem,' Trump said. Musk backs down Trump's threats against Musk's subsidies and government contracts seemed to have worked. Musk on Wednesday back down from his claims. 'I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far,' Musk wrote on X early Wednesday morning. This came after Musk made a private phone call to Trump. The development came after Musk and Trump allies including Vice President J Dance and White House Chief Suzie Wiles privately met to discuss a truce. SpaceX headquarters is shown in Hawthorne, California. The company receives billions of dollars in revenue every year in government contracts. Reuters Trump, for his part, appeared pacified by the apology. 'I thought it was very nice that he did that,' Trump told the New York Post. 'Look, I have no hard feelings,' Trump said. 'I was really surprised that that happened. He went after a bill that's phenomenal. …He just — I think he feels very badly that he said that, actually.' 'The President acknowledged the statement that Elon put out this morning and he is appreciative of it and we are continuing to focus on the business of the American people,' the White House said in a statement. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD How has Musk's apology been good for business? According to Forbes, Musk's net worth rose to $411.4 billion after the apology – an increase of $191 million. This came as, Tesla's shares, which had tanked 14 per cent in the middle of the feud, gained around 1 per cent on Wednesday. The spat between the two men had caused Musk around $34 billion of his net worth – which makes given that SpaceX and Tesla, which form a huge chunk of his net worth, are hugely dependent on government contracts and subsidies. Investors in Musk's companies would now be heaving a sigh of relief after his apology to Trump. Now, with both men seemingly on a path to reconciliation, Musk can keep financing Trump and the Republicans' political ambitions and the government money can keep flowing for both SpaceX and Tesla. With inputs from agencies

China to kill AUKUS without firing a bullet? Trump's ‘America First' stand behind review of nuclear submarine deal with Australia
China to kill AUKUS without firing a bullet? Trump's ‘America First' stand behind review of nuclear submarine deal with Australia

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

China to kill AUKUS without firing a bullet? Trump's ‘America First' stand behind review of nuclear submarine deal with Australia

President Donald Trump has launched a Pentagon-led review of the 2021 AUKUS pact, which brings together Australia , the United Kingdom, and the United States in a multi-decade effort to counterbalance China's growing influence in the Indo-Pacific. This deal was signed under the Biden Administration , a commitment to give its allies the missing military edge in the form of nuclear-powered submarines to Australia. This review marks the first serious reappraisal of the deal since its 2021 announcement and is being undertaken to find the perfect strategy to tackle China's military posturing in the Pacific and South China Sea. Also Read: Trump's US losing its tourist destination sheen, Australia joins growing list of friendly nations dropping America from travel itineraries by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Dad-Approved Ways to Celebrate Father's Day in Costa Mesa - Travel Costa Mesa Travel Costa Mesa Read More Undo Officials say the review is to ensure the project aligns with Trump's 'America First' agenda and addresses concerns over resource limits in the US Navy . With the Chinese People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) modernising rapidly and operating multiple nuclear submarines as well as aircraft carriers, the US forces are getting stretched. Live Events A defense official confirmed that the review will examine America's readiness, allied contributions, and the US industrial base. Why is Trump having second thoughts? Trump's team, led by Undersecretary Elbridge Colby, has questioned the submarine component, known as Pillar I, while supporting broader cooperation in intelligence and advanced technologies. Colby warned that US nuclear submarine capacity may not be sufficient to both supply Australia and meet American needs in a hypothetical conflict on other fronts, such as around Taiwan. This review is normal for a new administration (Trump) to evaluate key defense agreements. Canberra has already committed around A$4 billion toward US production and $500 million upfront. But the review stresses that the US must hit production targets, about 2.33 submarines per year, before transferring vessels. The Australian Government forecast suggests that this submarine program could cost a staggering US$235 billion over 30 years. Trump's approach also uses AUKUS to pressure Australia to increase defence spending significantly, from 2% of GDP to roughly 3.5%. Australia's Deputy PM Richard Marles said that AUKUS will stay on track. He called the review 'natural and understandable,' given the change in US leadership. He stressed that Australia has a 'plan' and 'is sticking to it.' The Chinese reaction China maintained its opposition to the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal as the Trump Administration reviewed it to align with its " America First " agenda. Beijing had earlier labeled the deal as driven by 'Cold War thinking' and accused the US, UK, and Australia of embarking on a 'path of error and danger.' Also Read: Trump threatens broader troop deployment if ICE protests and riots spread After the news that the US is reviewing AUKUS, the Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian said at a briefing on Thursday, June 12, 'China has made clear more than once its position on the so-called trilateral security partnership between the U.S., U.K., and Australia, designed to advance cooperation on nuclear submarines and other cutting-edge military technologies." What is AUKUS and what was it meant to serve? The AUKUS pact, short for Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States, is a strategic security partnership announced in 2021. Its purpose is to strengthen military capabilities among these three countries and deter threats in the Indo-Pacific region, especially amid China's growing influence. The deal, estimated to cost US$239 billion (or A$368 billion) over three decades, is structured around two main pillars. Pillar I: Nuclear Submarines Pillar I will focus on providing Australia with nuclear-powered attack submarines, marking a big leap forward from its current fleet of diesel-electric vessels. Only five countries, the US, Russia, China, France, the UK, and India operate nuclear-powered submarines. Australia will build a nuclear submarine base that will be operational by 2027 just off Perth, for $1.7 billion. US and UK submarines will begin short-term rotational deployments to Western Australia by 2027. These deployments are meant to familiarise Australia with nuclear-powered technology and operations. From 2032, Australia will purchase at least three second-hand Virginia-class submarines from the US, with the option to buy two more if needed. The long-term vision is to create a new generation of nuclear-powered submarines, SSN-AUKUS. The UK and Australia will jointly design these submarines using British blueprints, but with integrated US technology. They will be constructed in both countries and serve both navies. With this part of the plan, the Australian government officials hope to strengthen deterrence, build Australia's domestic defence industry, and deepen military interoperability among the three nations. Pillar II: Advanced Capabilities and Intelligence Sharing This part includes collaboration on artificial intelligence, undersea robotics, long-range hypersonic missiles, quantum technologies, cyber operations, and electronic warfare systems. The arrangement expands on decades of deep intelligence sharing between the US and UK, now extended to Australia. It is designed to give the allies an edge in emerging technologies that are crucial for modern warfare. Together, both pillars of AUKUS aim to reshape the Indo-Pacific security landscape and establish a long-term technological and strategic alignment framework between the three partner countries. What lies ahead for Australia? The Pentagon review is expected to wrap up within 30 days; however, no timeline is given. Its outcome could reshape AUKUS or prompt negotiations over defence spending and industrial commitments. Australia may also consider a fall-back plan if the submarine deal is delayed or altered, though Marles has ruled out mid-course changes. London reiterates AUKUS's strategic value but supports revisiting its terms. For Australia, the review brings uncertainty over its biggest defence project. AUKUS's future role in Indo-Pacific security could be in doubt if the review leads to cancellation or delay.

Canada's F-35 stealth jet ambition hit by 50 percent cost surge, US warning of military unpreparedness
Canada's F-35 stealth jet ambition hit by 50 percent cost surge, US warning of military unpreparedness

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Canada's F-35 stealth jet ambition hit by 50 percent cost surge, US warning of military unpreparedness

A warning from the US Joint Strike Fighter Program Office puts the vision of the sleek F‑35 stealth fighter touching down on home soil by 2028 on hold. According to Canada's Auditor General Karen Hogan, a report released June 10 states that critical infrastructure, hangars, maintenance facilities, and secure networks built at Cold Lake, Alberta, and Bagotville, Quebec, 'weren't up to American standards'. This failing forced costly redesigns and delays. When US officials assessed readiness in June 2024, they rated Canada RED - indicating 'significant issues' that demanded senior-level intervention ahead of the planned December 2028 arrival of the first jets. 50 percent cost surge Play Video Pause Skip Backward Skip Forward Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration 0:00 Loaded : 0% 0:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 1x Playback Rate Chapters Chapters Descriptions descriptions off , selected Captions captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected Audio Track default , selected Picture-in-Picture Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Ödeme? Dieses simple Haushaltsmittel reduziert Flüssigkeit Venen Kompass Weiterlesen Undo Canada's $19 billion plan to buy 88 F‑35As has ballooned to at least C$27.7 billion and could reach C$33.2 billion, nearly a 50 percent increase. Much of the overspend stems from fluctuating foreign exchange rates, inflation , outdated cost projections, and necessary interim infrastructure, on top of another C$5.5 billion needed for Full Operational Capability. Defence Minister David McGuinty accepted Hogan's findings. He said the department will perform annual cost reviews and manage risks, pressing on with procurement. The government expects delivery of the first 16 jets 'in the next several months,' with initial training in the US, and full operations in Canada by 2028. Live Events Pilot shortage threatens readiness Adding to the scramble, the Royal Canadian Air Force has suffered a chronic pilot shortage since at least 2018, undermining efforts to staff and fly the stealth fleet. Internal assessments show just 58 percent of personnel are ready for emergencies, and only 40 percent of fighter jets are deemed combat‑ready. Canada at a geopolitical crossroads Beyond infrastructure and cost, the issue touches national sovereignty. Relying on American control over F‑35 software and parts, some analysts argue, could leave Canada vulnerable at moments of political strain. The saga revived a fierce debate about whether Canada should seek alternatives like Sweden's Gripen or retain flexibility with future purchases. Prime Minister Mark Carney ordered a comprehensive review in March 2025, partly prompted by US policy pressures and trade tensions. Defense Minister David McGuinty blamed the cost overruns on inflation and the pandemic, but told journalists Tuesday that Canada was soon to receive its first 16 F-35s. 'We'll be taking possession of those 16 F-35 fighter jets in the next several months,' he added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store