Ukrainian Journalist Tortured, Had Organs Removed In Russian Custody: Report
Summary is AI generated, newsroom reviewed.
Ukrainian journalist Viktoriia Roshchyna was found dead after being captured by Russian forces, suffering extensive torture. Her body showed signs of an autopsy and missing organs, raising suspicions of war crimes.
A recent investigation by media organisations has shed light on the tragic death of Ukrainian journalist Viktoriia Roshchyna, who was captured by Russian forces in 2023 while reporting on the illegal detention and torture of Ukrainians in the occupied region of Zaporizhzhia.
According to a forensic examination of her body, Roshchyna, 27, suffered extensive torture and ill-treatment, including "abrasions and hemorrhages on various parts of the body, a broken rib, neck injuries, and possible electric shock marks on her feet," as described by Yuriy Belousov, head of the War Crimes Unit at the Ukrainian Prosecutor General's office.
Belousov also noted that Roshchyna's body showed signs of an autopsy having been performed before it was returned to Ukraine, and that some of her organs were missing. The missing organs could signal that Russia attempted to hide the cause of death, possibly to conceal that it had committed a war crime, Belousov said.
Roshchyna's colleagues at Ukrainska Pravda said, citimg members of the investigating team, that her brain, eyeballs, trachea were missing.
Roshchyna's death has sparked widespread condemnation, with Sevgil Musaieva, her editor at Ukrainska Pravda, describing her as a dedicated journalist who saw reporting from Russian-occupied territories as a mission.
"Viktoriia was the only reporter who covered the occupied territories. For her, it was a mission," Musaieva said. The Committee to Protect Journalists also condemned Roshchyna's death, stating that Russia was responsible. Ukrainian officials have raised concerns about the thousands of citizens being held in Russian custody without charges or access to legal counsel. "The issue of civilian hostages abducted and held by Russia requires increased international attention and immediate and strong response," Ukrainian foreign ministry spokesman Georgiy Tykhy said.
One of her colleagues at Hromadske, a Ukrainian media outlet said that, 'For her, there was nothing more important than journalism. Vika was always where the most important events for the country took place. And she would have continued to do this for many years, but the Russians killed her,' said in a statement published on Hromadske's website.
Meanwhile, the conflict in Ukraine continues to escalate, with Russia launching a drone and missile attack on the cities of Kharkiv and Dnipro, killing at least one person and injuring 46. This comes as President Donald Trump claimed that Vladimir Putin wanted to stop the war, saying, "If it weren't for me, I think he'd want to take over the whole country", Trump told ABC News.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
27 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Peace momentum: on the White House meetings and the Ukraine war
The unprecedented multilateral summit at the White House on Monday between U.S. President Donald Trump and a host of European leaders, including Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, just after Mr. Trump's meeting with Russian leader Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, points to a renewed willingness on all sides to end the Ukraine war. The Alaska summit marked a new start in Mr. Trump's push for conflict resolution, although it did not yield an immediate breakthrough. While Mr. Trump invited Mr. Zelenskyy to the White House to discuss 'the Putin proposal', European leaders, including the British Prime Minister, France's President and the chiefs of the European Commission and NATO, also travelled to Washington, in a strong show of solidarity with Ukraine. Mr. Zelenskyy's visit to the White House, in February, had gone poorly. This time, Mr. Zelenskyy and his European allies were careful not to upset their host. The message from Europe is clear: irrespective of Washington's position, Europe is firmly committed to Ukraine's security. But European leaders also recognise that they lack the capability to continue to back Ukraine in a war it is not winning should the U.S. cut off its weapons supplies to Kyiv. So, the challenge before the French and British leaders was to persuade Mr. Trump — he has already ruled out NATO membership for Ukraine — to offer some form of American support for security guarantees to Ukraine as part of a final settlement. Europe has already begun planning to send a 'reassurance force' to Ukraine. Mr. Trump's comments signalling support for the idea of security guarantee were a small but significant breakthrough. He said Europe would be 'the first line of defence' but did not rule out American involvement, adding that Mr. Putin would accept western security guarantees for Ukraine. The next big question is on where to draw the ceasefire line. Mr. Putin wants all of Donbas and is willing to freeze the frontline in the south. Mr. Zelenskyy and his European partners have so far ruled out any territorial concessions for peace, but all sides are ready to continue the talks. Mr. Zelenskyy should adopt a pragmatic approach, weighing Ukraine's future security against its present battlefield vulnerabilities. Mr. Putin should realise that this may be his best opportunity to end the war that he launched in February 2022. Mr. Trump and the European leaders must now work towards a compromise formula that addresses Ukraine's future security needs and Russia's past grievances. The current momentum for peace should not be squandered.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
27 minutes ago
- Business Standard
India's oil reforms to blunt US and European Union supply coercion
The government has no say in where the country's refiners source oil from because these are commercial transactions, the official reiterated premium S Dinakar New Delhi Listen to This Article India's energy security will get a leg up amid US President Donald Trump's tariff rumbles as the government hopes to finalise by September major reforms in the oil and gas sector, a senior government official said. These measures are expected to help the government deal with geopolitical pressures inflicted by countries like the US by squeezing supplies of oil via coercive methods or from armed conflicts in West Asia that block key passageways like the Suez Canal or the Strait of Hormuz through which India receives most of its oil and gas. India's oil lobby is funding Russian President Vladimir
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
27 minutes ago
- Business Standard
India's richest families benefit from Russian crude oil deals: Bessent
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent claimed some of the 'richest families in India' benefited from the purchase of Russian crude oil, while reiterating plans to boost tariffs on the South Asian nation. 'We have planned to up the tariffs on India — these are secondary tariffs for buying the sanctioned Russian oil,' Bessent said in an interview to CNBC on Tuesday. Before Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine, less than 1% of India's oil came from Russia, 'and now, I believe, it's up to 42%. So India is just profiteering,' he said. 'They are reselling, they made $16 billion on excess profits — some of the richest families in India,' he said. The latest comments show that President Donald Trump's administration is doubling down on its attack on India and indirectly Asia's richest billionaire Mukesh Ambani for purchase of cheap Russian oil. Ambani's Reliance Industries Ltd., which runs the world's largest petroleum refining complex in western India, has been among the buyers of Russian crude. It has bought cargoes under long-term contracts. An email query to Reliance outside of business hours was not immediately replied to. Earlier this week, White House trade adviser Peter Navarro in a column for the Financial Times took a swipe at the South Asian country's oil tycoons and their ties to the government, saying that the surge in purchases were driven by 'profiteering by India's Big Oil lobby' and not 'domestic oil consumption needs.' Trump has threatened to raise the levies on Indian exports to the US to 50% — among the highest on any country's products — on Aug. 27. Half of that penalty is for New Delhi's purchases of Russian oil. The South Asian nation has defended its right to buy oil from the cheapest source, calling the additional tariffs 'unreasonable.' Historically, India hasn't been a significant importer of Russian crude, depending more heavily on the Middle East. That changed in 2022, after the invasion of Ukraine and a $60-per-barrel price cap imposed by the Group of Seven nations that aimed to limit the Kremlin's oil revenue while keeping supplies flowing globally. India's ability to purchase discounted cargoes was a feature of that mechanism acknowledged by US officials. Bessent defended the administration's lack of secondary tariffs on China, which buys more crude oil from Russia than India. China was importing 13% of its oil from Russia before the 2022 invasion, and now it's 16%, 'so China has a diversified input of their oil,' he said.
