Timothee Chalamet's fans convinced he's hiding bold new look on Kylie Jenner outing
The actor, 29, was pictured enjoying quality time with his girlfriend Kylie Jenner, 27, but it was his hair that had all the fans talking.
The Dune star sported a Nike baseball cap with a babushka style green scarf wrapped around it to shield his head.
But the nape of his neck appeared to be very closely shaven, prompting fans to believe Chalamet had cut off his luscious dark locks for his upcoming role in Dune: Messiah.
Filming for the third part of Denis Villeneuve's franchise is reportedly set to begin in Budapest this week.
'IVE NEVER BEEN INTO RUMORS BUT GOD I REALLY HOPE CHALAMET DIDNT CUT HIS HAIR... WE CANT HAVE PAUL ATREIDES WITH A f*****g BUZZCUT,' one anxious fan wrote in reaction to the possible hair change.
'OMG BUZZ CUT!!??' another wondered.
Someone else shared a clip of Natalie Portman getting her hair shaved in a movie and crying with the caption, 'Timothée Chalamet's prep for Dune: Messiah.'
'Not his divine locks!' another fan pleaded.
'Thats dedication,' yet another comment read.
'That's disappointing. I guess we're stuck with that for DUNE 3.'
Many others joked that the transformation was due to his character, Paul Atreides, being a Harkonnen by blood - a plot twist that was revealed in Dune: Part Two (2024).
In Villeneuve's film adaptations Harkonnen men are depicted as bald.
'He's gone full Harkonnen,' one fan wrote.
'Well that makes sense....He is Harkonnen,' another added.
Frantic fans reacted to the possible hair change, with one writing, 'WE CANT HAVE PAUL ATREIDES WITH A f*****g BUZZCUT'
Kylie's boyfriend has also appears to have shaved his mustache ahead of filming.
It has not yet been confirmed what his character will look like in the upcoming Dune film, which is set one decade after Dune: Part Two.
Dune: Messiah is slated for a December 2026 release.
During his outing in the south of France on Monday, Chalamet and the makeup mogul sweetly held hands.
The New York City native wore a Nigerian soccer jersey and a $40,000 diamond Cartier pendant necklace.
Meanwhile the Kardashians star rocked a vintage Jean Paul Gaultier minidress.
The mom-of-two, who shares seven-year-old daughter Stormi and three-year-old son Aire with ex Travis Scott, also wore narrow black sunglasses.
Joining the couple was Kylie's older sister, 29-year-old model Kendall Jenner.
The catwalk queen looked runway-ready in a figure-hugging little black dress that grazed her thighs.
The French holiday comes days after eagle-eyed fans noticed that the billionaire reality television star recently started following Timothée on Instagram.
The notoriously private couple had previously not shown any signs of their romance on social media.
For his part, the Call Me By Your Name star does not follow anyone on Instagram, where he boasts 19.7 million followers.
Insiders revealed earlier this year that Jenner and Chalamet have agreed to a set of stipulations regarding their relationship.
While the twosome have started attending public events together, they do not post each other online.
And Timothée will not appear on Kylie's family Hulu series The Kardashians.
Jenner and Chalamet began dating around April 2023, but did not make their red carpet debut until the 70th David Di Donatello Awards in May 2025.
A source revealed to Us Weekly around the same time that the lovebirds are 'practically living together.'
'Kylie's really happy and relieved they finally made their debut. It was time and she wanted to publicly support him and show how proud of him she is,' the insider shared. 'She and Timothée have gotten really serious, and this was a big step.'
The person close to the stars also divulged, 'They are practically living together at this point, as he stays at her house often when he is not working. He has been fully integrated into her life.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
19 minutes ago
- Telegraph
France ‘wanted its citizens to see Bayeux Tapestry for free at British Museum'
France reportedly demanded that its citizens be allowed to see the Bayeux Tapestry for free or at a discount when it goes on display at the British Museum next year. Last month, The Telegraph revealed that a deal had been reached for the 900-year-old textile artwork depicting the Norman Conquest of 1066 to be loaned to the British Museum French officials lobbied for their compatriots to be allowed to visit the London display for free, according to the Financial Times, but officials close to negotiations thought the idea was a 'try-on' and 'never going to happen'. French museums do not typically provide free entry in France itself. In return for the tapestry, George Osborne, the British Museum chairman, agreed to loan the Anglo-Saxon treasures of the Sutton Hoo burial, and the medieval Lewis Chessmen. French officials are said to have initially wanted to borrow the Rosetta Stone, arguably the most popular item in the British Museum's collection. The museum did not wish to part with the 2,100-year-old Ancient Egyptian artefact, and this idea fell by the wayside. The Rosetta Stone was discovered by French forces in 1799 during Napoleon's campaign in Egypt. It was being used by the local population to bolster a wall. The stone was seized by the British, at war with France at the time. Its inscription, deciphered by Jean-François Champollion, a French orientalist, showed scholars how to read Ancient Egyptian texts. The stone may have fitted with Emmanuel Macron's plans for the Bayeux Tapestry exchange, which is intended to demonstrate the bonds between Britain and France and a new spirit of co-operation. The tapestry is likely to bring in crowds comparable to the most popular shows in the British Museum 's history, which drew hundreds of thousands of visitors. A British Museum spokesman said: 'As our chairman George Osborne has said, this will be the blockbuster show of our generation. This is an object of such historical significance for the UK that we want as many people as possible to have the chance to see it.' The deal on the tapestry, which is to be moved next year, came after plans first announced in 2018 by Theresa May, the prime minister at the time. She hoped to secure a loan for the tapestry, but this was repeatedly put off because of concerns over the delicate condition of the embroidery and the risk of moving it.
Telegraph
19 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Word ‘Jewish' ripped from comedian's posters at the Edinburgh Fringe
A comedian has claimed the word 'Jewish' was burned from posters advertising her Edinburgh Fringe show. Earlier in the festival Rachel Creeger had one show cancelled over alleged staff concerns about potential security risks. Ms Creeger was offered the chance to perform at another venue, Hoots, and posters were put out advertising her show, Ultimate Jewish Mother. The word 'Jewish' appears to have been deliberately burned on outdoor posters, rendering the 'Jew' illegible. She posted on Instagram: 'Overnight, vandals burned out the word Jew out of the signage outside my lovely venue. I am not going to let this break me, but I am not going to lie, it's a tough day.' The vandalism marks the latest in a string of controversies at the Fringe, amid the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict. In July, Ms Creeger and Philip Simon were set to perform at the Whistlebinkies venue in Edinburgh. However, they claimed they were informed that their gigs would be cancelled after bar staff at the venue expressed fears of feeling 'unsafe'. It was claimed that the concerns were raised after an announcement that the venue would receive extra police supervision amid continued worries over the safety of Jewish acts. Days later, having found an alternative venue, Mr Simon was cancelled again, barred from the Banshee Labyrinth pub because of alleged 'rhetoric and symbology' linked to Israel. One reason cited by the venue for cancelling his show, Shall I Compere Thee in a Funny Way?, was his attendance at a vigil for people killed in the 2023 Hamas terror attacks. He said of the incident: 'I am still processing the concept that in 2025 I can be cancelled just for being Jewish. In the meantime, I will still be at the Fringe for my one remaining children's show and continue to investigate possible alternative venues for both of my cancelled shows.' It is understood that the alleged vandalism has been reported to Police Scotland.
Daily Mail
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
JOHN MACLEOD: Sturgeon clawed her way to power but it's the whine of a victim that drips from Frankly's tawdry pages
Had I eagerly shelled out £28 in advance for a copy of Nicola Sturgeon 's memoirs, I'd now be inclined to cut up rough. Frankly's juiciest bits have been sprayed with abandon everywhere this week – interviews graciously granted; studios regally toured – to the point that today, on official publication, must feel like hurtling joyously downstairs of that cold and frosty morning to find someone has opened all your Christmas presents. And such chunks; and such gobbets. As if the sometime First Minister had rolled onto The Jeremy Kyle Show and told all. Like those magazines of the TV ChitChat order you glimpse in passing at the shops. Shrieking headlines like 'My Dad left my Mum – for my boyfriend!!!' Before even the silky dustjacket is in your hands, even before said autobiography falls open with that exquisite whiff of printers' inks, you already know Sturgeon thinks she may be non-binary. Who does not rule out, some day, a relationship with another woman. That, as a quivering Scottish Parliament newbie, some rank man kept sidling up to her to snigger about a coarse – and, indeed, apocryphal – nickname. Yet Sturgeon, heedless of the no-smoke-without-fire brigade, throws it out there again, amidst much other titillation. She has, no doubt, decades ahead of her to look back and wonder why none of her Pan Macmillan editors – eagerly egging her on – raised a hand gently to breathe, 'Whoa…' And thus Nicola Sturgeon is left sprawled out there on the reputational beach. Not in the thoughtful, statesmanlike company of, say, Thatcher or Mitterand, Garret Fitzgerald or Charles de Gaulle. Much more in the tawdry, brackish he-bwoke-my-necklace waters of Harry and Meghan. And even the late Queen, come to think of it, is betrayed by Sturgeon. There is an unwritten rule that conversations with the Sovereign are not repeated. Especially her exchanges with ministers. All in Elizabeth II's circle knew that she only welcomed tittle-tattle from her closest personal servants – pages, her dresser and that; those she saw every day. Yet Ms Sturgeon quotes the Queen at some length, declares – improbably - that Her Majesty 'loved a bit of a gossip' and wanted details of the racked Alex Salmond. Some, too, have wondered aloud why, given the fraught state of Scottish publishing, Sturgeon rolled all the way down to London town to spill such beans. Surely money was not a consideration for our sometime National Mammy? And there are oddities. Sturgeon, it seems, cares far more about the rights of trans-identifying men in her deathless prose - she devotes pages and pages to it - than about the cause to which she has supposedly devoted her life. Scotland's independence, meriting nothing like as many paragraphs and barely a tenth of the passion. The pages of Frankly, too, are strewn with factual errors: silly mistakes, easily checked. One instance will suffice. Recalling when Covid-19 rolled in like a tsunami, Sturgeon hyperventilates, 'We moved more quickly than the other governments to ban mass gatherings and close schools.' Actually, Sturgeon's general approach was slyly to ascertain what ministers in Whitehall were about to do – and then announce it first. And Scotland's schools closed their doors on Friday 20 March 2020 – the same day as every other school across the United Kingdom. Almost the saddest aspect of Sturgeon's autobiography is her obsession with Alex Salmond – longtime friend, a colleague through decades, a mentor at critical moments. Until they fell so spectacularly out, from 2017, like jostling barons at a Shakespearean court. Bloated and bitter, Salmond died last October at some conference in the Balkans. That recent demise – and broken hearts left behind – might, you think, have signalled some Sturgeon caution. On top of three incontestable facts: Salmond in 2019 won a civil court case, with costs and damages, against the Scottish Government. M'luds concluded that it had treated Salmond 'unlawfully,' in a manner 'tainted with apparent bias.' A year later he was acquitted of all charges – by a majority in each instance – of criminal offences against womn, this by a majority-women jury under a presiding female judge, Lady Dorian. And, a year after that, the relevant Holyrood committee concluded that Nicola Sturgeon, First Minister, had in the course of this tacky episode misled the Scottish Parliament. Indeed, giving evidence to that committee, there were extraordinary lapses in the Sturgeon memory: one can but congratulate her, half a decade on, how much her grasp of events has improved. In Frankly, she now goes after her late patron like a studs-up Emily Maitlis. As early as 1989, Sturgeon confides of some internal party episode, she had 'doubts.' During the independence referendum, she now and then questioned Salmond's judgement – though privately, of course; always 'privately.' Which did not prevent Sturgeon's 2004 plot with him to trick Roseanna Cunningham out of the SNP's deputy leadership, joyously leading the Nationalist charge at Holyrood (Salmond then was marooned in the Commons), holding high office under him for seven years and great prominence in that independence campaign. Salmond was buried on October 29 yet she is yet fixated on him, even after his two-nil triumph in the courts, her own censure by her Holyrood peers and when, as a woman far more important once murmured, some recollections may vary. Like Holmes and Moriarty, and as far as Nicola Sturgeon is concerned, she and Salmond must be roped together for always, tumbling down the Reichenbach Falls of history. The sometime First Minister gives little thought to the other women, Roseanna Cunningham apart, slighted or brutalised as Sturgeon surged through the decades to become great. She has always howled down the obvious comparisons with Margaret Thatcher, apt as they are. As to what her surrogates did to, for instance, Johanna Cherry and J K Rowling – well, silence is golden. Or, perhaps, just yellow. And then, working the phones in 2023, briefing her useful idiots in the Scottish media, watching complacently as the Scottish Greens joined the pile-on against Kate Forbes. Twisting her faith and background – a Free Church launched, you know, in a radical stand against despotic landlordism – till leadership-candidate Forbes was suitably painted as the sort of crazy Pentecostal from the Appalachians who dances with snakes. But saddest of all is how self-demeaningly, Nicola Sturgeon does down herself. This was our most cultured and best-read First Minister since Donald Dewar. A girl without advantage or contacts from an Ayrshire new town who spurned the most obvious (and the laziest) vehicle for ambition – the Labour Party – and who refused to sit at the back of the bus and shut up. By hard, hard work and against daunting odds – it took her four draining bids to win Glasgow Govan – Sturgeon clawed her way to power. Was not ashamed to reinvent her image. Impressed civil servants in every brief she held. A fearsome debater; a tough political operator. Swept to the SNP leadership, at the last, unopposed. A woman with a delicious sense of humour, at her peak beset everywhere for selfies. Who sold out the SECC Hydro faster than Beyoncé and would win eight national elections on the trot. Yet all, inexplicably, that drips through the pages of Frankly is the whine of a victim.
