11 Things Emotionally Supportive Grandparents Never Say to Their Grandkids, According to a Psychologist
In any emotionally supportive relationship, it all comes down to how you treat and speak to the other person. This particular relational factor is not limited to connections such as between a parent with their child, or between two people in a marriage or friendship. It also applies to workplaces, extended families and more.So, this is something that continues to be true in a relationship between a grandparent and grandchild. Ahead, discover the things that emotionally supportive grandparents never say to their grandkids, according to a mental health professional. A psychologist reveals the phrases that these emotionally intelligent grandmothers and grandfathers avoid, and why they're harmful for grandchildren to hear. Plus, why it's important to be emotionally supportive of granddaughters and grandsons.Related: 10 Things Every Kid Needs To Hear From Their Parents and Grandparents, Child Psychologists Say
Why Is It Important To Be Emotionally Supportive of Grandchildren?
Gina Radice-Vella, Psy.D., Clinical Psychologist and Chief Psychologist at Jersey Shore University Medical Center, says that it's important for grandparents to be emotionally supportive of their grandchildren for a variety of reasons. 'Primarily, children need many sources of emotional support,' she explains. 'While we often think of parents as the primary source of support for children, parents are not the only source of support. Other important people in a child's life, such as grandparents, can have a profound impact on their development. In fact, grandparents can play a vital role in reinforcing many of the values, attitudes and beliefs shaped by a child's parents. Children often look to outside sources for validation, comfort and support, and grandparents can be the primary source they look to.' Related: 9 Habits of Grandparents Who Stay Emotionally Close to Their Grandkids—Even From Far Away
11 Phrases Emotionally Supportive Grandparents Avoid, According to a Psychologist
1. 'Don't tell your Mom/Dad.'
Dr. Radice-Vella says that asking a child to withhold something from their parents is wrong for many reasons. She explains, 'First, it teaches children that secrets are okay to hide the truth. Secondly, it can create a lot of pressure for children to feel as if they must harbor a secret because Grandma or Grandpa told them not to tell. This can lead to feelings of shame or guilt, and ultimately may lead to acting-out behavior.' She adds that an emotionally supportive grandparent would not say this because they would want to promote an open, trusting environment and teach effective communication skills.
2. 'Big boys/girls don't cry.'
Children should never hear this phrase from an adult, 'because it tells the child that it is not okay to cry and that their maturity is contingent on holding their emotions in,' Dr. Radice-Vella notes. She says that an emotionally supportive grandparent would not say this because it does not teach a child anything nor does it offer a loving, supportive space for the child to express emotions. Related:
3. 'Don't be sad.'
'This statement invalidates a child's emotional experience,' Dr. Radice-Vella explains. 'It teaches them it is not okay to be sad, even though that is what they are experiencing at the moment. It can cause them to second guess their internal experience, without good evidence for doing so. Labeling emotions and internal experiences is crucial for healthy psychological functioning.' Instead, emotionally supportive grandparents would help a child label their feelings and validate the emotional process.
4. 'Stop crying.'
Dr. Radice-Vella says that this phrase 'puts pressure on a child to put a stop to their feelings,' which is rarely possible to do. 'An emotionally supportive grandparent would not say this because they would want to create a safe space for the child to express their emotions, without shame or embarrassment,' she explains. 'An emotionally supportive grandparent would model what healthy emotional expression looks like and teach the child healthy, adaptive coping skills they could use in the moment.' Related:
5. 'It's not a big deal.'
This statement could cause a child to question their emotional reaction to an event. 'If something upsets the child, telling them that it's not a big deal causes them to second guess their response to the situation,' Dr. Radice-Vella says. 'Over time, this can lead to a pattern of self-doubt, self-deprecation and insecurity.'On the flip side, an emotionally supportive grandparent would reassure the child that it is okay to be upset and ask how they can help them in that moment.
6. 'You're overreacting.'
'This statement implies that how a child is reacting is wrong or improper,' Dr. Radice-Vella says. 'It can cause a child to question their response to certain situations, which may lead to insecurities and poor boundaries later in life.' Related:
7. 'You're bad.'
Dr. Radice-Vella says that 'You're bad' or any phrase that implies something negative about a child's inherent worth should be avoided. 'When a child makes a mistake or does something wrong, it is okay to name the behavior as 'bad' or 'wrong',' she says. 'However, we must be careful not to label the child as such. To avoid it completely, emotionally supportive grandparents may focus on labeling a positive behavior instead.' Related: 6 Ways Kids Benefit From Spending Time With Grandparents, a Child Psychologist Reveals
8. 'Grow up.'
According to Dr. Radice-Vella, this statement creates pressure for a child to respond in a way that is beyond their control. She adds, 'An emotionally supportive grandparent would not say this because they would want the child to feel comfortable expressing themselves as they are, without the pressure to be older or more mature than they may be ready to be.' Related:
9. 'You're making me mad.'
These words aren't emotionally supportive because 'it signals to a child that they are responsible for another person's feelings, which is not the case,' Dr. Radice-Vella says.She goes on to explain, 'Every person is entitled to feel how they feel, but one must take accountability for that feeling rather than blaming it on someone else. As a child, to hear the message that they are responsible for someone feeling a certain way, particularly a negative emotion, can lead to feelings of guilt or sadness. This statement does not model adaptive coping and essentially shifts the focus away from the person to the child.'
10. 'Hurry up.'
Dr. Radice-Vella says that hurrying children can create anxiety. 'Children are naturally curious—from their eyes, the world is full of new and exciting things," she continues. "They see things in ways adults don't. When we try to hurry them through life, even small day-to-day activities, we are stifling their curiosity, imposing a false sense of urgency and reinforcing a societal message that we must constantly rush through life to get to the next thing.'
11. 'You're stupid.'
It's simple: any negative comment or insult about a child is not emotionally supportive. 'Grandparents want to send messages of love, acceptance and unconditional worth that make children feel good about themselves,' Dr. Radice-Vella says. 'Critical statements or insults, especially from loved ones, can really affect how a child views themselves. The younger the child, the more impressionable they are, meaning those messages are going to become part of their internal view.'
Up Next:Source:
Gina Radice-Vella, Psy.D., Clinical Psychologist and Chief Psychologist at Jersey Shore University Medical Center.
11 Things Emotionally Supportive Grandparents Never Say to Their Grandkids, According to a Psychologist first appeared on Parade on Jul 30, 2025
This story was originally reported by Parade on Jul 30, 2025, where it first appeared.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Associated Press
10 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Sila Realty Trust Completes Acquisition of a Two-Property Medical Outpatient Building Portfolio for $16.15 Million
TAMPA, Fla.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Aug 4, 2025-- Sila Realty Trust, Inc. (NYSE: SILA) (the 'Company', 'we', or 'our'), a net lease real estate investment trust ('REIT') with a strategic focus on investing in the growing and resilient healthcare sector, today announced the $16.15 million acquisition of two medical outpatient buildings ('MOBs') located in Southlake, Texas, an affluent suburb in the Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington MSA (the 'Portfolio' or 'Southlake Healthcare Facilities'). The Portfolio is comprised of one gastroenterology center and one ambulatory surgery center ('ASC') with an overlapping physician group and patient population, benefiting from strong operational synergies due to their complementary uses and proximity to each other. The gastroenterology center is leased to GI Alliance, the largest gastroenterology group in the United States and a subsidiary of investment grade-rated Cardinal Health. The ASC is leased to a joint venture between a partnership comprised of Baylor Scott & White Health and United Surgical Partners International and a group of physicians. 'The operational integration of the Southlake Healthcare Facilities paired with the strong institutional support of the tenancies are key characteristics that we seek in the triple-net lease healthcare facilities that we endeavor to own,' stated Michael A. Seton, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. 'The ASC's affiliation with Baylor Scott & White Health and the tenants' focus on the best possible outcomes for patients result in strong operating performance and, consequently, durable income streams for Sila.' About GI Alliance & Cardinal Health GI Alliance is the largest gastroenterology group in the United States with over 1,000 physicians across the country. Partnering with the nation's premier independent gastroenterology physician practices, GI Alliance supports operational management, ancillary service development, and patient engagement, enabling practices to focus on providing the highest quality patient care while maintaining clinical autonomy. In January 2025, Cardinal Health acquired a 73% majority stake in GI Alliance for approximately $2.8 billion. Cardinal Health is a publicly traded, global healthcare services and products company that serves nearly 90% of all U.S. hospitals. The company provides customized solutions for hospitals, healthcare systems, pharmacies, ambulatory surgery centers, clinical laboratories, physician offices and patients in the home and is the 14 th highest revenue generating company in the U.S. It is also the largest distributor of medical supplies and surgical products across the country. About Baylor Scott & White Health and United Surgical Partners International Baylor Scott & White Health ('BSWH') is the largest not-for-profit healthcare system in Texas and one of the largest in the United States with more than 7,200 physicians and over 57,000 total employees. BSWH operates at 52 hospitals and over 1,300 clinics and care sites across north and central Texas, with the nearest hospital, the 302 bed Baylor Scott & White Medical Center, approximately two miles from the Southlake Healthcare Facilities. United Surgical Partners International ('USPI') is a for-profit subsidiary of Tenet Healthcare, operating as the largest ambulatory surgery service provider in the United States. USPI serves as a platform for partnerships with physicians and not-for-profit health systems, offering high-quality, convenient, outpatient surgical care. Today, USPI has over 535 ASCs and surgical hospitals across 37 states. About Sila Realty Trust, Inc. Sila Realty Trust, Inc., headquartered in Tampa, Florida, is a net lease real estate investment trust with a strategic focus on investing in the growing and resilient healthcare sector. The Company invests in high quality healthcare facilities along the continuum of care in the pursuit of generating predictable, durable, and growing income streams. Sila's portfolio comprises high quality tenants in geographically diverse facilities, which are positioned to capitalize on the dynamic delivery of healthcare to patients. As of March 31, 2025, the Company owned 136 real estate properties, and two undeveloped land parcels, located in 66 markets across the United States. For more information, please visit the Company's website at Forward-Looking Statements Certain statements contained herein, other than historical fact, may be considered 'forward-looking statements' within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are intended to be covered by the safe harbor provided by the same. These statements are based on management's current expectations and beliefs and are subject to a number of trends and uncertainties. No forward-looking statement is intended to, nor shall it, serve as a guarantee of future performance. You can identify the forward-looking statements by the use of words such as 'anticipate,' 'believe,' 'continue,' 'could,' 'estimate,' 'expect,' 'intend,' 'may,' 'outlook,' 'plan,' 'potential,' 'predict,' 'project,' 'seek,' 'should,' 'will' and other similar terms and phrases. Forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties and factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the Company's expectations, and you should not rely on forward-looking statements since they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which are, in some cases, beyond the Company's control and could materially affect the Company's results of operations, financial condition, cash flows, performance or future achievements or events. Additional factors include those described under the section entitled Item 1A. 'Risk Factors' of Part I of the Company's 2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on March 3, 2025, a copy of which are available at The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by law. View source version on CONTACT: Investor Contact: Miles Callahan, Senior Vice President of Capital Markets and Investor Relations 833-404-4107 [email protected] KEYWORD: UNITED STATES NORTH AMERICA FLORIDA TEXAS INDUSTRY KEYWORD: HEALTH HOSPITALS SURGERY COMMERCIAL BUILDING & REAL ESTATE CONSTRUCTION & PROPERTY GENERAL HEALTH REIT SOURCE: Sila Realty Trust, Inc. Copyright Business Wire 2025. PUB: 08/04/2025 06:30 AM/DISC: 08/04/2025 06:30 AM

Associated Press
10 minutes ago
- Associated Press
CCHR: Coercive Psychiatric Commitment Worsens Homeless Crisis at High Cost
LOS ANGELES, Calif., Aug. 4, 2025 (SEND2PRESS NEWSWIRE) — The Citizens Commission on Human Rights International (CCHR) warns that proposals to expand involuntary psychiatric commitment of the homeless will not solve homelessness but will worsen it—by increasing trauma, violating civil liberties, and fueling massive public spending on a failed system. Despite mounting evidence that coercive psychiatric policies are ineffective and dangerous, policymakers are turning to forced hospitalization and drugging as supposed solutions to the growing homelessness crisis. CCHR, a watchdog organization established in 1969, says the data proves otherwise. 'This is not an expansion of care—it is an expansion of control,' said Jan Eastgate, president of CCHR International. 'These policies echo the disastrous mistakes of the 1960s that helped create today's homelessness. Repeating them will only entrench the crisis.' FORCED PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT WORSENS OUTCOMES A July 2025 U.S. study found that individuals involuntarily hospitalized for psychiatric reasons were nearly twice as likely to die by suicide or overdose within just three months of release. Others were more likely to be charged with a violent crime[1] – an outcome CCHR says is potentially linked to psychotropic drug effects. 'Involuntary psychiatric hospitalization research is likely the first to establish a causal link between hospitalization and harm a person experiences after they're discharged,' said Pim Welle, Chief Data Scientist in Allegheny County.[2] Other studies confirm the danger: Medical researcher Dr. Peter Gøtzsche stated: 'It has never been shown that forced treatment does more good than harm, and it is highly likely the opposite is true.'[7] Psychiatric drugs do not cure mental disorders. Instead, they often inflict permanent damage. Antipsychotics—frequently administered under court order—can cause: Even treatment for drug-induced conditions like TD comes with severe side effects, often mimicking or compounding symptoms caused by the original drugs. The Alaska Supreme Court ruled against forced drugging in a hospital setting due to the severe risks involved.[9] Yet many are still forcibly injected with long-acting antipsychotics that remain in their systems for weeks. The psychiatric industry often cites 'anosognosia'—the alleged inability to recognize one's own illness—to justify forced detainment and drugging. But there is no test to confirm this claim. People often refuse psychiatric drugs because of intolerable side effects, not because they lack insight. Psychiatrist and author Dr. Thomas Szasz wrote: 'There is neither justification nor need for involuntary psychiatric interventions.… Beware of benefactors who deprive their beneficiaries of liberty.'[10] MASSIVE COSTS WITH NO RETURN The financial burden of involuntary psychiatric treatment is staggering: And the spending doesn't stop at hospitalization. Many could be placed under Community Treatment Orders (CTOs) or Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT),[15] requiring continued drugging and threatening re-hospitalization if non-compliant—creating a costly, coercive revolving door. Dr. Gøtzsche has gone so far as to call forced psychiatric treatment 'a crime against humanity.'[16] CCHR asserts that involuntary psychiatric commitment is not compassionate care—it is legalized abuse wrapped in psychiatric-mental health justification. It fails the homeless, fails taxpayers, and fails basic human rights standards. 'The billions being funneled into failed psychiatric systems should instead be redirected into voluntary supports—such as housing, medical screenings, and non-coercive help,' Eastgate said. About CCHR: Founded in 1969 by the Church of Scientology and the late psychiatrist Dr. Thomas Szasz, CCHR investigates and exposes human rights violations in the mental health system. With chapters in over 30 countries, CCHR has helped achieve more than 200 reforms protecting individuals from psychiatric abuse. To learn more, visit: Sources: [1] 'A Danger to Self and Others: Health and Criminal Consequences of Involuntary Hospitalization,' Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports, July 2025, [2] 'Study: Many Allegheny County psych hospitalizations do more harm than good,' Pittsburgh Public Source, 28 July 2025, [3] 'Risk of suicide according to level of psychiatric treatment: a nationwide nested case-control study,' Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol, Sept. 2014, [4] 'Suicide Rates After Discharge From Psychiatric Facilities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis,' JAMA Psych., July 2017, [5] 'Patients with substance use disorders need care, not coercion,' Harvard Public Health, 18 July 2023, [6] Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports, July 2025 [7] 'Abolishing Forced Treatment in Psychiatry is an Ethical Imperative,' 17 June 2016, [8] 'Brave New Pittsburgh: Forced Use of Psychotropic Pharmaceuticals is Coming,' Popular Rationalism, 16 May 2025, [9] Faith Myers vs. Alaska Psychiatric Institute, Supreme Court, 2-11021, Superior Court No. 3AN-03-00277, Opinion, No. 6021, 30 June 2006, [10] Thomas Szasz, MD, Coercion as Cure: A Critical History of Psychiatry, 2007, p. 22. [11] [12] 'Under an L.A. Freeway, a Psychiatric Rescue Mission,' New York Times, 22 Oct. 2024, [13] 'Descriptive Trends in Medicaid Antipsychotic Prescription Claims and Expenditures, 2016 – 2021,' The Jour. of Behavioral Health Services and Research, 10 July 2024, [14] The Jour. of Behavioral Health Services and Research, 10 July 2024 [15] [16] 'Forced treatment in psychiatry is a crime against humanity,' Journal of the Academy of Public Health, 30 Jan. 2025, MULTIMEDIA: Image link for media: Image caption: CCHR warns that proposals to expand involuntary psychiatric commitment of the homeless will not solve homelessness but will worsen it – by increasing trauma, violating civil liberties, and fueling massive public spending on a failed system. NEWS SOURCE: Citizens Commission on Human Rights Keywords: Religion and Churches, The Citizens Commission on Human Rights International CCHR, involuntary psychiatric commitment of the homeless, Forced treatment in psychiatry, CCHR International, involuntary commitment, Jan Eastgate, LOS ANGELES, Calif. This press release was issued on behalf of the news source (Citizens Commission on Human Rights) who is solely responsibile for its accuracy, by Send2Press® Newswire. Information is believed accurate but not guaranteed. Story ID: S2P128192 APNF0325A To view the original version, visit: © 2025 Send2Press® Newswire, a press release distribution service, Calif., USA. RIGHTS GRANTED FOR REPRODUCTION IN WHOLE OR IN PART BY ANY LEGITIMATE MEDIA OUTLET - SUCH AS NEWSPAPER, BROADCAST OR TRADE PERIODICAL. MAY NOT BE USED ON ANY NON-MEDIA WEBSITE PROMOTING PR OR MARKETING SERVICES OR CONTENT DEVELOPMENT. Disclaimer: This press release content was not created by nor issued by the Associated Press (AP). Content below is unrelated to this news story.


Washington Post
40 minutes ago
- Washington Post
After cancer diagnosis, out-of-pocket costs jump, study says
Out-of-pocket costs increased by an average of $592.53 per month in the six months after a cancer diagnosis, according to a recent study published in JAMA Network Open. The study analyzed a sample of over 46,000 patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) cancer registry, examining responses from 2008 to 2019. The sample consisted of both patients with and without cancer to provide a control group. Within the sample group, breast cancer was the most common form of cancer (74.1 percent), followed by colorectal (14.5 percent) and lung cancer (11.4 percent). On average, out-of-pocket costs rose by a cumulative total of $4,144.71. 'This difference, driven by the onset of cancer diagnosis and its associated treatment, underscores the financial burden of cancer care on patients with insurance who are not yet eligible for Medicare,' the authors write in the study. Cost also increased with stage of diagnosis. Patients with Stage 0 cancer saw an average increase of $462.01 per month, while Stage 4 patients' costs rose an average of $719.97 per month. The authors note that late-stage disease usually is associated with more treatment and higher medical expenditures. This study has implications for policy reform, the researchers argue. 'The variability in [out-of-pocket costs] based on cancer stage underscores the need for policies such as paid sick leave, that address both insurance continuity and financial assistance, especially for patients with more advanced cancer,' they write. — Hannah Docter-Loeb This article is part of The Post's 'Big Number' series, which takes a brief look at the statistical aspect of health issues. Additional information and relevant research are available through the hyperlinks.