logo
Utahns agree housing is a problem. What they don't agree on is why, new survey finds

Utahns agree housing is a problem. What they don't agree on is why, new survey finds

Yahoo28-01-2025

More than two-thirds of Utahns believe the state is dealing with serious or even crisis-level housing issues, according to a new survey from Envision Utah.
But they're not so sure why.
'They're kind of all over the map,' said Ari Bruening, Envision Utah's president and CEO. 'No. 1, there's just a lot of confusion. Why is (housing) so expensive? People just don't really know and they point to a wide variety of causes.'
The nonprofit, focused on growth-related issues, surveyed 601 Utah adults along the Wasatch Front, the Wasatch Back and in southwest Utah last September, asking them to rate the significance of more than a dozen potential causes of the state's housing problem.
More than half of respondents assigned high levels of blame to rising interest rates (67%), construction costs (58%), developer or landlord greed (57%), or too many people moving to Utah (53%).
But only 35% did the same for what's seen as a root cause for Utah's housing crisis, simply not having enough housing available.
The survey found only a slight majority agree that Utah needs 'to build more homes and increase the overall number and availability of homes and apartments in the state,' while 21% disagreed and 26% had no opinion either way.
Yet Utah's housing shortfall is expected to reach 153,000 homes and apartments by 2030. Gov. Spencer Cox, in his recent State of the State address, once again called for building 35,000 single-family starter homes priced under $400,000 over the next few years.
And a statewide initiative urging Utahns to 'Demand more supply,' that includes TV commercials featuring children was recently launched by another nonprofit, Utah Workforce Housing Advocacy.
'To ensure that the American Dream stays alive and well in Utah, we must add housing supply to the market,' said Steve Waldrip, the governor's senior advisor for housing strategy and a member of the advocacy's executive committee.
'That's why our campaign is focused on raising awareness of the core problem of high home prices — not enough supply,' Waldrip said.
For Bruening, it's pretty simple.
The housing shortage means builders can choose 'to build whatever they want, so they're going to build something that has the greatest return,' he said. 'If the market were functioning better, they'd have to build something more in line with what people can afford.'
'I would love to see more people just understand that basic lack of supply issue,' Bruening said. 'If we can get our supply to match our demand better, prices should come down across the board.'
The survey showed 34% of Utahns living in non-rural areas believe the state is 'in a major housing crisis,' while 35% say Utah is 'facing serious housing challenges, but it's not a crisis."
Another third are less concerned, with 15% acknowledging there are housing challenges in Utah but with limited impacts, and 11% saying the state's housing situation is fine and 4%, great.
However, the need to address supply and demand became more obvious to the 36 Utahns who participated in a week-long online focus group held in October by Envision Utah to better understand how Utahns perceive housing.
Among the focus group participants, the number who said they were 'extremely concerned' about housing doubled, as did the number who saw it as 'extremely important' to address housing challenges.
Bruening said the extra attention helped clarify the problem.
'The more they thought about it, the kind of simple supply and demand dynamics became clearer to them. We just need more homes,' he said. 'I think it just took the time of thinking about it.'
The biggest surprise in the survey for Bruening was the ranking ensuring low-income Utahns can afford to live in neighborhoods with good schools and economic opportunity as the most important housing goal for Utah.
That was chosen as one of the top three housing goals by 49% of survey respondents, followed by providing affordable homes to the very poor and homeless, then to seniors, those with disabilities and veterans.
Having affordable starter homes for young families was a top three pick by just 32%, and having enough to ensure that future generation of Utahns don't move out of state was ranked that high by 27%.
'I thought that people would say starter options for young people. Instead, they said low income families,' Bruening said, calling that encouraging. 'I think here's a little narrative out there that people want to keep low income people out of their neighborhoods.'
While public officials often emphasize the need for young people starting out to have the opportunity to buy a home, he said the survey results suggests the public is more behind affordable housing, including rental units, for low income Utahns.
'I don't know that people are saying, 'I don't care about young families.' But it does suggest that they care even more about low income people,' Bruening said. 'Maybe that's a messaging piece policymakers and others ought to pick up on.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Want To Be In The Top 5% Of Households? Here's Exactly How Much You Need—And It's Much Lower Than You'd Guess
Want To Be In The Top 5% Of Households? Here's Exactly How Much You Need—And It's Much Lower Than You'd Guess

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Want To Be In The Top 5% Of Households? Here's Exactly How Much You Need—And It's Much Lower Than You'd Guess

How do you know if you're actually rich — like, rich rich? If you've ever wondered whether your savings, investments, or home equity stack up to the country's wealthiest, there's a number that draws the line. And while it might sound like an elite bracket reserved for finance bros and inheritance babies, the top 5% isn't as far out of reach as some might think. You'll hear people toss around figures like "I want to retire with $5 million," or "You're not rich until you never check your balance." Fair. But in the background, many are just quietly checking to see if their net worth is even close to making the cut. You'll spot them in Reddit threads, in comment sections, or sitting across from you at brunch, casually mentioning their Roth IRA. So—how rich do you need to be to join the top 5% of households? Don't Miss: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: . According to the Federal Reserve's Survey of Consumer Finances, you'd need a net worth of about $3.8 million to break into the top 5% of U.S. households. That includes everything you own—retirement accounts, investments, your home—minus any debts you owe. Seems steep? Compared to the median net worth in America, which is around $192,700, it is. But if you've been aggressively saving, investing wisely, or just got lucky with some real estate timing, you might be closer than you think. The average net worth of households in the U.S. is about $1.06 million, but don't let that fool you. Averages get warped by the ultra-wealthy. The median is a better measure for the "typical" household—and that's why $192,000 matters. If you're above it, you're ahead of most. If you're below it, you're not alone. Trending: Invest where it hurts — and help millions heal:. This number includes: Retirement savings (401(k), IRA) Brokerage and investment accounts Real estate equity Business ownership or equity Cash and bank holdings Minus credit card debt, student loans, mortgages, etc. It doesn't count income—this is strictly net worth, not how much you make. Whether you're halfway there or just getting started, here are a few things that actually move the needle: Automate your investing. Consistency beats timing. Pay down high-interest debt. It eats your momentum. Own appreciating assets. Think equities or property, not depreciating toys. Reinvest wisely. Compound interest rewards the yourself to others isn't the recipe for happiness—but it is human nature. Benchmarks like this help give context, not judgment. Some people live well below their means and still feel broke. Others drive a 15-year-old car and feel free. Your version of "rich" might mean peace of mind, flexibility, or just not sweating the small stuff. These numbers are guideposts, not gospel. But if you're aiming for top 5% status? Now you know the number. The rest is strategy. Read Next: Here's what Americans think you need to be considered wealthy. Image: Shutterstock UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Want To Be In The Top 5% Of Households? Here's Exactly How Much You Need—And It's Much Lower Than You'd Guess originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Why both the Left and the Right are failing American workers
Why both the Left and the Right are failing American workers

New York Post

timea day ago

  • New York Post

Why both the Left and the Right are failing American workers

Working-class voters had high hopes that Donald Trump would help them out economically: Inflation and the economy were top priorities for Trump voters in 2024. These voters have seen the fading of the American Dream first-hand: Over 90% of Americans did better than their parents in the decades after World War II, but only half born in 1980 will. Why? A major reason is that employers pocketed workers' fair share of productivity increases. Wages used to rise when productivity did; if that had continued, workers' wages would be 43% higher than they are today. 6 Only half of Americans born in 1980 are doing better than their parents, with the root causes far harder to solve than mere DOGE-style cost cuts by President Trump and Elon Musk. FRANCIS CHUNG/POOL/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock You won't hear about this from President Trump. Instead, his villain is foreign trade, and his solution is to use tariffs to bring back blue-collar jobs. But tariffs won't work quickly, because onshoring means building new factories, which takes years. And it may never happen. Meanwhile, tariffs threaten to take away the only real benefit workers got from globalization: cheap Nikes, T-shirts, and party favors. To add to that, the Trump administration is DOGE-ing away stability at the Veterans Administration and Medicaid, which middle-class and rural Americans rely on. In short, the right isn't doing right by Lunchpail Joe and Jane. But neither is the left. Instead, it's obsessing nonstop about Trump's flouting of democratic norms — that's all progressives want to talk about. Defense of democracy was a top priority for those who voted for Kamala Harris, but way, way down for those who voted for Trump. The left also wants to talk about how DOGE is firing government workers, making professionals' jobs unstable and nerve-wracking. 6 Attacks on Obama-era healthcare initiatives are another reason American workers are feeling the pinch, some critics claim.. Getty Images Welcome to our world, say non-college voters. Thirty years ago, sales personnel at Macy's had full-time jobs with benefits. Today, associates worry constantly about whether they will accrue enough hours to pay the rent, in jobs that typically lack health insurance. As a result, many workers without degrees are working all kinds of hours. A 38-year-old construction worker described the impact on family life: 'People can't get or stay married because it takes so much effort to survive. My ex-fiancée said, 'You're never around.' But I was working to get a better life for us. No one has time for their kids. It's the American Nightmare.' 6 Today, associates worry constantly about whether they will accrue enough hours to pay the rent, in jobs that typically lack health insurance. Bloomberg via Getty Images DOGE is placing college-educated professionals where workers without degrees have been for decades — worried sick about how they're going to support their families. Don't expect workers to care. In earlier eras, the left was focused on good jobs for blue-collar workers and universal programs to ensure stability for the middle class, like Social Security, Medicare, and VA home loans and college benefits. In the 1970s, the focus changed to prioritize issues of greater concern to liberal college grads: environmentalism, racism, and sexism. As political priorities changed, so did 'feeling rules' that set the parameters of our heartstrings. A good lefty should feel angst about climate change, the poor, LGBTQ+, racism, and immigrants. But blue-collar Americans who vote for Trump? They're deplorable. If you care deeply about people disadvantaged by race, gender, and country of origin — but ignore class disadvantage — then people disadvantaged by class will seek solace by flocking to those who channel their anger. In both Europe and the US, those who flock to the far right are middle-status voters in routine jobs, holding on for dear life and just waiting for the other shoe to drop. A reality check: Democrats have generally done better for working people than Republicans. Obamacare is only the most recent example. The Trump administration has cut funding to programs that underlie the stability of middle-class Americans, like the VA and Social Security, creating overly lengthy wait times. 6 'Out-classed: How the Left Lost the Working Class and How to Win Them Back' by Joan C. Williams. 6 Author Joan C. Williams. This is what the left should be focusing on, not the defense of democracy. Americans who feel they've been screwed for the last 40 years feel democratic institutions haven't delivered for them. If Democrats are seen as defending the status quo, they won't win over non-college voters who feel like the status quo isn't working for them. And nearly two-thirds of Americans lack college degrees. Without them, Democrats can't win elections. Here's the bottom line. My message for Republican powers-that-be is a question: Does the current business climate, rife with chaos, instability, and the corrosion of both democratic norms and the US credit rating, really work for you? If you'd prefer a more orderly political and business climate, you need to deliver a stable, middle-class future for Americans without college degrees. 6 The Trump administration is DOGE-ing away stability at the Veterans Administration and Medicaid, which middle-class and rural Americans rely on. Getty Images My message for Democratic powers-that-be is also a question: Do you want to win elections? If you do, you need to change policies and feeling rules to deliver both economic stability and respect for non-college voters. Because if you don't, what you now see is what you'll get. There's your coalition out of this mess. Joan C. Williams is director of the Equality Action Center at UC Law San Francisco and the author of 'OUTCLASSED: How the Left Lost the Working Class and How to Win Them Back.'

In major reversal, Kotek seeks return of fugitive suspected of targeting Asian Oregonians
In major reversal, Kotek seeks return of fugitive suspected of targeting Asian Oregonians

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

In major reversal, Kotek seeks return of fugitive suspected of targeting Asian Oregonians

Gov. Tina Kotek delivers her State of the State address on Monday, Jan. 13, 2025. She recently ordered the extradition of a suspected member of a multi-state burglary ring from Texas to Oregon. (Laura Tesler/Oregon Capital Chronicle/pool) Gov. Tina Kotek on Friday said she has ordered the extradition of a suspected member of a multi-state burglary ring from Texas to Oregon who allegedly targeted Asian households throughout the Eugene area, averting some of the blowback she faced for rejecting the extradition earlier this week. The reversal marks the second time in the past two weeks that Kotek has changed course in an extradition decision in the wake of public pressure. The governor made a more explicit reversal in May regarding the transfer of a woman accused of embezzling from Eugene Weekly, a move the locally-beloved newspaper has called 'an about-face.' This time, the decision to extradite came 'after further communication with the Lane County DA's office and review of the information provided,' Roxy Mayer, a Kotek press secretary, said in an email. The governor is 'still not moving forward' with the extradition of another member of the burglary ring who fled Oregon and who is being held in Texas with an Immigrations and Customs Enforcement hold. 'We were notified two days ago that the Governor's Office has changed their position on funding in [a] case where our Asian residents were targeted,' Lane County District Attorney Christopher Parosa said in a statement. 'I am grateful for that. It will go a long way to allowing us to make that community feel welcomed and protected in Lane County.' Parosa told The Register-Guard on Tuesday that Kotek's denial was out of the ordinary and 'seems to be an attempt by the governor's office to put that financial obligation on the local communities, who, of course, have never had that responsibility in the past.' He declined to elaborate on the state's extradition efforts to the Capital Chronicle but shared a statement in an email. 'It is my hope that further dialogue regarding extradition funding requests will occur between the Governor's Office and the Lane County District Attorney in the near future,' he said. Jennifer Jonak, a board member at the Eugene-based Asian American Council of Oregon, said in a statement that the group is 'grateful that the Governor's office has heard and taken into account the impact on our Asian American community.' Jonak said the council is still reviewing further details regarding the suspect still on ICE hold in Texas. 'We deeply appreciate the hard work of local law enforcement agencies and the Lane County DA's office who have worked so hard to obtain justice for the victims of these race-targeted offenses,' she said. The Oregon governor has the discretion to make decisions on extraditions in light of the sometimes high costs, a factor Kotek's office has highlighted when explaining its recent rejections of extradition requests. Costs of retrieving alleged criminals from other states have significantly increased since 2020, according to data shared by Kotek's office. The average cost of extraditions from 'non-shuttle states' – those are states that don't participate in cost-sharing and inter-state coordination with fugitive return – has risen about 30% since the 2019-2021 biennium. Police in Eugene described the burglaries as part of a 'multi-state crime ring targeting wealthy individuals of Asian descent, to include business owners, doctors, and others,' according to one February news release, including states such as Washington and Idaho. The suspects surveilled and targeted homeowners who they believed were likely to store valuables at home, police say. Authorities estimated similar crimes continued throughout summer and fall of 2024. While some suspects have been arrested and charged, many warrants remain standing nationwide as several alleged perpetrators are believed to have fled the country. Officials have not named or released a country of origin for the suspect. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store