GUBBIO v MILAN FUTURO: MATCH PREVIEW
GUBBIO v MILAN FUTURO: MATCH PREVIEW
No rest on Easter Monday for Milan Futuro, who are ready to play on Matchday 37 (out of 38) in Serie C. The boys will be travelling to Umbria to face Gubbio on Monday 21 April at 15:00 CEST, during a positive spell at the end of the season that has begun to show what we are really capable of.
Advertisement
LATEST FROM MILAN FUTURO
Oddo's Rossoneri are in their best form of the year, right at the end of a very tiring season. Three wins in a row for the first time this campaign, and it comes at a crucial time, boosting our hopes and energy. From 3-2 against Campobasso, to 2-1 against Sestri Levante, to 1-0 against Ternana: nine points that make a huge difference, and that are hugely deserved for top performances and for the hard work shown over months without much reward. We are still in a tough position in the table, in 17th place on 33 points, so our final two games against Gubbio and Vis Pesaro are huge in reaching our goal. Both Quirini and Magni are suspended.
LATEST FROM GUBBIO
Fontana's squad are in eleventh place, just behind Pontedera who are ahead on goal difference. It is a key detail because, if it stayed like today, the Lupi would not go into the play-offs, even though they're fully on course for them. It will be a home game and they'll have the support of their fans, and although they score less at home than away, it will hugely boost them to give their all and to push for that win. Their recent form hasn't been great: last weekend they lost to Pescara (0-2) after a draw against Ascoli (0-0). Normally, Gubbio play a 4-3-3, and the striker Tommasini (on eight goals) is their biggest threat.
WHERE TO WATCH MILAN FUTURO ON TV
In Italy, the game will be exclusively live on TV on Sky Sport e NOW, while worldwide there will be the free streaming on FIFA+. Don't miss our coverage on Instagram, AC Milan Official App - where in the days after the match, the entire match will be available on demand (also on acmilan.com).
Advertisement
LATEST FROM SERIE C
The referee will Francesco Zago, from Conegliano. He will have assistants Capriuolo and Andriambelo, with fourth official, Castelli.
Matchday 36 (Group B) will be played throughout the day on Monday 21 April, at 15:00 CEST, all at the same time: the other games will be Arezzo v Lucchese, Campobasso v Perugia, Legnago Salus v Pescara, Pineto v Virtus Entella, Pontedera v Rimini, Sestri Levante v Ascoli, Ternana v Pianese, Torres v Carpi Vis and Pesaro v SPAL.
The table: Virtus Entella 81; Ternana (-2) 70; Torres 65; Pescara 61; Arezzo 58; Vis Pesaro 56; Pineto 55; Pianese 53; Rimini (-2) 50; Pontedera e Gubbio 45; Carpi e Perugia 44; Campobasso 40; Ascoli 39; Lucchese (-6) 36; MILAN FUTURO 33; SPAL (-3) 31; Sestri Levante 27; Legnago Salus 26.
Match Kit, clothing, accessories, gift ideas and much more: visit the Store online AC Milan!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Countdown is on: One year until 2026 FIFA World Cup comes to Massachusetts
BOSTON (WPRI) — With a year to go until the 2026 FIFA World Cup, officials in Boston unveiled a countdown clock at Faneuil Hall. The international soccer tournament will be played in 16 host cities, including Boston. Seven games will be held at Gillette Stadium in Foxboro from June 13 to July 9, including a quarterfinal matchup. The stadium is slated to undergo extensive renovations ahead of the tournament and will temporarily be named 'Boston Stadium' for the World Cup matches. RELATED: Providence leaders 'actively involved' in conversations to host 2026 World Cup team Since the tournament is expected to bring an influx of tourists and revenue to Southern New England, Providence leaders are already warning about the level of planning that needs to be done. Providence is looking to host one of the teams after FIFA released 14 base camp options, which the organization described as a 'training site and accommodation pairing that will serve as the primary base for teams during the group stage, where they will train, rest, and prepare for their matches.' Currently, only New York and New Jersey are the closest base camp options to New England. A FIFA spokesperson told 12 News that more options will be announced later this year. Separately, the Rhode Island Emergency Management Agency (RIEMA) is meeting monthly to prepare for the matches, which will increase to bimonthly in August. Download the and apps to get breaking news and weather alerts. Watch or with the new . Follow us on social media: Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
England's drab display against Andorra shows football's real problem
After a game that was so dismally lacking in spark, Thomas Tuchel had one message he clearly wanted to repeat, doing so in three different interviews: 'We were playing with fire.' It says much that a Champions League-winning manager genuinely thought there was a chance that England might slip up to Andorra. Another comment after this dreadful 1-0 win said even more. Advertisement Tuchel was so alarmed by England's 'attitude' in the last 30 minutes of this match that he plans a meeting on Sunday to let the squad 'know what we want from them'. That is what might make an otherwise completely forgettable game somewhat significant. Tuchel was furious. And yet, through all of this, it was difficult not to think back to words the England manager said in March: 'The Fifa June window is I think debatable if it makes sense.' Tuchel was at the time talking about how some players won't have played a game for four weeks but, given the amount of discussion about the calendar right now, it's hard not to put that into a wider context. At Espanyol's new stadium, England looked like what they are: a group of elite-league players who have had long seasons, and need a break. Some of them instead have to go to the Club World Cup. They played as if they wanted to be anywhere but here. Advertisement And that is what most aggravated Tuchel. It was why he was completely unwilling to reassert his reservations about the June window. 'No excuses,' he said. 'The window is the window.' In other words, they can all have arguments about what this international break should be but that doesn't mean they should allow themselves to drop off in the way they did in the last half-hour. Tuchel simply said he didn't like it. 'I think we lacked the seriousness and the urgency that is needed in a World Cup qualifier. I think we played with fire. I didn't like the attitude in the end. I didn't like the body language. It was not what the occasion needed.' Tuchel instead likened it to an FA Cup game, where the favourite fails to realise there is a real risk of an upset. Andorra's Guillaume Lopez even caused a late scare. Harry Kane's 72nd international goal spares England's blushes (Reuters) 'Matches like this can become awkward when you don't score or you don't score a second goal,' Tuchel said. 'It can be stuck. Even then it's more necessary to not get frustrated, to not let your energy drop, to do the little things right. I had the feeling after 25 minutes that it becomes like we are frustrated with the little things, then everybody tried a little bit different than we tried in the first 25. It looked slower and slower and slower. Advertisement 'There were no more movements in the last third to attack the box. Everyone wanted the ball then into the foot, no more speeding up the game with runs. You need runs, you need counter-movements, you need nonstop movement. If you don't invest, then it becomes suddenly a stuck game and you get frustrated. 'I think in the end, we played with fire, honestly. I felt it almost like in a cup game where the favourite does not smell the danger. I didn't feel a team that was aware it was only 1-0 in a World Cup qualifier.' It's actually a perfect summation of these types of games, that aptly explains the psychology of such occasions. What Tuchel described was very visible, right up to players forcing dribbles or long shots. There was that growing angst about England. In the end, it was just a natural lack of quality from a side ranked 173rd in the world that settled the game. That's so low it's well over 100 places more than Fifa's absurd World Cup expansion. Noni Madueke provides the assist for Kane and has a chance of his own (Getty Images) Either way, Curtis Jones played the ball through, Harry Kane finally got inside, the initial effort was diverted – Andorra's Iker did have a good game – and Noni Madueke diverted it back for the captain. It was Kane's 72nd goal for England, putting him joint 15th in the overall international rankings. Madueke himself missed a good late chance for a second, but that was pretty much it. Advertisement England had created so little. Even Tuchel remarked how they 'created an xG of three and underperformed with one goal, which is very unusual in a match like this where you usually over-perform an xG'. The manager had said before the game that he was almost seeing this as a training exercise to prepare for low blocks. Except, England weren't playing with the necessary edge, and no one plays a block as low as Andorra. There were long periods when they had five players in their own six-yard box. That ensured Dan Burn was on the ball so much that it was hard not to wonder if Cole Palmer would be better served in that position. England might have benefited from some searching balls. As it was, they toiled to find a way through. Andorra had a well-executed tactical plan, and the game was clearly well worth it for Andorra. They could be proud of this, and Tuchel praised them for their resilience and how 'well drilled' they were. 'It is the third time we have played a deep block, the third time we have played a 5-4-1 from the opponent, and we struggled heavily in the ending of the first and second halves to create, to show the quality in one-on-ones, to create overloads and decisive situations for us.' Kane says the long season has resulted in some tired legs (PA) From all of that, you could say England ultimately won and this game barely matters. Gareth Southgate's side used to rack up heavy scores in such matches only for it to have no bearing on actual tournaments. It's like a different level of football. Advertisement Except, there was a wider significance. Tuchel well knows that successful sides can't just switch it on and off like that. Spain 2008-12 weren't like that. Germany 2014 weren't like that. What made them successful was the absolutely punishing standards, and the expectation that they would fully execute their great quality in all moments. They acted as if any drop-off would be fatal. That is what Tuchel demands. 'We got away with a win,' he concluded. 'I think we still deserved the win and we've got three wins and three clean sheets. OK, we will not stop encouraging them and make clear after we have a proper look at the match what we want from them.' It's not about a 1-0 against Andorra. It's about the standards of champions.
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Club World Cup refs to wear eye-level cameras but it's what FIFA won't show that's most telling
MIAMI (AP) — Referees at the Club World Cup will wear eye-level cameras to finally allow fans to see exactly what the officials are looking at during a soccer match. Well... not quite. FIFA has announced the innovation will be implemented at its newly-expanded tournament, which kicks off in Miami on Saturday. But on closer inspection, the technology appears to be more about improving the experience for television viewers than improving the game. For instance, only 'non-controversial' images will be shown during the match. FIFA has not specified what that means, but don't look for goal-scoring incidents and potential red cards to be included. The camera will be attached to the referee's earpiece. 'It is a trial,' Pierluigi Collina, chairman of the FIFA referees committee, said Wednesday. "What will be the future? We will see. 'We have said that we want to, let's say, offer a new experience to TV viewers. We want to show something, let's say, entertaining. I don't think that we always need to think of the controversial or potentially controversial incidents on the field of play.' Footage will be checked before being broadcast, rather than shown live. FIFA says the refcam view could be used to show unique angles of goals scored and offer different perspectives of the game that normal cameras cannot see. But if restricted to that, it would appear to be a missed opportunity in a sport that is increasingly using advances in technology to improve the accuracy and transparency of decision-making. Another innovation at the Club World Cup — a month-long tournament staged in the United States and featuring 32 of the best soccer teams in the world — is to show footage being reviewed by VAR for the first time on big screens inside the stadium. In theory, the refcam would make referees more accountable for their decisions by allowing fans to see exactly what the official saw before making a call. But it is not even clear how much it would be used to help VAR. While Collina said all footage would be available to the VAR, he questioned how useful the refcam would be in such circumstances. 'Honestly, can you believe that a camera position just besides the referee's eyes can see something that the referee's eyes cannot see? Honestly, I think it's difficult to believe,' he said. FIFA, itself, has made clear where it believes the footage would be of most use, saying the test was designed to 'explore whether the new camera angle can improve the experience for those watching on television and online by showcasing the referee's perspective.' It added that the tests would be used to make guidelines for future use. 'Step by step' Collina said. "We need to do something new and the simpler the better." Time wasting FIFA also announced a clampdown on time wasting by goalkeepers at the Club World Cup. Previous rules specified keepers can't hold onto the ball for longer than six seconds, but Collina said that was frequently being flouted. The time limit has now been extended to eight seconds, but referees will be much stricter in enforcement. The referee will also count down from five seconds with their hand to indicate the time remaining. If a keeper holds onto the ball for longer than eight seconds, a corner kick will be awarded to the opposition, rather than an indirect free kick, which was the previous punishment. ___
