
‘Law doesn't recognise marital rape's concept': Delhi HC quashes Section 377 case against husband
NEW DELHI: Saying the law doesn't recognise the concept of
marital rape
,
Delhi High Court
has quashed an order directing prosecution of a man for performing "unnatural" sex with his wife.
The court noted Section 377 of IPC penalising such acts won't apply in a marital relationship particularly when the allegation of consent was missing.
Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma was dealing with the man's plea against a trial court order which directed framing of Section 377 (punishment for unnatural offences) charge against him for allegedly performing
oral sex
with his wife.
The verdict said the law did not recognise the concept of marital rape. "There is no basis to assume that a husband would not be protected from prosecution under Section 377 of IPC, in view of exception 2 to Section 375 of IPC since the law (amended Section 375 of IPC) now presumes implied consent for sexual intercourse as well as sexual acts, including anal or oral intercourse within a marital relationship," it said.
The high court noted the wife did not specifically allege if the act was performed against her will or without her consent.
"The essential ingredient of lack of consent - central to constituting an offence under Section 377 of IPC post-Navtej Singh Johar (case) between any two adults - is clearly missing. Thus, there is not only a lack of prima facie case, but even the threshold of strong suspicion is not met," the court said.
The top court in the Navtej verdict de-criminalised consensual sex among adults, including those from the same sex.
"No prima facie case is made out against the petitioner for the offence under Section 377 of IPC. The impugned order directing the framing of charge is, therefore, unsustainable in law and is liable to be set aside," the court added. PTI
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
Prajwal Revanna gets life imprisonment in 1st of 3 rape cases
Prajwal Revanna BENGALURU: A special court on Saturday sentenced former MP Prajwal Revanna to life imprisonment. The verdict was pronounced a day after the former parliamentarian from Hassan was found guilty of repeatedly raping his 47-year-old domestic help. Of the three rape cases and one sexual harassment case against Prajwal, this is the first to go to trial and reach a verdict. The 34-year-old grandson of former Prime Minister HD Deve Gowda was once seen as a rising political star of the JD(S) first family. Special Judge Santosh Gajanan Bhat announced the punishment in a packed court hall around 4.30 pm. With his head down, Prajwal listened to the judge as he detailed the quantum of punishment under different sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). He was visibly shattered upon hearing the sentence. Later, he silently walked out of the court hall. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru In the first part of the day, Justice Bhat heard the arguments of the special public prosecutors as well as the counsel for Prajwal, who was found guilty under eight IPC sections. Among them, IPC 376 (2) (K) (being in a position of control or dominance over a woman, committing rape on such a woman) and 376 (2) (N) (committing rape repeatedly on the same woman) resulted in life imprisonment. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is this legal? Access all TV channels without a subscription! Techno Mag Learn More Undo Police found it difficult to escort Prajwal out of the jam-packed court hall, with advocates, mediapersons, and others present. According to special public prosecutor Ashok Nayak, Prajwal can appeal the sentence in high court. Rs 11.3 lakh will have to be paid to survivor The court also imposed a fine of ₹11.6 lakh on Prajwal, of which, ₹11.25 lakh will have to be paid to the survivor as compensation. He can make a plea for suspension of the sentence first. If the court upholds the sentence, then Prajwal can appeal for reduction in the punishment. However, if the high court rejects both, then he may knock on the doors of Supreme Court,' special public prosecutor Ashok Nayak said. Apart from IPC 376 (2) (K) and and 376 (2) (N), the other sections under which Prajwal was found guilty and punished include: IPC 354A (sexual harassment; three years' rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs 25,000); IPC 354B (assault or use of criminal force on any woman; seven years' rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs 50,000); IPC 354C (voyeurism; three years' rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs 25,000); IPC 506 (criminal intimidation; two years' rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs 10,000); IPC 201 (tampering of evidence; three years' rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs 25,000); Section 66 of Information Technology Act (three years' rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs 25,000). DKS: Why BJP leaders not talking about it? Declining to comment on the conviction, deputy CM DK Shivakumar said the reactions of JD(S) and BJP functionaries were more important than his.'You should ask for the reactions of JD(S) and BJP leaders than asking for my comments. They have to tell us what is right and what is wrong. We respect the law and abide by it. Why are BJP leaders, including CT Ravi, Ashoka and Narayanaswamy, not talking about this?' Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !


The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
Delhi Police bans use of aerial platforms ahead of Independence Day celebrations
The order said that such aerial platforms may pose a threat to public safety, VIPs, and critical installations in Delhi during the sensitive period around August 15. This is Singh's first order as the new Delhi Police Commissioner. According to the order, flying aerial devices such as paragliders, para-motors, hang-gliders, UAVs (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles), UASs (Unmanned Aircraft Systems), microlight aircraft, hot air balloons, small-sized powered aircraft, quadcopters, and remotely piloted aircraft has been banned under Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. New Delhi, Aug 2 (PTI) Delhi Police Commissioner SBK Singh on Saturday ordered a ban on sub-conventional aerial platforms across the national capital from August 2 to August 16 in view of security preparations related to the upcoming Independence Day. The ban is aimed at preventing their possible misuse by anti-social and terrorist elements, including for para-jumping or launching airborne attacks. The prohibition will remain in force for 15 days, starting from August 2 and ending on August 16, unless withdrawn earlier, the order said. Security agencies are already on high alert across the capital as preparations for the 78th Independence Day event at the Red Fort are underway. PTI SSJ SKY SKY SKY SKY This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.


The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
Shop owner shot at by former tenant in southeast Delhi
A former tenant allegedly opened fire outside Qibla Perfumes, which is run by Furkan (32), and his two brothers, Waseem (33) and Abdul Khalid (30), police said. After being hit with bullets on Friday, he was immediately rushed to AIIMS Trauma Centre, where he is undergoing treatment, an officer said. New Delhi, Aug 2 (PTI) A shop owner was shot at by a group of men in southeast Delhi's Nizamuddin area, police said on Saturday, adding that they have made two arrests in the case. According to officials, the victim and his brothers had recently asked Ehsaan to vacate a shop he had rented. He complied about 15 days ago, and the firing is suspected to be related to that dispute. A PCR call regarding the firing was received at the Nizamuddin police station at 10.08 pm on Friday. Preliminary inquiry revealed that around 10 pm, their former tenant, Ehsaan, arrived at the shop along with a few associates and began a quarrel with Waseem, police said. During the altercation, one of the accused pulled out a firearm and fired three rounds. Furkan suffered an injury to his leg during the incident. 'A case was registered under sections 109(1) (attempt to murder) and 3(5) (joint liability) of the BNS and relevant sections of the Arms Act on August 2 has been registered and investigation has been taken up,' Deputy Commissioner of Police (Southeast) Hemant Tiwari said. He added that two accused have been apprehended and one of these two has fired upon the victim as confirmed by the CCTV footage. 'None of these two have any previous involvement. Few other accused are still at large. Efforts are underway to apprehend them,' the officer said. An inspection of the crime scene led to the recovery of three empty cartridges and two live rounds, police said. PTI SSJ SKY SKY SKY This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.