Russia and Mali sign trade deals, eye nuclear energy cooperation
Putin received Colonel Assimi Goita in the Kremlin, where the two spoke for two hours, Russian state media said.
Putin said relations with Mali had a "good upward trend" even if bilateral trade was currently "modest", according to a Kremlin readout.
"There are good areas for future cooperation: these are geological exploration, natural resource development, energy, logistics and the humanitarian fields," Putin said.
One of the deals Putin and Goita signed concerned cooperation in nuclear energy, the Kremlin said.
Mali and Russia have in the past discussed what they have called a strategic project to build a Russian-designed low-power nuclear power plant.
Construction began earlier this month in Mali on a new Russian-backed gold refinery, which Goita, who seized power following coups in 2020 and 2021, has said would give the Western African country greater control over its natural resources.
Mali is one of Africa's top gold producers, but currently lacks a functional and globally certified refinery.
Russian mercenary groups have also supported Goita's government with deployments of fighters after the Malian army kicked out French and U.N. troops that had been involved in fighting the Islamist insurgents for a decade.
Russia's Wagner mercenary group announced earlier this month it was withdrawing from Mali, but the African Corps still operates there.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Finextra
11 minutes ago
- Finextra
Africa's cross-border payments boom: Why stablecoins and AI are key to the next financial leap
1 This content is contributed or sourced from third parties but has been subject to Finextra editorial review. Remittances to Africa have hit record highs, but sky-high fees and inefficiencies in Africa's payments landscape still hold back economic potential. This article explains why stablecoins and AI could reshape cross-border payments and inclusion across the continent. Africa is experiencing a cross-border payments boom, with data from the World Bank showing that remittance inflows into Africa soared to USD 95.3 billion in 2024, despite a rocky global economic environment. Countries like Egypt, Nigeria, and Morocco continue to receive billions annually from their diasporas. The individual transactions may be small – a few hundred grand sent to a parent in Johannesburg, with a few more sent to relatives elsewhere – but these small sums add up to billions across the continent, underpinning sectors like education and healthcare. However, this lifeline is still marred by high transaction costs and settlement delays. Sending money into Africa has historically been expensive and slow. In 2023, the average cost of sending $200 into sub-Saharan Africa was 7.9% of the amount being sent – significantly higher than other regions like South Asia (5.8%) and Latin America and the Caribbean (5.9%). This is putting the brakes on economic development in the region, impacting both families dependent on remittances and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which suffer from delayed access to working capital. But there is a new era of payments dawning. There are now big players entering the market to modernise the continent's financial infrastructure and transform the way that money moves across borders – both within Africa, and overseas. For instance, the new partnership between Yellow Card and Visa is a key example of where stablecoins are being used to radically improve the speed, cost, and security of cross-border transactions. This is critical in markets like Africa, where legacy systems continue to weigh down on the financial ecosystem. Stablecoins – a financial transformation? Stablecoins can be a reliable alternative to traditional remittance corridors, as they are linked to fiat currencies or to a commodity like gold. For instance, USDT and USDC are pegged to the US dollar, allowing users to transfer digital dollars quickly and with minimal volatility. Stablecoins can thus eliminate the need for complex foreign exchange conversions and costly intermediaries; instead of sourcing FX liquidity or relying on multiple correspondent banks, remitters can send funds in a stablecoin directly to recipients. This minimises both settlement risk and delays, so, a payment that once took two or three days to process, can now be completed in minutes. What's more, as central banks continue to explore their own digital currencies, this innovation could become even more integrated into formal financial systems. AI is key for Africa's payments future Coupled with stablecoins, AI has the potential to unlock huge value and reshape Africa's payments landscape, notably by improving credit scoring, streamlining regulatory compliance, and generating behavioural insights. While financial inclusion across the continent has been steadily rising for years, a significant proportion of the population is still underbanked. In an environment where many Africans operate outside the traditional banking sector, mobile wallets and digital payment platforms can plug this gap and unlock a treasure trove of untapped data. AI tools can analyse this information to assess spending habits, repayment patterns, and risk profiles far more accurately than outdated, document-heavy processes reliant on payslips or formal credit histories. For instance, imagine a user who receives their salary into a digital wallet, pays their utilities on time, and regularly shops locally using tap-to-pay. AI can interpret these behaviours as signs and evidence of financial reliability, which paves the way for micro-lending, insurance, or savings products tailored to their needs. AI can enable remittance providers to also track spending patterns more accurately, helping them to understand demand and design services that respond to real customer behaviour. Plugging the infrastructure gap That said, Africa's readiness to support this shift is mixed. While countries like Kenya and Nigeria have made strides with mobile money and fintech innovation, infrastructure and regulation remain major hurdles. Many African markets remain deeply reliant on cash, with limited access to point-of-sale terminals and mobile data. As the saying goes, 'cash is still king' – and that's a heavy barrier to progress. To bring more users into digital ecosystems, the continent needs widespread infrastructure investment. This means improving mobile and internet access, especially in rural areas, and expanding access to smartphones. Other opportunities are in building digital identity systems that allow users to open wallets, verify transactions, and access formal banking services securely. At the same time, governments and regulators must step up. In the UK and Europe, governments are proactively exploring digital currencies and setting out clear regulatory roadmaps. In Africa, however, regulators have generally adopted a wait-and-see approach, making movement in this space slow. To truly benefit from the promise of stablecoins and AI, governments and financial regulators across the continent should engage more closely with fintechs and central banks operating in the region. Policy harmonisation and cross-border regulatory alignment will be key to moving the needle in this area. Accelerating inclusion and innovation If these pieces come together, the benefits on Africa's payments ecosystem could be transformative. – bringing millions of unbanked individuals into formal finance. Ultimately, the biggest winners will be end-users. Consumers who previously waited days for cross-border transfers, paid excessive fees, or were denied access to credit will benefit from a faster, fairer, and more intelligent system that understands their needs and works in their favour.
Spectator
12 minutes ago
- Spectator
What will happen in Alaska?
The Trump-Putin summit in Alaska could be the flop of the century or turn out to be the first step towards negotiating a ceasefire in Ukraine and eventually an end to the war. The White House has been trying to downgrade expectations of any breakthrough and has described the meeting on Friday as an opportunity for President Trump to listen to President Putin's pitch and assess whether the Russian leader actually wants peace or not. Trump says he will be able to do this within two minutes. While it might be sensible to lower expectations, always a favourite ploy of political leaders, the Anchorage summit might just be different. First of all, Putin asked for it, and secondly, he has hanging over his head Trump's threats to ratchet up economic sanctions. If Putin plans to pursue his war in Ukraine and, possibly, have other military adventures in the future, he can ill afford Russia's economy to worsen. The key to the summit will be whether Putin shows even a hint of compromise. If Putin starts the session with a drawn-out monologue about how the war can never come to an end without the 'root causes' being accepted and respected by Trump – principally Nato's open-door policy which allowed Ukraine to be considered as a future member of the alliance – then the talks may never get off the ground. However, Putin has learned much from his relatively long association with Trump. He knows Trump is sceptical of Ukraine ever joining Nato, and he will be hopeful that he can get that in writing, something which America's western alliance partners will be desperate to prevent. The alternative, at this stage no doubt unacceptable in Moscow, would be a cleverly-framed security guarantee agreement in which Ukraine would have US and European military backing to deter Moscow from launching any future invasion of Ukraine. It would be a sort of Nato-lite arrangement. If that were to happen, then Kyiv might be persuaded to give up some of the Russian-occupied territory in eastern and southern Ukraine (as well as Crimea). At the moment, President Zelensky and nearly all European leaders are adamantly opposed to any land-swap. The wily Senator Lindsey Graham, a Trump supporter and a veteran international security affairs protagonist, said in an NBC News interview at the weekend that land exchanges would only happen 'after you have security guarantees to Ukraine to prevent Russia from doing this again.' 'You need to tell Putin what happens if he does it a third time,' Graham said, referencing Russia's annexing of Crimea in 2014 and the invasion of Ukraine on 24 February, 2022. One bizarre option for the occupied territories supposedly discussed by Steve Witkoff, Trump's special envoy, is to convert them into Moscow-governed regions without Kyiv having to concede sovereignty. According to a report in the Times, it would be a formula similar in style and structure to the Palestinian territory of the West Bank, which is occupied by Israeli troops. The idea would be to get round Ukraine's constitution which disallows any ceding of territory unless approved by a national referendum. The White House gave the idea short shrift. So who will have the upper hand at the Friday summit to be held at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, 11 miles north-east of Anchorage and 4,500 miles from Moscow? Despite being a self-professed dealmaker, Trump will be at a disadvantage. He has already indicated that any peace deal is bound to involve Moscow holding on to some of the territory it is currently occupying. Crimea is a given in his mind and key parts of Donbas, consisting of the eastern regions of Luhansk and Donetsk, are also likely to be prominent in his land-swap blueprint. But he has President Zelensky and European allies ranged against him. Zelensky refuses to consider any handover of territory occupied by Russian invaders and he, and Europe, say concessions of this nature would be an invitation to Putin to plot further aggression in the future. This argument will have been underlined during the video conference yesterday between Trump, Zelensky and key European leaders, including Keir Starmer. Trump knows all the arguments. He has heard them over and over again. But he seems to feel that Putin is ready for a deal of some sort, and he wants to exploit that to find a way of avoiding all the fears emanating from Kyiv and European capitals. Trump does have cards of his own. If Putin declines a ceasefire, Trump has serious sanctions at- the-ready, including penalising all countries still buying cheap Russian oil. He can also tell Putin that if he rejects all attempts to stop the bombing of Ukrainian cities, the US will start delivering to Kyiv on a large scale the sort of long-range weapons which can put military targets inside Russia at much greater risk. Putin doesn't have everything going his way. The battlefield landscape has changed in his favour, but not dramatically so. For example, Russian troops are trying to encircle and overcome Pokrovsk, a strategic city northwest of Donetsk which is vital for Ukrainian military resupply logistics. Although Russian forces have made tactical advances, they have failed to follow through with any significant success. This has been the story of the war in eastern Ukraine. Putin would have wanted a victory on the battlefield in this region to provide him with leverage at the Alaska summit. But Ukrainian temerity and the exploitation of advanced drone warfare have stymied the Russians. For the summit in Alaska to be deemed successful, much will obviously depend on the personal relationship between Trump and Putin. Trump seemed genuinely angry after he spoke on the phone to the Russian leader in early July only for Russia to launch 550 drones and missiles in one of the largest attacks on Ukraine. This is why Zelensky has emphasised repeatedly that Putin must agree to a ceasefire before any serious peace negotiations can begin. After Putin's previous blatant rejection of Trump's phone-call peace efforts, the US President will surely demand new ground rules when they sit down together at the military base near Anchorage. Ceasefire first, and then a framework for peace, with Zelensky invited as a co-participant.
Scottish Sun
12 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Kremlin confirms details of Putin-Trump talks in Alaska including JOINT press conference that may decide Ukraine's fate
CRUNCH SUMMIT Kremlin confirms details of Putin-Trump talks in Alaska including JOINT press conference that may decide Ukraine's fate Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) KREMLIN has confirmed key details of Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin's crunch talks in Alaska. The programme for the talks between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin has been agreed, Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov says. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 Trump is reportedly planning to make a bombshell offer to Vladimir Putin to crack a ceasefire deal Credit: Reuters Ushakov said it will be a one-on-one meeting where "sensitive matters" will be discussed. Russian state news agency TASS revealed that the meeting will start at 11.30am Alaskan time (8.30pm UK). The crunch talks will be followed by a joint press conference by both leaders. More to follow... For the latest news on this story, keep checking back at The U.S. Sun, your go-to destination for the best celebrity news, sports news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures, and must-see videos. Like us on Facebook at TheSunUS and follow us on X at @TheUSSun
