
Dimple Kapadia: The return of romance
(NOTE: This article was originally published in the India Today issue dated November 30, 1985)In 1973 she was the miniskirt-wearing Bobby-girl of everyone's dream and the silver screen's teeny-bopper goddess who came, conquered and went away. And then life imitated art through a dramatic marriage with superstar Rajesh Khanna—twice her age at that time, a total eclipse from films, the birth of two beautiful daughters, a traumatic separation, and her rising mermaid-like from the sea this year, in Saagar.advertisementDimple Kapadia is one of the most gorgeous women on screen today. But how has the Bobby girl grown into womanhood over the years? What strange imprints of experience her eventful life has left on her face that the film-goers now find so compelling? As a teenager, she was part nymph, part imp. At age 28, it is still Dimple all right, but blended totally anew. How did it happen?The change is of course something that the Dimple Kapadia of today would not readily like to admit. Because for the past three years since her return to movieland, directors obsessively thought of her—in the words of Saagar's maker Ramesh Sippy—"as Bobby grown over the years". No wonder the hemline was lower, but the neckline too was lower.
But, alas, the real Dimple Kapadia is no grown-up clone of either Bobby, the fisherman's daughter in the screen Mills and Boon story of Raj Kapoor, or Mona, the "grown-over-the-years" Bobby-girl cast as an innkeeper's daughter this time round. Dimple has acquired a totally new persona in her second incarnation. It is more elusive than the old one, more complex, and perhaps more beautiful.advertisementAnd now, spread-eagled over a huge grey boulder after climbing 1,500 feet in one burst up a hill 80 km from Bangalore on the Bangalore-Pune highway, at the location of Feroz Khan's blockbuster-in-the-making, Janbaaz, Dimple surveys her face before a shot in a heart-shaped looking glass, and says: "I think all my life's story is condensed in my face. It is neither innocent nor coy. It speaks volumes." It does indeed.Because no sugar-candy actress in Bombay's film and today has got so much of tautness tied up with so much of beauty. Khan looks through his camera once for a close-up of her near the climax of the film, and mumbles almost to himself: "No other girl has so much of pent-up aggression."But it is not aggression alone that makes Dimple Kapadia unique, for there are far more intertwined shades of expression under the layers of Max Factor on her face. Says Mahesh Bhatt, the new and subversive messiah of serious cinema in Bombay's entertainment industry: "Dimple Kapadia has gone through so much in her life that she need not read up the text books of method acting to play a real woman. She only has to be herself." The valuable compliment could not have been timelier. Bhatt announced last fortnight that Dimple was the heroine of his next film, Kaash, with Naseeruddin Shah.advertisement"I can't believe it. It is perhaps the most serious artistic challenge I have ever faced in my career," cooed Dimple as the offer filtered in through long-distance telephone from Bombay to the lavishly appointed farmhouse of Khan on the outskirts of Bangalore, where the Janbaaz unit is putting up. She was feeling higher than the top of the cliffs where all the unreal movies had taken her for shooting dance sequences through heavy filters. "I feel like doing a step right now, yeah, great heady feeling to know that I can play a real character at last, I mean someone who exists in flesh and blood, may be in the next house down the lane."In Dimple, the yearning to play the "real character at last" is perhaps the natural backlash to the event-filled, high-voltage life she has all along led. The first taste of its unreality comes off as soon as one steps into the overpoweringly decadent home of the Kapadias at Juhu in Bombay.There are no familiar stacks of doubtful trophies in the living-room: only rows upon rows of cutglasses, Belgian and not-so-Belgian, punctuated by peeled off plaster on which apathy and sea-wind have wrought strange cobweb patterns. It could indeed be the ideal set for The Cherry Orchard; one only has to imagine the sound of the falling axe. And the male members of the family, father Chunibhai and brother Suhail, are almost never to be seen.advertisementThe vague reply is: they have gone abroad for treatment. The ailment is deliberately left unspecified. What is more important is the tomblike silence that surrounds the inmates of the house—mother Betty, who is perennially cagey, and her two sisters Simple and Reem, who would shy away from any conversation on their illustrious didi on the ground that she is "her own spokesperson.""The life and happiness in our house came to an end the day I and Rajesh got married," Dimple now reminisces almost clinically. And it was really a marriage on which some of the weirdest film scripts could have been written. Rajesh Khanna was 32 at that time, flush from the success of a string of chart busters, and Dimple, at 16 and preening her feathers after Bobby, was just waiting to be swept off her feet in a whirlwind romance.advertisement"I came to know him well precisely seven days before the marriage. We were going together to Ahmedabad for some kind of a show on a chartered flight. He sat next to me all along but did not utter a word. Just as the flight was about to land, he turned towards me, looked hard into my eyes, and said he wanted me to marry him."There were very few young women then who could say no to the superstar's offer, for Rajesh was indeed at the zenith of his popularity. "What was I compared to him then? A one-trick pony!" But there were other reasons too for Dimple to be overawed by Khanna. Till end-1970, weeks before Raj Kapoor selected her for the role in Bobby, she had suppurating warts on her fingers which everybody took for leprosy.In fact family friend Raj Kapoor had one day come to their house to see her on hearing the rumour, and, according to Dimple, was so pleased to find that her affliction was indeed not leprosy that he at once decided to cast her as Bobby. "I really swung between the extremes. From the danger of being ostracised by the society, I almost overnight found myself as virtually the darling of the millions. I was thankful to my fate. So thankful that I could have accepted the hand of anybody at that moment."advertisementBut there was something oddly rebellious about Chunibhai himself, the scion of the family that owned the Killicks Nixon group of industries, who was driven out of the pack for his love of the horseflesh. But being a punter and a bookmaker was not what broke the camel's back. The wealthy Khoja family, which embraced Hinduism only with Chunibhai's father, Laljibhai, and which accepts the Agha Khan as its religious mentor even now, disowned Dimple's father the day he agreed to Raj Kapoor's proposal to let her sign for Bobby."When I was a child, my parents took me to Agha Khan, and he named me Ameena. Beautiful name, it means the dignified one". The marriage with Rajesh Khanna was hopelessly one-sided and almost totally lacking in dignity. Khanna put a ban on her acting career promptly after the marriage. But that was the time when, in the wake of Bobby's success, incredibly lucrative offers were coming her way, one of them being to play the leading role for the movie great Manmohan Desai."They were offering me Rs 5 lakh for a film in those days," she says. If true, it was decidedly the highest rate in the industry at that time paid to women artistes and only marginally less than the fees Dimple reportedly commands now—Rs 6 lakh."I was too young to realise the importance of Bobby for my career, but from the day I entered Rajesh's house, Ashirwad, I somehow knew that the marriage wouldn't work." Life at the oddly spacious Bandra bungalow, overlooking the sea, was full of experiences that seem like harrowing nightmares to Dimple now. Most notable of them was the arrival of "my first rival"—a glamorous star of the times—on the third month of the marriage."I was not in the least bothered by the procession of women who walked into Rajesh's life thereafter, but the marriage was certainly not based on any equality. It was a farce, but it took me such a hell of a long time to realise that!" Ironically, the slide-back in Rajesh's career also began with the marriage.After the resounding success of Aradhana, Anand, Aap Ki Kasam, all released between 1969 and 1973, his career graph began finally dipping with Namak Haram, where Amitabh Bachchan, the man who would finally take over the mantle from him, was aided by the script to outshine him completely.DiI Daulat Duniya, Prem Kahani, Mahachor, Bundlebaaz—the bombs piled upon each other. "It was my first encounter in life with failure," Dimple says. "When a successful man goes to pieces, his frustration engulfs the entire surroundings. It was a pathetic sight when Rajesh waited at the end of the week for collection figures but the people didn't have the guts to come and tell him."There was an upheaval in the house every day, and almost every night battle scenes were being enacted. After their separation, the film press in Bombay even reported acts of gross sadism, such as Dimple being subjected to cigarette burns and whipping. No one denied the reports."I left the house thrice earlier, but every time I went back home I felt sorry about the whole thing and came back. Both Rajesh and I were unable to accept the failure of our marriage. But I realised I wouldn't survive as a human being if I lived there any longer. I got totally neurotic because I was prepared to do anything...to go to any extreme ...only in order to extract a smile from him."The most widely publicised marriage of the early '70s between Rajesh Khanna and Dimple Kapadia thus virtually came to an end when, one day in April 1982, Dimple, accompanied by her two daughters, Twinkle and Pinkie, then aged eight years and five years respectively, arrived in her parents' home, determined not to go back this time. Dimple was at last prepared to put up a fight. She had already negotiated with Sippy for the role in Saagar, paving the way for her return.However, Rajesh and Dimple are still fighting in court over virtually every issue: the custody of the children, alimony, share of property, share of investments, "for a share of even the most insignificant thing that we ever possessed between ourselves."Dimple admits of having an involvement with another person during the period that her marriage with Rajesh had lasted. "It was a selfish involvement. I was experimenting with myself. I had to. I wanted to find out what was wrong with me as a woman." She puts up a brave front, but the separation must have left her a very insecure person. And she never got over her sense of guilt for having been the cause for her family's ruin...first being cast off by her grandfather, and then the humiliating raids complete with metal detectors and sniffer dogs. Chunibhai reportedly became a changed man afterwards, withdrawn into a shell, and shy of company. "I was the favourite child," Dimple chokingly says, "and everything went wrong in my life."Saagar, Lava, Patal Bhairvai, Arjun, Manzil—Dimple has been deluged with work ever since her return to films. And, in the three years, she and Rajesh have done their best to make sure that they don't have to run into each other. It is only early this year, during the dubbing of Lava, that they met on the staircase of the dubbing studio. "He looked pale and thin. I invited him for a cup of tea and he said he'd come. But 15 minutes later, when I enquired, I was told that he was gone."However, Dimple is not nostalgic but regretful for having taken so much in her stride, "having suffered at the hand of blind emotion, and inertia". But the gap of 10 long years has landed her up in the new realities of the film industry which has only lately emerged out of a long period of absolute male domination and is again on the lookout for faces, lovely feminine faces, well-scrubbed and glamorous, which can set the wheels of moviedom in motion all over again.Anil Kapoor, Dimple's co-actor in Janbaaz, reveried: "She is the most beautiful woman on screen since Madhubala." That may or may not be true, with a close contender like Rekha still being around. But it was left to Perez Khan, whose Qurbani hooked the nation on to disco fever and the pretty face of Zeenat Aman a few years ago, to give vent to the most accurate assessment of Dimple: "You look at her on a long shot. You see a good body, but there are many such that you're sure to find all around. Move the camera closer. Well, a remarkable face, something that always seems freshly washed, but made somewhat alien-looking with that longish nose of hers and the watery eyes. But now look at her big close-up. It is not at all the face of a woman who is acting her part: she is a woman who is just dying to be herself on screen."In an industry dominated by its cerebral Shabana Azmis and highly paid mannequins like Jaya Prada and Sridevi, Dimple Kapadia is the unabashed announcement of a return of romance.Subscribe to India Today MagazineTrending Reel
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Shweta Tripathi on turning producer with Cock: I am hungry to act, not greedy
After showcasing her talent as an actor in multiple roles, Shweta Tripathi has now turned producer under her banner, AllMyTea Productions. The queer-themed play 'Cock' by Mike Bartlett is back on stage, with Rytasha Rathore in the lead about her love for the stage in an exclusive chat with India Today, Shweta shared that she had always imagined herself on stage when she dreamt of becoming an actor. She also revealed that the name of her production house is a wordplay on the term almighty, while also representing tea, something that holds great importance in the world of shooting. Shweta Tripathi spoke about the representation of LQBTQI+ community in cinema. advertisementShweta recalled being absolutely blown away when she first read the script. "It's so witty, it's so funny, and it's also award-winning. The character talks about things I deeply relate to. There's a dialogue: 'Why are you telling me that what I sleep with is more important than who I sleep with?' This is such an important line. These days, we've become obsessed with labels. We're in a rush to judge. The play is also about identity, and it explores relationships, identity, and the dilemmas that arise when you realise you have a choice," she said, speaking about 'Cock.' Shweta Tripathi has backed the theatrical play 'Cock' by Mike Bartlett with Rytasha Rathore in the lead role. advertisement When asked why she didn't cast herself in the play, Shweta explained, "I wouldn't cast myself just for the sake of it. I'm hungry to act, but I'm not greedy. And I've done casting before, so I know how crucial it is. Rytasha has done a brilliant job—what she brings to the table, I cannot. We did weeks of readings with multiple actors before we finally zeroed in on her." Shweta Tripathi praised the script of 'Cock' and called it award-winning. As a producer, Shweta Triipathi described herself as hands-on, always striving to support her cast and crew to the best of her ability. She added that she's picking up the tricks of the trade and even checking account books like any other actor also spoke about the portrayal of the LGBTQI+ community in cinema. She noted that society still has a long way to go, and only when we evolve as people will cinema reflect that change. Shweta emphasised that support from audiences is crucial too—a powerful play like this cannot be staged in an empty the debate around casting queer individuals in queer roles, she said, "Of course, it's important. My costume director is from the community, and we definitely want to work with as many people as possible, not just for this project, and certainly not as a tick-box exercise. We're not doing it because people are talking about it. I want to work with people who are talented, dedicated, and hardworking, regardless of their sexuality."advertisementWhen asked how she would introduce the LGBTQI community to a young person, Shweta said they stand for love, freedom, and respect. She questioned why anyone would oppose something rooted in love when hate is what truly needs to be actor added that societal resistance comes from old conditioning, which can and should change. She also pointed out that even ancient texts reflect diversity, and that anything genuine and pure should be accepted, not closing, Shweta spoke about her desire to helm films and shows. She shared that she came to Bombay with big dreams and doesn't want to live with regrets."I don't want to think, 'I wish I'd done this.' If I want to live well and fulfil both my dreams and the dreams of others, I need to keep going. For now, our play is running in Delhi and Mumbai, and I truly hope people come forward to support us financially so I can take it to other cities too. I want to travel with it both domestically and internationally," she added.'Cock' will make its grand new premiere in Delhi on June 6 and on June 10 at Prithvi Theatre in Watch


India Today
5 hours ago
- India Today
Exclusive: Shweta Basu Prasad says she is scared of repeating herself as an actor
Actor Shweta Basu Prasad, who reprised her role as Lekha in 'Criminal Justice' Season 4, opens up about her evolving choices as an actor, her experience working alongside Pankaj Tripathi, and her constant quest to keep things fresh on screen. In an exclusive chat with India Today, the actress shares why reinvention matters to her and how collaboration shapes her started her journey in the industry at a young age, Shweta says her selection of roles has always come from a very personal space, 'I've been pretty lucky that good work has consistently come my way,' she says.'My choice of projects has always come from the lens of an audience. I'm a movie buff—I love watching films and series. So, when a new project is offered to me, beyond just looking at the team or the scale, it's really the story and character that matter most," she added. The actor believes in taking responsibility for the content she's a part of. 'My decision-making always starts with the question: Would I want to watch this? Because if I wouldn't, how can I expect others to? I'm asking people to subscribe, to spend their time and money—there's a certain responsibility in that. I have to genuinely believe in what I'm promoting.'advertisementWhen asked about working with Pankaj Tripathi and whether it has changed her approach, Shweta shares, 'I wouldn't say my performance has changed, but working with Pankaj ji has definitely added to my experience. There was a kind of nervous excitement, especially in Season 3 when my character was introduced. It wasn't just another scene—I was literally going head-to-head with him in court.'She adds, 'It was argument-heavy, dialogue-heavy, and technically demanding. But once I step into Lekha's costume and onto the set, that nervousness fades. Shweta takes a back seat, and Lekha steps in. The same happens with him—Pankaj ji disappears and Madhav Mishra takes over.'For Shweta, acting is deeply rooted in reaction and chemistry with co-actors. 'If I say something and I don't get the right reaction in return, my motivation for the next line falters. So, working with good actors really elevates your performance. I owe that to everyone I've worked with—Pankaj ji, Surveen, and the whole team.'The actress admits that her biggest fear is stagnation. 'Repeating myself is something I'm very conscious of—and scared of—as an actor,' she says. 'Cinema is a reflection of life, and life is full of surprises. Every day is different, and our art should reflect that.'advertisementShe emphasises the importance of reinvention in storytelling. 'There are many legal and courtroom dramas out there, but the key is in reinvention. It's not just about repackaging; it's about breathing new life into something. We are documenting the times we live in. What we created two years ago can't be replicated today—2025 brings a whole new lens. Even if it's the same story, it evolves with time. And that process of reinvention is far more exciting than mere repetition.''Criminal Justice' Season 4 is currently streaming on JioHotstar. You May Also Like


News18
5 hours ago
- News18
Housefull 5 Director 'Understands' Deepika Padukone's 8-Hr Shift Ask: 'Want To Spend Time With My Dog'
Last Updated: Tarun opined that an 8-hour shift ask is justified, but should be voiced before the shoot commences. Housefull 5 director Tarun Mansukhani has addressed Deepika Padukone 's reported demand for an 8-hour shift since becoming a mother. In a recent chat with India Today, Tarun opined that an 8-hour shift ask is justified, but should be voiced before the shoot commences. He said that it must be included in the contract. Tarun mentioned that he would also like to be home and spend time with his dog. Tarun Mansukhani said, 'I want to go home and spend time with my dog, and I understand the feeling. But you have to put it in the contract so that everyone is prepared." He said that once the film goes on floors, there are a lot of other factors involved, like actors' schedules, location permissions and money. Addressing Deepika Padukone's reported 8-hour work request, he said, 'No problem. Eight hours? I'll need that many extra days, and then we'll go ahead, but you need to tell me in advance. You can't come to me at 11 am and tell me you need to leave at 5. There are other actors involved; the location for the day might not be available again, or the budget might not allow it." Deepika Padukone, Sandeep Reddy Vanga Row For the unversed, Deepika Padukone was reportedly removed from Sandeep Reddy Vanga's Spirit as the director couldn't match her demands. As per reports, these demands included an 8-hour work day, which amounts to 6-hour shoot time, and a remuneration upwards of Rs 20 crore. Several acclaimed celebs like Ajay Devgn and Mani Ratnam have spoken in favour of Deepika's reported demand for an 8-hour shift. Housefull 5 Review Meanwhile, Tarun Mansukhani's Housefull 5 has finally been released in theatres. News18 Showsha gave the film 2.5/5 stars. Our review read, 'The movie is set on a luxurious cruise ship, and a chain of mishaps and murder make up the plot of the film, which feels stretched and dull. Besides a weak script, the film is filled with mediocre jokes and situational comedy that doesn't hit the right chord." 'However, it does offer a few laughs here and there. Throughout the film, Akshay Kumar, Abhishek Bachchan and Riteish Deshmukh are trying their best to make their chemistry and comic sense to make you laugh. But, the dull script and somewhat lame jokes don't live up to their efforts. While the three male actors are running around in their own rut, the three lead women of the film are having a joy ride of their own," the review also mentioned. First Published: June 06, 2025, 14:04 IST