Britons are to gain access to European airport e-gates (but there's a catch)
Nick Thomas-Symonds, the European Union Relations minister, told the BBC that the agreement will grant British travellers 'more time to spend on holiday or work trips… doing what you want, not being stuck in queues'.
Here is everything you need to know about how the new e-gate rules will impact your holidays, and when they will likely come into effect.
Since the UK voted to leave the European Union in 2016, British passport holders have been considered as 'visa-exempt third-country nationals' when arriving or departing EU countries. This means UK citizens have the same rights as passport holders from Australia and Venezuela.
At most EU airports British passport holders have to join the (slower) 'other nations' queue on arrival. UK travellers also currently face additional checks when departing EU countries.
Many British holidaymakers will experience considerably longer processing times at airports.
The reason for this is that since Brexit, EU border officials have been required to manually check that UK arrivals have sufficient means of subsistence, that their visit will not exceed the stay limit of 90 days over a 180-day period, and that the passenger has 'the means to return to the country of origin'. The guard must also now stamp the British passport.
It is worth noting that, since Brexit, travellers with EU passports arriving into the UK have continued to have access to e-gates across UK airports.
The wording is as follows: 'The United Kingdom and the European Commission will continue their exchanges on smooth border management for the benefit of their citizens, including the potential use of e-gates where appropriate.
'They note that European Union citizens can use e-gates in the United Kingdom and that there will be no legal barriers to e-gate use for British Nationals traveling to and from European Union Member States after the introduction of the European Union Entry/Exit System.'
The agreement means that UK passport holders will be able to use e-gates previously reserved for arrivals from EU or European Economic Area countries (including Iceland, Norway and Switzerland).
Some airports may opt to introduce new, special 'third-country nationals' e-gates to speed up the facial recognition part of the process. Others may allow UK passport holders to use existing EU e-gates.
Mark Tanzer, Chief Executive of ABTA – The Travel Association said: 'The agreements around e-gates and pet passports will make it easier for travellers, cutting down on queues and pre-holiday admin. There are of course more border changes coming down the line – including the EU Entry/Exit System planned for October 2025. It is vital we continue to see good cooperation between the UK and EU on the introduction of this scheme, to make it as streamlined as possible for UK travellers.'
According to the agreement the barriers preventing UK passenger access to e-gates will end after the introduction of the EU Entry/Exit System (EES) (see below). After multiple delays it is expected that the EES will be rolled out from October 2025. Widespread changes regarding e-gates are unlikely to come into effect in time for the 2025 summer holidays.
Some European countries are already rolling out more e-gates at their airports in a bid to reduce passenger processing time. Others already allow UK passport holders to use e-gates.
Rome Fiumicino has special 'third-country national' e-gates in operation, and at Amsterdam Schiphol and Lisbon UK passengers are allowed to use the same e-gates as EU citizens, before going on for manual border official checks.
While access to European e-gates could reduce queues, there are wider EU border changes on the horizon which will see UK passport holders giving up more personal data when entering the EU.
Under the Entry/Exit System (EES), e-gates will capture fingerprints and facial scans of non-EU citizens entering the Schengen bloc, replacing the need for manual passport checks and stamps.
This means that, on first entry into an EU country, third-country nationals including UK passport holders will need to provide facial biometrics and fingerprints. Some fear this could lead to significant hold-ups at European airports after EES is rolled out. However, once the process is up and running, UK passport holders should be able to proceed through an e-gate without any further checks.
Separately, UK passport holders will soon have to get an Etias 'euro visa' (expected to come into effect six months after the EES).
The visa waiver will come with a one-off €7 fee and will be valid for three years, or until the expiry of your passport.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
16 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
AST SpaceMobile Shares Gain on Launch Plan, and New Government Contracts
AST SpaceMobile shares climb after the satellite firm set out an ambitious plan to launch 45 to 60 satellites in 2025 and 2026. The firm also said it received two additional early-stage contracts for the US government. Bloomberg's Bruce Einhorn reports. (Source: Bloomberg)
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Post-Brexit chaos as EU citizens living in Britain wrongly barred from UK
EU citizens waiting for the government to decide their pre-Brexit residency status have been wrongly refused entry to the UK, forcing them to give up their lives here. The Independent Monitoring Authority for Citizens' Rights Agreements (IMA) has expressed 'serious concerns' after individuals who left to go on holiday or visit family were barred from entering Britain on their return. Among those affected was a 34-year-old Spanish woman who was removed from the UK despite showing Home Office documents which proved her right to live and work in the UK. She had flown to Spain to see her sister and her new baby at Christmas, The Guardian reported. Another EU citizen, Greek Cypriot Costa Koushiappis, was forcibly removed after taking a short trip to Amsterdam in November, the paper said. The IMA has now written to the Home Office, warning that those waiting for a decision on their residency should not be removed if they make short trips overseas, including for business or leisure. It is advised that those who hold a valid 'certificate of application' (CoA) from the Home Office show it to Border Force officials at airports or ports to prove they are allowed to travel. Miranda Biddle, chief executive of the IMA, said: 'Our position is that a citizen with a valid certificate of application has a right to exit and enter the UK while waiting for a decision on their EU settlement scheme application, subject to providing additional documentation required at the border.' She said she was 'keen to continue to work with the government' to 'ensure citizens are not discouraged from exercising their rights'. The group has called on the Home Office to clarify the CoA rules before a new system requiring visitors to the UK to have 'electronic travel authorisations' (ETAs) is enforced. Campaign group the3million said it was 'very disappointed' that the IMA had agreed with Border Force's approach of asking EU citizens to carry documents to prove their residence before Brexit took effect on 31 December 2020. A CoA was sufficient proof of rights until such time as a final decision is taken, the group said. A Home Office spokesperson said: 'All individuals with a certificate of application are made aware that they may be asked for evidence to show that they qualify under the scheme before they are allowed entry to the UK. Equivalent guidance has been issued to Border Force officers and published online.'
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How Zelensky can save Ukraine (and himself)
For European diplomats, officials and analysts, Vladimir Putin has done little to soften his long-standing war aims in Ukraine. They say the Russian president wants nothing less than a Kremlin-friendly government in Kyiv, Ukraine blocked from joining Nato and the size of its armed forces curtailed. When Putin first discussed the parameters of a peace deal with Donald Trump in February 2025, demanding an election as the price for a ceasefire appeared a realistic way of toppling Volodymyr Zelensky's government. But as the months have gone by, the US president has slowly appeared to tilt his favour from Moscow to Kyiv. The apparent change in direction in the White House has made it harder for Moscow to make these sorts of ultimatums. Maintaining these demands cements Putin as the main barrier to Mr Trump's peace efforts. Now, with the Russian and American leaders set for their first face-to-face meeting since 2019, Putin needs another way to sell his vision for removing Kyiv's Western-facing government. Could the key to sowing further chaos through a US-backed peace settlement lie in Ukraine's own constitution? Kyiv's laws state that its president or parliament cannot legally cede territory without a nationwide referendum. Practically, that would not currently be possible, given that Russia occupies around 20 per cent of Ukraine. And any attempt to act unilaterally and overrule the constitution would foment unrest – not least among the soldiers who have fought so hard to defend their homeland for more than three years. Mr Zelensky's position would probably be untenable. For this reason, when Washington and Moscow were exploring a deal that would bring about a ceasefire if Ukraine were to withdraw its troops from the Donbas regions of Donetsk and Luhansk, Mr Zelensky was forced to speak out very loudly against it. Militarily, the Ukrainian president would have got nothing in return, other than a halt to the fighting, while Russia would have been allowed to bypass some of Ukraine's stiffest defences for free. There was some talk of Russian forces being made to withdraw from the northern region of Sumy and neighbouring Kharkiv. This strategy, according to Jaroslava Barbieri, a research fellow at Chatham House's Ukraine Forum, was designed by Putin to position Mr Zelensky as the main blockage to peace in Mr Trump's eyes. 'I'd say in demanding swathes of Ukrainian territory as part of a peace deal, Putin is aware the condition is unacceptable for most Ukrainians,' Ms Barbieri said. Rejecting the offer could 'portray Ukraine's position as unco-operative and ungrateful to Trump's peace-brokering efforts,' she added. Ms Barbieri said: 'It could drive a wedge between Trump and European allies, who have reiterated the importance of preserving Ukraine's sovereignty. 'And ... potentially destabilise Ukrainian society by mobilising grievances among the minority who are willing to accept concessions to end the war.' Polling by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology released in June found that just 38 per cent of Ukrainians were willing to accept territorial losses 'in order to achieve peace as soon as possible and preserve independence'. In comparison, 52 per cent said they were firmly against ceding land 'even if this makes the war last longer'. But Mr Zelensky has accepted that some form of cession of territory will be necessary to end the war. Without it, he'd be likely to lose support of the Americans, and eventually European allies would start to fade away. There will be, Mr Trump declared on Monday: 'Some swapping, some changes to land.' Sources have told The Telegraph that the Ukrainian president could be ready to stop fighting, freeze the front line and hand over de facto control of territories occupied by Russian forces to Moscow as part of any settlement. These include swathes of Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson and Crimea. Mr Trump added: 'We're going to try to get some of that territory back for Ukraine.' The key to Mr Zelensky managing the process and selling it back to his public will be in the language. De jure recognition of Russia's control would require a referendum, and would be likely to stoke tensions in the population, enough to hurt Mr Zelensky at the ballot box of any future election. Handing de facto control, which is not legally recognised, in acceptance of the temporary reality of the situation on the ground is more likely. One possibility for this being discussed amongst war-watchers would be to replicate the Sino-British Joint Declaration signed between China and the UK to decide on Hong Kong's future. That deal saw Britain return sovereignty to Beijing in 1997, but under the condition that it would maintain Hong Kong's special status for 50 years. Could Ukraine and Russia agree to recognise that the Donbas regions are legally Ukrainian but managed as if they belonged to Moscow for a set period of time? That would be likely to settle Mr Zelensky's referendum problem by kicking any real decision into the long grass. The bloodshed would stop and the line in the sand would be drawn – for now. However, Moscow would use the time to sow anti-Ukrainian sentiment in the region, with the intention of making its eventual return almost impossible and unpalatable for Ukrainians, who have all lost a father, brother or friend in the war. Whatever the proposal, it would appear that Putin has covertly edged closer to one of his war aims again by leaving Mr Zelensky with a decision that will shape his future as president. And he has put the spotlight back on Ukraine's leader. Mr Trump cut through the public protestations on Monday. The US president said: 'I was a little bothered by the fact that Zelensky was saying: 'Well, I have to get constitutional approval.' I mean, he's got approval to go into war and kill everybody, but he needs approval to do a land swap?' The final representations will be made by Mr Zelensky and other European leaders in a video call with Mr Trump on Wednesday. Forty-eight hours later, Putin will arrive in Alaska. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Solve the daily Crossword
