
A pig's head and decapitated rats: a new era of intimidation dawns for journalists in Indonesia
Instead, it contained a stinking, mutilated pigs head.
'I was shocked, I cried, and was immediately evacuated by some of my friends,' said Francisca, 'I was worried this terror would hurt my family.'
The grisly gift was the first in a series of threats aimed at Tempo media in the past week, in what is being seen as a new low amid increasing intimidation of journalists in the world's third-largest democracy.
First it was the pig's head, with its ears cut off. Days later, six decapitated rats wrapped in rose-adorned paper were sent to Tempo's Jakarta office.
Online, there was a steady stream of harassment. 'Are there enough pig heads? If not I can send more,' wrote one menacing user on Tempo's Instagram account.
The threats have in turn led to criticism of the leadership of ex-special forces commander turned president, Prabowo Subianto. Asked to comment on the pig's head threat, presidential spokesperson Hasan Nasbi initially suggested the Tempo journalist 'just cook it'.
Hasan later clarified his remarks, saying that Indonesia remained committed to upholding press freedom, as guaranteed by Indonesian law. The police were investigating, he added, and the human rights minister had visited Tempo's office.
Francisca was also doxed, and her mother's phone hijacked, while a relative received strange, threatening phone calls.
Tempo, one of Indonesia's most critical media organisations, is no stranger to threats. During the decades-long reign of former authoritarian ruler Suharto, its weekly magazine was twice banned.
'Bombs, doxing, hijacking of phone numbers. We have had so many threats in the past,' said Bagja Hidayat, Tempo's deputy editor in chief, contemplating the changing nature of the scare tactics used against its journalists.
'But now it's very physical. For the first time animals and organs have been used as messengers … It's very scary.'
The threats, said Bagja, were also menacingly symbolic. In the world's largest Muslim-majority nation, pork is considered haram. The six rats, he said, appeared directed at the six hosts of Tempo's hit podcast, Bocor Alus Politik, which does not shy away from discussing sensitive political issues.
Francisca is one of the hosts, and the only woman among them.
Recently, she has written about electoral and judicial scandals, and the controversial revision of the military law. 'This terror is related to my writing,' she said, 'I often produce coverage that criticises the government.'
The attacks come weeks after Prabowo publicly stated that some elements of the media had been infiltrated by 'foreign interests' intent on destroying the nation.
Tempo's Bagja says there is no clarity on who is behind the recent threats, but police are investigating.
Inaugurated in October, Prabowo – a former special forces commander dismissed from the military amid allegations of rights abuses for which he has always denied wrongdoing – is wary of the press.
During his election campaign he avoided all but a handful of interviews, and days before the vote was the only presidential candidate to skip an event where candidates pledged their commitment to uphold press freedom.
Ross Tapsell, an expert on Indonesian media at the Australian National University, said the case was a test for Prabowo government. 'A flippant or nonchalant response will signal that journalists are legitimate targets of attacks,' he said.
'The incident is also important in the context of worsening attacks on female journalists in southeast Asia, where hyper-masculine, military-leaning leadership encourages more overt displays of misogyny.'
Indonesia's Alliance of Independent Journalists (AJI) condemned the attack, which it described as a 'symbolic death threat', and one that undermined the public's right to quality news.
The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) described the threats as a 'dangerous and deliberate act of intimidation'.
'Tempo is well-known internationally for its fiercely independent reporting; using this playbook from autocrats elsewhere simply will not work,' said CPJ's Asia program coordinator Beh Lih Yi. 'President Prabowo Subianto must uphold press freedom and condemn this highly provocative act if he wants Indonesia to be taken seriously as the world's third-largest democracy.'
But some damage has already been done.
Some reporters are scared, admitted Tempo's deputy editor in chief, while other media outlets have started to self-censor, he said.
Goenawan Mohamad, founder of Tempo magazine, described the recent threats as a 'sign of cowardice'.
Referring to the movement that began after the fall of Suharto in 1998 he said: 'Today, thanks to Reformasi you can't ban a newspaper. But it will be interesting to see if there is any move from the regime to review the press law.'
Last year the government, then led by former president Joko Widodo, mulled revising another relevant law, proposed revision of the broadcast law that would have banned 'exclusive investigative journalism'. Amid vociferous outcry, the government backtracked.
Since the fall of Suharto, Indonesia has enjoyed a dynamic and free press, arguably the freest and most independent in South-east Asia.
Reporters like Francisca want to keep it that way. 'I want to say to all female journalists: don't be afraid of intimidation, because those who intimidate are actually those who are afraid of the truth.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
an hour ago
- The National
BBC accused of 'building consent for genocide' at Glasgow protest
Campaign groups Mothers Against Genocide Scotland and Scotland for Palestine organised the demonstration in response to the news at the weekend that Israel targeted and killed six journalists in Gaza, including a prominent Al Jazeera reporter who had previously been threatened by Israel. Campaigners accused the BBC of "being complicit in the genocide" as they banged pots and pans outside the corporation's Pacific Quay building on Monday evening. (Image: Fraz @fraz1409, via Instagram) (Image: Fraz @fraz1409, via Instagram) Activists could also be seen holding a cardboard press vest – protective gear worn by the media in Gaza – inscribed with the names of Palestinian journalists who have been killed by Israel. (Image: Fraz @fraz1409, via Instagram) There was also a sign which read "BBC: Bought, Biased, Complicit". (Image: Fraz @fraz1409, via Instagram) The National reported how six journalists, including Al Jazeera correspondent Anas al-Sharif – one of the network's most well-known journalists – were killed in an Israeli strike on Sunday evening. The other journalists who were killed were Al Jazeera correspondent Mohammed Qreiqeh and camera operators Ibrahim Zaher and Mohammed Noufal, as well as freelance journalists Moamen Aliwa and Mohammad al-Khaldi. Israel's military confirmed killing al-Sharif, alleging he was with Hamas – an accusation Al Jazeera has denied. READ MORE: Monarchists fume over Nicola Sturgeon remarks on late Queen and Prince William According to the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), a non-profit organisation based in New York, 192 journalists have been killed since the start of the conflict on October 7, 2023. At least 184 of those journalists were Palestinians killed by Israel. The CPJ added that the attack on Sunday raises the number of Al Jazeera journalists killed by Israel since October 7, 2023 to 11. The organisers behind Monday's demonstration accused the BBC of "building consent for genocide" in its reporting on Israel's brutal assault on Gaza. It comes after a landmark report from the Centre for Media Monitoring (CfMM) showed "a pattern of bias, double standards and silencing of Palestinian voices" in the BBC's coverage of Israel's assault on Gaza. The report also found that the BBC gave Israeli deaths 33 times more coverage per fatality, despite Gaza suffering 34 times more casualties than Israel. Further, the broadcaster was found to have interrupted or dismissed claims of genocide more than 100 times – while only 3% of articles analysed by the CfMM used the terms "war crimes" in relation to Israeli violence against Palestinians. Mothers Against Genocide Scotland, one of the organisers behind the protest, take part in pot banging demonstrations at more than 20 locations across the country. Made up of parents and children, the group was inspired to take action after Palestinian journalist Bisan Owda urged people around the world to bang pots to highlight Israel's forced starvation of Palestinians in Gaza. READ MORE: Disgraced Prince Andrew should be stripped of all royal titles, UK voters say A spokesperson for Mothers Against Genocide told The National: "The murder of these journalists made us decide to target the BBC building for the pot banging last night. "Sadly, the BBC's editorial line keeps parroting the Israeli excuses for these war crimes and, in doing so, seeks to diminish the murders or pour doubt on those who have been murdered. "This illustrates how the media is complicit through its reporting and how the BBC builds consent for genocide. "As parents, we can't idly sit by and watch war crimes, including the collective punishment of men, women and children, continue to be misrepresented on our media." Fraz, a pro-Palestine activist who attended the protest, told The National: "It's a gut punch every time you hear about yet more Palestinian journalists being targeted by Israel. The tactic is clear, so silence any news coming out of Gaza to hide the atrocities. "This is bad enough, then you have globally respected media bodies like the BBC who further help to suppress and distort the news through lack of coverage or simply prioritising Israel over Palestine." The BBC was contacted for comment.


Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Vigilante cyclist who pushed his bike into a car he was trying to stop at ‘no entry' sign makes bizarre excuse
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A VIGILANTE cyclist who filmed himself pushing his bike into a car to stop it driving down a 'no entry' road has given a bizarre excuse. Footage posted by Michael van Erp, known as Cycling Mikey, shows him getting into a heated exchange with the motorist on Sunday. 5 Mikey's bike was smashed out of the way Credit: Cycling Mikey 5 The motorist ignores the flimsy roadblock and accelerates along the road anyway Credit: Instagram / CyclingMikey 5 Despite being confronted by the vigilante, the driver keeps trying to sneak down Credit: Cycling Mikey The video, posted on his Youtube channel, shows the 52-year-old initially blocking the Fiat 500 from driving down the road. Due to roadworks, the road appears to be reduced to a one way street, with traffic cones and signs telling drivers not to enter it. Despite being confronted by the vigilante, the driver keeps trying to sneak down Paddenswick Road in Hammersmith, west London. It is at this point the brazen vigilante cyclist tries to block the driver's path by throwing his bike in his path. The motorist ignores the flimsy roadblock and accelerates along the road anyway, smashing into the bicycle in the process. Responding to critics of his extreme actions today, Cycling Mikey gave a bizarre excuse for not stopping his bike. Writing on X, he claimed that he 'couldn't… brake a 28kg e-bike once I realised the driver wasn't stopping'. Footage of the confrontation between the road safety warrior and the driver was filmed by Mikey and a bystander. The Dutch vigilante is then left to pick up his possessions from the tarmac after unsuccessfully stopping the motorist. Prior to the smash, Mikey can be heard in the clip saying: "What is that sign back there? You have to go back now, very naughty.' Shouting at another driver who attempts to drive through the one-way street, he says: "No f*** off, go back. "What do you think you're doing? Go back." Moment dog walker 'pushes cyclist into canal' - but claims HE'S in the right The Met confirmed they were aware of the footage and urged Cycling Mikey to speak with officers. A spokesperson for the force said: 'We are aware of footage circulating on social media which appears to show an incident on Paddenswick Road, Hammersmith on Sunday August 10. 'No arrests have been made at this stage. 'We urge victims of crime to contact the police by calling 101, or 999 in an emergency.' Cycling Mikey has made a name for himself by filming motorists breaking the rules of the road and reporting them. On his social media, he claims to have reported more than 2,000 drivers in the space of six years. Since 2019, he says motorists have paid a total of £165,700 in fines and received 2,649 penalty points due to his actions. He also claims 35 people have been disqualified from driving. Last year, footage showed him cruising along the road before he caught a woman red-handed using her phone behind the wheel. She can be seen winding the window down as Mikey explains what she's done wrong. The woman then says how she's a doctor and explains it's a very "difficult job". Mikey then appears to consider letting the woman off the hook before he asks her if she already has points. But then when she admits she does he replies: "I'm starting to think you're someone not learning from the points system." In 2020, he videoed Guy Ritchie texting while behind the wheel of his Range Rover The exchange led to the film director being banned from driving for six months, as he already had nine speeding points. He also caught Chris Eubank on the phone in 2021, with the former world champion boxer telling him: 'Go away. Off you go, off you go.' Eubank was handed three penalty points and fined £280 in costs because he jumped a red light having driven away from van Erp. As well as his YouTube site, van Erp also uploads footage to a police website which is set up for citizen reporting. 5 Cycling Mikey has made a name for himself catching drivers breaking the rules Credit: Cycling Mikey


New Statesman
4 hours ago
- New Statesman
Palestine Action and the radicalisation of grandma
Demonstrators attend a pro-Palestine Action protest on Saturday 9 August. Photo byLast weekend (9-10 August), the Metropolitan Police arrested more than 500 people on Parliament Square for displaying signs supportive of Palestine Action, a group the government has recently categorised as a proscribed terror organisation. One of the things that has led coverage of these mass arrests is the average age of those involved: of the 519 people who provided the police with a date of birth, just under half were over 60, with 15 octogenarians detained. On my Instagram feed, among the blur of holiday pictures, a video of a woman in her sixties or seventies being carried across the grass plays again and again. 'That could be your grandma,' an offscreen voice tells the police who are carrying her. Surprise at protesters' ages led several BBC bulletins and the coverage of various newspapers. This angle suggests that Palestine Action's supporters were formed of a novel demographic composition. But this is not a silent cohort at last moved to action, some slumbering conscience of the nation. The old maids haven't ditched their bikes mid-misty cycle to Holy Communion to rush to Parliament Square and get arrested for terror-related offences. Or if they have, it shouldn't surprise us: these statistics describe no more than the demographic in the United Kingdom that does politics. People of every age have political beliefs, of course, and polling can tell you that the young are more concerned about events in Gaza, or more sympathetic to Jeremy Corbyn's new party, than the old. Age (along with education level) is a good predictor of political opinion, but it's a less useful metric when you consider not what people are thinking about politics but who is actually doing it. The average age of the Labour Party membership after the surge when Corbyn was elected leader was 51. Councillors are the base unit of political activism in this country, and only 16 per cent of them are under 45 (on average, they're 60). More than half of trade union representatives are over 50, and anyone who has ever run a local Labour branch knows that retired public-sector workers are the party's most dogged foot soldiers. I'm sure the same goes for the Conservative Party and retired private-sector workers, or the Liberal Democrats and retired biologists who play the French horn. Politics is an old person's game. I spent much of this year writing a book about the anti-Brexit movement – a serious political force between 2017 and 2019 – and arguably Britain's biggest protest movement since the campaign against the war in Iraq. The People's Vote marches – lampooned as the 'longest Waitrose queue in history' – pulled in hundreds of thousands. Its base was what you'd expect. A survey of Remain activists by the political scientists Adam Fagan and Stijn van Kessel found 87 per cent were 45 or older, with 41 per cent over 65. Part of the reason for all of this engagement, of course, is simply free time: whether you're becoming a councillor or standing outside parliament with Steve Bray every Wednesday, retired or retiring people generally have more of it than younger people. But when it comes to protest that brings with it significant legal jeopardy – such as that undertaken by the Palestine Action protesters – we can think a little more deeply than 'they have the time'. While the Extinction Rebellion protests were cross-generational, over-65s were over-represented among post-protest defendants. A criminal record is not damaging to the prospects and future of a retiree who is more likely to own their home outright in the way it is to a 21-year-old who is likely to rent. As with anti-Brexit protesters who talked about rights they enjoyed being taken from their grandchildren, older people who took the legal risk over climate protests often did so with inter-generational fairness on their minds. A similar calculation played out this weekend. All of this protesting and activism is downstream from the most important bit of political engagement that older people reliably do at much higher rates than younger people – vote. One can post up a storm about youthquakes and Gen-Z radicalism, but in assessments of activity rather than of disposition, it's the old who are more relevant and more engaged, in all kinds of ways. Our political system acknowledges this – two-child limit, acceptable; winter fuel means test, unacceptable – but culturally it's not something we seem to grasp. That the political activist in our collective mind's eye looks more like Phoebe Plummer, the 23-year-old Van Gogh soup-thrower, than Alice Oswald, the 58-year-old poet who was among the Palestine Action arrestees, is one of our many national failures of perception. It is probably helpful for Palestine Action's supporters that we have a media environment that tends to take the concerns of people with grey hair more seriously than those with pink. But who actually does politics is a fact of public life that Government strategists would do well to reckon with, instead of doubling-down on the 'hippy-punching' stance that got it into this mess in the first place. That could be your grandma; and she definitely votes. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe [See also: Palestine Action and the distortion of terrorism] Related