How to thrive in SA's tough job market: embracing side hustles and inclusion
For job seekers, these numbers aren't just statistics—they represent real challenges that require new strategies. The traditional approach of sending countless CVs and hoping for interviews simply isn't enough in today's competitive market.
What employers are looking for
While companies still prioritise qualifications and experience, many are increasingly focused on finding employees who reflect the communities they serve. This shift creates opportunities for candidates who might previously have been overlooked.
'You cannot find a more diverse place than South Africa,' notes Nomie Nxumalo, Executive Head of People and Transformation at Miway. 'If leaders want to attract the right customers, they need to have the right people in the organisation – people who reflect the communities they're serving.'
Nxumalo emphasises that this isn't just about ticking demographic boxes: 'It's about access, opportunity, and transformation. When you recruit from the communities you operate in, you're not just hiring staff, you're solving unemployment.'
Job seekers should research potential employers' diversity commitments before interviews. Companies with genuine inclusion programs often highlight these on their websites and social media. Look for specific initiatives rather than vague statements about valuing diversity.
Evaluating opportunities beyond salary
When considering job offers, today's savvy job seekers should look beyond just the paycheck. While compensation remains important, other factors significantly impact job satisfaction and career growth.
'Everyone needs to feed their families, but we're finding that young people today aren't only looking for a salary,' says Nxumalo. 'They want to know how we treat each other, what we're doing in our communities, and whether they'll have opportunities to grow.'
Questions worth asking potential employers include:
What professional development opportunities do you offer?
Do you have mentorship or sponsorship programs?
How do you support employees' wellbeing?
What community initiatives is the company involved in?
According to Nxumalo, sponsorship is particularly valuable: 'A sponsor is someone who opens doors for you, even when you're not in the room. That's the kind of support many young South African professionals have never had.'
Navigating the job market with a disability
For South Africans with disabilities, the employment landscape presents significant challenges. Current statistics show that while approximately 15% of South Africans have disabilities, the employment rate for disabled persons within companies is just 1.0%, with unemployment rates among this group estimated at over 86%.
'The stigma around disability – especially mental illness – is still massive,' says Nxumalo. Many companies, however, are beginning to partner with organisations like the Career and Disability Expo to change this reality. These collaborations aim to dismantle stubborn stigmas while creating meaningful employment opportunities.
Job seekers with disabilities should consider:
Researching companies with established disability inclusion programs
Connecting with specialised career expos and recruitment initiatives
Being prepared to discuss reasonable accommodations that could help you succeed in the role
Building digital skills that future-proof your career
As automation transforms workplaces, developing digital skills has become essential for long-term employability. With AI and automation reshaping the world of work, job seekers need to prioritise digital upskilling.
'Digital transformation has been happening for years, but what's changed is the speed,' notes Nxumalo. Programs focusing on data literacy, cybersecurity, and digital behavior are becoming increasingly important across industries.
Fortunately, South Africa offers several free and accessible digital skills training options:
Mzansi Digital Learning: Free courses in AI, entrepreneurship, cybersecurity
Grow with Google: Over 70 free online courses in digital marketing and business tools
MTN Skills Academy: Digital skills training focused on career advancement
ALX Africa: Practical courses in software engineering and data science
'Leaders need to be willing to be upskilled and reskilled too. You can't lead in a digital world if you're afraid of it,' Nxumalo points out. This means digital literacy is valuable at all career levels.
Read more | Overemployed and leading a double (remote) life – how having more than one full-time job works in SA
Embracing the side hustle generation
Perhaps the most significant opportunity for today's job seekers lies in embracing the 'side hustle' mentality—even when pursuing traditional employment.
'They're not chasing a nine-to-five; they're chasing impact,' observes Nxumalo about today's workforce. 'If we want to keep the next generation engaged, we need to design workplaces that support project-based, creative, and side-hustle mindsets.'
Successful approaches include:
When interviewing, don't hide your side projects—highlight them as evidence of your drive and creativity. Some companies are now actively encouraging internal 'gig work' and leveraging employee talents in unconventional ways — from hiring staff as DJs at events, to tapping into hidden talents like photography, coding, and content creation.
'You're not just one thing,' Nxumalo emphasizes. 'We want our people to bring their whole selves to work – because when you do that, you build a workplace that's truly inclusive.'
South Africa's unemployment crisis won't be solved overnight, but understanding how the employment landscape is changing helps individuals navigate it more effectively. By developing digital skills, embracing side projects, and seeking out truly inclusive employers, job seekers can position themselves for success even in a challenging market.
As Nxumalo concludes, 'This is how the private sector can move the needle on South Africa's deeply entrenched issue of economic exclusion.' For job seekers, this shift represents an opportunity to stand out by authentically sharing not just what you can do, but who you are.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
2 minutes ago
- Forbes
3 Resources To Help Companies Design And Defend Legal DEI Programs
Business leaders are being pushed from opposite directions on diversity, equity and inclusion. These competing forces are creating confusion over the most effective path forward in designing and defending legal DEI initiatives. Most workers still value DEI practices, which impact recruiting and retention. Four out of five workers support their organization's DEI efforts, and more than two thirds say that DEI initiatives positively impact their work experience, according to a 2024 survey of 1,345 U.S. employees conducted by The Conference Board. Two out of three workers surveyed said they would not work for an employer that does not take DEI seriously, or would do so only reluctantly. Yet the Trump Administration and federal agencies that enforce discrimination laws have launched a concerted attack on DEI measures. America First Legal, cofounded by conservative Stephen Miller, has initiated multiple legal actions with the stated goal of dismantling DEI across both private and public sectors. As a result, 63% of executives in The Conference Board survey view the current political climate for DEI as very or extremely challenging. Despite these increased threats, over 80% of corporate leaders still view diversity initiatives as essential to their business strategy, based on a 2024 report by Morning Consult surveying 325 C-Suite executives at large U.S. companies. The majority of companies are seeking ways to continue their DEI investments while mitigating legal risk. In response to these conflicting pressures, legal experts have created three resources to assist companies in designing and defending legal DEI measures. 1. The Legal DEI Project In the wake of anti-DEI efforts, four employment law experts created a resource for companies to clarify the legality of DEI initiatives. Launched in June 2025, The Legal DEI Project offers a comprehensive FAQ on what discrimination laws both permit and require of employers. The Legal DEI Project's four co-founders include law professors Rachel Arnow-Richman from the University of Florida Levin College of Law, Stephanie Bornstein from Loyola Law School, Tristin Green from Loyola Law School, and Deborah Widiss from Indiana University Maurer School of Law, all of whom corresponded via email. According to the co-founders, the Project's central goal is to help employers distinguish the law from political rhetoric. Their core message: 'DEI is not illegal; discrimination is.' The Project's resources respond to executive orders that the experts say mislead employers about their legal obligations, including the order issued on January 21, 2025 titled, 'Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity.' 'We were concerned that the Trump administration's executive orders were confusing and could cause employers to overreact—and understandably so,' said Bornstein. 'But executive orders don't change the law—they are policy directives that apply only to federal workers and contractors. All the federal laws, and decades of caselaw, remain exactly the same as before President Trump took office.' 'I believe academics have a public responsibility to share knowledge in times like these when honest information about the law is in short supply,' added Arnow-Richman. To help employers make more informed decisions, The Legal DEI Project offers a risk assessment of the trade-offs that companies face from maintaining versus halting their diversity initiatives. 'Businesses right now are in a hard situation,' said Widiss. 'The Trump administration has made it sound like anything associated with 'DEI' should be scrapped—but if companies simply shut down all those offices, they may increase, rather than decrease, the likelihood they will be sued for failing to address discrimination.' Retreating from DEI increases legal risk because well-designed programs help ensure fair and nondiscriminatory workplace decision making, according to The Legal DEI Project experts. Continuing DEI measures reduces legal risk because employers remain far more likely to be sued for discrimination by individuals from historically excluded groups than to be investigated by the government for diversity initiatives. To help employers design effective DEI programs, The Legal DEI Project website includes a list of common measures that remain lawful. Permissible practices include broadening recruiting strategies to expand candidate pools, and collecting voluntary demographic data on applicants and employees to assess barriers to equal opportunity. Employers may continue inclusive employee mentoring programs and antiharassment trainings, both of which reduce rather than increase legal risk. According to the Project's website, it also remains lawful—and advisable—for employers to reduce bias by linking hiring and performance evaluation criteria to objective job responsibilities and skills, using consistent interview questions and assessment rubrics, and publicizing promotion and advancement opportunities to all employees. Best practices also include evaluating the accessibility of physical, technological, and communication tools in the workplace. 2. The Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Leadership Group Employers seeking to defend DEI practices against legal challenges may access free resources on the Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Leadership Group website, launched in February 2025. The EEO Leadership Group is comprised of 11 former officials of the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the U.S. Department of Labor's Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs. The EEOC is the agency responsible for enforcing federal employment discrimination laws. The OFCCP is the agency tasked with ensuring that federal contractors comply with equal employment opportunity laws. The 11 former officials created their resource website to clarify the legal status of DEI initiatives and remind employers of their legal obligations, despite the Trump Administration's curtailment of civil rights enforcement. 'Given the onslaught of attacks on civil rights in employment, we organized as former leaders of the EEOC and the OFCCP to monitor what this Administration was doing and to provide accurate and timely responses that would help employers, employees, and the general public,' said Chai R. Feldblum, former EEOC Commissioner and cofounder of the EEO Leadership Group, via email. On the Group's website, employers may access the experts' written responses to actions by the EEOC's Acting Chair Andrea R. Lucas targeting corporate DEI initiatives. One of the Group's goals is to ensure that employers understand that federal employment discrimination laws cannot be changed by anti-DEI executive orders or unilateral actions by the EEOC's Acting Chair. 'The legal right not to be discriminated against in employment cannot be taken away by a President or by an agency,' said Feldblum. 'The EEO Leadership Group provides employers information about what they are still required to do under the law, as well as what they are legally entitled to do in their efforts to increase DEI.' For example, the EEO Leadership Group website contains expert analysis of Lucas's March 19, 2025 document titled, 'What You Should Know About DEI-Related Discrimination at Work.' The EEO Leadership Group's response describes Lucas's guidance as misleading employers by overstating the legal risks of well-designed DEI initiatives and ignoring the need for DEI programs to ensure compliance with antidiscrimination laws. The EEO Leadership Group website offers advice on lawful ways to design DEI programs, including trainings to promote inclusion and avoid harassment. The Group's resources explain how to lawfully implement employee resource or affinity groups, expand applicant recruiting pools, and collect workforce data to analyze barriers to equal opportunity. 'The EEO Leadership Group also exists to provide employees with information about their rights under the law, despite efforts by this Administration to undermine those rights,' said Feldblum. Even if federal agencies decline to enforce employment discrimination laws, employees may still file private lawsuits, which means that employers must stay apprised of their legal obligations. 3. Catalyst And Meltzer Center 2025 Report On Legal DEI Organizational leaders trying to navigate DEI backlash may find comprehensive risk-assessment guidance from a report titled, 'The Risks of Retreat: The Enduring Inclusion Imperative,' published on June 11, 2025. The Report is authored by experts from Catalyst, a global nonprofit seeking to advance gender equity at work, and the Meltzer Center for Diversity, Inclusion, and Belonging, a research institute focusing on DEI and the law. 'Many leaders are looking at all the headlines but aren't sure what's really going on underneath the surface,' said David Glasgow, executive director of the Meltzer Center, via email. 'We felt there was a need for clear and balanced guidance on this topic—informed by both empirical data and legal expertise.' A central goal of the Catalyst/Meltzer Report is to enable employers to 'weigh all the risks in the area rather than just fixating on the risks that are most salient in the media coverage of the topic (which tend to be the risks of anti-DEI lawsuits or anti-DEI government action),' said Glasgow. 'Our aim was to enable leaders to make more informed, balanced, and strategic decisions rather than purely reactive ones,' said Alixandra Pollack, vice president at Catalyst, via email. To achieve that objective, the Catalyst/Meltzer Report analyzes data from a survey of 2,500 individuals across industries in U.S. organizations with 500 or more employees, conducted from January 20 to February 11, 2025. Survey participants included 1,000 C-suite executives, 250 legal leaders, and 1,250 employees. Based on the survey results, the Catalyst/Meltzer Report warns that retreating from DEI programs can increase corporate risk in four areas. First, companies may lose talent because a commitment to DEI impacts recruiting and retention. Over 75% of employees surveyed said they were more likely to stay in a job long-term if their employer is committed to DEI, and 43% said they would quit if their employer rescinds its support. Second, companies may face financial losses from consumers who make consumption decisions based on DEI commitment. Third, companies may face reputational losses if their programs no longer align with their stated values. Fourth, companies may face increased legal risk of discrimination claims without DEI programs that reduce biased decision making. On the flip side, the Catalyst/Meltzer Report also recognizes potential risks from maintaining or expanding DEI programs in the current environment. Within the past year, 55% of the C-suite leaders surveyed said they had dealt with social media attacks, threats or protests from anti-DEI advocacy groups, or legal actions related to DEI. In light of these competing pressures, the Catalyst/Meltzer Report explains how companies can conduct a holistic risk assessment and modify DEI programs to ensure they are legally defensible. The Report encourages employers to make strategic and sustainable long-term decisions with a 'big picture' view, as most constituents still agree with the values underlying DEI measures. By sharing data from a large group of organizations, the Catalyst/Meltzer Report also enables companies to benchmark their approaches against peers that are also continuing to invest in legal DEI initiatives. 'This report seeks to equip organizational leaders and decision makers with the information and tools needed to build fair and inclusive workplaces,' said Pollack, 'ones that go beyond mere compliance to create true impact.'
Bloomberg
2 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Africa Must Plug $580 Billion Leak to Curb Debt, AfDB Chief Says
African governments must end corruption and illicit capital flows that cost the continent more than $580 billion annually if they're to deal with a debt pile that's approaching $2 trillion, according to the head of the African Development Bank. While nations also need access to more concessional financing — and debt-restructuring where necessary — curbing outflows is crucial, Akinwumi Adesina, the lender's president, said in an interview last week.
News24
3 minutes ago
- News24
Ex-lotto board member ordered to repay R21m in misappropriated grant funds
SIU Special Tribunal finds advocate Huma and associates liable for misappropriated community grant funds. Money meant for Marikana chicken farm funnelled into Huma's company instead. SIU preserves R10 million from property sales, plans to auction farms. The Special Investigating Unit (SIU) has scored a major victory in its corruption investigation into the National Lotteries Commission (NLC), after the Special Tribunal ordered former board member Advocate William Elias Huma and his associates to repay more than R21 million in misappropriated grant funds In a landmark ruling delivered by Judge Margie Victor on 31 July, the tribunal declared that the awarding of R16.5 million to the Samaritan Initiative NPO and more than R4.5 million to Reagile NPC was unlawful, invalid and riddled with misconduct. Together with Huma's affiliated entities, the organisations were found to have cost the commission R21 158 118 through dishonesty, negligence and breaches of fiduciary duty. SIU 'This is the first judgment setting aside grant funding in the commission investigation,' the SIU said, noting it had also launched 18 more review applications valued at more than R320 million. Hijacked projects, ghost benefits The Samaritan Initiative NPO, controlled by Huma's relatives, was awarded a R16.5 million grant in 2019 for community upliftment projects, including a chicken farming scheme, in Marikana in the North West. Instead, the SIU investigations found the money was funnelled into Silverlite Trading, a company solely controlled by Huma. The farm is now derelict and it never benefited local residents, the SIU found. Similarly, Reagile NPC, with Huma's wife and nephew as directors, pocketed R4.6 million in 2020 but did not produce any tangible community benefits. The conduct of advocate Huma, the Samaritan Initiative and Reagile has been reprehensible. There is no explanation from any of them for the loss of money to the state. In particular, [Huma], a non-practising advocate, would have been aware of his fiduciary duties to the board. His defences were bald, obtuse and unmeritorious. Judge Margie Victor Quoting former UN Human Rights commissioner Navi Pillay, Judge Victor underscored the devastating cost of corruption: 'Corruption kills. The money stolen through corruption every year is enough to feed the world's hungry 80 times over.' Recovery in motion The tribunal ordered Huma and the implicated entities to repay the full R21.2 million, with costs on an attorney-client scale, including senior counsel fees. To ensure recovery, the SIU has preserved R10 million in proceeds from the sale of Huma's property in Waterkloof in Pretoria, making it immediately executable. In addition, assets linked to commission funds have been frozen, including Farm Zwartkoppies 296 in the North West and a boutique hotel in Rustenburg. The SIU plans to auction these properties, redirecting proceeds back to the commission for genuine community upliftment projects. SIU Bigger clean-up ahead President Cyril Ramaphosa authorised the investigation in 2020 under Proclamation R32, giving the SIU the powers to investigate corruption and recover state losses. The Huma ruling is seen as a pivotal test case in untangling the vast web of lottery looting. This judgment sends a clear message that abusing positions of trust to enrich oneself at the expense of communities will not go unpunished. SIU READ Lotto licence saga: ANC-linked group led before Sizekhaya win, court papers show With more than R320 million in questionable grants under review, the SIU is expected to file additional applications to claw back misused lottery funds. Evidence of criminal conduct uncovered in its investigations will be referred to the National Prosecuting Authority for possible prosecution. A precedent for accountability The ruling is significant, not only for its financial implications, but also for its precedent in holding senior figures accountable for abusing public institutions. Judge Victor made it clear that with his legal training and position on the NLC board, Huma had no excuse to do what he did. His attempt to deny, deflect and avoid accountability was rejected outright. 'His refusal to deal with simple denials to issues which called for an answer cannot be condoned,' the judgment said. The SIU hailed the outcome as part of its broader mandate to impose 'consequence management' and restore public trust in state institutions battered by corruption. For communities such as Marikana, promised jobs, food security and development that never materialised, the ruling offers hope that stolen resources will finally be clawed back and redirected where they were meant to go.
