Supreme Court stays trial in two cases involving Azam Khan's son Abdullah
A Bench of Justices M.M. Sundresh and N. Kotiswar Singh also issued notice to the Uttar Pradesh Government on an appeal filed by Mr. Abdullah.
On July 23, the High Court dismissed two petitions filed by Mr. Abdullah challenging the proceedings of criminal cases against him. The first case is related to Mr. Abdullah's alleged fake passport and the second case to his obtaining two PAN cards.
'Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in my considered view, the instant application is devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed,' the High Court said.
Mr. Abdullah filed separate petitions in the High Court concerning the two cases requesting it to set aside the entire criminal proceedings of the ongoing trials in Rampur's MP/MLA Court.
BJP MLA Akash Saxena had filed a case against Mr. Abdullah in Rampur on July 30, 2019, alleging fraud and violation of the Passport Act for allegedly obtaining the travel document using an incorrect date of birth.
According to the complaint, Mr. Abdullah was issued a passport on January 10, 2018. The passport lists the date of birth as September 30, 1990 but his educational certificates say January 1, 1993.
Mr. Saxena also filed an FIR against Mr. Abdullah and father Azam Khan at the Civil Lines police station in Rampur on December 6, 2019.
Mr. Saxena alleged that Mr. Abdullah had furnished an incorrect PAN number in his election affidavit during the 2017 Assembly elections. Mr. Saxena also accused Mr. Azam Khan of being a fraudster and a liar, claiming that the senior SP leader got two PAN cards made for his son through fraud to enable him to contest elections.
According to him, Mr. Abdullah allegedly concealed this fact in the affidavit submitted to the Election Commission of India (ECI). He showed one PAN number in the affidavit, but used another number in his income tax return documents.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
2 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Religion vs dissent: Which right wins?
The Supreme Court has, through multiple judgments, affirmed the right to protest while imposing 'reasonable restrictions' on its exercise in public spaces. The Court's rationale has been that the right to protest cannot be exercised at the expense of public order, with considerations such as the smooth flow of traffic weighing on the court's mind. As the Kanwar Yatra ended this year, the Delhi Police saw a surge in complaints on traffic congestion, excessive noise and disturbances well into the night over the span of a few days. There have been reports of hooliganism, aggression and violence by the kanwariyas. In India, streets are not just for commuting: The everyday affairs of community, religion, celebration, mourning, and social life play out on them too. (ANI) There are few legal challenges to these acts or restrictions on the Kanwar Yatra. Religious practice, the reasoning goes, must be given a longer rope. But does such accommodation on disruption of regular life in the city pass muster? Every year, several groups of kanwariyas traverse the streets of North India. In recent years, the Kanwar Yatra has grown in both popularity and scale — large trucks are hired, food stalls set up (with QR codes displaying information on the seller's religion in some places) and roaring boomboxes announce its arrival. It may seem that the yatra has turned into an opportunity for unrestrained revelry and lawlessness. Often, the yatra seems no more about personal, pious observations, but a means of loud and disruptive assertion. By and large, the kanwariyas have a de facto immunity — actions that would normally invite the attention of law enforcement agencies are ignored and even actively permitted. In India, streets are not just for commuting: The everyday affairs of community, religion, celebration, mourning, and social life play out on them too. But the access to this public space, and the degree to which rights can be exercised, are differentiated. Who may occupy a public space and for what purpose is neither universal nor equal. In Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (2018), the Supreme Court held that the rights under Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(b) of protestors have to be balanced with the rights of commuters. Permission for a demonstration or public meeting should be granted keeping in view its effect on traffic, human safety, and public tranquillity. Similarly, in Himat Lal Shah (1973), the Court held that the right to a public street can be regulated so that all can enjoy that right. In the wake of protests at Shaheen Bagh against the Citizenship Amendment Act, the Supreme Court found in 2020, that the right to dissent could not be at the cost of inconvenience to commuters and authorities must take action to prevent undue encroachments and obstructions in public spaces. In 2021, during the farmers' protests, the Supreme Court once again remarked that protests could not inconvenience the general public and lead to roads being blocked. The only time that the Kanwar Yatra has been made subject to legitimate restrictions was in 2021, when the Supreme Court took suo motu cognisance of the yatra held despite the rising cases of Covid-19. No doubt, all sects have a right to profess and practise religion, subject to 'public order, morality and health'. The right to protest is restricted by similar considerations. Should the State then not be equally concerned by the civic inconveniences caused by religious processions, as it is by the peaceful public gathering of dissenters? If freedom and liberty are the cornerstones of our Constitution, their equal application is its chief anchor. The popular saying 'your right to swing your wrist ends where my nose begins' must apply in equal measure to all those who lay claim to a public space. Katyayani Suhrud and Trisha Chandran are lawyers practising in the Supreme Court of India. The views expressed are personal.
The Hindu
2 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Award for The Kerala Story invites a storm of criticism
The National Film Award jury's decision to bestow two awards, including the best director award to Sudipto Sen, for the film The Kerala Story has invited a storm of criticism in Kerala. Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan, in a statement marking his protest, said the jury insulted the noble tradition of Indian cinema that stood for religious brotherhood and national integration by awarding a film that was built on lies to defame Kerala and spread communalism. 'By honouring a film that spreads blatant misinformation with the clear intent of tarnishing Kerala's image and sowing seeds of communal hatred, the jury has lent legitimacy to a narrative rooted in the divisive ideology of the Sangh Parivar. Kerala, a land that has always stood as a beacon of harmony and resistance against communal forces, has been gravely insulted by this decision. It is not just Malayalis but everyone who believes in democracy must raise their voice in defence of truth and the constitutional values we hold dear,' he posted in X. General Education Minister V. Sivankutty said recognising The Kerala Story, a film that spreads hate and baseless allegations, devalued all the other awards. 'It is extremely regrettable that a national award is being given to a film that is full of baseless allegations and hate propaganda. This is a recognition of attempts to create divisions in society. Such trends do not augur well for the pluralism of our country,' he said. Social media platforms were abuzz with posts criticising the National Film Award jury for awarding the film. Ahead of the film's release two years ago, various organisations from Kerala had moved the Supreme Court calling for a ban. Though the Supreme Court and the Kerala High Court refused to stay the film's release, the makers of the film had to remove its teaser after their claim about '32,000 women' from Kerala joining the IS. They also altered the trailer to say that it was a 'compilation of the true stories of three young girls.' They also added a statement to the film which said that it was a work of fiction. The ruling Left Democratic Front and the Opposition United Democratic Front were united in their opposition to the film, with much of the civil society too calling it an attempt to malign the State. Only the Bharatiya Janata Party openly endorsed the film in Kerala. The film also led to a flurry of social media posts and videos titled 'The Real Kerala Story,' portraying stories of communal amity from the State. Documentary filmmaker Sanu Kummil made the documentary The Unknown Kerala Stories portraying six stories of communal harmony from different corners of Kerala.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
‘Rummy-in-the-House' row in Maharashtra: Opposition slams NCP minister Manikrao Kokate's shift to sports and youth department
Mumbai/Nagpur: Criticising the BJP-led Mahayuti govt's decision to assign the sports and youth welfare department to NCP MLA Manikrao Kokate over the 'rummy-in-the-House' controversy, the opposition on Friday said govt would now make rummy a state game and advocate for its inclusion in the Olympics. In the wake of growing public outrage over Kokate's conduct and controversial remarks, CM Devendra Fadnavis on Thursday changed his portfolio from agriculture to sports and youth welfare, minority development and Waqf, and NCP minister Dattatray Bharne was given the agriculture portfolio. State Congress president Harshawardhan Sapkal condemned the CM for his failure to sack Kokate from the cabinet. "We were expecting that Fadnavis would sack Kokate, instead he has been promoted and posted as cabinet member for sports and youth welfare. Quite shocking,'' he said, adding that rummy players should now be awarded the Shiv Chhatrapati Awards. You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai NCP (SP)'s Rohit Pawar, who first released Kokate's rummy-playing video in the legislature, said: "Instead of accepting Kokate's resignation, govt decided to take away the agriculture department and assign him the sports department. The sports department is also important from the perspective of the youth, and while working in this department, he should avoid past mistakes, make proper use of his experience, and do justice to the sports sector. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo " He added: "Similarly, it is expected that Bharane will do justice to the farmers and remove the shadow of controversies that has plagued this department. Any ministerial position is a great responsibility, and if the person in that position does not act responsibly or fails to do justice to the post, the common people bear the brunt. Something similar happened in the case of Kokate, and it was the common farmers who were suffering the consequences, which is why there was a demand for his resignation. " NCP (SP) MP Supriya Sule said, "A person [Kokate] who is playing cards in the House, which is called the temple of democracy, should have been asked to resign, but they [BJP] have instead given him a promotion... On one hand, under the Khelo India programme, athletes are working to build their careers, and on the other hand, a leader who plays cards, 'Rummy Rao', has been given this ministry. This is very harmful for Maharashtra ." Kokate, on his part, said, "I am very happy with the new department. I accept the decision taken by the CMs and the deputy CMs. I will continue my journey according to this decision." On Bharne taking over the agriculture portfolio, Kokate said: "Bharne is a farmer's son. He is also a knowledgeable farmer, and this account has been entrusted to him. Therefore, this account will definitely get justice. If he asks me for any help, I will help him 100%." Fadnavis on Friday said the decision to assign sports and youth welfare, minority development and waqf portfolio to Kokate was taken jointly after a discussion with deputy chief ministers Eknath Shinde and Ajit Pawar. He termed it a move to uphold accountability in governance. Kokate was shifted in the wake of growing public outrage over his conduct and controversial remarks. "There was a lot of public anger. We discussed it together and decided to reassign the agriculture department to Dattatraya Bharne," Fadnavis told the media on the sidelines of the inauguration of the new international campus of Kavi Kulguru Kalidas Sanskrit University at Waranga. "No other portfolios have been changed, and as of now, no such changes are being considered." Dispelling speculation over his meeting with former NCP minister Dhananjay Munde, Fadnavis clarified there were no discussions related to any cabinet changes during a meeting between them. "Such decisions are not taken at Munde's level. They happen between me, Shinde, and Pawar," he said. Fadnavis reiterated stern warning to all ministers against inviting public ire, stating, "I, Shinde, and Pawar have made it clear that irresponsible behaviour will not be tolerated. The decision to remove Kokate is a signal — we are here for public service, and our words and actions must reflect that." Ajit Pawar too cautioned NCP workers against misconduct, including public disturbances and celebratory firing, saying such actions tarnish the reputation of both the individual and the party. His remarks come in the wake of two recent controversies linked to NCP members, which included an incident in Pune district where the brother of an NCP MLA allegedly fired a gun at a "tamasha" venue in Daund. "Do not go to Chaufula and do not open fire in the air. Such acts not only bring disrepute to the individual but also to the party," he told party functionaries at a gathering in Pune. Chaufula is a village on the Pune-Solapur Road in Daund tehsil, known for its folk art centres showcasing lavani and tamasha performances. Kokate has been mired in controversy — first when a camera caught him allegedly playing an online card game during the recently concluded monsoon session of Maharashtra Legislature, and more recently, for his inflammatory statements about farmers and govt schemes. He denied the gaming allegation, claiming he was trying to close a pop-up ad, and even offered to resign if proven guilty. However, it was his remarks comparing govt with beggars in reference to the Re 1 crop insurance scheme that appear to have sealed his fate for showing the govt in poor light. "The govt takes Re 1 from farmers. But it does not give a single rupee to the farmers. The govt takes money. So who is the beggar? The govt is the beggar, not the farmers," he had said. In previous statements, Kokate also alleged that farmers used govt funds for weddings and not agriculture, and that "2% to 4% corruption" in schemes was not a reason to shut them down. In Feb, he and his brother Sunil Kokate were sentenced to two years jail by a Nashik court for submitting fake documents to obtain flats under a govt quota in the 1990s.
