logo
Here's How to Make Your Business Exit-Ready

Here's How to Make Your Business Exit-Ready

Entrepreneura day ago
Buyers don't fear imperfection. They fear uncertainty. Clean businesses get offers faster and at better multiples.
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.
If you're building a business with the goal of eventually selling it, whether to private equity, a strategic acquirer or even a search fund, your exit won't depend just on how much money you make. It'll depend on how clean your business is.
Buyers are increasingly paying a premium for operational clarity: clean financials, structured operations and a team that's ready to scale. And the absence of these things? That's the fastest way to lose millions on valuation, even if you've built a profitable business.
Here's how to get exit-ready and a real example of a company that lost significant deal value simply because they weren't.
Related: 7 Preparation Essentials for Selling a Business
1. Clean beats clever: What buyers really want
We recently evaluated a fast-growing B2B SaaS company. On paper, it checked every box: over $1M in ARR, 70%+ profit margins, low churn, high organic traffic and an efficient two-person team. The kind of deal any buyer would get excited about.
But under the hood, it was chaos.
There was no standardized financial reporting. Customer retention data was inconsistent. Expenses were loosely categorized; everything from marketing performance to support SLAs lived in the founder's head.
Because of that, we couldn't underwrite it as a turnkey asset. Instead of offering a premium 4x-5x multiple (typical for comparable assets), we priced it closer to 2.8x ARR, factoring in the cost and risk of operational cleanup. They lost nearly 40% of their value, not due to bad performance, but due to a lack of systems.
2. Financials: The foundation of exit-readiness
The first thing any buyer asks for is your financials, and if they're not clean, expect the deal timeline to stretch or the offer to shrink.
Here's what "clean" looks like:
Accrual-basis accounting (not cash)
Monthly P&L, balance sheet and cash flow statements are consistently reported
Customer metrics like CAC, LTV, churn, ARPU, ideally broken down by cohort
A 12-24 month forward-looking forecast built from bottom-up assumptions
Even better? Use tools like LiveFlow or Fathom to build a dashboard that auto-updates with your financial and operational KPIs. This isn't about impressing a buyer; it's about building confidence and showing you run your business like an investor would.
3. Operational hygiene: Scale without the founder
The most valuable businesses are the ones that don't depend on the founder to function.
When we looked at that earlier SaaS deal, we saw that every customer ticket, every marketing campaign and every pricing decision flowed through the founder. No SOPs. No documented workflows. No delegation framework.
That meant the acquirer would need to rebuild the operating system from scratch, which directly impacted valuation.
Want to fix that? Start using tools like Notion or Process Street to create SOPs, checklists and role-based documentation. Make sure team members own specific KPIs. And start building workflows that can run without you.
Related: I Specialize in Exit Planning — You Need to Make These 5 Moves Before Selling Your Business
4. Build the team that buyers can plug into
Even if your team is lean, buyers want to see a structure they can build on, not a tangle of freelancers or founder-only dependencies.
Ask yourself:
Do I have a clear org chart (even if it's lean)?
Are roles and KPIs defined in writing?
Do I know which roles a buyer would need to hire post-acquisition?
For example, the company we reviewed had zero customer success coverage and no growth team. That meant we needed to staff key roles immediately post-close, which translated into more risk, more effort and a lower purchase price.
If you're bootstrapped and wearing multiple hats, that's fine — just be honest about it. But make sure you have a blueprint for what the company will need to scale, and price that into your operating model.
5. Forecast, don't guess: The value of a real plan
Exit-ready businesses don't just report the past; they can confidently project the future.
A buyer needs to know how your business will perform 12-24 months from now. That means your forecast should be tied to real input traffic growth, customer acquisition costs, churn rates and expansion revenue. And it needs to be regularly updated.
Not sure where to start? You can build a simple model in Google Sheets or use tools like Brixx or Finmark for SaaS-friendly forecasting.
Forecasts help buyers understand the upside and justify a higher valuation.
6. Due diligence as a mirror, not a test
Most founders treat due diligence like a test, a final hoop to jump through before a deal closes. But the savviest founders treat it as a mirror: a way to see how investable their company truly is.
The business we referenced earlier had never run a data room before. Their answers were delayed, documents were unstructured, and there was no central place to review customer contracts, churn data or financial history.
7. Build to sell, even if you never do
You might never sell your company. But if you build it like you will, you'll run it better, and if an unexpected opportunity comes your way, you'll be ready.
Here's the mental shift:
Start acting like a capital allocator, not just an operator.
Document your processes as if you'll hand them off.
Track metrics like a CFO, not just a founder.
If you do that, even unsolicited offers will come in stronger because your business won't just look good; it will be built right.
Related: The 5 Biggest Business Sale Mistakes...
Buyers reward clarity
Most business owners wait too long to clean up their financials or structure their operations. By the time they think about selling, they've already lost leverage.
Don't let that be you.
Build discipline early. Track what matters. Document everything. And design your business to scale without you at the center.
Because when it comes time to sell, buyers won't just look at your revenue.
They'll look at your systems.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fed minutes: Most officials worried about inflation moving higher
Fed minutes: Most officials worried about inflation moving higher

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Fed minutes: Most officials worried about inflation moving higher

WASHINGTON (AP) — Most Federal Reserve officials said last month that the threat of higher inflation was a greater concern than the potential for job losses, leading the central bank to keep its key rate unchanged. According to the minutes of the July 29-30 meeting, released Wednesday, members of the Fed's interest-rate setting committee 'assessed that the effects of higher tariffs had become more apparent in the prices of some goods but that their overall effects on economic activity and inflation remained to be seen.' The minutes underscored the reluctance among the majority of the Fed's 19 policymakers to reduce the central bank's short-term interest rate until they get a clearer sense of the impact of President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs on inflation. So far inflation has crept up in the past couple of months but hasn't risen as much as many economists feared when Trump unveiled some of his duties. The Fed left its key interest rate unchanged last month at about 4.3%, though two members of its governing board dissented in favor of a rate cut. Both dissenters — Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman — were appointed to the board during Trump's first term. At a news conference after the meeting, Chair Jerome Powell signaled that it might take significant additional time for the Fed to determine whether Trump's sweeping tariffs are boosting inflation. When the Fed changes its rate, it often — though not always — affects borrowing costs for mortgages, auto loans, and credit cards. The Fed typically keeps its rate high, or raises it, to cool borrowing and spending and combat inflation. It often cuts its rate to bolster the economy and hiring when growth is cooling. Christopher Rugaber, The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Tech, chip stock sell-off continues as AI bubble fears mount
Tech, chip stock sell-off continues as AI bubble fears mount

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tech, chip stock sell-off continues as AI bubble fears mount

Tech stocks fell for a second day on Wednesday as investors sold off a slew of tech names amid concerns over the sustainability of the AI boom and a recent market rotation away from some of this year's biggest winners. Among the Magnificent Seven Big Tech stocks, Nvidia (NVDA) was down about 0.8%, and Alphabet (GOOGL, GOOG) stock fell about 0.6%. Amazon (AMZN), Apple (AAPL), and Meta (META) shares fell over 1%. Chip stocks Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) and Broadcom (AVGO) dropped more than 2%; Micron (MU) shares plummeted more than 5%. CoreWeave (CRWV), the AI data center company that rents computing power to Microsoft (MSFT) and Meta — making it essentially an AI pure play — also dropped nearly 4%. Palantir (PLTR), a defense tech stock that's seen a major upswing from the AI boom, sank nearly 2%, extending its recent losing streak. The rotation out of AI-linked stocks comes as sentiment soured this week on the market for artificial intelligence, fueled in part by a recent report from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and commentary from OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. Researchers for MIT's Project NANDA authored a report released this week that said 95% of companies it studied are getting no return on AI. The findings of the report were first detailed by Fortune on Monday. That report followed commentary from OpenAI's Altman shortly after the ChatGPT-maker finished out its latest multibillion-dollar funding round, with the CEO telling reporters that he believes there's an AI bubble, a diversion from his prior characterizations. 'When bubbles happen, smart people get overexcited about a kernel of truth,' he said. 'Are we in a phase where investors as a whole are overexcited about AI? My opinion is yes." DA Davidson analyst Gil Luria likened the changing market sentiment to a pendulum. 'This is really just pendulum swinging back,' he told Yahoo Finance on Wednesday. AI stocks have taken off in recent months after a rocky start to the year. A new, cost-effective AI model from Chinese firm DeepSeek released in January cast doubt on the massive sums of money Big Tech was spending to build out AI infrastructure to power the technology — and sent tech stocks tumbling. Two rounds of earnings updates from some of the biggest AI plays in the market and more clarity on Trump's trade policies have since quelled those fears. Investors applauded recent quarterly reports from Big Tech firms Alphabet, Meta, and Amazon, which surpassed Wall Street's expectations as the companies said AI boosted their underlying businesses. That news overrode the fact that those companies also raised their forecasts for spending on AI infrastructure. 'The AI trade was getting so expensive that all it took was some comment from Sam Altman to make the investment community take some profits off the table,' Luria said. Luria added that 'the reality is that AI still has limited applications' beyond consumers talking to AI chatbots and using the tools as a search engine. Some AI bulls, however, maintain faith in the technology's ability to fuel markets to new highs. 'We are still in the early days of the AI Revolution as the use cases are just starting to massively expand as more companies recognize the value creation being driven by a handful of tech companies led by the Godfather of AI [Nvidia CEO] Jensen [Huang] and Nvidia,' wrote Wedbush analyst Dan Ives in a note to investors Wednesday. He added that 'the tech bull cycle will be well intact at least for another 2-3 years given the trillions being spent on AI.' More will be revealed when leading AI chipmaker Nvidia reports its quarterly earnings results after the bell next week on Aug. 27. Laura Bratton is a reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow her on Bluesky @ Email her at

California voters support EV tax incentives, but are wary of sales mandates says poll
California voters support EV tax incentives, but are wary of sales mandates says poll

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

California voters support EV tax incentives, but are wary of sales mandates says poll

California drivers don't want to lose their electric vehicle tax incentives, but even voters in one of the bluest states are wary about reviving plans to phase out gas cars. Voters are split down the middle on whether California should stick to its guns on its Trump-blocked plans to phase out sales of gas cars by 2035, according to an exclusive POLITICO-Citrin Center-Possibility Lab poll. Only 46 percent of the more than 1,400 registered voters surveyed said they support the policy, while 47 percent said no. Yes, there was an obvious partisan split: 60 percent of Democrats said they backed the phase-out, compared with 40 percent of independents and 31 percent of Republicans. But the results offer a note of caution for Gov. Gavin Newsom, who directed the California Air Resources Board to start writing new vehicle emissions rules after Republicans revoked the state's sales mandates for cars and heavy-duty trucks in June. 'None of us really like the idea of government intervening to take something away from us,' said Dan Sperling, a former California Air Resources Board member and director of the University of California, Davis' Institute for Transportation Studies. 'That's even the most liberal of us.' Poll respondents are more bought into Newsom's plan to backfill the soon-to-be-defunct $7,500 federal EV tax credit. Nearly two-thirds — 64 percent — said they would support state-funded tax incentives once the federal subsidy ends Sept. 30, as part of the Trump administration's ongoing attacks on clean energy policy. That question again showed a partisan divide, with 80 percent of Democrats saying they back the approach, compared with 60 percent of independent voters and just 43 percent of Republicans. But the overall result bolsters Newsom's push to backfill incentives that the Biden administration used to coax drivers off fossil fuels, as he suggested using cap-and-trade revenues last year and directed state agencies to consider in a June executive order. But Jack Citrin, a veteran political science professor at UC Berkeley and partner on the poll, said a closer look at the poll results shows that Democrats need to keep affordability in mind. He pointed to the fact that 28 percent of respondents said they'd support new EV incentives only if gas prices aren't impacted and another 20 percent said they should be reserved for low-income buyers, reflecting the fact that cost of living was the top concern of voters polled. And 64 percent of respondents said gasoline prices are putting a significant, extreme or moderate burden on their household budgets. 'That reflects a concern with the cost of all of this,' Citrin said. 'Yes, we're for environmental protection. Yes, we're for all of this, just as long as it doesn't cost a lot.' The poll comes as state agencies released a joint report Tuesday with recommendations for countering Trump's assault, calling on lawmakers to bolster tax incentives, improve charging infrastructure and regulate facilities that attract polluting trucks, but offering few specific timelines or dollar figures. CARB Chair Liane Randolph framed the report — which Newsom asked for in his June order — as a first step in the state's defense against a hostile federal government. 'Clean air efforts are under siege, putting the health of every American at risk,' she said during a press briefing. 'California is continuing to fight back and will not give up on cleaner air and better public health.' Sperling called the report a surprisingly 'modest document,' and said it lacks the specificity he hoped to see. 'The word I would use is disconcerting,' Sperling said when asked about where California stands in its fight against Trump. The POLITICO-Citrin Center-Possibility Lab poll was fielded by TrueDot, the artificial intelligence-accelerated research platform, in collaboration with the Citrin Center and Possibility Lab at UC Berkeley and POLITICO. The public opinion study, made possible in part with support from the California Constitution Center, was conducted in the field between July 28 and Aug. 12. The sample of 1,445 registered voters was selected at random by Verasight, with interviews conducted in English and Spanish, and includes an oversample of Hispanic voters. The modeled error estimate for the full sample is plus or minus 2.6 percent. The policy influencer study was conducted from July 30 to Aug. 11, among 512 subscribers to POLITICO Pro, and the modeled error estimate is plus or minus 3.7 percent. Like this content? Consider signing up for POLITICO's California Climate newsletter.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store