This simple Android Auto change would set my voice command frustrations to rest
When I hop into my car, there is a list of checklist items I absentmindedly tick off. One is reaching for my cheap Android Auto dongle in my glovebox and plugging it in. Google's in-car phone mirroring service has become essential to my car trips, as much as fuel, a seat belt, and a steering wheel. However, unlike driving, operating Android Auto is often challenging, especially when using voice commands.
I've had so many issues with Android Auto's voice assistants that I'm just about ready to give up on the feature entirely. This problem, as is the case so often, could easily be solved with a small tweak from Google. Instead of making its product the exclusive in-car assistant, I'd like to see the choice given to the consumer. As Android users can now select their default voice assistant of choice, this feature on Android Auto would put to bed my frustrations.
Do you have problems using Android Auto's voice controls?
0 votes
Yes, the service often mishears or misunderstands me.
NaN %
Yes, it mostly understands my requests, but it takes ages to action them.
NaN %
No, Android Auto's voice controls have never given me problems.
NaN %
'Sorry, I don't understand'
Andy Walker / Android Authority
I'm not the only Android Auto user facing voice command problems, either. I've seen many forum posts from disgruntled users detailing their frustrations, with many highlighting its inability to understand and execute simple commands. It's a curious issue, too. Assistant (now Gemini) works well on my phones, but when I'm in the car, the service becomes dumber than lead. Even when it encounters a recognizable command, I wait fleeting seconds for a reciprocating action. Voice assistants are supposed to keep drivers focused on the road with both hands on the wheel, but I've found their ponderous behavior distracting and frustrating. It's not like I'm asking for instructions on how to build a rocket, either. Generally, my commands involve selecting a playlist or artist on Spotify, navigating to the nearest fuel stop, or responding to a WhatsApp message — still, the feature stutters and stumbles.
Android Auto never seems to understand my commands, and when it does it takes ages to execute them.
Often, the problem is a simple misinterpretation of a command. 'Play 2021 hits on Spotify,' I'll bark, seeking the actual playlist titled '2021 hits,' but the assistant will instead play songs from 2021. Dare I navigate to a restaurant, road, or town with a complex or non-English name, or not pronounce words like I'm at a grade school spelling bee. In the image above, I had to type out Ou Meul, because saying 'Ow Mule Doo Toights Kloof' phonetically didn't work either.
I should mention that I haven't yet received the Gemini on Android Auto update, but I doubt this would solve my problems. I have the next-generation assistant on Wear OS, and it's as sluggish and simple-minded as Assistant was. I fear that nothing will change when it comes to my car.
Multiple assistants for multiple tasks
Joe Maring / Android Authority
There's no way to select an alternative voice assistant in Android Auto. It's Gemini, Assistant, or the highway. This is a particularly odd omission given Google's willingness to offer third-party platforms on Android. I can opt for ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, or Perplexity on my Android phone. Since Auto is largely a mirror of my device, why isn't this option available on it too?
While the issue may not lie with the voice assistants themselves, I'd still like to verify this myself. In preparation for another feature I'm penning, I've been using Bixby instead of Gemini on my Samsung phone, and it's been a markedly positive experience. The once maligned voice assistant is now adept, seamlessly adjusting, opening, and tweaking things on my phone. It also responds far swifter than Gemini, whether I ask for the weather or demand a follow-up response to an ongoing conversation. Notably, Bixby is capable of opening and commanding apps that are compatible with Android Auto. This includes Fuelio, my car's logbook app, Google Maps, and Spotify. Asking it to navigate to a specific town opens Maps and plugs in the destination, while requesting a specific playlist on Spotify does just that.
Yes, there are some things Bixby doesn't work well for either. It, too, is tripped up by non-English names and even common names, but I do feel more confident in its ability to pinpoint the intention of my voice commands. Using Bixby with Android Auto is an option I want to have in my car.
I'd love access to more voice assistants on Android Auto, beyond Assistant or Gemini.
Let's take this a step further. I wouldn't mind using specific voice assistants for particular tasks. Sure, if Google wants me to use Assistant or Gemini to navigate or control apps in my car, it could at least offer secondary options for querying information. If I'm driving through a new town, I'd like to ask Perplexity about its history or significant events. Diagnosing a rattle in the engine bay? I wouldn't mind asking ChatGPT for suggestions based on the make and model of your vehicle. If I'm on a long road trip and want to know if there's any breaking news I should be aware of in the next city, I'd like to call on Copilot to give me an update.
While I don't believe a third-party service will immediately solve my Android Auto voice command problems, I would like more options to customize my in-car assistant experience. Whether it's Bixby for navigation and playlist selection, Perplexity for news and cultural snippets, or ChatGPT for guidance on specific challenges, there is room for Android Auto's voice capabilities to be truly customizable, hands-free, reliable, and, more importantly, useful.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Blink Charging, dfYOUNG Partner For Simplified EV Fleet Management
Blink Charging (NASDAQ:BLNK) announced a new partnership with logistics firm dfYOUNG on Monday to simplify EV fleet management and home charger installations for corporate sales teams across the U.S. The companies aim to streamline the EV transition by combining Blink's charging technology with dfYOUNG's fleet logistics expertise. As part of the collaboration, dfYOUNG will deliver and install pre-packaged, RFID-enabled Blink chargers at sales representatives' will handle around-the-clock customer support, while dfYOUNG oversees fleet operations, which include delivery tracking, job completion, safety checks, and regulatory compliance. The news comes as Blink Charging's stock has faced significant headwinds, plunging over 19% year-to-date. This decline is largely attributed to the company missing analyst revenue estimates for the past four consecutive quarters and EPS estimates for at least two quarters. The stock performance has also been impacted by the Trump administration's recent reversal of EV tax credits. The U.S. House of Representatives approved President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill,' which terminates the $7,500 tax credit for new U.S.-made EVs, effective September 30, 2025. This policy change is expected to negatively affect the EV industry and its ecosystem, including companies like Blink Charging, with some automakers already increasing EV prices in response. Despite these challenges, Blink Charging has remained committed to unlocking value through strategic partnerships, acquisitions, and geographical expansions. Last Monday, Blink Charging expanded its partnership with Belgian real estate firm Group Bernaerts to boost EV charging infrastructure across Belgium. By the end of 2025, it plans to install at least 176 active chargers at Bernaerts-owned properties. The stock gained close to 13% after the update. Since the partnership was launched in 2022, the two companies have deployed 88 charging stations in Antwerp and Mechelen. As they accelerate their sustainability goals, they expect to double that number by the end of this year. On July 16, Blink Charging expanded its EV network in South Florida by installing Series 7 chargers at two Accesso-managed commercial properties. The move strengthens Blink's regional presence, bringing clean energy charging to high-traffic sites in Sunrise and West Boca Raton. On July 14, Blink Charging expanded its EV charging footprint by acquiring Zemetric, a Silicon Valley-based fleet-focused infrastructure firm. The deal brings Zemetric's leadership team, now filling key executive roles at Blink, together to accelerate innovation and global growth in smart fleet charging. On July 10, Blink Charging advanced its U.K. expansion by partnering with Axxeltrova to launch a £100 million fund for EV infrastructure growth. Under the deal, Axxeltrova will fund and own the chargers, while Blink installs, operates, and maintains them through its Blink Network. Price Action: BLNK shares are trading lower by 5.36% to $1.060 at last check Monday. Photo via Shutterstock UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article Blink Charging, dfYOUNG Partner For Simplified EV Fleet Management originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Android Authority
13 minutes ago
- Android Authority
Poll: Which abandoned Android phone features do you miss the most?
Robert Triggs / Android Authority Our phones have undergone remarkable changes over the years of their existence. Android phones are unwarrantedly sleeker, significantly faster, have larger screens, and even feature cameras that, for most non-professionals, can replace a DSLR or a mirrorless camera. Yet, Android manufacturers have made some compromises to make the phone less bulky, increase internal space for more advanced components, or even just to save costs. Newer Android phones are deprived of some amazingly useful features, such as FM radio, notification LEDs, and the beloved headphone jack. Even though most hardcore Android fans have moved on, some of these features can still evoke a strong sense of nostalgia and are difficult to forget, especially if you banked on their utility and haven't found a perfect replacement. So, today we're asking you about features from old Android phones that you miss or still hope to return. Which forgotten Android feature do you still crave or want back? 0 votes 3.5mm headphone jack NaN % Removable battery NaN % Expadable storage NaN % IR blaster NaN % Notification light NaN % FM radio NaN % Any others (tell us in the comments below!) NaN % For me, the biggest letdown, as I believe might have been for many others, was the removal of a headphone jack. While I have (unwillingly) adjusted to Bluetooth headsets, I sometimes still crave the ease and flexibility of using wired headphones. Despite the lack of dependence on wires in Bluetooth headsets, I loathe the arduous process of keeping each headset charged (and as someone who reviews many of them, this is really exhausting!) or pairing it to the device I'm using at the moment. I have my gripes with the lack of a removable battery too. I doubt I would need to pull out a battery to recover an unresponsive phone, simply because there are far fewer instances. However, I despise taking the phone to a service center to replace the battery, which is pertinent in case of a faulty one. As someone who still has a Pixel 6a, I might have no choice but to do that to avoid becoming another victim of battery fire, and I really wish we still lived in simpler times of phones with removable batteries. What additional features do you think should also be on the list above? I wouldn't be surprised if your decisions for buying an Android device still revolve around having one or a few of the features from older Android phones. If that is so, tell us in the comments below. Follow
Gizmodo
13 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Google Assistant Is Basically on Life Support and Things Just Got Worse
Voice assistants are… not perfect. That's me being nice. But if I were to cease being nice, I'd probably say something more like 'voice assistants suck,' and I think most would agree I'd be justified in saying so. While no voice assistant really manages to escape that criticism, I usually opt for Google Assistant, which—in my experience—is the least sucky. Or it used to be, but after some recent hiccups, I may have to start rethinking that dishonorable distinction. Last week, Google Assistant users reported that the voice assistant was bordering on broken. Those complaints across Reddit and X were so loud, in fact, that Google itself decided to get out there and address them. Here's Google's Director of Product Management, Google Home & Nest, Anish Kattukaran, doing some damage control on X last week. Hey everyone, I want to acknowledge the recent feedback about Google Assistant reliability on our home devices. I sincerely apologize for what you're experiencing and feeling! — Anish Kattukaran (@AnishKattukaran) July 23, 2025Pretty bad, right? Well, unfortunately, those attempts at getting out ahead of problems appear mostly rhetorical, because things somehow have gotten worse, and now Google Home is at the center of what I would describe as a reputation shitstorm. According to way too many people on Reddit, Google Home is so broken that some people are actually unable to even turn their smart lights on and off properly. And it's not just lights; if Reddit complaints are anything to go off of, it looks like all kinds of smart devices are affected by problems with Google Home, including other speakers and even (disconcertingly) cameras and smart doorbells. While Google has apparently promised to fix the issues, it looks like, for lots of people, they've persisted. A quick scan of the Google Home subreddit reveals that connectivity issues and general issues are still pouring in, with no official announcement from Google. Mileage may vary, but if you're one of the many unlucky Google Home users having issues with third-party devices, you can pull open your Google Home app and navigate to the settings and see if the connecting app is still synced. To do that, go to Settings in the bottom-right corner, then tap 'Works with Google,' and a list of your synced apps should show up. If they're no longer synced, re-sync the app by finding it under 'Add new.' If they're still synced and not working, unsync the app by tapping on the icon and then tap 'Unlink account.' After that, you can try syncing once more and hope that it works. Obviously, having to do any of this is annoying for lots of reasons. For one, people use the Google Home app and smart products on a daily basis to do things like turn their freaking lights on and off. It's also frustrating from a more general standpoint, given Google Assistant's slow erosion over the past few years to the point where some of its core functions have basically broken. To me, this is the clearest indication that voice assistants are in a very bad place, and something needs to be done. That something, if Google, Apple, and Amazon have anything to do with it, will probably be a much-needed dose of AI chatbots like Gemini, but it remains to be seen whether an infusion of a large language model will be enough. The bittersweet news is that it looks like it can't possibly get any worse, though. On the bright side, Apple must feel pretty good about delaying its promised next-gen Siri. Better late than broken, I say.
