US ex-officer sentenced to prison over Breonna Taylor raid – DW – 07/22/2025
A former Kentucky police officer was sentenced to 33 months in prison on Monday for violating Breonna Taylor's rights during the raid in which she was shot and killed five years ago.
Kentucky police officers shot and killed Taylor, a Black woman, in March 2020 after they used a controversial no-knock warrant at her home.
Taylor's death, along with the murder of George Floyd in Minnesota in May 2020 by a white police officer, sparked racial justice protests across the US and internationally.
Civil rights attorneys for Taylor's family welcomed prison time but had hoped for a tougher sentence.
"While today's sentence is not what we had hoped for — nor does it fully reflect the severity of the harm caused — it is more than what the Department of Justice sought," they said. "That, in itself, is a statement."
The court heard that Taylor and her boyfriend were sleeping when they heard a noise at the door around midnight.
Her boyfriend, believing it to be an intruder, fired his legally-owned gun, wounding a police officer. Police officers then opened fire, killing Taylor.
'A piece of me was taken from me that day," Taylor's mother Tanika Palmer told the court.
Brett Hankison is the only officer to be convicted in connection with the incident.
He fired 10 shots during the raid but didn't hit anyone.
US District Judge Rebecca Grady Jennings said she was "startled" there weren't more people injured during the raid from Hankison's blind shots.
In addition to almost three years in prison, Hankison was also sentenced to three years of supervised release afterwards. The charges against him carried a maximum sentence of life in prison.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The Trump administration's Justice Department had recommended that Hankison be given no additional prison time beyond the one day he spent in jail at the time of his arrest.
"Hankison did not shoot Ms Taylor and is not otherwise responsible for her death," Harmeet Dhillon, the head of the Justice Department's civil rights division, wrote in a rare memo to the judge.
"Hankison did not wound her or anyone else at the scene that day, although he did discharge his duty weapon ten times blindly into Ms Taylor's home."
However, Jennings said this recommendation treated the shooting as "an inconsequential crime" and would minimize the jury's verdict from November, which found Hankison guilty of using excessive force.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
2 days ago
- DW
Iran executes two members of exiled militant group – DW – 07/27/2025
The alleged MEK operatives were convicted of manufacturing and using homemade projectiles to target homes, public buildings, and charitable institutions in Tehran. Iran executed two men accused of working for the dissident organization Mujahideen-e-Khalq (MEK), according to the judiciary's official news outlet, Mizan on Sunday. Mehdi Hassani and Behrouz Ehsani-Eslamloo were found guilty of carrying out attacks on civilian infrastructure on behalf of the exiled opposition group. They were convicted of manufacturing and using homemade projectiles to target homes, public buildings, and charitable institutions in Tehran. The judiciary said they operated from a safe house and filmed their activities for MEK-linked media. "The terrorists, in coordination with MEK leaders, had set up a team house in Tehran, where they built launchers and hand-held mortars in line with the group's goals, fired projectiles heedlessly at citizens, homes, service and administrative facilities, educational and charity centres, and also carried out propaganda and information-gathering activities in support of the MEK," the judiciary report said. Both were found guilty of waging war against God, armed rebellion, and plotting to undermine national security. The Supreme Court had upheld their death sentences. The MEK, a leftist-Islamist group, is designated as a terrorist organization by Iran. The US and the European Union had also labelled it as a terrorist organization until 2012. The MEK opposes the Islamic Republic in Iran, even as its leadership operates in exile. According to human rights groups, Iran ranks second in the world in enforcing capital punishment. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
DW
3 days ago
- DW
Leading Pakistan rights group decries government crackdown – DW – 07/26/2025
One of Pakistan's most prominent civil rights organizations has said it faces intimidation and harassment from authorities, warning of a widespread threat to rights advocacy in the country. The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP), an independent civil rights group, has warned that its operations are being affected due to pressure from Pakistani authorities. "In the past few months, HRCP has faced a series of arbitrary, illegal and unjustified actions that have impeded the organization's ability to carry out its mandate," the commission said in a statement released earlier in July. Harris Khalique, HRCP's secretary-general, told DW that the group has been facing "unprecedented pressure." "Authorities prevent us from organizing events and create disruptions. They have sealed the HRCP's Lahore office, frozen our bank accounts, claiming it is involved in commercial activities, and have blocked our electricity meters while issuing inflated bills," he said. Events organized in various cities were obstructed, and staff received threatening phone calls warning them against discussing topics considered sensitive. "We are against both violence and militancy. Individuals claiming to represent security agencies, along with those identifying as officials from the Interior Ministry, are threatening our female staff," said Khalique. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The HRCP was co-founded in 1987 by late lawyer and activist Asma Jahangir, former Supreme Court Justice Dorab Patel and former Air Force Chief of Staff Zafar Chaudhry. It has since grown into Pakistan's leading human rights organization. The HRCP has consistently acted as an independent and credible advocate for civil liberties, both within Pakistan and on the global stage. Amid pressure from authorities, the HRCP has voiced significant concern regarding the increasingly shrinking space for human rights advocacy in Pakistan. The security situation in Pakistan has deteriorated in recent years, with militant attacks occurring regularly. In the southwest, security forces are engaged in a long-standing conflict with Baloch separatist militants. Pakistan's foremost opposition party, Imran Khan's Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), was not allowed to contest the 2024 election as a party, resulting in violent protests and a crackdown on its members and supporters. Khan remains imprisoned on various charges, which his party has said are politically motivated. The government has denied pressuring the HRCP, and says it is taking measures to ensure security. "The standard operating procedures are in place for events due to security concerns and there are ongoing protests in the country. We have put no restrictions on freedom of expression, " Talal Chaudhry, state minister of interior, told DW. Chaudhry added that "online events are also being conducted without any limitations, and the state is not restricting them." But Hina Jilani, a human rights advocate and member of the HRCP's council, disputes this claim. "The government is employing tactics to silence the group activities. Our events are being obstructed and there are efforts to introduce laws that could impact our finances, hindering our ability to carry out the work," she told DW. Jilani cited two examples of the government placing bureaucratic hurdles that prevented an HRCP community outreach event from taking place in the northern Gilgit-Baltistan region, and a roundtable discussion in Islamabad focused on the human rights situation in northwestern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and southwestern Balochistan province. Jilani said the government crackdown threatens the "HRCP's autonomy and poses a significant risk to the human rights of the people of Pakistan." The human rights situation in Pakistan remains marked by inadequate judicial protection and rising authoritarianism. According to Amnesty International's 2024 report on Pakistan, authorities "weaponized laws" on defamation and hate speech as the security situation deteriorated amid militant attacks. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Amnesty cited dozens of examples of legal measures to suppress opposition parties, particularly targeting Imran Khan's PTI following protests in May 2023. More than 80 people were imprisoned in connection with the protests after "secret trials." Freedom of the press and freedom of assembly have also been severely curtailed. "Enforced disappearances continued unabated, targeting journalists, activists, students, comedians, political opponents and families of political opponents," the Amnesty report said. In 2024, Pakistan's democracy ranking fell six places, placing it among the "top 10 worst performers" in the Democracy Index released by the Economist Intelligence Unit. Independent media outlets are facing increasing pressure, censorship and economic hardship. Social media platforms are often restricted during protests or political events. "Pakistan has become a completely authoritarian regime, there are no courts, there is no media, they have broken the civil society," Imaan Mazari, a rights activist and lawyer, told DW. "The human rights situation in Pakistan is deplorable and effectively we are living in a martial law," she added. However, HRCP leader Khalique remains optimistic and said the commission will continue its work and "persist in efforts to advocate for the rights of the people of Pakistan." On pressure from the government, Khalique said he hopes for more cooperation in the future. "We are critical friends, not adversaries, and we aspire for a healthy society and a strong country," he said. "We are an independent organization that strives to remain neutral and evidence based. We cannot compromise our integrity." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
DW
3 days ago
- DW
Ghislaine Maxwell questioned on Epstein case – DW – 07/26/2025
Ghislaine Maxwell, former girlfriend and accomplice of Jeffrey Epstein, answered every question posed by the Justice Department, her lawyer said. Meanwhile, US President Trump faces questions from his MAGA supporters. The US Justice Department's deputy chief, Todd Blanche, finished questioning Ghislaine Maxwell at a courthouse in Florida on Friday. The former girlfriend and accomplice of sex offender Jeffrey Epstein was jailed in 2022 for grooming underage girls between 1994 and 2004. She is currently serving a 20-year prison sentence following a conviction for child sex trafficking. Epstein died in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. He had previously been convicted of soliciting prostitution from a minor. His death was ruled a suicide. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Maxwell was questioned for one and a half days, though Blanche did not give specific details about the conversations. Maxwell's lawyer, David Oscar Markus, told reporters discussions addressed "every possible thing you could imagine" and that Maxwell answered questions "about 100 different people." "She answered those questions honestly, truthfully, to the best of her ability," Markus said, adding that the Justice Department made no offers of clemency for Maxwell's cooperation. Maxwell is the only former associate of Epstein to be charged. According to Markus, she still plans to appeal her conviction to the Supreme Court, describing her as a "scapegoat." Blanche, a former personal attorney for US President Donald Trump, stated on social media that he will share more information "at the appropriate time." Trump's past friendship with Epstein has been attracting a lot of attention over the past week. On Wednesday, the(WSJ) reported that Trump contributed to a letter for Epstein's 50th birthday in 2003. The US newspaper also reported that Attorney General Pam Bondi had made Trump aware that his name appeared multiple times in Epstein's files. Trump denies knowledge of this and is now suing the WSJ for defamation. He also said Bondi never informed him that his name was in the files. "No, I was never — never briefed, no," Trump said. "I have nothing to do with the guy," Trump told reporters before going to Scotland on Friday. Trump said journalists should instead "focus" on other people who he claimed were "really close friends" with Epstein. There are, however, several photos showing Trump and Epstein together at social gatherings. "You're making a very big thing over something that's not a big thing," Trump told reporters. When asked about pardoning Maxwell, Trump said that while he's allowed to do it, it's something he "hasn't thought about." Epstein, a multi-millionaire, was accused of procuring underage girls for sex. His death in custody fueled conspiracy theories that he was murdered to prevent him from testifying against prominent accomplices. Earlier this month, the Trump administration said it would not be releasing more files related to the Epstein case, despite earlier promises by Bondi and Trump himself. He's asked his followers to "forget" about the files. The DOJ and the FBI said there was no proof that a list of Epstein's clients exists and reaffirmed that Epstein died by suicide. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
