Chennai cyber crime cops quiz Madurai Adheenam
2
Madurai: A Chennai cyber crime police team on Sunday conducted inquiry with the 293rd pontiff of Madurai Adheenam, Sri La Sri Harihara Sri Gnana Sambandha Desika Swamigal, at the Adheenam mutt in Madurai in connection with the case against him for his alleged provocative remarks that could incite conflict between religious communities.
The Adheenam had claimed a conspiracy to murder him, suggesting links to Pakistan and Muslim men, following a road accident at Ulundurpet in Kallakurichi on May 2. Though his claims were later found to be entirely false after a police investigation into the road accident involving his car, his claims had by then been widely shared on media and social media platforms. On Saturday, the Chennai principal sessions court granted the Adheenam conditional anticipatory ball.
On Sunday, a Chennai cyber crime police team came to the mutt near Meenakshi Amman temple and conducted an inquiry with the Adheenam. His advocate told reporters that the Adheenam fully cooperated with the inquiry despite undergoing a surgery recently and suffering from illness. "The police did not permit even a helper inside during the inquiry which lasted around 45 minutes. The Adheenam told us that he answered all the questions of the police," added the advocate.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
No annual fees for life
UnionBank Credit Card
Apply Now
Undo
Meanwhile, BJP state president Nainar Nagenthran hit out at the police and state govt for 'going after' elderly spiritual and religious leaders and gurus like the Madurai Adheenam even when they are aged and suffering from illness. Local BJP functionaries gathered near the mutt on Sunday but were not permitted to enter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
17 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Jagdeep Dhankhar's turbulent innings: Face-offs with Oppn, judiciary; Janata Dal to BJP via Congress
Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar resigned late Monday night to 'prioritise health care and abide by medical advice'. He stated that his resignation, addressed to President Droupadi Murmu, comes into effect immediately. Dhankhar, 74, who is also the Rajya Sabha Vice-Chairman, is unlikely to attend the proceedings of the House during the ongoing Monsoon Session on Tuesday. In his resignation letter, Dhankhar thanked the President for her 'unwavering support' and the 'soothing, wonderful working relationship' they shared. He expressed gratitude to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Council of Ministers for their 'invaluable support,' adding that the warmth and affection shown by MPs 'will remain embedded' in his memory. The resignation came just hours after what turned out to be his final sitting as the Rajya Sabha Chairman. There was no indication about it during the day. Dhankhar assumed office as the 14th Vice-President of India in August 2022. In the Vice-Presidential polls, as the BJP-led NDA candidate, he trounced the Opposition's nominee Margaret Alva comfortably by securing 528 votes against the latter's 182. He had not been a stranger to rows. His stint as the Rajya Sabha Chairman had remained turbulent, as he had runs-ins with the Opposition members on a regular basis. He also stridently took on the judiciary over the issue of separation of powers. Dhankhar has been the only Vice-President against whom the Opposition brought a notice of removal for 'partisan' conduct as the Rajya Sabha Chairman. The notice was rejected by Deputy Chairman Harivansh, even as Dhankhar dubbed it as a 'rusted' vegetable-cutting knife which, he said, was used for a bypass surgery. Prior to the second highest constitutional office, Dhankhar had been the West Bengal Governor. Since July 2019, when the Modi government sent him to the Kolkata Raj Bhavan, Dhankhar had been at loggerheads with the Mamata Banerjee-led Trinamool Congress (TMC) government on a range of issues. For a leader known more for his face-offs with the Banerjee government as the Governor, and whom the TMC had often accused of acting as an 'agent of BJP', the first election Dhankhar contested was on a Janata Dal ticket, when he was elected to the Lok Sabha from Rajasthan's Jhunjhunu in 1989. His next election was for the Rajasthan Assembly — this time on a Congress ticket. Having represented the Kishangarh Assembly constituency from 1993 to 1998, Dhankhar, a graduate from University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, who completed his LLB degree in 1978-79, was also a former president of the Rajasthan High Court Bar Association. 'From 1998, he was a full-time senior advocate practising in Supreme Court — until he was appointed the Governor of West Bengal in 2019,' according to his younger brother Randeep Dhankhar. After he joined the BJP, Dhankhar, a Jat leader, became the national convener of the BJP's law and legal affairs department in 2016. Born into a farmer's family at Kithana village in Jhunjhunu district in 1951, Dhankhar studied at a local government school before going to Sainik school in Chittorgarh. He is married to Sudesh Dhankhar and they have a daughter, Kamna. During his role as the Bengal Governor, Dhankhar had been virtually a one-man opposition in the state, having taken on the TMC government regularly over various issues. In fact, such acrimonious had been the relationship that CM Banerjee had even blocked Dhankhar on social media. From law and order situation in the state to post-poll violence, and from corruption charges to lapses in bureaucracy, Dhankhar was never short of issues to criticise the TMC government. The relation between Dhankhar and the Mamata government took a turn for the worse when the latter decided to replace the Governor with the CM as the Chancellor of the state universities. While the TMC had accused Dhankhar of not clearing various Bills and creating 'unnecessary hurdles' in the functioning of the state government, the latter claimed he had gone by the book and the Constitution in pointing out issues to the government and the state legislature. Dhankhar had often sought details, especially details of expenditure, from the state government on various issues. Interestingly, in the V-P polls, the TMC MPs had abstained from voting, not backing the Opposition candidate, which left many baffled given the protracted bad blood between the party leadership and Dhankhar. Dhankhar is said to be an avid reader, a sports aficionado — he has been president of the Rajasthan Olympic Association and Rajasthan Tennis Association — and loves travelling with his family. In 1989, the then Haryana CM Chaudhary Devi Lal had vigorously campaigned for Dhankhar when the Janata Dal had fielded him in the parliamentary polls from Jhunjhunu. Ranjit Singh Chautala, Devi Lal's son and former Haryana minister, had earlier told The Indian Express: 'Dhankhar is like a member of our family. He came into politics after being influenced by Devi Lal.' Ranjit had said: 'In 1987, Chaudhary Devi Lal had called for a rally of the Opposition at Boat Club in Delhi. Dhankhar brought as many as 500 vehicles full of people from Jhunjhunu to participate in the rally. Devi Lal patted him on the back. Devi Lal called him from his home and offered a ticket of Janata Dal to contest from the Jhunjhunu Lok Sabha constituency in 1989.' Dhankhar won the election and became minister of state (parliamentary affairs) in the V P Singh-led government when Devi Lal became Deputy Prime Minister. Ranjit Chautala had recalled that 'Following differences, PM V P Singh had dismissed Devi Lal in 1990. Then, Dhankhar was the only minister who resigned from the Union Cabinet standing by Devi Lal. It impressed Devi Lal who called Dhankhar a man of commitment.' Later, Devi Lal became Deputy PM in the minority government led by Chandrashekhar while Dhankhar also became a minister in his government.
The Hindu
17 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Cost of promises: on the Bihar election and poll-eve welfare measures
It is raining welfare in Bihar. Nothing surprising: the stakes are high for the ruling National Democratic Alliance in the approaching Assembly elections. According to recent announcements, household consumption of up to 125 units of electricity per month will be free, with effect from August 1 this year. This scheme will cover around 1.67 crore households. Under the Kutir Jyoti Yojana, the government will provide free rooftop solar installations for about 58 lakh Below Poverty Line families. The welfare hamper of the ruling coalition also includes a promise of 35% job reservation in all State government jobs for women, an increase in social security pension from ₹400 to ₹1,100, the creation of a Bihar Youth Commission, and more. A new internship support scheme offers between ₹4,000 and ₹6,000 a month to youth (18 to 28 years) for undertaking internships, and based on their educational qualifications. The plan is to start supporting 5,000 youth in the first year and scaling it up to cover one lakh beneficiaries over the next five years. To promote religious tourism, the State has announced a ₹882.87 crore redevelopment plan for Punaura Dham Janki Mandir, said to be the birthplace of Lord Rama's wife Sita. Migrants from the State who live outside will receive government support to return home during festivals. All this follows a familiar pattern of governments using welfare as an instrument of election-eve management of popular sentiment. The absence of any serious planning or vision behind such sporadic announcements is evident. They are often in response to the promises of a political rival. In Bihar, the Opposition Rashtriya Janata Dal has said that the Nitish Kumar government's welfare catalogue is a forced reaction to its promises of similar measures if voted to power. Ahead of the Maharashtra Assembly elections, the Mahayuti government rolled out a cash transfer scheme for women which helped it win. Later, the new government pruned the list, admitting that there were undeserving beneficiaries. Free electricity schemes now exist in several States. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has often questioned the rationale of 'freebies', but arbitrary new schemes continue to proliferate. In Bihar, the scramble among parties is also in the context of Chief Minister Nitish Kumar's advancing age. His party, the Janata Dal (United), is smaller than the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), and the election could further alter the dynamics of State coalition politics. The control of power had increasingly shifted from Mr. Kumar to the BJP in the last five years and the future of the JD(U) is set to decline. Competitive welfarism is all that remains in the toolkits of all parties to woo voters.
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
Madras high court stays OTP verification during DMK's 'Oraniyil Tamil Nadu' enrolment drive
Madras high court MADURAI: Madras high court on Monday ordered a limited interim injunction restraining DMK from sending OTP verification messages during the party's enrolment drive 'Oraniyil Tamil Nadu'. The restraint order shall be in force until the issues of right to privacy and data protection are examined by the court in detail. A division bench of Justice S M Subramaniam and Justice A D Maria Clete, passed the interim orders on a PIL pertaining to DMK's 'Oraniyil Tamil Nadu', which is a mass membership drive organised across the state by DMK. 'Digital membership drives conducted by the political parties in recent times are a new area of study, whereby there is a clear departure from the conventional modes of inducting party members. The bearing it has on the data privacy of the individual is a concern that has to be addressed. Hence, a clarity is required as to the means and infrastructure adopted by the political parties to collect, process and store data from the public. How this data is stored and processed and the implications on the right to privacy of the voter including the right to privacy of the political affiliation also ought to be examined," the judges observed. You Can Also Check: Chennai AQI | Weather in Chennai | Bank Holidays in Chennai | Public Holidays in Chennai In the absence of accountability and transparency in the data collected from individuals across the state, it is an issue which needs elaborate analysis, the judges said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Book Now And Save up to ₹23.71L on Luxury Homes in Whitefield Sumadhura Group Learn More Undo A valid and free consent is an essential part of such membership programmes organized by the political parties. Hence, no force or coercion shall be employed in such membership drives conducted by the political parties, they said. The judges then directed the DMK to provide details on the data privacy policy employed in this membership campaign and ensure the security of the data collected and whether 'informed consent' is obtained from the individuals in this membership drive. It is also to be seen if other smaller or economically challenged political parties will be put in a disadvantageous position and will disturb the level playing field in the election thereby impacting Article 14 of the Constitution, the judges observed. Justice Maria Clete, in a separate order, observed that when a query was put forth as to whether any mechanism or designated authority exists to address violations under the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, the Centre responded that rules have been framed under the Act and that the authority concerned is the joint secretary. However, the Centre sought time to verify and respond on the specific operational aspects and the institutional framework under the Act. The judge observed that she agreed to the interim order particularly in light of the serious concerns relating to personal data protection and digital privacy. However, she made it clear that such relief is extended with circumspection, particularly in the absence of a counter-affidavit and without full knowledge of the programme's operational framework. She clarified that she did not agree with Justice Subramaniam's views pertaining to smaller or economically challenged political parties being put in a disadvantageous position. They were not immediately germane to the legal and factual matrix presently before the court, she said. The judges then ordered notice to the Centre, state and DMK and adjourned the hearing in the case by two weeks. The court passed the order while hearing a public interest litigation filed by S Rajkumar, a resident of T Athikarai village in Sivaganga district in Tamil Nadu.
