Jim Cramer Sees Comerica Incorporated (CMA) as a Quiet Standout in Banking
On Thursday, Jim Cramer, the host of Mad Money, walked viewers through what he described as an important week ahead for Wall Street, with earnings season hitting full stride and a flood of quarterly reports expected from companies spanning multiple sectors.
'The fact is the president wants lower interest rates to help offset the pain from higher prices that gonna be caused by the tariffs, but higher prices represent inflation.'
READ ALSO: 12 Stocks on Jim Cramer's Radar Recently and Jim Cramer Discussed These 12 Stocks Recently.
'The Federal Reserve never cuts rates when inflation's out of control,' Cramer emphasized and added that it may very well become the case if tariffs continue to drive up costs. He made it clear that he respects Fed Chair Jerome Powell as he described him as a capable public servant who, in Cramer's words, has 'generally done a good job.' Still, he acknowledged Powell's difficult position as he said the Fed chair is 'stuck between a rock and a hard place.' He added:
'Now history says he should be doing exactly what he's doing, but history is now in the eye of the beholder and there's only one beholder in this whole country and it ain't Jay Powell.'
While Cramer stopped short of diving deeper into political commentary, he admitted he is growing increasingly weary of the political noise surrounding monetary policy. As earnings reports begin to dominate the conversation, he highlighted how swiftly sentiment on Wall Street can shift based on results and noted that the market is entering a phase where 'snap judgments' start flooding in after hours.
'Here's the bottom line: I know it's supposed to be a terrible time, right? I mean like woo, scary, but I don't know. The companies themselves they keep delivering and delivering, and you know what? I don't think next week's going to be any different.'
For this article, we compiled a list of 25 stocks that were discussed by Jim Cramer during the episode of Mad Money aired on April 17. We listed the stocks in the order that Cramer mentioned them. We also provided hedge fund sentiment for each stock as of the fourth quarter of 2024, which was taken from Insider Monkey's database of over 1,000 hedge funds.
Why are we interested in the stocks that hedge funds pile into? The reason is simple: our research has shown that we can outperform the market by imitating the top stock picks of the best hedge funds. Our quarterly newsletter's strategy selects 14 small-cap and large-cap stocks every quarter and has returned 373.4% since May 2014, beating its benchmark by 218 percentage points ().
Number of Hedge Fund Holders: 50
Starting next week's game plan with Comerica Incorporated (NYSE:CMA), Cramer said:
'Now it all starts with the banks, specifically two really incredibly boring banks, Comerica and Zions Bancorp. Now both are considered suspect. They have high yields, you can tell that. But the banks have been outstanding in this environment, no tariff exposure, low charge off, decent loan growth, and hopefully some boost from deregulation down the road, which is what a lot of people voted President Trump for.'
Comerica Incorporated (NYSE:CMA) offers a wide range of financial services, including commercial lending, consumer banking, and wealth management, with products like loans, credit solutions, investment advisory, and private banking.
Overall, CMA ranks 1st on our list of stocks that Jim Cramer discussed. While we acknowledge the potential of CMA as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns, and doing so within a shorter time frame. There is an AI stock that went up since the beginning of 2025, while popular AI stocks lost around 25%. If you are looking for an AI stock that is more promising than CMA but that trades at less than 5 times its earnings, check out our report about this cheapest AI stock.
READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires.
Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Earnings To Watch: Assurant (AIZ) Reports Q2 Results Tomorrow
Insurance services company Assurant (NYSE:AIZ) will be reporting results this Tuesday afternoon. Here's what investors should know. Assurant met analysts' revenue expectations last quarter, reporting revenues of $3.07 billion, up 6.7% year on year. It was a strong quarter for the company, with a solid beat of analysts' EPS estimates and an impressive beat of analysts' net premiums earned estimates. Is Assurant a buy or sell going into earnings? Read our full analysis here, it's free. This quarter, analysts are expecting Assurant's revenue to grow 6.5% year on year to $3.11 billion, in line with the 7.1% increase it recorded in the same quarter last year. Adjusted earnings are expected to come in at $4.45 per share. The majority of analysts covering the company have reconfirmed their estimates over the last 30 days, suggesting they anticipate the business to stay the course heading into earnings. Assurant has a history of exceeding Wall Street's expectations, beating revenue estimates every single time over the past two years by 2% on average. Looking at Assurant's peers in the property & casualty insurance segment, some have already reported their Q2 results, giving us a hint as to what we can expect. Mercury General delivered year-on-year revenue growth of 13.2%, beating analysts' expectations by 2%, and Allstate reported revenues up 6%, falling short of estimates by 0.7%. Mercury General's stock price was unchanged after the resultswhile Allstate was up 5.7%. Read our full analysis of Mercury General's results here and Allstate's results here. The euphoria surrounding Trump's November win lit a fire under major indices, but potential tariffs have caused the market to do a 180 in 2025. While some of the property & casualty insurance stocks have shown solid performance in this choppy environment, the group has generally underperformed, with share prices down 4% on average over the last month. Assurant is down 2.6% during the same time and is heading into earnings with an average analyst price target of $233.20 (compared to the current share price of $186.48). Here at StockStory, we certainly understand the potential of thematic investing. Diverse winners from Microsoft (MSFT) to Alphabet (GOOG), Coca-Cola (KO) to Monster Beverage (MNST) could all have been identified as promising growth stories with a megatrend driving the growth. So, in that spirit, we've identified a relatively under-the-radar profitable growth stock benefiting from the rise of AI, available to you FREE via this link. StockStory is growing and hiring equity analyst and marketing roles. Are you a 0 to 1 builder passionate about the markets and AI? See the open roles here. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NFLPA elects David White to serve as interim executive director after Lloyd Howell's resignation
The NFLPA has finally elected an interim replacement for Lloyd Howell. The union announced late on Sunday night that it had elected David White to serve as the new interim executive director. White will replace Howell, who resigned last month amid a scandal that rocked the union. White was a finalist for the role in 2023. He is the former national executive director and chief negotiator of the Screen Actors Guild. He's also the CEO of 3CG, and is the board chair of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. 'I am grateful to the NFLPA's player leadership for entrusting me with the privilege and responsibility to guide their union as interim executive director,' White said in a statement. 'It's a duty I do not take lightly, and I'm committed to re-establishing trust and ensuring the union is serving its members best. 'I look forward to working with the entire NFLPA team to prospect players' health and safety, secure their financial well-being and further strengthen their voice to shape their futures.' This post will be updated with more information shortly.
Boston Globe
13 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump fired America's economic data collector. History shows the perils.
There is the case of China, where earlier this century local authorities manipulated data to hit growth targets mandated by Beijing, forcing analysts and policymakers to turn to alternative measures to gauge the state of the country's economy. Advertisement Perhaps most famously, there is the case of Argentina, which in the 2000s and 2010s systematically understated inflation figures to such a degree that the international community eventually stopped relying on the government's data. That loss of faith drove up the country's borrowing costs, worsening a debt crisis that ultimately led to it defaulting on its international obligations. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up It is too soon to know whether the United States is on a similar path. But economists and other experts said that Trump's decision Friday to fire Erika McEntarfer, the Senate-confirmed head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, was a troubling step in that direction. Janet Yellen, the former Treasury secretary and chair of the Federal Reserve, said the firing was not what is expected from the most advanced economy in the world. Advertisement 'This is the kind of thing you would only expect to see in a banana republic,' Yellen said. Essential data The Bureau of Labor Statistics is officially part of the Labor Department, whose secretary is a member of the president's Cabinet. But the agency operates independently, producing detailed, nonpartisan data on employment, prices, wages and other topics. Economists say that reliable, independently produced statistics are critical to good decision making in both the public and private sector. Officials at the Federal Reserve rely on government-collected data on inflation and unemployment to decide how to set interest rates, which affect how much Americans must pay to get a mortgage or a car loan. 'Good data helps not just the Fed, it helps the government, but it also helps the private sector,' Jerome Powell, the Fed chair, said at a recent news conference. 'The United States has been a leader in that for 100 years,' he added, 'and we really need to continue that in my view.' Experts on government statistics say data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and other agencies is unlikely to deteriorate dramatically overnight. The acting commissioner named to replace McEntarfer on a temporary basis, William J. Wiatrowski, is a longtime employee of the agency who is widely respected by experts inside and outside government. The career employees who collect and analyze the data remain in place, using the same methods and procedures they used before McEntarfer was pushed out. But experts who just days ago were defending the integrity of the statistical agencies now find themselves asking uncomfortable questions about the trajectory of economic data in the United States. Advertisement 'If the poverty numbers come in and look great, is the director of the Census going to get a raise?' said Amy O'Hara, a former Census Bureau official who is now a professor at Georgetown University. 'If the household income numbers don't look great what happens then? What about GDP? What about CPI?' Andreas Georgiou knows the challenges of standing up to such political pressure. After he took over Greece's statistical agency in 2010, he found that the country has been severely understating its budget deficits. Those findings ran afoul of Greek authorities, who spent years trying to prosecute him on a variety of charges related to his work, despite independent reviews that supported his conclusions. (He fared better, though, than Olimpiy Kvitkin, a Soviet census official who was arrested and executed when his population count came in lower than Josef Stalin had announced.) Georgiou refused to bend. Reliable statistics are important for policymaking, he said. But they are also essential to democracy. 'Official statistics, government statistics are a mirror that society holds up to itself,' he said. If that mirror is distorted, or broken entirely, then the accountability that is central to a democratic system cannot work. 'If society cannot see itself clearly, then it cannot identify its problems,' he said. 'If it cannot identify its problems, then it cannot find the right solutions. It cannot find the right persons to solve these problems.' Data integrity at risk Trump said he fired McEntarfer because the numbers produced by her agency were 'rigged' to hurt him politically. Experts on the government statistics, including former commissioners in both Democratic and Republican administrations, have called foul on that accusation. The commissioner, who is the bureau's sole political appointee, does not control the numbers that the agency publishes, or even see them until they have been finalized by a staff of career technocrats whose careers typically span multiple presidential administrations. Advertisement Erica Groshen, who led the bureau under President Barack Obama, recalled getting resistance from the agency's staff when she tried to liven up the language of the monthly jobs reports. The bureau's staff insisted that the agency's job wasn't to say whether the glass was half-full or half-empty, only to report that, 'It is an eight-ounce container with four ounces of liquid.' Groshen relented. That is not to say political interference would be impossible. Government statistics rely on hundreds of methodological decisions, many of them judgment calls with no obviously correct answer. A sufficiently sophisticated agency head might, over time, be able to nudge the data in a politically advantageous direction, without any single decision being so egregious that it led to a mass resignation of career employees. 'I could imagine a new commissioner coming in and trying to make changes to those methods and procedures that try to move those numbers one way or the other,' said Katharine G. Abraham, who led the bureau during the Clinton and George W. Bush administrations. 'They would have to know a lot in terms of where to put the finger on the scale.' Private alternatives There are also blunter approaches. In Argentina in 2007, the government of then-President Néstor Kirchner pushed out the mathematician in charge of the country's consumer price data, then released an inflation figure that was dramatically lower than the one the mathematician had calculated. The public wasn't fooled. Nor were international bond investors, who ultimately turned to alternative sources of inflation data, calculated by researchers outside the government. Advertisement But such alternative sources are inherently limited, said Alberto Cavallo, a Harvard University economist who developed one of the most widely used private inflation indexes in Argentina. 'Private alternatives can complement official statistics, but they are not a substitute,' Cavallo wrote in an email. 'Government agencies have the resources and scale to conduct nationwide surveys -- something no private initiative can fully replicate.' Recently, Cavallo has been publishing data on consumer prices in the United States, which has shown the impact of Trump's tariffs more quickly than the government's data. But while such real-time sources are valuable, they don't carry the 'institutional credibility' of government data. The trouble is that once that credibility is eroded, it is hard to repair -- particularly at a time when partisans on both sides of the political aisle are skeptical of numbers put out by members of the opposing party. Nancy Potok, a former Census official who served as chief statistician of the United States during the first Trump administration, said that in the past there had been strong bipartisan support for the statistical system in Congress and the business community. But partisanship seems to have eroded that support at a moment when a combination of political pressures and long-standing budget challenges are making it most necessary. 'There were some people who really understood the value of the economic data, and now that's not the conversation and those champions aren't there that were there in the past,' she said. 'There's no one leading the charge to make these kind of investments.' This article originally appeared in Advertisement
