
Tradition Meets Transition: The Rocky Road for College Football's Biggest Brands
Updated
Aug. 11, 2025 8:21 p.m. ET
share
x
link
The impact of conference realignment over the past 15 years could easily fill several volumes of Encyclopedia Britannica. But as college football continues to evolve at a rapid pace, some of the sport's most recognizable programs are showing signs of strain after switching leagues.
Since the early 1970s, Oklahoma, USC, Alabama, Ohio State and Nebraska have been standard-bearers for excellence in the sport. The three that have changed conferences since 2011 — Oklahoma, USC and Nebraska — have struggled to regain their footing since making the move.
Neither USC nor Nebraska appeared in this season's AP Top 25 or Coaches Poll. Oklahoma was ranked No. 18 in Monday's AP preseason poll (No. 10 in my "Ultimate 136") but was left out of the Coaches Poll for the first time since 1999. That means 62 FBS coaches came to the conclusion that none of these blue-blood programs are among the 25 best — something that would have felt unthinkable just 15 years ago.
[ Check out RJ Young's Ultimate 136 College Football Rankings here ]
Since 1950, Alabama has won 14 (claimed) national titles and seen four players win the Heisman Memorial Trophy; USC has won seven national titles and been home to eight Heisman winners; Ohio State has won eight national titles, produced six Heisman winners, and is home to the only two-time Heisman winner in the history of the sport; Nebraska has won five national titles and counts three Heisman winners.
ADVERTISEMENT
Two of those programs — Ohio State and Alabama—have remained members of their respective leagues, the Big Ten and SEC, for over a century. And their decision not to change conferences or even venture toward independence has paid dividends in this new era of college football where we've seen the collapse of the Pac-12 Conference, the expansion of the Big Ten, SEC, ACC and Big 12, and 49 programs changing their conference allegiance.
Nebraska's move to the Big Ten hasn't lived up to Huskers fans' standards, with just one 10-win season and eight losing seasons as a conference member. It's a stark contrast from the Huskers' Big 8 and Big 12 years, where, when paired with Oklahoma in the same league, Nebraska could be counted on to win at least nine games and a national title every eight years from 1962 to 2002.
USC's first season in the Big Ten began with it ranked inside the top 25 and ended with a rather deflating 7-6 record. While the program had been slipping — everything is downhill when you win 11 or more games for six straight years from 2002 to 2008 and two national titles — not enough media members or coaches believe Lincoln Riley has done enough to warrant inclusion into the preseason top 25.
Oklahoma's first season in the SEC began with it ranked inside the top 20 and ended with just the second losing season in Norman since 1998. What's more is, the Sooners have won 10 or more games 18 times from 2000 to 2021. For Brent Venables, who is responsible for the only two losing seasons Oklahoma has suffered in the 21st century, this season could not be more important.
If Oklahoma in the SEC feels a lot like Lewis Hamilton's move from Mercedes to Ferrari, that's because it is. Both can't figure out how to win in the new digs, and both are searching for an identity that was once as sturdy as a 1,0000-year-old tree.
Among the three aforementioned teams, Oklahoma is not only the program with the biggest target on its back, but also the one with the toughest schedule: No. 1 Texas, No. 8 Alabama, No. 9 LSU, No. 13 South Carolina, No. 14 Michigan, No. 21 Ole Miss and No. 24 Tennessee are lined up and ready to pour it all on OU.
When the Sooners announced their move to the SEC, most Oklahoma fans celebrated. The athletic department even threw an "SEC Day" to commemorate the move because, well, the grass must just be greener in the SEC. It turns out that even if it's green — mo' money, mo' money, mo' — it still has to get cut. And, so far, Oklahoma can't get it done.
Nebraska, a program that reached its first bowl game in eight years last season, the longest bowl brought in program history, is also trying to climb back up the mountain it once ruled with a fan base as rabid and switched on as any. Rather than learn from Nebraska, Oklahoma and USC might come to find out they should've paid closer attention.
Know your roots. Respect them. And if you cut them off, don't be surprised if you start to fall.
RJ Young is a national college football writer and analyst for FOX Sports. Follow him at @RJ_Young .
FOLLOW
Follow your favorites to personalize your FOX Sports experience
College Football
share
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
19 minutes ago
- USA Today
Oklahoma Sooners are a blue blood, but a rival got left out
College football has 136 programs at the FBS level for the 2025 season. Those teams are spread across 10 conferences (with two schools playing as FBS Independents), and compete for the right to go to the College Football Playoff and take their best shot at the national championship. There haven't always been this many teams at college football's highest level, but the sport has always had a large number of schools spread across the country competing for the same thing. College football has been around for over 150 years, and some programs are just better at winning than others. But which programs are the cream of the crop, and which fall below that very lofty standard? That's the question that On3 Sports college football analyst Andy Staples attempted to answer on Monday. He put out a list of college football's "blue blood" programs over the course of the sport's history. The Oklahoma Sooners were an obvious choice to make the cut, and they did so. OU is a shoo-in as one of college football's all-time historically great programs, a no-doubt inclusion in the blue blood club. Staples used two criteria to make his list of 12 true blue bloods. First, the program had to be in the top 15 in all-time winning percentage, with a minimum of 750 total games played. Secondly, the program had to have at least one national title in at least two of three eras: AP or Coaches Poll in the two poll eras, or be the winner of the final game in the BCS and playoff era. Oklahoma joined the Alabama Crimson Tide, Florida State Seminoles, Georgia Bulldogs, LSU Tigers, Michigan Wolverines, Miami Hurricanes, Notre Dame Fighting Irish, Tennessee Volunteers, Ohio State Buckeyes, Texas Longhorns, and USC Trojans as the best programs of all-time. The Auburn Tigers, Clemson Tigers, Florida Gators, Nebraska Cornhuskers, and Penn State Nittany Lions just missed the cut. Taking a look at those distinctions, I feel that there are a few levels that certain teams fall into. Alabama, Notre Dame, Ohio State, Oklahoma, and USC feel like obvious choices to me. Those five programs are the most important in telling the history of college football. Michigan, Texas, and Nebraska would easily make the cut for me as well. They fall a step behind the first five, but still should be pretty clear picks. If I'm making this list, LSU and Penn State are probably safe if we capped the list at 12, with Florida and Georgia just sneaking in for me. Staples putting teams like Florida State, Miami, and Tennessee in over a couple of teams that missed the cut is a bit of a head-scratcher, and I think Auburn and Clemson bring up the rear of the 17 teams mentioned. It's hard for me to see the argument for the Seminoles, Hurricanes, and Volunteers making the list over the Cornhuskers, especially, but also over the Nittany Lions and Gators. The resume for FSU, in particular, is tough to ignore, but the 'Huskers have got to be in there. The good news for OU fans is that there's no doubt about the Sooners' place in college football. Out of the many programs that have played at the highest organizational level over the course of the long history of the sport, Oklahoma stands tall among the best of the best elite programs in college football history. Contact/Follow us @SoonersWire on X, and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Oklahoma news, notes, and opinions. You can also follow Aaron on X @Aaron_Gelvin.


USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Eric Gentry will be a huge X-factor for the Trojans this season
The heart and soul of this USC football team is Butkus Award watch list linebacker Eric Gentry. Not only has Gentry been having a great offseason and camp, but he is becoming a leader for this improved defense. Eric Gentry is one of the best returning linebackers in college football. This season he is trying to put it all together. Last season in five games and two starts, Gentry was extremely productive, racking up 33 tackles, including 6.5 for loss with 2 sacks. His versatility was always on full display. He also had 1 PBU and 1 fumble recovery. There are so many ways to use this freakishly athletic defender. He will be the biggest X-factor for this defense if it is going to reach new heights in its improvement. PFF gave Gentry excellent grades across the board last season; he received an 83.4 defensive grade, a 92.6 run defense grade, and a 75.6 pass rush grade. With him being fully healthy and getting after it in camp, Gentry his turning heads. Most notably he has his starting quarterback taking notice of the problems he can create for opposing offenses. In a recent tweet, Ryan Kartje of the LA Times broke down Jayden Maiava's thoughts on the star linebacker for USC: "USC QB Jayden Maiava was asked which defender was giving him the most trouble during practice. Maiava: 'For sure, Eric Gentry. He's covering half the field himself.'" Eric Gentry will be a problem this season for opposing offenses. It is very encouraging to see that he is fully healthy and picking up right where he left off last season before he got hurt. If the Trojans want to compete in the Big Ten and contend for a playoff berth, they will need players such as Gentry to be healthy difference makers.


USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
College football analyst Josh Pate puts USC at No. 15 in preseason power ratings
USC football may not be ranked in the preseason AP Poll or coaches poll, but the Trojans did make one preseason poll of sorts. On Tuesday, college football analyst Josh Pate put out his preseason 'JP Poll' which has the Trojans at No. 15. As Pate often reminds fans, his poll is not a traditional ranking system. Rather, he does power ratings—evaluating which teams would be favored on a neutral field. Hence, his poll implies that on a neutral field, the Trojans would be favored against all but 14 teams in the country. Of the 14 teams that USC would not be favored against, two are on the Trojans' schedule: No. 6 Notre Dame and No. 7 Oregon. Hence, Pate seemingly believes that if the favored team won all of USC's games this fall, the Trojans would finish 10-2. Of course, as Pate would be the first to tell you, that is not how football works. Games are not won on paper, but rather on the field. Lincoln Riley and USC will need to show this fall that they can win actual contests, rather than just hypothetical ones.