logo
Why are we obsessed with body counts again?

Why are we obsessed with body counts again?

Yahoo15-05-2025

Picture this: it's a busy Tuesday and you're running into town to run errands on your lunch break. You're balancing about six items in your arms and already having a stressful day when you're approached by a man-child with his phone in your face and a tiny microphone in his hand. That's when he asks you, 'What's your body count?'
He awaits your answer impatiently and you're confused, frustrated, and not sure why the question is so important. Yet there's still an immense pressure to answer it.
This situation, as much as it sounds like a nightmare, is a reality. In fact, it's a TikTok trend that's amassed an eye-watering 917 million views and counting. Whether it's viral street interviews, skits, or podcast debates, judging women based on their body counts, or how many people they've had sex with, is algorithmic gold dust for content creators.
For something so personal, so irrelevant to anyone else's life, it's staggering how much weight society still gives to this arbitrary number. And it's not just about curiosity. This number has somehow become a measure of a person's worth, particularly for women. And they're being shamed for views and exploited for the revenue that comes with them.
SEE ALSO: How the internet became a breeding ground for slutshaming
So, why does body count matter so much? Why are we still having these conversations in 2025? And more importantly, why does it always seem to matter more for women than it does for men?
When was the last time a man's sexual history was used to discredit his character, imply he was 'used up', or suggest he was unworthy of love?
Body count judgement is nothing more than good old-fashioned slutshaming, the belittling of women and marginalised genders that keeps purity culture in check. Gigi Engle, clinical sexologist, sex educator, and author of All the F*cking Mistakes: A Guide to Sex, Love, and Life explains that purity culture derives from Christianity and was a movement, gaining mainstream recognition in the 1990s, to emphasise the importance of abstaining from sex before marriage in order to please God. However, purity culture has leaked out of religion and the 1990s and permeated every crevice of modern culture.
'One of purity culture's biggest myths is the idea that every time a woman has sex, she attaches herself to that person and a part of her has been damaged or taken away." - Gigi Engle, sexologist
Engle tells Mashable that purity culture is built on misinformation about female sexuality, rarely demonising men for the same acts, and is passed off as fact. 'One of purity culture's biggest myths is the idea that every time a woman has sex, she attaches herself to that person and a part of her has been damaged or taken away,' she explains. This belief is rooted in Christian purity culture, dating back to medieval times, and is often referred to as 'soul ties', a method of shaming women into keeping their body count low.
Engle adds that soul ties were designed to make women feel guilty for having more than one sexual partner. 'Purity culture scares us into believing we'll lose any chance of finding a partner by sleeping around.'
It should go without saying, but none of these puritanical ideas are true. Studies consistently show that a person's sexual history has no bearing on their ability to maintain a healthy, fulfilling relationship. That being said, marriages can be impacted by partners' amount of previous partners because of cultural issues, including the false narrative that a person's worth can be determined by how many people they've slept with. Ironically, and sadly, the only danger having a high body count poses on being a good partner is being so judged by your partner that it affects the whole relationship.
Even though we know these ideas aren't true, the myth of purity has bled into mainstream dating culture, even for those who don't believe in religion. It manifests in the anxiety many people feel about body count discussions. At the time of writing, TikTok videos under the 'soul ties' hashtag have been viewed over 437 million times, many of them spreading misinformation about what happens to our bodies and psyches after sex.
This pressure to conform to outdated sexual expectations has very real consequences. Even in modern dating culture, the expectation that women should suppress their sexuality remains deeply ingrained. Research shows that a significant amount of people openly admit they find a woman less attractive if she has had multiple sexual partners. And that's just the ones willing to say it out loud.
SEE ALSO: The best dating apps and sites in May 2025
According to a sexual secrets survey of 1,500 British people by sex toy shop Lovehoney, 22 percent of people have lied to a partner about how many people they've had sex with. A third of Brits admit to keeping sexual secrets out of fear of judgement, and 30 percent say they've kept their number a secret out of embarrassment.
Even on Pure, a dating app that actively promotes sex positivity, body counts are still a point of tension. In a survey of 3,000 people, just 16 percent of women said they feel comfortable openly sharing past sexual experiences with a date, and 17 percent of men stated they find it unattractive when women have had many sexual partners or kinky experiences.
So, it's no wonder women feel compelled to downplay their history. The silver lining: for everyone who finds it a turn-off, there are thankfully 83 percent who aren't put off by certain body counts or wild stories.
Still, this leaves women feeling disillusioned with dating, afraid to disclose their true sexual history in case of judgement or personal attack, and ultimately leads to shame they don't deserve to carry.
Nowhere is body count judgement and slutshaming more evident than in the way sex workers are treated online. It's hard to scroll through TikTok for long without seeing a sex worker being interrogated by podcasters who seem less interested in genuine discussion and more intent on condemnation.
Take Rebecca Goodwin, an OnlyFans performer who made headlines after walking out of a podcast recording earlier this year. She later revealed she had been repeatedly berated about her career, with the hosts attempting to frame her work as morally bankrupt. Despite asking for the episode to be scrapped, clips of her trying to defend her choices flooded Instagram and TikTok, spliced with disapproving commentary. Similarly, musician Kate Nash — who joined OnlyFans to fund her next tour — was forced to justify her decision in national news segments.
This trend of scrutinising and shaming sex workers spills over into body count discourse, where women who have multiple partners are treated as if they are somehow tainted. Society continues to associate female sexual freedom with degradation, while simultaneously holding men to a completely different standard.
The backlash against sex workers is particularly apparent in the recent moral panic surrounding porn performers Lily Phillips and Bonnie Blue. Phillips set out to sleep with 100 people in a day, while Blue attempted 1,000, reigniting a debate about 'body counts' that quickly spiralled into outright misogyny. While some critics voiced concern over the ethics of such stunts, much of the outrage stemmed from the sheer audacity of women publicly embracing their sexuality. The reaction split into two camps: one expressing concern over the men involved and another fixating on the idea that women having too much sex is inherently wrong.
This kind of reaction, unfortunately, isn't surprising. Slutshaming is often about power and control, according to Erica Smith, founder of the Purity Culture Dropout Program, which helps people unlearn internalised shame. She tells Mashable, 'Often a person will slutshame someone because they think that person needs to be put in their place.'
The deep-rooted stigma surrounding sex work has long been used to punish women for any sexual behaviour that isn't seen as perfectly pure. If a woman's number is 'too high', she is treated as though she has crossed some invisible threshold into territory reserved for sex workers, who are already relentlessly judged and vilified.
Of course, the idea that women's value disintegrates with each person they sleep with completely disregards consent, sexual agency, and the fact that women don't exist purely to be chosen by men. What's even more insidious is how this rhetoric is framed as 'helpful advice' rather than what it actually is: old-fashioned misogyny, dressed up in modern aesthetics.
Slutshaming is also about deflection. 'They may not be happy with their own sex lives, and it's hard for them to see someone enjoying themselves freely,' Smith says. Instead of embracing sex positivity, some people choose to dismiss, belittle, and even actively suppress it.
At the heart of the body count debate is a fundamental misunderstanding of human sexuality. The idea that a single number can define someone's character, their capacity for love, or their ability to commit is not just ridiculous; it's dangerous.
Sexuality isn't a fixed formula. Some people have had many partners, others have had very few, and neither experience is inherently better or worse. Studies consistently show that a person's sexual history has no bearing on their ability to maintain a healthy, fulfilling relationship. So instead of 'what's your body count', the real question should be: why are we still measuring a person's worth this way?
Sluts: The Truth About Sex Shame & What We Can Do To Fight It by Beth Ashley (£9.99, Penguin Random House) is out now and is available from Amazon and all good bookshops.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Unrelated images shared with false claims of deadly Mauritanian plane crash heading to Mecca
Unrelated images shared with false claims of deadly Mauritanian plane crash heading to Mecca

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Unrelated images shared with false claims of deadly Mauritanian plane crash heading to Mecca

'A plane carrying Mauritanian hajj pilgrims crashed on their way to the holy city of Mecca. More than 210 hajj pilgrims were martyred,' reads part of a text overlay published on a TikTok post on May 28, 2025. The caption of the post, shared more than 1,300 times, includes the hashtag '#airplanecrashmauritania'. The video contains two static images of burning planes on a runway, edited with a motion filter and Arabic music playing in the background. Similar claims were published elsewhere on Facebook here and here. Millions of Muslims make the once-in-a-lifetime pilgrimage each year to the site believed to be the birthplace of the prophet Mohammed (archived here). However, posts claiming the images of a burning plane show a Mauritanian air disaster involving Muslims on their way to Mecca in June 2025 are false. Search results showed that the image has been previously linked to reports of different airline disasters. Two online publications dating from 2022 (archived here) and 2024 (archived here) also previously used the photograph to illustrate two separate incidents. The first occurred when a Nigerian air-force plane crashed in April 2022, killing the two pilots on board (archived here). The second incident, reported by the BBC in December 2023, wasn't a crash at all, but involved a NAF plane that apparently mistakenly fired at worshippers in a mosque in Kaduna, northwestern Nigeria, leaving some 85 people dead (archived here). However, reverse image searches revealed that the photo was published by aviation website Airliners, on May 10, 2007 (archived here) and showed a Russian-made Ilyushin Il-76td military cargo plane fire that occurred at Pointe-Noire Agostino Neto Airport, in the southwest of the Republic of the Congo. 'The Il-76 freighter caught fire on the ground while it was being loaded in preparation for a flight to Brazzaville (BZV),' reads the photo caption. The markings on the nose of the plane in the TikTok post clearly match those in the original image. Various articles in local news outlets from 2007 corroborate the date and location of this incident, stating that there were no casualties (archived here and here). Additional images of the event found on online forum Flightstory (archived here) were used alongside a Google Earth search to pinpoint the location of the fire, placing it next to an air-traffic control tower seen in a photograph taken outside the airport. The spot where the plane burnt – located behind the control tower – is still visible on Google satellite imagery taken in 2018 (seen here). Reverse image searches for the second image in the TikTok video led to an AFP report published on France 24 about a South Korean passenger plane that crashed in December 2024, killing 179 people (archived here). Featured in the AFP article is a photograph showing the damage to the plane. The caption in AFP's archives reads: 'Firefighters and recovery teams work at the scene where a Jeju Air Boeing 737-800 series aircraft crashed and burst into flames at Muan International Airport in Muan, some 288 kilometres southwest of Seoul on December 30, 2024.' The photo used in the false claim appears to have been altered to remove the South Korean flag, which is clearly visible on the side of the aircraft in the AFP photograph. AFP Fact Check did not find any credible reports on a recent Mauritanian plane crash. However, Mauritania's state-run news outlet published a statement confirming that all hajj pilgrims arrived safely on June 4, 2025 (archived here). Additionally, Mauritanian Airlines dismissed all claims of a crash in a statement published on Facebook on May 27, 2025 (archived here). 'Some foreign social media pages have circulated malicious rumors about a plane carrying Mauritanian pilgrims crashing off the Red Sea. These reports are completely unfounded,' reads the statement in Arabic. 'Mauritania Airlines confirms that all Mauritanian pilgrims have arrived safely and securely in the Holy Land, thank God, and no accidents have been reported related to the flights organized in this context.' AFP Fact Check has previously debunked other images relating to this claim here and here.

My teens and I text each other everything from memes to meaningful articles. Modeling healthy tech boundaries is key.
My teens and I text each other everything from memes to meaningful articles. Modeling healthy tech boundaries is key.

Business Insider

time7 hours ago

  • Business Insider

My teens and I text each other everything from memes to meaningful articles. Modeling healthy tech boundaries is key.

I've read the headlines, skimmed the studies, and fought the impulse to yank every device from my kids' hands and toss them into a screen-free cabin in the woods. Like most modern parents, I worry about screens. But I've also seen the good that can come from technology. I believe it's possible to raise emotionally intelligent, creative, and grounded kids — not by banning screens, but by modeling how to use them with intention. Unexpectedly, smartphones made my kids feel less isolated We've gotten all three of our daughters' phones in eighth grade, and when we got our youngest daughter her first phone, I braced for her to become more withdrawn from friends and family. Middle school had been a little lonely — her closest friends lived in our neighborhood but went to different schools, and the lunchroom social shuffle wasn't always kind. I worried a phone would only isolate her more. But the opposite happened. Group texts became lifelines: inside jokes, spontaneous hangouts, encouragement on rough days. Her phone became a bridge, not a wall. That bridge also reaches all the way to college, where her older sister just wrapped up her freshman year. They text nearly every day — silly memes, heart emojis, cute photos of our dog snoring on the couch. Their relationship hasn't faded with distance; it's shifted and, in some ways, grown stronger through the digital thread that connects them. Phones in our family aren't just for staying in touch. My oldest daughter has begun to find her voice around social justice issues through Instagram — sharing resources, following organizers, and supporting friends through these outlets. My middle and youngest daughters, both budding foodies, dive into recipe videos on TikTok and YouTube — my youngest doesn't have these apps yet, but follows her sister's lead. The other night, they made homemade boba tea — yes, including from-scratch tapioca pearls — from a video my middle daughter saved. It took forever, but they laughed the whole way through. And the tea? Surprisingly good. I'm talking to them about technology and modeling healthy boundaries I'm not just a bystander in all this. I'm in it with them. I send my daughters memes, reels, and articles — funny, profound, or just weird in the best way. Sometimes it's a way to check in. Sometimes it's how we process the world together. I've had better conversations with my teens sparked by a 20-second video than from the age-old "How was school?" Of course, we set boundaries. We delay social media until high school — my youngest can get those apps next year if she requests them. We talk about the difference between passive scrolling and active engagement. We ask questions like: What does this video do for you? Do you ever see things that make you uncomfortable? And we try to practice what we preach. My husband and I both use our phones for work, and we're learning to narrate that: "I'm writing an article," or "I'm researching something," instead of just disappearing into our screens. That said, I'm guilty of scrolling, too — and my kids have no problem calling me out on it. Recently, I joined stop-motion artist Colette Peri's "Touch Grass" phone boundaries challenge, and it's made me more mindful of my own habits. Setting screen limits for myself — like no scrolling in bed, and taking phone-free walks — has been good for me and, I hope, good modeling for them. I'm building up to a phone-free day, too. Not quite there yet. Our kids don't need us to be perfect; they need us to be honest. Technology is part of our family's life, like books, board games, and backpacks. I'm not here to police my kids into tech shame, though I definitely fall into that trap sometimes. I want to raise kids who can navigate this world with curiosity, empathy, and agency. Phones and social media aren't going anywhere. So instead of pretending it's all doom, I'm leaning in — asking better questions, setting boundaries, and yes, sending a few cat memes along the way. Because if parenting has taught me anything, it's this: We don't get to choose the world our kids grow up in — but we do get to help them live wisely and well within it.

Video does not show China recently airdropping aid to Gaza
Video does not show China recently airdropping aid to Gaza

Yahoo

time15 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Video does not show China recently airdropping aid to Gaza

What was claimed: A video shows China dropping aid on 17 May 2025. Our verdict: This isn't wholly accurate. While the video does depict an aid drop in Gaza, it has been circulating online since at least September 2024. And there's no evidence that China has recently delivered aid to Gaza by air. A video which has been shared over 8,000 times with claims it depicts an air aid drop by China is misleading. The clip, which is circulating on Facebook, was shared on 17 May with the caption: 'This is not Saudi Arabia's 600 Billion This is not Qatar's 1.2 Trillion This is not UAE's 1.4 Trillion This is china dropping air aids today [sic].' In the video, large parachutes can be seen falling from the sky attached to crates, while a large number of people on the ground run to retrieve them. Although neither the caption nor the overlaid text specifies where aid is being dropped, many accounts in the comments reference Gaza or Palestinians. The parachutes seem to be identical to those seen in other videos of humanitarian aid being airdropped into Gaza. The same video was also shared on X (formerly Twitter) on 17 May with claims it showed China dropping food and medical supplies into Gaza. However, this footage does not show China delivering aid through air drops last month. The same clip has been circulating online since at least September 2024, when it was shared on TikTok with a description stating that it showed the 'situation in northern Gaza in obtaining aid'. Full Fact has not been able to verify when or where exactly the video was taken. As we have previously written, we have found no credible reports that China has been delivering aid by air during the 11-week Israeli blockade, which was recently eased to allow a limited amount of food and aid into Gaza. Aid distribution centres in Gaza run by Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a controversial US and Israel-backed aid network, were closed on 4 June, following a number of shootings on the roads to the sites, and only two centres were reportedly operating on Thursday, 5 June. Air aid drops from other countries, including the US, UK, Jordan, France, Germany, Indonesia, the Netherlands, the United Arab Emirates and Egypt, did take place between March and May 2024, but we've not found any reports of these having involved China. China announced in February earlier this year—before the blockade began on 2 March—that it would deliver 60,000 food parcels through Jordan, which according to Chinese media reports, was to be transported over land borders and not by air. We have previously fact checked other videos of aid being air dropped via similar parachutes as well as aeroplanes in flight which have been shared with misleading claims that China was responsible. And similar claims about other images or videos supposedly showing China airdropping aid have been debunked by other fact checkers. Before sharing content like this that you see gaining traction on social media, first consider whether it comes from a trustworthy and reliable source and really depicts what it is claimed to show. Our guide to spotting misleading videos can help you do this. This week (1-7 June) Full Fact is the subject of the BBC Radio 4 Appeal. Listen today to broadcaster and journalist Martha Kearney tell Charlotte's story—all donations mean Full Fact can do more to help people like Charlotte.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store