I'm a Mechanic: 6 Electric Vehicles I Would Buy and Why They Are Worth It
Be Aware:
Find Out:
According to car experts, some models stand out for their reliability, performance and long-term value. To help narrow down your search, here are EVs they recommend and why they're worth a closer look.
And while you're on the hunt for an electric, make sure you avoid these rides.
Tesla Model 3
MSRP: $44,130 to $56,630
'Tesla tops the list for me. Model 3 is the best of them all. They are futuristic styled. They have all the features one would want in a vehicle, especially in the electronics aspect. They have good battery life and battery distance,' Chris Pyle, auto expert with JustAnswer, the expert on-demand platform, wrote in an email.
It also retains its value as long as you trade them in before the battery starts to wear out, he noted. But that could take years. According to Insurify, the average lifespan of a Tesla battery is between $300,000 to $500,000 miles, or 15 to 20 years of use.
'Tesla's battery system is unique, and in many ways, it's superior to what other brands offer,' added Melanie Musson, an auto expert with Quote.com. Its placement and weight is another pro, Musson pointed out, which can help the Model 3 maintain balance on the road and handle corners well.
Trending Now:
Lucid Air
MSRP: $71,400 to $250,500
According to Pyle, the Lucid Air, a luxury sedan that first launched in the 2022 model year, is often seen at the top of lists. Its recent launch and price also mean it's a rarity on the road.
Pyle has never seen or talked to anyone who's driven one, but he said it looks great.
'The distance to empty is at the higher range. Downfall though, is that the car is very expensive and when it breaks, finding a shop near you will be next to impossible, but EVs rarely go to the shop,' he wrote.
Ford F-150 Lightning
MSRP: $56,975 to $87,190
Want something tough but environmentally friendly? Musson recommends the Ford F-150 Lightning.
'Drivers who are looking for something that can handle off-road situations praise the Lightning for its toughness,' Musson wrote.
It's powerful yet quiet, and comes with top-of-the-line features.
'It's a good mix of rugged traditional truck capabilities and luxurious modern electric mechanics,' Musson added. 'The Lightning holds its value well, which is not something many EVs have been able to do.'
Hyundai Ioniq 6, Kia EV4 and Kia Niro EV
Ioniq 6 MSRP: $39,095 and $52,345
Kia EV4 MSRP: $37,000 to $50,000
Kia Niro EV MSRP: $40,0995 and $45,523
When it comes to budget-friendly EVs with solid range and reliability, Hyundai and Kia are hard to ignore.
'Although I think the Ioniq is ugly, Kia and Hyundai are putting in the work to make affordable vehicles that have what you need, most of what you want and the longevity and low repair costs you expect,' Pyle claimed.
He also pointed out that both brands choose to focus on longevity, low repair costs and repeat customers rather than a wow moment with sleek designs.
More From GOBankingRates
3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025
These Cars May Seem Expensive, but They Rarely Need Repairs
3 Reasons Retired Boomers Shouldn't Give Their Kids a Living Inheritance (And 2 Reasons They Should)
This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: I'm a Mechanic: 6 Electric Vehicles I Would Buy and Why They Are Worth It
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNET
10 minutes ago
- CNET
The Tesla Cybertruck May Have Found Its True Calling: Military Target Practice
Table of Contents The Tesla Cybertruck May Have Found Its True Calling: Military Target Practice The Tesla Cybertruck inspires strong opinions. People either love or hate the shiny, sharp-angled trucks, many of which have been vandalized and even shot with paintball guns as a reaction against Tesla CEO and former Trump administration staffer Elon Musk. So this one's for you, Cybertruck haters: The Air Force recently had 33 vehicles, including two Cybertrucks, delivered to the White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico, with plans to shoot them up. Documents first spotted by TWZ show that the Air Force is looking to test the durability of the Cybertruck, given its unique makeup and features, for target-vehicle training test events. Representatives for the Air Force and Tesla did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Read more: Every Tesla Cybertruck Recall Since the Vehicle Was Released Ever since the Cybertruck was announced, Tesla has touted it as difficult to damage. Musk called the vehicle "bulletproof," and said it would survive an apocalypse. In an infamous 2019 launch event, Musk challenged a colleague to throw steel balls at the truck's windows, saying they wouldn't break. They did. The Cybertruck performed better in later tests. In 2024, Tesla posted a YouTube video where the truck held up to gunfire from a Tommy gun, pistol and shotgun. Because of the Cybertruck's tough outer structure, made of a proprietary stainless steel alloy, there's an expectation that the vehicles could be used by an enemy. Air Force documents note that the truck "does not receive the normal extent of damage expected upon major impact." And that expectation is backed up by some evidence. In 2024, Ramzan Kadyrov, leader of the Russian Republic of Chechnya, posted a video of a Cybertruck with a machine gun mounted on it, saying it had been sent to the front lines of Russia's war in Ukraine. The planned military tests will mirror these potential real-world situations in a live-fire test. We don't know exactly what weapons the Air Force plans to turn on the Cybertrucks, but probably everything they've got that can make a dent in them. Read more: Cybertruck Recall Hits 46K Vehicles Thanks to a Glue Failure The other vehicles chosen for testing include pickup trucks, SUVs and sedans. But only the Cybertrucks were called out specifically by model and maker name.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
1 Standout Cryptocurrency to Buy Before It Rockets 2,975% Higher by 2030, According to Cathie Wood's Ark Invest
Key Points Bitcoin currently trades near all-time high prices of $123,000. Cathie Wood and her research team at Ark Invest are predicting that Bitcoin could reach a price of $3.8 million by 2030. A number of factors are driving Wood's optimistic views of Bitcoin. 10 stocks we like better than Bitcoin › Cathie Wood has built a reputation on Wall Street for making bold -- and, at times, seemingly unconventional -- predictions. As CEO and Chief Investment Officer of Ark Invest, Wood was an early champion of electric vehicle (EV) pioneer Tesla and artificial intelligence (AI) software developer Palantir Technologies -- two picks that, in retrospect, appear to have been obvious opportunities. Given Wood's penchant for asymmetric risk assets, it should come as no surprise that she has also developed a strong conviction for cryptocurrency -- particularly Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC). In prior reports published by Ark Invest, Wood and her team of analysts modeled an upside price target of $1.5 million per Bitcoin by 2030. Since then, Wood has amplified her forecast considerably. She's now projecting a price of $3.8 million per Bitcoin within the next five years. At Bitcoin's current price of roughly $123,000, this forecast implies nearly 3,000% potential upside. Let's explore the key factors that could propel Bitcoin's price higher in the latter half of the decade. What could drive the price of Bitcoin higher? For years, Bitcoin found greater acceptance among retail investors compared to large institutional players such as banks, hedge funds, or wealth management firms. Historically, asset management funds steered clear of Bitcoin due to its uncertain regulatory framework and perceived lack of real-world utility compared to traditional fiat currency. However, these dynamics are starting to shift. Digital assets are increasingly viewed as a legitimate avenue for portfolio diversification. According to Wood's research, even a modest reallocation of 1% to 5% from commodities into cryptocurrency within institutional portfolios could release billions in capital -- a shift that would significantly boost demand for, and consequently the prices of, digital assets such as Bitcoin. Closely tied to this trend is the introduction of spot Bitcoin ETFs. These are vehicles that offer direct exposure to Bitcoin without the complexities of managing a crypto wallet or navigating specific exchanges such as Coinbase. Moreover, the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) approval of these ETFs signals a growing regulatory acceptance of cryptocurrency as a mainstream asset class -- a development that likely alleviates lingering concerns among institutional money managers. Outside of traditional portfolios, Bitcoin adoption is also accelerating as part of evolving corporate treasury strategies. Companies such as Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) and GameStop are complementing cash and short-term investments on their balance sheets with direct exposure to Bitcoin. Much like Wood's thesis on untapped institutional liquidity, if more corporations adopt Bitcoin as a strategic financial differentiator, it could create a domino effect -- prompting additional enterprises to do the same. Taking this idea a step further, several countries around the world have explored creating a strategic Bitcoin reserve. The same logic driving increased institutional and corporate adoption applies here. While Bitcoin should still be viewed as a speculative asset, it could prove to be a major differentiator in a world of increasingly complex trade negotiations and heightened geopolitical risks -- factors that often contribute to fluctuations and instability in traditional currency markets. Stablecoins are a type of cryptocurrency pegged to the value of a fiat currency. While this may seem unrelated to Bitcoin at first glance, broader adoption of stablecoins as a medium of exchange could foster greater psychological acceptance of digital assets as an integrated part of commerce. In turn, increased acceptance of decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols could encourage more investors to hold cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin as a core component of their investment playbooks. The core pillar of Wood's forecast rests on Bitcoin's fixed supply cap of 21 million coins. Prices of traditional commodities such as gold fluctuate based on changes in production. In contrast, Bitcoin's supply is finite by design and inherently constrained by periodic halving events -- a feature that instills a scarcity mindset among investors. As a result, Bitcoin is often referred to as "digital gold" and is viewed by many as a hedge against inflation. In essence, the basic dynamics of supply and demand point to exponentially rising demand chasing a fixed supply -- an idea that supports the potential for meaningful price appreciation. Is Bitcoin right for your portfolio? Indeed, Wood's $3.8 million price forecast is aggressive -- and perhaps overly optimistic. As a long-term investor, I would not focus solely on Bitcoin's potential upside in terms of absolute dollars. Instead, investors should consider the underlying factors driving bullish sentiment from investors like Wood. As Bitcoin gains broader acceptance among major financial institutions, corporations, and governments, the cryptocurrency becomes increasingly positioned to play a meaningful role in the modern financial system. Even a modest allocation to Bitcoin could serve as both a diversification tool and a potential hedge against inflation during periods of economic uncertainty. In my view, an investment in Bitcoin reflects a broader endorsement of the digital asset revolution -- and I see no better asset to own in this space. Do the experts think Bitcoin is a buy right now? The Motley Fool's expert analyst team, drawing on years of investing experience and deep analysis of thousands of stocks, leverages our proprietary Moneyball AI investing database to uncover top opportunities. They've just revealed their to buy now — did Bitcoin make the list? When our Stock Advisor analyst team has a stock recommendation, it can pay to listen. After all, Stock Advisor's total average return is up 1,070% vs. just 184% for the S&P — that is beating the market by 885.55%!* Imagine if you were a Stock Advisor member when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,155!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,106,071!* The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 Adam Spatacco has positions in Palantir Technologies and Tesla. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Bitcoin, Palantir Technologies, and Tesla. The Motley Fool recommends Coinbase Global. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 1 Standout Cryptocurrency to Buy Before It Rockets 2,975% Higher by 2030, According to Cathie Wood's Ark Invest was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Business Insider
33 minutes ago
- Business Insider
I drove Tesla's first car, the 2008 Roadster. It was one of the most fun EVs I've driven in years — and I got a bicep workout.
In 2006, Tesla CEO Elon Musk published a blog post titled " The Secret Tesla Motors Master Plan (just between you and me)." Tesla hadn't built any cars yet, but the post outlined its planned strategy for success. "So, in short, the master plan is: 1. Build {a} sports car; 2. Use that money to build an affordable car; 3. Use that money to build an even more affordable car; 4. While doing above, also provide zero-emission electric power generation options," Musk wrote. Tesla followed this strategy. Its first product was the 2008 Roadster, a $100,000 two-seater sports car. Tesla then built the more mainstream Model S and Model X, eventually paving the way to the Model 3 and Y. Tesla is almost unrecognizable from its original form when the Roadster launched in 2008. In 12 years, it went from a cash-strapped startup to the world's most valuable automaker. The Silicon Valley tech firm is now worth over a trillion dollars. But we cannot forget where Tesla started, and the vehicle that thrust the company into relevance was the Roadster. The little Roadster that could When Tesla started, the goal was straightforward: to make a product cool enough to generate interest among the populace. There were many previous attempts at electric cars, primarily in the 1990s, but none of them became mainstream. Tesla wanted to prove that efficiency, power, and looks were not mutually exclusive pillars to achieve. The result was designing a fast and zingy electric sports car. The Roadster could thrust itself to 60 miles per hour in just 3.7 seconds and had a range of 244 miles. It could go further than other EVs at the time, squashing the Nissan Leaf's 73-mile range and the Mitsubishi i-Miev's 62-mile estimate. Most importantly, it didn't look or feel like anything electric on the market. But the numbers only tell part of the story. On the road, it was completely different from anything I've ever driven. Back to Tesla's roots When I was in California last summer, my friend Wade Higgins asked me if I would like to drive his Tesla Roadster. Naturally, I cleared out my calendar. Wade worked at Tesla from 2013 to 2015. In 2014, he sold some of his Tesla stock and picked up a used Roadster he found online. Wade estimates his Roadster could be worth three times what he originally paid, which was $55K. Still, with Elon Musk's polarizing right-wing presence and the small number of used Roadsters on the market, current values remain uncertain. The design As I reached Wade's house, the doors from his garage lifted, and the silver 2008 Roadster was unsheathed. I had only seen one on the road prior, so merely being in its presence was a surreal experience. The first thing I noticed was that the Roadster was tiny — its hood barely made it up to my knees. The Roadster was so small because it was based on the Lotus Elise platform. While many newer EVs are built from the ground up on electric platforms, Tesla didn't have the resources back in the old days to do so. Therefore, Tesla partnered with the then-struggling Lotus Cars to procure the vehicle's chassis and help with engineering support. The result is a 155.1-inch-long car measuring only 44.4 inches in height. For comparison, it's about 30.7 inches shorter than a Model 3. This small form factor is excellent for its electric powertrain Aerodynamics are key to securing the range. Simply put, a smaller car means a smaller frontal area. Less area means the vehicle won't have to push as much air out of the way when driving. The car also uses a relatively small battery. Its 53-kilowatt-hour battery pack allows it to achieve its 244-mile range. A smaller battery means less weight and fewer battery cells to keep cool. Wade's Roadster is also still on its original battery pack, which, seventeen years later, is still operating normally. The 2008 Roadster weighs about 2,900 pounds. The low weight means the car doesn't need mountains of horsepower to go fast. The original Roadster "only" made 248 horsepower, which is far lower than most modern sporty EVs. The feel The tight dimensions become immediately apparent when you get behind the driver's seat. Everything feels miniature. You'll literally sit shoulder-to-shoulder with the passenger. Starting the Roadster is also different from any other modern Tesla. There's no app or sleek keycard — instead, owners have a physical key. Slide it into the receptacle to the right of the wheel, twist it, and you'll hear a muted electronic hum, an analog ritual for an electric car. The only attribute the Roadster shares with modern Teslas is the minimalist "TESLA" typeface across the rear. Beneath its sleek exterior, a brutal and raw sports car resides. Another interesting quirk? There's no power steering. At low speeds, the driver receives a complimentary bicep workout. Especially when navigating through parking lots, you must supply a decent amount of force to make the car turn. The lack of power steering also means there's no intermediary between the road and the steering column. Every bump, crack, and imperfection in the asphalt's surface permeates up the steering rack and into your fingertips. The ride is just as unforgiving. The taught suspension transfers shocks directly into the cabin, creating a bumpy but visceral driving experience. Every jolt and vibration reminds you that comfort was never a priority in the Roadster. All of these attributes deliver a raw and engaging ride. It was truly one of the most fun EVs I've driven in recent years, but I could assume the harshness would get old if I drove this car frequently. Charging The Roadster can't use Superchargers because it launched four years before the first one was built. Therefore, it cannot DC fast charge, meaning you're limited to slower AC charging. At home, the Roadster will charge at 70 amps, which is high even for today's standards. Most EVs top out at 40 or 48 amps. This means the Tesla Roadster can charge at 15.4 kilowatts, adding about 60 miles of range per hour. A zero-to-full charge takes three and a half hours. Public charging the Roadster adds some complexity. It uses an obsolete charging connector, so a regular Tesla NACS connector won't work. You'll need an adapter if you want to charge on a public level 2 station. The Tesla Roadster wasn't made to be a mass-market vehicle The Roadster was made to show the world what electric cars could be. Despite being 17 years old, the Tesla Roadster still breaks many preconceptions. It's lightweight, blisteringly quick, and still running strong, thanks to the long-lasting battery pack. If it hadn't been for the Roadster, Tesla would likely not be where it is today. I think it's the most important car of the 2000s.
