
Iran asks Taliban for ‘kill list' so it can hunt down MI6 spies
The Tehran regime hopes to examine the list of nearly 25,000 Afghans who worked with British forces as they seek leverage with the West ahead of nuclear negotiations this autumn.
The so-called 'kill list' contains the names of Afghans who were applying for asylum, including soldiers who had worked with the British Army, intelligence assets and special forces. Some are believed to have subsequently fled to Iran.
In a sign that the two sides are already collaborating, at least one Afghan whose name was allegedly on the list has been deported from Iran to Kabul in the past few days.
A senior Iranian official in Tehran confirmed that the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) had formally requested that the Taliban government share the leaked list. It is understood that MI6 intelligence assets will take priority in the search.
He said: 'On the Iranian side, there are also efforts to find the list, with a special committee assigned for it. There have been discussions on cooperation between Tehran and Kabul on this issue as it can help both countries for negotiations with the West.'
The Telegraph understands that Taliban leadership in Kandahar has also ordered officers in Kabul to arrest as many individuals as possible from the leaked document to use them as leverage in exerting diplomatic pressure on London.
The database was accidentally leaked in February 2022 when a Royal Marine emailed the complete file to Afghan contacts in Britain instead of sending a small extract.
The spreadsheet contained names, telephone numbers and email addresses of Afghan soldiers, government workers and family members who applied to relocate to Britain under the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy after the 2021 Western military withdrawal.
The list also included identities of more than 100 British special forces personnel and MI6 operatives who had vouched for Afghan applicants.
A Taliban government official told The Telegraph that they obtained the spreadsheet in 2022.
Speaking to this newspaper last month, he said: 'After the reports were published in England, it became clear how significant this leak was. The order is to arrest as many individuals as possible to use them as a tool of diplomatic pressure against England.'
The IRGC's demand comes after Britain, France and Germany threatened Tehran with a so-called snapback mechanism, which would restore UN Security Council resolutions against Iran, if no progress is made on negotiations over its nuclear programme by August 30.
The most significant resolution that would return is 1929, adopted in June 2010, which expanded sanctions beyond technical nuclear restrictions to target Iran's broader economy.
The resolution required all UN members to take 'all necessary measures' to enforce Iran's enrichment ban and ballistic missile restrictions.
Iran has refused to abandon uranium enrichment that could ultimately lead to a nuclear weapon, despite a bombing campaign by Israel and the US last month.
Iranian authorities want to check borders and detain Afghans in Iran whose names appear on the list, with particular focus on those who worked as intelligence operatives, according to the Iranian official.
He said: 'There is an urgency to find as many of them as possible before the snapback deadlines arrive to use them as backdoor bargaining tools.'
A Ministry of Defence spokesperson said: 'We take the safety of our personnel very seriously and personnel, particularly those in sensitive positions, always have appropriate measures in place to protect their security.
'The independent Rimmer Review concluded that it is highly unlikely that merely being on the spreadsheet means an individual is more likely to be targeted, and this is the basis on which the court lifted its super-injunction.'
David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, is prepared to trigger sanctions against Iran to prevent it from developing nuclear weapons, The Telegraph revealed last year.
The UK remains a participant in the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action and can unilaterally force a return to sanctions if it considers Iran has violated the deal's terms.
At least one Afghan whose name appeared on the leaked list, and who had escaped to Iran after the leak, was detained for deportation on Friday.
His son was ill, and his wife and two daughters remained in Iran, the deported man said, 'unable even to go out and buy bread.'
'They arrested me on the street, handcuffed me, and sent me to a deportation camp,' he told The Telegraph from Kabul.
'I pleaded with them. I told them my life would be in danger in Afghanistan. I shouted, 'Where are human rights?' But they didn't care. They sent me straight to the border.'
'They can come and kill me any moment'
He questioned whether the Government was truly unaware of what was happening in Iran.
'There are many people like me there – being deported, being arrested,' he said. 'The British know all of this. If they wanted to help, they would've done it already. But they don't want to.'
Now in Kabul, he said he was constantly on the move, hiding in a different place each night, afraid for his own safety and for his family left behind in Iran.
'They can come and kill me any moment,' he said. 'But it doesn't matter to anyone any more. That's just my life now.'
He expressed bitter frustration over the UK's resettlement priorities.
'I hope the Brits are happy – they took cooks and masseurs to Britain, but those who lost their eyes serving British forces, and many more are left behind,' he said.
'Maybe that's what they wanted. I just regret not realising it sooner.'
He asked how it was possible that the Government – 'once rulers of half the world – could remain blind to the situation'.
'They took cooks, but left behind generals and colonels,' he said. 'What kind of logic is that?'
The Telegraph has revealed that former Taliban members were brought to the UK on British evacuation flights from Afghanistan after the leak.
The individuals were flown out for their safety, but among them were suspected jihadists, sex offenders, corrupt officials, and people previously jailed by US-led forces – raising concerns over poor vetting.
Insiders say some Afghans are also exploiting a family reunion scheme set up after the leak and are using it to enter the UK under false pretences.
The Telegraph understands that evacuated migrants are offering people in Afghanistan help to get to Britain, including fake family links for up to £20,000 per person.
Iran is using espionage allegations against Afghans as a pretext for the mass arrests and deportations following the recent conflict with Israel.
The Telegraph spoke to Afghans in Iran, at the border, and in Afghanistan, who said the regime in Tehran was targeting them to divert public attention from its 'humiliation' by Israel in last month's 12-day war.
During the conflict, daily deportations jumped from 2,000 to over 30,000 as Iranian authorities turned public anger toward the vulnerable minority.
Those persecuted by the regime also reported suffering widespread abuses including beatings and arbitrary detention.
The Government imposed a super-injunction in September 2023 preventing media coverage of the data breach, which has been described as one of the most damaging intelligence leaks in recent history.
The injunction was extended before last year's election, despite a judge's decision to lift it in May 2024.
Johnny Mercer, the former Conservative veterans minister who served in Afghanistan, called the leak 'gut-wrenching.'
The Government established an emergency scheme called the Afghanistan Response Route in March 2024 to airlift people named in the breach to the UK.
The total relocation program for Afghans could cost up to £7bn of taxpayers' money.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
23 minutes ago
- BBC News
Sussex couple detained in Iran allowed to call home for first time
A British couple detained in Iran have been allowed their first phone calls home after several months of no direct and Craig Foreman, from East Sussex, were on a once-in-a-lifetime trip around the world when they were detained by Iranian authorities in January and charged with family deny the son, Joe Bennett, said he "finally" got to hear his mother's voice for eight minutes after not knowing if she was alive for more than 200 days. "We laughed, we cried, and for a few brief moments, it felt like the weight of the past seven months lifted," he Bennett, from Folkestone in Kent, said his parents were "holding strong"."They're resilient, they're positive, and somehow, they're still smiling," he told the added that the call had been a "real boost" for everyone, but said it was still a "very traumatic time". 'Hole of despair' The family were previously told by the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) that they would be able to speak to their parents, though this did not materialise, Mr Bennett was revealed on Monday that Mr and Ms Foreman had been separated and were being held in what Mr Bennett called "Iran's worst prisons".Craig Foreman's son, Kieran Foreman, said the calls were a "massive relief"."It brings us back up from the hole of despair we have been in – climbing back up from the depths of darkness," he said. The family said the couple told them that they had access to the most basic of Mr Bennett told BBC Radio Kent that British officials saw his father was "dishevelled and had lost a lot of weight", while his mother was not walking well due to prison Mr Bennett said it was "amazing" to hear their voices, he continued that eyes should be "firmly on the real issues".He called on the British government to recognise them as hostages and indicate what it was going to do to secure their release. An FCDO spokesperson said it was continuing to raise their case directly with Iran's government."We are providing them with consular assistance and remain in close contact with their family members," a spokesperson O'Hara, vice chair of the all-parliamentary group for arbitrary detention and hostage affairs, previously told the BBC that the couple were "innocent victims of a geopolitical power struggle".The Scottish National Party MP likened them to "bargaining chips" between Iran's government and Western states, like the US, UK and Israel.


Daily Mail
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Afghans who risked their lives for Britain reveal 'panic' over claims Iran is plotting with the Taliban to exploit lost government database
Afghans who risked their lives for Britain told of their 'panic' at claims Iran is plotting with the Taliban to exploit a lost database containing their details alongside those of MI6 spies. The Afghans in hiding have dubbed it a 'deal of devils' and believe such an agreement between the brutal leaderships in Tehran and Kabul will increase their value as targets of both regimes. Ahmad, who worked with both the SAS and SBS, said: 'Our lives are now at greater risk because our importance to both Iran and Afghanistan has increased as they will think we know information about the Britons. 'Reports of a deal of devils has spread quickly among those in hiding in Iran, it has caused panic and terror as our value to both sides has increased. The 38-year-old, who fled with his wife and children to Iran after the Taliban takeover is waiting to hear if he can relocate to the UK. Last week he was arrested and tortured but released. Now he believes that if he is arrested again, he will face further torture to reveal those from Britain he worked with. Among thousands of Afghans hiding inside Iran are families who have qualified for sanctuary in the UK and hundreds waiting to see if they can relocate. Iran is said to have asked Afghanistan's warlords for access to the highly sensitive dataset 'so they can hunt down MI6 spies'. Tehran's fundamentalist leaders are desperately seeking leverage with the West ahead of nuclear negotiations this autumn. While the loss of the list put 100,000 Afghans at risk of death, it also included the names of more than 100 British officials, including military commanders, MI6 and Special Forces. The Daily Mail has seen a copy of the full dataset and although codes are used, and the list does not specifically identify any spies or special forces, it could be a valuable dataset for an enemy. Security officials point out that Iran has been 'running agents of many nationalities' in the UK for several years posing an increased threat to those named although the names on the list are seen 'primarily as a 'bargaining chip'. When the Daily Mail discovered this data breach disaster in 2023, the government secured a court order to hush it up, triggering a 23-month battle in secret courts for open justice. Finally, last month the Government abandoned its super-injunction and the public discovered ministers had secretly agreed a £7billion scheme, including a mass evacuation programme to rescue thousands of Afghans who had worked for British forces. But then ministers ordered lawyers to gag the Daily Mail and others with a second High Court injunction, to prevent us revealing how the lost list had included details of more than a hundred MI6 spies, Special Forces and other UK officials. The Revolutionary Guard's demand comes after Britain, France and Germany threatened Tehran with a so-called snapback mechanism, which would restore UN Security Council resolutions against it, if no progress is made on negotiations over its nuclear programme by August 30. Iran has deported thousands of Afghans, many into the arms of the Taliban which has moved biometrics containing details of those who worked for the West to border crossing points. At least four of those who worked for the Afghan forces and Coalition have been executed since news of the list was made public. The Taliban has claimed to have had the list for two years but UK officials say there is no evidence to confirm the claim. Afghans inside Iran say that if the list is handed to Tehran then they will be Kabul's reward. Waheed, 40, who worked beside UK forces for three years and is now hiding with his brother in Iran, while he waits to lean if he can relocate, said: 'This agreement would be terrifying as the Taliban's reward for sharing the list would be for Afghans who worked against them to be arrested and deported into their arms. It would mean torture and probably death for many of us. 'I worked with intelligence forces and they would torture us for details of the British we worked with – some have kept pictures, others still message their ex-colleagues – so they could give such things to the (Revolutionary) Guards.' He added: 'If the Taliban has the list why would they not do it? It would be a big gain for them – those they see as spies for Britain would be passed to them while Iran would be in their debt.'


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Rwanda agrees to take up to 250 migrants from the US
The Rwandan government has said it would accept up to 250 migrants from the US under a deal agreed with Washington but gave no details on who could be included. The Trump administration's deportation drive has included negotiating arrangements to send people to third countries, among them South Sudan and Eswatini. The deal announced on Tuesday follows a cancelled agreement with Britain under which Rwanda would have received asylum seekers from the UK. That deal was scrapped after the Conservative government that negotiated it lost last year's general election. 'Rwanda has agreed with the United States to accept up to 250 migrants,' government spokesperson Yolande Makolo told AFP. She said Kigali would maintain 'the ability to approve each individual proposed for resettlement'. Makolo said Kigali had agreed to the new scheme with Washington because 'nearly every Rwandan family has experienced the hardships of displacement'. Those who arrive in Rwanda will be provided with training, healthcare and accommodation, she added. No further information was given, including any indication of a timeline, with Makolo saying that Rwanda 'will provide more details once these have been worked out'. Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has taken a number of actions aimed at speeding up deportations of undocumented migrants to countries that are not their own. His administration has defended third-country deportations as necessary, since the home nations of some of those targeted for removal sometimes refuse to accept them. But rights experts have warned that the deportations risk breaking international law by sending people to countries where they face the risk of torture, abduction and other abuses. South Sudan – which is teetering on the edge of renewed conflict – accepted eight criminal migrants from the United States, with Juba saying in July they remained in government care. Only one is South Sudanese. Five other migrants labelled criminals by the US were flown to Eswatini in July and incarcerated. The government later said they will be repatriated to their own nations. Rwanda, which is in Africa's Great Lakes region, is home to 13 million people, and its government claims it is one of the most stable countries on the continent and it has drawn praise for its modern infrastructure. However, the migrant agreement with the UK government drew criticism from rights groups and faced a long-running legal challenge. President Paul Kagame's government has frequently been accused of rampant human rights violations and crushing political dissent and press freedoms. Kigali has also come under pressure over its role in the violence roiling the neighbouring eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). In June, the DRC and Rwanda signed a peace agreement aimed at ending decades of conflict in eastern DRC, where there were fresh clashes this year when the M23 armed group, backed by Rwandan troops, captured two major cities.