
Burberry got too fancy. This American is taking it back to its British roots.
What he didn't see were any $500 umbrellas—the type of higher-volume accessory that, along with trench coats, made Burberry an icon of functional, aspirational luxury for well over a century. As an American who had long admired the British brand, Schulman was puzzled.
'I'm like, why don't we have hats or umbrellas on the floor?" he recalled. A store employee told him that went against the company's visual guidelines, which called for sparse setups and no mannequins, another thing that struck Schulman as odd given that Burberry sells a full wardrobe. 'I said, 'Well, why don't we try?'"
Employees quickly retrieved some from the stockroom and propped them up prominently. As luck would have it, a rainstorm soon blew through, and several shoppers bought umbrellas with Burberry's signature check pattern within the hour.
One year in as Burberry CEO, Schulman is taking a back-to-basics approach to reviving the cachet of a company that once helped define British culture around the world. He is unwinding some of the brand's overly ambitious detours and refocusing on what built Burberry's name: classic British style and clothing designed to withstand the elements. A new ad campaign proclaims 'It's Always Burberry Weather" and features Olivia Colman, who played Queen Elizabeth II on 'The Crown," in a quilted jacket and Liam Gallagher of Oasis in a parka ahead of the '90s British rock band's reunion tour.
'Some of this is about slicing and dicing the numbers and looking at deep analysis," says the 53-year-old in an interview in his office at Burberry's London headquarters near the Thames. 'And some of it is just leaning into the assets that we have already and celebrating who we are."
Since its founding in 1856 and Thomas Burberry's invention of weatherproofed gabardine fabric designed to withstand the British climate, Burberry has outfitted polar explorers, soldiers and royalty. A young Princess Diana was frequently photographed in her Burberry trench, establishing the coat as a symbol of understated aristocratic style. By the late 1980s, it was becoming the uniform of London's club kids and fashion outsiders. The shift diluted its luxury image; it was too everywhere. In the 2000s, the brand mounted a comeback, running ads with the likes of Kate Moss and aristocratic model Stella Tennant that blended heritage with edge.
Burberry's Bond Street store in London in 2023 shows how the retailer then favored a minimalist aesthetic with no mannequins.Since Schulman joined as CEO, Burberry is featuring more traditional patterns and full wardrobe looks on mannequins, as seen in its Regent Street store in London in June.
In recent years, a series of CEOs and designers tried to catapult Burberry into the top tier of the fashion world with avant-garde runway looks and bags at prices that rivaled Louis Vuitton.
The timing couldn't have been worse. As Burberry tried to push upmarket, the luxury industry turned. Consumers cut back amid economic uncertainty and balked at prices that had soared during the pandemic boom in demand. Sales were hit especially hard in China, the world's largest luxury market.
Burberry was caught in an identity crisis.
The brand, Schulman believes, had lost focus, pursuing a niche aesthetic at the expense of its more universal luxury appeal.
And because Burberry is the U.K.'s only global luxury brand—as well as the marquee name at London Fashion Week—its missteps have wider implications for British fashion as a whole.
'When it falters, it exposes how heavily the system depends on a single brand to lead," said Andrew Groves, a professor of fashion design at the University of Westminster.
Princess Diana, with Prince Charles on tour in Nova Scotia in 1983, made the Burberry trench a symbol of understated aristocratic style.
Other fashion rivals are privately owned (Chanel) or part of sprawling conglomerates (Gucci or Dior), but Burberry is on its own as a company and publicly traded. That puts more pressure on Schulman to turn things around, despite the weaker luxury market, and fast.
In May, Burberry announced a second annual decline in sales and a net loss for the fiscal year ended in March. Burberry's share price is down more than 50% since early 2023. Schulman moved quickly to overhaul the executive team and announced plans to cut roughly 1,700 jobs by 2027—nearly 20% of its global head count.
The oldest of six children, Schulman grew up in Los Angeles. As a boy, he had his nose in Women's Wear Daily, known in the industry as the 'fashion bible," and corporate annual reports. He would memorize the layouts and square footage of major department stores from company filings.
'I was a very strange child," he admits with a laugh.
When Nordstrom announced it would open a store nearby in West Los Angeles, Schulman, then around 13 years old, wrote to one of the company's leaders to say he was 'ecstatic." The executive wrote back, and he's kept the letter ever since.
Around the same time, Schulman got his first job at a children's clothing boutique in Beverly Hills. Kris Kardashian came in to shop for her young children. So did Kathy Hilton, for her daughter Paris. Schulman knew the regulars by name and paid close attention to their tastes. He joined the owner on buying trips, bringing back Versace and Moschino for kids.
'A lot of what I learned was in those four walls," he says. He was convinced he'd rocket straight to being CEO of Bloomingdale's.
After college at New York University and then Parsons School of Design, Schulman landed his first job in fashion at Perry Ellis, an American menswear brand known for its dress shirts and slacks. The company was in turmoil. It had just parted ways with Tom Ford—who would soon reinvent Gucci—and brought in Marc Jacobs, whose now-legendary Grunge collection also got him fired.
Schulman quickly learned the risks of misalignment between creative vision and corporate leadership.
A few years later, in 1997, he joined Gucci. There, Schulman was responsible for the commercial side of the ready-to-wear business, working closely with Christopher Bailey, who was head of women's design. Bailey later jumped to Burberry.
Schulman kept a close eye on Burberry as Bailey led a revival of the brand, and Schulman's interest deepened when he relocated to London to run Jimmy Choo from 2007 to 2012.
'Burberry was like the shining city on a hill," he said.
A succession of CEOs—five since the turn of the century—have tried to push Burberry higher up the luxury ladder, with some experimenting with less traditional styles like an urban, sports-luxe aesthetic.
Schulman at a Jimmy Choo event in 2009, when he was CEO of the luxury footwear label.
Burberry built out a network of global flagships and tightened control over its image. It gave up profits from high-volume licensing deals in Spain and Japan, pulled back from discount-friendly department stores in the U.S., and stripped out promotions from full-price boutiques.
The push accelerated during the pandemic. In late 2022, the company hired designer Daniel Lee and leaned hard into expensive handbags. Burberry increased prices on leather goods by 60%.
'It's been a mistake for them to raise prices like they did and to try to carve out a whole new lane for themselves," says Pete Nordstrom, president of the Seattle-based Nordstrom department store, one of Burberry's most important wholesale partners in the U.S. 'That's going to have a negative impact with customers—and it has."
Meanwhile, Schulman was on a fast track through some of America's biggest fashion names, including Coach and Michael Kors.
Schulman was in talks to bring more fashion know-how to Burberry as a potential board member in spring 2024, just as Burberry's strategy was unraveling. The company had issued a profit warning and seen its share price tumble. Shareholders were losing patience.
Instead of a board seat, Schulman was named CEO.
On his first day, he stood before staff at Burberry's London headquarters and delivered a blunt diagnosis: The brand had drifted too far into niche fashion. It needed to capitalize more on its roots—trench coats, scarves, the classic red, white, black and tan checks.
Within weeks, Schulman convened a 200-person session of designers, merchandisers, product developers and marketers. Burberry had narrowed its appeal too drastically, he told them, focusing on the 'opinionated customer" while neglecting others who he called investors, aspirers, hedonists and conservatives.
Burberry scarves are no longer tucked away in drawers. Prominent 'scarf bars' allow shoppers to pick among an array of patterns and colors of cashmere scarves, with on-the-spot monogramming.
'We had left behind the broader universe of luxury customers," he says.
One symbolic casualty of that shift was the classic Burberry polo, historically with an embroidered equestrian knight or checked trims.
'We had replaced that with a more anonymous polo shirt…at a much higher price point," Schulman said. 'Our customer didn't respond to that."
Pricing has been recalibrated: Schulman is charging a premium where the brand has authority—particularly outerwear and trench coats, which can run upward of $3,400—while pulling back in categories like handbags, where Burberry's credentials are weaker.
He is also highlighting globally recognizable symbols of Britishness—but with a sharper eye on how they would resonate internationally with, say, an American like himself. Internal data revealed a recurring problem under the previous leadership: Campaigns aimed at showcasing Burberry's 'modern British luxury" aesthetic struck a chord in the U.K., but often failed to resonate as strongly abroad.
In the fall, Schulman unveiled an ad campaign tied to the reopening of Burberry's New York flagship that featured British model and actress Cara Delevingne in front of London's iconic Big Ben. 'It may not be the most subtle reference, but it's globally recognizable," Schulman said. 'You can see the Eiffel Tower in ads for three or four of our French competitors all the time."
Nowhere is Schulman's shift more visible than in how Burberry displays scarves, once tucked away in drawers. New 'scarf bars" prominently showcase cashmere scarves in an array of patterns and colors that can be monogrammed on the spot.
Investors are optimistic. Same-store sales fell 5% in the six months to March 29—an improvement from the 20% drop in the previous half. Burberry's share price is up about 30% this year.
At a showroom in Paris shortly after Schulman joined Burberry, Nordstrom says his buyers and merchandisers were ready to lay out everything that wasn't working. Before they could start, Schulman cut in: 'You don't need to tell me. I know. We'll fix it."
Schulman and his team are eager to work collaboratively, says Nordstrom. 'Their time to shine is really the second half of the year, especially fall and winter. I think we'll know a lot more then."
With its recent focus on more accessibly priced products, some warn the brand risks drifting into 'affordable luxury" territory—a profitable but less rarefied space, closer to Coach. Two former Burberry executives contend that the shift to the higher end would have worked if given enough time, or if the broader environment hadn't changed so dramatically.
'It takes years to elevate a brand," said one. 'Burberry started that process, but it's very hard to achieve when you're a publicly listed company. Shareholders want results."
Schulman insists he has no intention of turning Burberry into a 'British Coach," emphasizing that the ambition remains firmly rooted in full luxury positioning. First, however, he needs to lure more customers with the kind of classic coats and scarves that made Burberry famous.
'We could be among those top five luxury brands in the far future," he says. 'That is the North Star for this business."
Write to Nick Kostov at nick.kostov@dowjones.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
28 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
'The last thing we want right now is a sequel': Lewis Hamilton not aboard bandwagon for part 2 of Brad Pitt's F1
The world may be waiting with bated breath for an announcement of a sequel to Brad Pitt's sensational racing drama F1, but the film's executive producer and seven-time Formula One champion Lewis Hamilton is not on board the bandwagon. The British racer warned Thursday that rushing a sequel would be 'the worst thing we probably could do.' Lewis Hamilton served as executive producer and consultant on Brad Pitt-starrer F1. Lewis Hamilton says he just wants to enjoy the movie's success. The film has become Apple's biggest box-office hit yet when it debuted with $55.6 million in North American theaters and $144 million globally over the weekend, according to studio estimates Sunday. Lewis Hamilton on F1's success On Thursday, Hamilton spoke to the press ahead of the British Grand Prix F1 race, where he was asked about a potential sequel to F1. 'We literally just finished it, so I think the last thing we want right now is a sequel,' Hamilton said, according to the news agency AP. The 39-year-old added, 'It's been four years in the making. It was a lot of work, particularly for (director Joseph Kosinski). It's time away from your family, it's time away from your kids, and also you need this to just simmer for a while, you know. Like, let's enjoy it. I think the worst thing we probably could do is to rush into doing a sequel,' the Ferrari driver added. "Most sequels are way worse, and so we don't need to rush it. I think if we do do a sequel, I would say let's really, really take our time in getting it even better.' Hamilton said he was bringing F1 race-track procedures to the movie business by asking for a 'debrief' on the project, in the same way a team analyses a race before heading to the next one. 'Let's review what we did, what we could have done better,' he said. 'I don't know if they ever do that in the movie business, but it's something obviously I've learned from here.' About F1, the film Directed by Joseph Kosinski, F1 stars Brad Pitt as Sonny Hayes, a driver who returns to Formula One after 30 years to help a friend's team win a race. The film was shot during actual F1 Grand Prix weekends with many drivers and team members appearing in cameos.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
GTA Online update bring bonus rewards, US Independence Day items, and more
American video game publisher, Rockstar Games, has rolled out a fresh update to GTA Online this week in celebration of the US Independence Day, offering players in-game bonuses, limited-time cosmetics, and a wide range of vehicle and property discounts. The update is now live and runs through July 9. As part of this week's changes, players can earn 4X in-game currency (GTA$) and reputation points (RP) for participating in Land Races, along with double rewards on Auto Shop Client Jobs and Tow Truck Services. A number of vehicles, weapons, and properties are also available at reduced prices, while themed gear and cosmetics are being distributed to mark the occasion. Available across platforms The Independence Day content is available to players on PlayStation, Xbox, and PC, including those using the enhanced versions of the game on PS5 and Xbox Series X and S. All offers and bonuses remain active until July 9, 2025. GTA Online update: What's new In-game bonuses and limited-time items Players who complete Land Races this week will receive quadruple rewards, with two race wins unlocking a special Fireworks Bucket Hat and GTA$100,000. Meanwhile, Auto Shop Client Jobs and Tow Truck Services will pay out 2X GTA$ and RP, offering opportunities for faster in-game earnings. Rockstar is also giving away a free Lady Liberty Bucket Hat to all players who log in before July 9. Additionally, business battle crates may contain four types of beer hats and the Statue of Happiness t-shirt, both tied to the holiday theme. Vehicle and property discounts For those looking to expand their in-game collection, Rockstar is offering up to 50 per cent off on various vehicles, including: 40 per cent off: Western Sovereign, Vapid Liberator, Sea Sparrow, Vapid Caracara, Declasse Walton L35, and more 50 per cent off: JoBuilt P-996 LAZER (fighter plane) 30 per cent off: Salvage Yard properties, Bunkers, Nightclubs, Cocaine Lockups 40 per cent off: Custom upgrades at Benny's Original Motor Works A full list of discounted cars, motorcycles, and other vehicles is available in-game via in-world dealerships like Premium Deluxe Motorsport and Luxury Autos Showroom. Fireworks, weapons, and gun van offers To go with the festive theme, the Musket and firework launcher are both available at 50 per cent off from the Gun Van, along with free firework launcher ammo. The Gun Van inventory also includes: Military rifle Combat shotgun Knuckle dusters Tear gas, grenades, and proximity mines Service carbine (30 per cent off for GTA Plus members) Salvage yard robberies and claimable vehicles Players completing Salvage Yard Robbery missions can claim two special vehicles this week: Declasse Drift Yosemite (from The McTony Robbery) Karin Boor (from The Duggan Robbery) Both vehicles feature patriotic liveries and are equipped with special limited-time license plates referencing Liberty City and Las Venturas. Car meet and prize challenges This week's LS Car Meet includes test drives for three vehicles and a prize ride challenge. Players who win in the Car Meet series for two consecutive days can claim the Bravado Hotring Hellfire in a special 17 Patriot Beer livery. The lucky wheel at the casino also features a chance to win the Vapid Dominator GTT, styled with another holiday-themed paint job. In related news, Rockstar Games has also recently dropped a surprise update for the Red Dead Online game. Earlier in 2022, the publisher told fans not to expect any major update from Red Dead Online as it was shifting its focus to the development of GTA 6. Now, the newly released update introduces four new missions, a limited-time community-designed outfit, and much more.


The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Back in the flesh: ‘Jurassic Park' and the Dinosaur Renaissance
In the summer of 1993, the world watched spellbound as a towering Brachiosaurus gracefully reared up to nibble treetops, while John Williams' score swelled like God breathing. Steven Spielberg's genre-defining blockbuster rewrote the cultural DNA of dinosaurs forever, transforming them from textbook curiosities into Hollywood royalty. An entire generation developed an unshakable obsession with creatures that had been extinct for 65 million years. All because of a movie. For a film that opens with a mosquito trapped in amber, Jurassic Park has aged with surprising elasticity. It had the makings of a pulpy B-movie, but the magician in Spielberg spun it into something timeless. Ever since, it's been re-spun, rebooted, and rebranded across three decades. The science, even then, was flimsy. Toxorhynchites rutilus, the species of mosquito shown, doesn't even suck blood. And DNA degrades far too quickly to survive millions of years. But that shaky premise has since evolved from science fiction, to 'science eventuality,' to literal modern-day science. While extracting dinosaur DNA from fossilised insects remains a fantasy, the real world has been inching closer to that cinematic magic. Iconic special effects Of course, the magic wasn't all Spielberg. Stan Winston built animatronics with blinking eyes, breathing chests, and skin stretched over robotic bones. Industrial Light and Magic's (ILM) groundbreaking CGI handled the weight and gait of creatures that had never been seen before, using a special 'Dinosaur Input Device' to puppeteer their movements digitally. Just 15 minutes of dinosaur screen time was enough to reshape how a generation imagined prehistoric life. The irony is that while Jurassic Park was hailed for its scientific fidelity, it also got a fair amount of things wrong. The Velociraptors were scaled up to nearly double their actual size. The T. Rex's vision, contrary to Dr. Grant's famous whisper, was not based on movement; it likely had binocular depth perception and could smell you coming a mile away. Most egregiously for modern palaeontologists, the dinosaurs were featherless, greyish reptiles, missing the colourful, bird-like traits we now know many had. But Jack Horner, the real-life palaeontologist who inspired Alan Grant, saw the bigger picture. In his words, the movie wasn't a documentary, but a doorway to suspend all disbelief. Yet, over time, the franchise leaned deeper into American military-industrial fantasies. The recent entries have given us weaponised Velociraptors, genetically-engineered hybrid killing machines, and a Mosasaur the size of a battleship. Behind the scenes, consultants still fought to keep the science honest. Some succeeded (the Pyroraptor from Jurassic World Dominion finally had feathers) but the overarching 'scary sells' mandate remained. Pink-plumed, birdlike dinosaurs, no matter how accurate, just didn't test well. The palaeontological re-awakening In the years following the film's release, palaeontology experienced a renaissance. The so-called 'Jurassic Park Effect' turned casual curiosity into career paths. Children who once saw dinosaurs as static images began imagining them as dynamic, intelligent, and even graceful creatures. Universities saw a spike in students declaring interest in prehistoric life. Museums were packed again. Dinosaurs were, suddenly, the coolest things ever. The once unassuming field relegated to academia now had a face, a soundtrack, and perhaps most importantly, funding. Governments and institutions began investing more seriously in palaeontological research, emboldened by a public that was suddenly into dinosaurs. Before Jurassic Park, new dinosaur species were discovered at a rate of maybe three or four per year. Today, that number hovers around 50. Whether digging in the deserts of Mongolia or scanning fossils with particle accelerators, researchers rode the wave of public fascination the film helped ignite. Which is exactly why the Jurassic World sequels sting a little. They're fine as popcorn films, but they could've done more. The original reimagined how the world saw dinosaurs. The new films played it safe, recycling familiar nostalgic images rather than reflecting what science had since uncovered. Sure, they'll still get some kid to Google 'Indominus Rex vs Spinosaurus', but it's hard not to feel a little let down by what could've been. On the ethics of de-extinction Jurassic Park did something more speculative and slippery by introducing the world to the concept of 'de-extinction.' Today, we live in a time where resurrecting lost species no longer sounds entirely impossible. Ben Lamm, founder of Colossal Biosciences, believes the woolly mammoth will walk again by 2028. His labs are working with ancient DNA, comparative genomics, and somatic cell nuclear transfer — the same science that cloned Dolly the sheep, now turbocharged with robotics and AI. The ostensible goal has been to resurrect extinct species to seed ecosystems with keystone animals. His team is also simultaneously attempting to revive the dodo, the thylacine (the Tasmanian Devil, or Taz from Looney Tunes), and potentially use artificial wombs for reproduction. It's the closest thing we have to a real-life InGen, though unsurprisingly, not everyone is optimistic. Some question the ethics of creating a single living animal just to prove it can be done. Others worry about the unintended consequences of gene editing, including evolutionary whiplash, cellular chaos, and the specter of designer organisms being commodified. There's a certain poetry in how Jurassic Park warned us about the dangers of turning nature into a spectacle while itself becoming the most breathtaking spectacle ever made. A movie that staged a cautionary tale about playing God with prehistoric DNA ended up inspiring decades of scientific fascination, funding, and, ironically, real-world attempts. The franchise that once asked whether we should resurrect extinct animals is now part of a cultural machine that increasingly seems to whisper, 'Why not?' It captured, maybe accidentally, the exact shape of our cultural neurosis: the maniacal desire to control nature, a belief in technological omnipotence, and a tendency to moralise after the fact. Perhaps the cruelest cosmic twist is that the plastic toy dinosaurs clutched by children today — those mass-produced echoes of Spielberg's creations — are, in a very real sense, made of dinosaurs. Fossil fuels, derived from ancient organic matter liquefied over millennia, have been moulded into choking hazards and Happy Meal replicas of the creatures. These great beasts who once walked the Earth now circle in a perfect closed loop of commercial mythmaking. Capitalism, like life, finds a way.