Court docs detail allegations against Kelly Grimsley Auto, judge grants TRO
Court documents showed that last week, United States District Judge David Counts signed an order with prevents the auto dealer from selling or trading vehicle inventory, and forbids the company from tampering with records, withdrawing more than $5,000 from company accounts, selling off real estate assets, taking new loans, or funneling money to the Grimsley family.
PREVIOUS COVERAGE: Kelly Grimsley Auto under fire, here's what you need to know if you made a purchase
The group can conduct routine business, but only with written permission from Hyundai and any violation of the order could result in further charges.
Hyundai finances Kelly Grimsley's vehicle inventory through a series of advances described in their Inventory Loan and Security Agreement, which is in turn secured by both K. Grimsley, L.L.C. and Kelly J. Grimsley through separate contemporaneous guaranty agreements. Through these Loan Documents, Hyundai is guaranteed full and prompt payment when due, by acceleration or otherwise. The ILSA itself grants Hyundai a security interest in Kelly Grimsley Auto Group's collateral, which includes, 'all inventory, including new and used motor vehicles.'
Through its lawsuit, Hyundai presented evidence that Kelly Grimsley Auto Group has defaulted under the ILSA.
Attorneys for the finance company said Hyundai initially grew concerned after receiving a notice of nonsufficient funds for Kelly Grimsley Auto Group payments. It quickly notified the Kelly Grimsley Auto Group entities of default only to receive another notice of nonsufficient funds. Hyundai then performed lot audits of Kelly Grimsley Auto Group vehicle inventory and reviewed sales reports.
Hyundai's evidence shows that four hundred and five vehicles subject to these Loan Documents bear unpaid, due, and outstanding balances, totaling $13,663,534.42.
This prompted Hyundai to act, and the company sent a notice of acceleration for $14,998,033.07, exercising its right of acceleration under the ILSA. Most recently, Hyundai provided a voluntary surrender agreement to Kelly Grimsley Auto Group seeking control of the remaining vehicles. So far, Kelly Grimsley Auto Group has failed to turn the remaining vehicles over.
Hyundai has also presented evidence of other concerning instances of default. Specifically, according to court documents, the evidence shows that Kelly Grimsley Auto Group has failed to make payments on one or more merchant cash advance agreements for amounts greater than $50,000. Additionally, issues with retail financing for Kelly Grimsley Auto Group's customers have caused difficulties for customers in obtaining license plates and titles— some customers have left Google reviews showing that this issue stretches back at least ten months.
'The evidence also shows that Kelly Grimsley Auto Group has defaulted on the dealership's mortgage. In addition to amounting to events of default under the ILSA, Hyundai has determined that these acts also constitute a material adverse change, as defined in the ILSA. Hyundai has accordingly shown a substantial threat that Kelly Grimsley Auto Group will continue to sell inventory without paying back its advances under the ILSA,' the lawsuit said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
I'm a Mechanic: 6 Electric Vehicles I Would Buy and Why They Are Worth It
Thinking about buying an electric vehicle (EV)? They're a good option if you want to save money on gas and maintenance and reduce your carbon footprint, but not all EVs are built the same. Be Aware: Find Out: According to car experts, some models stand out for their reliability, performance and long-term value. To help narrow down your search, here are EVs they recommend and why they're worth a closer look. And while you're on the hunt for an electric, make sure you avoid these rides. Tesla Model 3 MSRP: $44,130 to $56,630 'Tesla tops the list for me. Model 3 is the best of them all. They are futuristic styled. They have all the features one would want in a vehicle, especially in the electronics aspect. They have good battery life and battery distance,' Chris Pyle, auto expert with JustAnswer, the expert on-demand platform, wrote in an email. It also retains its value as long as you trade them in before the battery starts to wear out, he noted. But that could take years. According to Insurify, the average lifespan of a Tesla battery is between $300,000 to $500,000 miles, or 15 to 20 years of use. 'Tesla's battery system is unique, and in many ways, it's superior to what other brands offer,' added Melanie Musson, an auto expert with Its placement and weight is another pro, Musson pointed out, which can help the Model 3 maintain balance on the road and handle corners well. Trending Now: Lucid Air MSRP: $71,400 to $250,500 According to Pyle, the Lucid Air, a luxury sedan that first launched in the 2022 model year, is often seen at the top of lists. Its recent launch and price also mean it's a rarity on the road. Pyle has never seen or talked to anyone who's driven one, but he said it looks great. 'The distance to empty is at the higher range. Downfall though, is that the car is very expensive and when it breaks, finding a shop near you will be next to impossible, but EVs rarely go to the shop,' he wrote. Ford F-150 Lightning MSRP: $56,975 to $87,190 Want something tough but environmentally friendly? Musson recommends the Ford F-150 Lightning. 'Drivers who are looking for something that can handle off-road situations praise the Lightning for its toughness,' Musson wrote. It's powerful yet quiet, and comes with top-of-the-line features. 'It's a good mix of rugged traditional truck capabilities and luxurious modern electric mechanics,' Musson added. 'The Lightning holds its value well, which is not something many EVs have been able to do.' Hyundai Ioniq 6, Kia EV4 and Kia Niro EV Ioniq 6 MSRP: $39,095 and $52,345 Kia EV4 MSRP: $37,000 to $50,000 Kia Niro EV MSRP: $40,0995 and $45,523 When it comes to budget-friendly EVs with solid range and reliability, Hyundai and Kia are hard to ignore. 'Although I think the Ioniq is ugly, Kia and Hyundai are putting in the work to make affordable vehicles that have what you need, most of what you want and the longevity and low repair costs you expect,' Pyle claimed. He also pointed out that both brands choose to focus on longevity, low repair costs and repeat customers rather than a wow moment with sleek designs. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 These Cars May Seem Expensive, but They Rarely Need Repairs 3 Reasons Retired Boomers Shouldn't Give Their Kids a Living Inheritance (And 2 Reasons They Should) This article originally appeared on I'm a Mechanic: 6 Electric Vehicles I Would Buy and Why They Are Worth It
Miami Herald
7 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Toyota Drops Affordable 2025 Highlander Lease Deal For August
The Toyota Highlander is one of the original three-row SUVs, having originally debuted over 25 years ago. Fast forward to today, and its good cargo space, relative affordability, and inoffensive styling remind you why it's living a long, successful life. For August, Toyota is heating up the lease deal on the Toyota Highlander. In select markets, including the greater New York metro, you can take one home for as little as $499 per month. The lease term is 36 months and includes 12,000 annual miles, which means you could even save a little bit more if you can make do with 10,0000 per year. Toyota also includes the first two years or 25,000 miles of scheduled maintenance via ToyotaCare for $3,999 due at signing. It's worth noting that, although this lease price is specifically advertised in the New York region, there are very similar deals available elsewhere. Those in the Southwest (Arizona, New Mexico, etc.) can score a similar $519 per month payment with $2,999 due at signing, and California markets are advertised at $509 per month. Finally, Southeast coastal markets including Orlando, Tampa, and Miami will see an even lower payment - $449 per month - but will need $4,448 down. Of course, if you would rather not part with several thousand dollars at your lease's inception, you could also explore zero down options. By dividing the down payment evenly across 36 months, we can get a good idea of what a Toyota Highlander lease looks like without putting any money down. Based on our original lease deal ($499 per month with $3,999 down), that raises the new payment to $610 per month. Remember, advertised lease rates don't include local taxes, fees, or other charges, so your payment might be higher. Additionally, this isn't an official $0 down payment - just an estimate. We advise you to explore Toyota's website and enter your zip code to find the most accurate and localized Toyota Highlander deals and incentives. The Toyota Highlander is a legacy entrant in the fiercely competitive arena that is the mid-size SUV segment, and it wouldn't have made it this long without being seriously worthwhile. The standard engine is adequately powerful, delivering 265 horsepower to the front wheels unless optioned with available all-wheel drive. It beats out rivals like the Mazda CX-90 when it comes to rear seat room, and the interior features good quality materials that, while perhaps not best in class, will hold up well against daily wear and tear. A nice 84.3 cubic feet of total cargo space beats out rivals from Hyundai like the Santa Fe, too. In the interest of full disclosure, we will say that some rivals do some things better than the Highlander. For example, the Pilot has more cargo space and a tougher look; the CX-90 drives a little better; and the Telluride is on paper a better value. But the Toyota Highlander has amazing fundamentals and does everything a good mid-size SUV should do really well. Even if it doesn't particularly excel in one area or another. Being able to snag one under $500 per month seems like something seriously worth considering if you're in the market. *Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. The information presented herein is based on manufacturer-provided lease offer information, which is subject to frequent change and may vary based on location, creditworthiness, and other factors. We are not a party to any lease agreements and assume no liability for the terms, conditions, availability, or accuracy of any lease offers mentioned. All terms, including but not limited to pricing, mileage allowances, and residual values, require direct verification with an authorized local OEM dealership. This article does not constitute financial advice or an endorsement of any particular lease or vehicle. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Democrats ramp up pressure on Trump, GOP over Epstein files with arcane gambit
Democrats on Wednesday ramped up pressure on Republicans over the Jeffrey Epstein files, turning to an arcane rule to attempt to force the release of the documents that have become a significant pain point for the Trump administration and Republicans. Led by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), they are seeking the documents via the 'rule of five,' which dates to a 1928 law and requires government agencies to hand over information if any five lawmakers on a Senate or House panel — in this case the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee — request them. The rule is relatively untested in the courts, but that isn't stopping Democrats from using it to turn the screws on an issue that has divided the GOP. 'This is not complicated,' Schumer said at a press conference on Wednesday. 'Every single time Trump, his administration [and] Republican leaders have had a chance to be transparent about the Epstein files, they've chosen to hide.' Schumer was not only flanked by Sen. Gary Peters (Mich.), the committee's top Democrat, and Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), but also a sizable placard tying President Trump to Epstein, who died in federal prison six years ago while awaiting trial for sex trafficking charges. The picture showed an image of Trump and Epstein at an event, with the president being quoted as saying the disgraced financier was a 'terrific guy,' 'a lot of fun to be with' and 'likes beautiful women as much as I do.' Schumer and all seven Democrats on the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee signed on to a letter to the Department of Justice demanding the files. 'After missteps and failed promises by your Department regarding these files, it is essential that the Trump Administration provide full transparency,' the Democrats wrote to Attorney General Pam Bondi, pointing to promises she and Trump have made. 'We call on you to fulfill those promises of transparency,' they continued. They gave Bondi until Aug. 15 to hand over the relevant documents. The letter marked the latest attempt to put Republicans on the back foot and keep the Epstein issue front and center as lawmakers ready to depart for the August recess. Trump has made a concerted effort to push the discussions surrounding Epstein to the side. He urged his supporters to drop the issue, and in recent weeks the administration released a series of documents related to Hillary Clinton, former President Obama and Martin Luther King Jr. The Epstein issue drove such a wedge in the party that it forced the House to break early for the monthlong August recess after the chamber became paralyzed by an uproar from members over the administration's handling of the Epstein files. 'The evasions, the delays, the excuses — they are not just odd, they're alarming,' Schumer said. 'It begs the question: If there's nothing to hide, why all the evasiveness?' In addition, multiple Republicans on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee's panel on federal law enforcement defied the White House by backing a Democratic-led push to subpoena the Justice Department for its files regarding the Epstein investigation. And Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) moved during a separate Oversight subcommittee hearing to subpoena Ghislaine Maxwell, a longtime Epstein associate who is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking. An attorney for Maxwell said on Tuesday that she would only speak with the committee if granted immunity. The panel flatly rejected that possibility. The issue had been more muted in the Senate, but Democrats are working to change that. Schumer did not rule out the possibility of utilizing amendment votes on the three-bill funding package that could come to the floor before the August break. He said that they are checking in with members as part of the hotline being run on the planned 'minibus.' And Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) has repeatedly tried to pass via unanimous consent a bill requiring the Justice Department to release the Epstein documents, forcing Republicans to object. It's unclear whether the Justice Department will acquiesce to the Democratic 'rule of five' request, and what would happen if they stonewall the effort. 'This is a law,' Schumer told reporters. 'This should be bipartisan, and we're still talking to Republican colleagues about trying to join us and that could help get this public. If not, there's recourse in the courts. This is the law.' 'We have talked to some of our lawyers. This can be challenged in the courts,' he added. A Justice Department spokesperson confirmed receipt of the letter but declined to comment further. How Republicans plan to handle this gambit is also unclear at this point. 'We're looking into it. Obviously, it's a dated law,' Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) said, labeling the rule 'obscure.' 'I don't know how they came up with it. We're having some lawyers look at it.' Despite claims by Schumer, multiple Republicans indicated that they had not been approached by Democrats to back their push to force the release of the documents even though some have echoed similar calls. 'I've long said, I think DOJ should release all the documents, just like they did with MLK, RFK, JFK,' said Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), a fellow committee member. 'Everything they've got, they should put it out there.' 'I think it's a little bit more of a stunt. They didn't reach out to any Republicans before,' Hawley added. 'They didn't ask me [to sign the letter].' Multiple Homeland Security Committee Republicans also noted that they utilized the 'rule of five' during the Biden administration on multiple occasions to request documents, but were stonewalled repeatedly. Among the items they sought information about were those pertaining to the origins of COVID-19, vaccine safety and the 'burrowing' of Biden-era political appointees to become nonpolitical permanent roles. 'We were stiffed every time,' Hawley said. 'I don't think we ever got anything substantive.' Whether this is the maneuver that gets it done, some Republicans believe that the administration will eventually end up releasing the documents, as the fervor of the MAGA base has shown few signs of letting up over the Epstein files. 'I expect DOJ to get information out, period. I don't think this is what's going to move it out. I think there's plenty of interest in folks to just say, 'Get it out there,'' said Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.), a Homeland Security Committee member. The Oklahoma Republican added that conspiracy theories will only grow while the files remain behind closed doors. 'The conspiracy theories don't get better with less information,' Lankford continued. 'They just continue ramping up.' Rebecca Beitsch contributed. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
