Doctors write to health minister over 'deeply damaging' decision on northwest surgical hub
A group of 170 doctors in Donegal have written to the health minister, saying not awarding a new surgical hub to the county is 'flawed, unjustified, and deeply damaging' for patients.
Plans to build surgical hubs nationally were first announced in December 2022, with an 18-month turnaround time predicted. However, so far only one of the six has opened, with funding allocated for hubs in Cork, Waterford, and Limerick.
A location for the northwest hub has not yet been named, but it has recently emerged this is likely set for Sligo and not Donegal.
Now, GPs and hospital doctors have called on health minister Jennifer Carroll MacNeill to meet with them and hear the arguments against that decision.
Dr Padraig McGuinness said the decision ignores the reality of local geography.
'Donegal has a larger population than the combined areas of Sligo, Leitrim, South Donegal, and Cavan,' he said.
Many of our patients would face round trips of five hours or more to access elective surgical care in Sligo. That's unacceptable and dangerous.
He added: "This isn't just about a building or a budget line. It's about whether Donegal patients are treated as equals in our health system. Right now, they're not.'
Pressures on Letterkenny hospital are a key reason why they need the hub, argued Dr Louise Moran, consultant in intensive care and anaesthetics.
"Patients in Donegal already face some of the worst cancer survival rates in the country due to late presentation and access issues,' she warned.
'To bypass Letterkenny again is not only medically indefensible, it's a direct hit on patient safety and regional equality.'
Letterkenny is often among the most overcrowded hospitals in the country as recorded by the Irish Nurses and Midwives Organisation.
The hubs are seen as a central part of plans to tackle overcrowding.
Each is expected to deliver 10,000 day case surgeries and minor procedures, and 18,500 outpatient consultations every year.
Plans by the HSE to instead offer Letterkenny an ambulatory care centre for outpatients are seen by this group of doctors as 'an inadequate substitute lacking ring-fenced funding, staffing plans, or timelines.'
Consultant general surgeon Michael Sugrue said: 'We need real surgical infrastructure, not vague promises'.
He warned of the long-term impact for recruitment at Letterkenny University Hospital.
Without adequate surgical resources, we simply cannot attract or retain the consultants we need.
"This decision risks the future of general surgery in Donegal and the long-term viability of LUH as a Model 3 hospital,' he said.
They called for an evidence-based review of the HSE's plans to locate the hub in Sligo.
In April HSE regional executive officer Tony Canavan said a proposal to build a surgical hub linked to Sligo hospital has been submitted.
"We've identified a site for it that will be considered by the HSE senior leadership team in mid-May and then to the board of the HSE at the end of May,' he told RTÉ News.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
28 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
Cork woman with stage 4 cervical cancer urges women to continue screening and get vaccinated
A Cork woman with stage 4 cervical cancer, following two misdiagnosed smear tests, says she still urges women to attend regular screenings and get vaccinated. Mother-of-two Leona Macken received an apology from the HSE at the High Court on Tuesday after two of her smear tests — first in 2016 and again in 2020 — were misread. The 38-year-old hairdresser said she has since been overwhelmed with messages of support from the public, and that the apology meant 'the world' to her. She told the Irish Examiner: 'I still want women and young girls to get their vaccinations and to have their smears done. 'I paid privately for my first smear at 21 years old. I was always conscious of this'. She said taking the case to the High Court was about more than her personal experience — it was to highlight that the national cervical screening programme is 'not working properly' and must be 'properly examined.' 'This happened to me two years after Vicky Phelan, this is not ok, things need to be properly examined, how did this happen again?'. Leona Macken settled her legal action against the HSE, arising from what they said were failures in the CervicalCheck screening programme in 2016 and 2020. Picture: Collins Courts Following the High Court apology on Wednesday, Ms Macken appeared on Newstalk Breakfast and RTÉ's Today with Claire Byrne before heading to hospital for chemotherapy. 'They (the HSE) has publicly said they have failed me, there were failures in the system that led to my stage 4 diagnosis' she said. 'I read the apology before it was read in court, and I was really happy with that. But I know it's not easy to get an apology and it's rare and that was really so important to me and my husband and our children and our family'. Ms Macken has been documenting her journey on social media in recent months. 'Having a smear is so important' she said. 'I get so many messages from women telling me they had a smear and are now having a biopsy or laser treatment because they have abnormal cells. 'I wish I had that opportunity' she continued. 'But I didn't, and instead I discovered I was at stage 1, then stage 3 and now stage 4. 'My abnormal cells were missed and I missed a chance to treat them. I really wish I had that chance to have stopped it in its tracks that's why I say to people, get your smear done." She added: 'I will make sure my daughters get their vaccines, I am speaking for them and for the other women who are going to be possibly missed in the system too. 'I trusted the system, but it let me down. Someone needs to investigate why it's going wrong'. Leona Macken and her husband Alan settled their legal action against the HSE, arising from what they said were failures in the CervicalCheck screening programme in 2016 and 2020. Picture: Collins Courts Medical negligence solicitor Cian O'Donnell, who has represented several women affected by screening failures, supported her call. 'Leona Macken is right to encourage people to use the system, because screening does work. 'It didn't work for her, unfortunately, but Leona is clear in her message to other women and that is to engage with regular screenings and look after your health." He added: "The Minister for Health and the HSE and those in charge need to be honest with themselves and not to have this blind insistence that this programme is working. 'Not a single patient in the cervical screening programme has been investigated – Vicky Pelan's screen was never investigated. 'We need to look at the individual screeners and follow the patterns and audits must be done, but that has not happened and that is not norm in laboratories.'
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
HSE must specify when services will be provided to children with disabilities, Supreme Court says
The Supreme Court has delivered an important judgment concerning the obligations of the HSE towards children with disabilities, including a need to specify when services will be provided to them. Compliance by the HSE with its obligations under the Disability Act 2005 involves setting out and implementing 'measurable' actions, the court said. Although there is 'nothing objectionable' about the HSE's Individual Family Support Plan (IFSP) model for delivering services to children with disabilities, the court said the HSE must ensure it complies with its obligations and with the legislature's intention to give 'enforceable rights' to individuals. The five-judge court on Wednesday rejected the HSE's appeal against the High Court's finding that it failed to comply with its legal obligations in relation to an eight-year-old girl assessed as having autism spectrum disorder and global developmental delay. READ MORE Giving the judgment, Ms Justice Iseult O'Malley said the statutory process obliges the HSE to specify what services will be provided to children with disabilities and when they will be provided. Delays in assessments of need are a 'recurring' theme in cases before the courts, she noted. There was a delay of more than 18 months in assessing the girl and further delays in providing her with therapy services identified as being her health needs. The High Court, in finding the statutory requirements were not complied with, said the only service for the girl where the HSE specified a time frame for delivery was the development of an IFSP, but that was not a 'clinical service'. The core issues in the HSE's appeal were whether the 2005 Act required that each health service identified in an assessment report should be specified in a service statement; and whether the statutory requirements regarding the content of service statements were breached by identifying the development of the IFSP as a 'specified' health service. Ms Justice O'Malley found, while not every service recommended in an assessment report must be included in the service statement, there must be 'a rational connection' between the content of both. On the second issue, she ruled an IFSP is a 'health service' within the meaning of section seven of the 2005 Act. She said the commencement of an IFSP is the starting point for delivery of services and the plan continues as the evolving basis for development of further goals. The legislature had intended a process through which particular services and dates would be 'clearly identified' in the service statements, with a legal right to seek implementation through the courts if necessary. If each service statement only specifies a start date for the IFSP process, the right may appear reduced as the only complaint apparently possible would be the failure to commence that process, she said. The HSE can, within the IFSP model, comply with its obligations to set out and implement measurable actions, she said. The first service statement should 'spell out' what will be involved in the IFSP process. Reviews of the service statement also required greater detail, including an overall assessment of the goals set out, whether those have been achieved, identification of overall goals for the near future and the work to achieve those, the judge said. That might mean 'relatively frequent' reviews. If the only service specified in the first service statement is an IFSP, the HSE should record that the needs specified in the assessment of need have not been included. This was necessary under the HSE's obligation to assist in measuring aggregate needs. In the case of the girl, represented by Derek Shortall SC and Colin Smith SC, instructed by solicitor Wendy Lyon, she said the original service statement and the first review statement did not meet these criteria. The original statement had been superseded and it seemed likely there would have been further reviews, she noted.
Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
NTPF to face Public Accounts Committee over CHI oversight and funding concerns
The National Treatment Purchase Fund (NTPF) must appear before the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) to answer questions about its oversight arrangements, a PAC member has said. Social Democrats TD Aidan Farrelly has written to the committee's chair, calling for the NTPF to be added to its programme for this term. "The budget of the NTPF has increased exponentially in recent years and now stands at more than €220m this year alone," said Mr Farrelly. "However, recent scandals at Children's Health Ireland (CHI) have raised serious concerns about the NTPF's oversight of the allocation of public money for insourcing treatment." He added that the NTPF's decision to suspend all funding for insourcing at CHI suggests a lack of confidence in existing monitoring systems. While it is welcome that the NTPF has begun reviewing its operations at CHI, The Kildare TD said the results must be brought before PAC and thoroughly examined. "It must also provide assurances that the problems identified in insourcing at CHI are neither replicated across the country nor repeated when it comes to outsourcing treatment." Labour TD Marie Sherlock said she is deeply concerned that what is happening with CHI waiting lists is 'highly likely' to be occurring elsewhere in the health service. "It is abundantly clear that patient safety has taken a backseat across the health service," said Ms Sherlock. "I am deeply concerned that what is happening at CHI represents but a microcosm of the scale of abuses across the health sector. With more questions than answers, we need to hear in detail from the board of CHI, the minister and the CEO of the HSE." Labour TD Marie Sherlock said she is deeply concerned that what is happening with CHI waiting lists is 'highly likely' to be occurring elsewhere in the health service. Picture: SAM BOAL/Collins Photos Referring to the allegations involving an individual consultant, she warned that "the rights of one individual simply cannot trump patient safety". The Labour health spokesperson said extracts of CHI's internal review paint a "damning picture of a broken culture", and urged that the full report be published to provide transparency for affected families. On Wednesday, health minister Jennifer Carroll MacNeill asked parents for patience, saying: 'Sit with me just for a week or 10 days' to allow the NTPF to complete its work. "The NTPF has already assured that existing surgery scheduled will not be impacted but our concern is we need to make sure that this isn't happening anywhere else in the system," she said. Health minister Jennifer Carroll MacNeill asked parents for patience, saying: 'Sit with me just for a week or 10 days' to allow the NTPF to complete its work. Ms Carroll MacNeill also revealed that the NTPF only recently became aware that no referral had been made to the National Patient Safety Office, nor had any notification been sent to the department of health. "Let's not underestimate the impact of that, nor was there a referral to the department or a notification to any of us. So that's not a satisfactory way of managing that, and I expect that to be very, very different," Ms Carroll MacNeill told RTÉ Radio's Morning Ireland. She stressed the need for the NTPF to prevent cases where children wait so long that they end up on the NTPF list unnecessarily, missing earlier opportunities for surgical intervention. "That is the bigger issue and that is what raises such particular concerns around the issues in this report but it also raises the broader patient safety concerns and what we need to do is make sure that that is happening in the most productive way in the public system in every discipline," said Ms Carroll MacNeill. The minister added that, alongside the audit, there will be a move towards a centralised referral system. Under the proposed change, children referred for surgery would be added to a central list rather than being assigned to a specific consultant, improving transparency and equity. Read More Ireland does not satisfy international standard for election observation, group claims
