
Opinion: We bought a new car with cash, and the salesman wasn't happy
The salesman was friendly and helpful… until close to the end of our transaction. For whatever reason, the most crucial part of the sale had not been discussed – how we were paying for the £28,000 car. It was presumed by said salesman that we would put down a deposit, make monthly payments for three years, then either hand it back or make a balloon payment. And I do get it. Finance is how most cars are 'bought' in this country, because finding a five-figure sum of money is not exactly easy.
But I've never liked the idea of being on a constant hamster wheel of returning a car after three years, getting a new one, being in an endless trap with the manufacturer. We'd saved hard for the car, topped up alongside a lump sum my wife had, with the idea being, we'd have it for at least 10 years as we'd look after it (we're seven years and 60,000 miles in – we've never had a major problem). We're also not flashy in the least – we're not bothered by material things, and just wanted a safer, bigger car, that's reliable and would suit a growing family.
My thought process: that's £2,800 a year, or £233 per month for a decade to own the car, and that's excluding what we eventually get back for selling it on, which will shave a good chunk out of the above calculation. So back to the dealership. We said we were cash buyers, could we have a discount? And I can still picture his face dropping.
He tried to persuade us to take finance, stating that the value of the car will drop as soon as we drove it off the forecourt. It's a funny business buying a new car isn't it – where else in life are we told an item will lose a chunk of value a minute after owning it? We were insistent. He was insistent. And I remember coming away thinking: 'I wonder if he would earn commission on a cash sale, like he would car finance?'
What has transpired since from the car finance scandal is... probably not. He was clearly upset we'd decided not to finance the car through the in-house lender and his whole demeanour changed. As mentioned, I know we're in the minority here, not many can afford to fork out such a large sum upfront. But it highlights to me how rife pushy salespeople trying to squeeze as much money out of buyers on personal contract purchase (PCP) and hire purchase (HP) deals probably was.
We've now had the Supreme Court ruling on 'mis-sold' car finance deals. As many as 6.6million people unwittingly signed up to a discretionary commission arrangement (DCA) between 2007 and 2021 – where they paid more in loan interest than they should have done, in a ruse which bumped up the commission salesmen could earn. What we can learn from this is: keep all paperwork, read contracts and terms and conditions with a fine-toothed comb, and never expect a salesperson to act in your best interest.
There are also other ways to finance a car, such as taking out a personal loan, so it's vital to assess all options, not just be smooth-talked into an option that suits a company more than you as the customer. If you think you may have been unfairly treated, ignore the claims management firms and read this instead: How to work out if YOU can claim £950 from the car finance scandal - and what to do if you can't find the paperwork It appears this kind of behaviour was rampant for more than a decade and while it won't lead to the £44billlion worst-case scenario payout for lenders, it is still expected to cost them a huge £18billion.
If you bought a car on finance in those 14 years, it is quite likely you paid more than you should have. Buying a car outright worked for us. It might not for you, but fingers crossed we'll have it for another 10 years, with one careful owner – and no shady underhand commission tactics lurking under the bonnet.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
Eddie Howe shares update on Isak following talks about star's future
Newcastle manager Eddie Howe has indicated that striker Alexander Isak is unlikely to feature in the Premier League season opener against Aston Villa. Isak, who was the subject of a rejected £110m bid from Liverpool, has been training separately and has expressed a desire to explore his options. Howe admitted that the club cannot simply refuse to sell Isak, despite valuing him closer to £150m, and acknowledged the situation has unsettled the squad. Newcastle has experienced a challenging transfer window, missing out on several key targets, which has led to speculation regarding the Saudi Public Investment Fund's engagement. Howe firmly denied any disengagement from the club's owners, assuring that they remain fully committed to the project.


BBC News
20 minutes ago
- BBC News
North Somerset librarians told not to express views on cuts
Librarians have been asked not to express their views on cuts to the service while at work or within a libraries run by North Somerset Council are under threat of reduced hours and three have been earmarked for closure. The move comes after the council announced it was axing its annual spending on libraries by £ asked why librarians were being told not to talk to journalists about the cuts, North Somerset Council said librarians were just following the standard practice. The council told the Local Democracy Reporting Service: "Library staff are also free to express their own personal views on the library consultation, but we have politely requested this does not take place within a library building or within working hours so 'business as usual' is not disrupted."If they wish to comment, they should respond as a member of the public rather than as a staff member as any 'council' interviews should come from the library service's cabinet member."Worle Library, Pill Library and Winscombe Library are all under threat of closure under the plans, although one library in either Pill or Winscombe could be kept voted in February to cut £433k from the libraries budget as the council tries to make £44m of savings across the next three years to balance its budget. They will vote in February 2026 on the specific actions to achieve that cut, which could be implemented between summer 2026 and September 2028.A consultation on how to make the cuts is open until October 24.


The Sun
20 minutes ago
- The Sun
Full list of 33 River Island shops SHUTTING as mass restructuring approved by the court
A STAGGERING 33 River Island stores will be putting the shutters down after a huge restructuring bid was approved by the courts. The court's approval was a lifeline to the beleaguered company, though the fate of 71 stores still hangs in the balance. 2 River Island has been battling with soaring debt in recent years and, like many high street brands, has been struggling to stay open. In a desperate attempt to survive, the company announced a restructuring plan which will see a whopping 33 stores closed across the UK. Locations in major UK cities including Edinburgh, Leeds, Oxford, Brighton and Perth are all expected to close. The axed sites will remain open until January 2026, as River Island desperately tries to make the most of peak trading times. The company has 250 stores across the country and an estimated total of 5,500 employees. It is hoped that the restructure will guarantee the safety of at least 140 stores out of that total. The plan, put forward by PWC, prohibited River Island from trading and ensured that it would be 'subject to administration or other insolvency proceedings', in the event that it didn't get approved. Ben Lewis, CEO of River Island, said: "We are pleased that River Island's restructuring plan has been approved by the High Court. "We have a clear transformation strategy to ensure the long-term viability of the business, and this decision gives us a strong platform to deliver this. "Recent improvements in our fashion offer and shopping experience are starting to show results, and the restructuring plan will enable us to align our store estate to our customers' needs. River Island confirms which 33 stores are shutting as a further 70 at risk in huge shake-up – is your local going? "We are grateful to our suppliers, landlords and other stakeholders for their constructive engagement and shared confidence in River Island's future." However, despite the huge cash injection about to be pumped into River Island, the fate of an additional 71 stores is still uncertain. After failing to get landlord approval for rent reduction at the 71 stores, the recent court decision could turn the tide for River Island. Michelle Quinn, partner at Grosvenor Law, said: "Absent any successful appeal, the landlords will now be subject to what is called a 'cross-class cram down' meaning that the restructuring plan will be imposed on them despite their objections." River Island stores set to close These are the 33 stores River Island has already earmarked for closure... Beckton Bangor Bloomfield Wrexham Edinburgh Princes Street Hereford Surrey Quays Didcot Sutton Coldfield Aylesbury Burton-Upon-Trent Northwich Taunton Workington Falkirk Cumbernauld Kirkcaldy Gloucester Hartlepool Brighton Lisburn Norwich Oxford Poole Kilmarnock Hanley Barnstaple Grimsby Leeds Birstall Park Rochdale Great Yarmouth St Helens Stockton-on-Tees Perth All of these stores are set to stay open until January 2026 to make the most of peak trading. That means the rent reductions could be enforced anyway. In late 2023, River Island revealed that it had made pre-tax losses of a staggering £33.2 million. In 2024, its turnover plummeted to £517.8 million - a reduction of 19 per cent. 2