logo
Albanese is the conservative who mugged the Liberals. Let's hope he seizes the moment

Albanese is the conservative who mugged the Liberals. Let's hope he seizes the moment

The Age13 hours ago
Anthony Albanese is a man who likes props. In the 2022 election campaign, he regularly brandished a one-dollar coin to emphasise his support for a pay rise for workers on the minimum wage. And in the lead-up to this year's election, he employed his Medicare card as a talisman to ward off Peter Dutton's supposedly evil plans for the nation's healthcare system. Clearly, his approach has worked.
Everyone has a Medicare card and Albanese was wise to embed in the public consciousness that Medicare is a Labor Party creation, implemented by Bob Hawke's government in 1984 against the fierce opposition of the Coalition. Because Medicare, for all its shortcomings, is an entrenched and popular feature of everyday Australian life, the Labor Party of today has been able to leverage Hawke's long-ago policy success to its great advantage.
There's upside for the ALP in portraying itself as a defender of institutions, as it can make the party look less risky, and Albanese leant into this heavily during the election campaign. At his recent post-election address at the National Press Club, he outlined the reasons Labor had won a second term. Electors, he said, had voted for Australian values and for doing things 'our way' – that is, not like Donald Trump and Trump-wannabe Peter Dutton. He also cited Labor's 'commitment to fair wages and conditions, universal Medicare and universal superannuation' that 'set us apart from the world'.
In some respects, it's a conservative formulation for a centre-left party: preserving what's already in place. And that signals some potential downside for the government. Universal super was the joint brainchild of Paul Keating and the ACTU's Bill Kelty as part of the union movement's Accord agreement, which also gave rise to Medicare. The historically transformational nature of universal super has been brought into sharp focus this week, with the attainment of the compulsory 12 per cent super contribution and the wider discussion about super balances in the millions of dollars.
Inevitably, talk of that achievement invites comparisons between the current Labor government and the all-conquering five-term government led first by Hawke and then Keating.
Hawke and Keating wasted no time in office. The Albanese government is 38 months old. Inside the same timeframe, the Hawke government had held two summits – on the economy and on tax – and introduced Medicare, a new incomes policy, an assets test on pensions, floated the dollar, changed the banking system, begun the march on super and produced a comprehensive new package of tax measures.
Loading
Somewhere within the Labor Party, people will eventually start to ask what a Labor leader 40 years from now will be fighting to preserve from the Albanese years. The course that the prime minister is pursuing – backed strongly by Labor's national secretary Paul Erickson, who has definitely earned his status as the nation's campaigning guru du jour – is the one that secured the government's second victory. In short, the government's first priority will be about delivering methodically on its promises, namely reducing HECS debts, building 1.2 million homes, continuing the push towards renewables, increasing the number of Medicare urgent clinics, and continuing to keep inflation down.
That makes sense, especially since the national political scene is now a bunch of players who have, to an extent, been mugged by reality. Everyone is a smartie after the event, but no one expected a Labor landslide. The government wasn't geared up for it. The Liberals had even less of a clue. None of the polls predicted it. YouGov got closest; its central projection was 84 lower house seats for Labor – a mild increase on its majority but still 10 short of the actual, stratospheric result.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nationals Senate leader blasts Foreign Minister as she returns from Washington without a trade deal
Nationals Senate leader blasts Foreign Minister as she returns from Washington without a trade deal

Sky News AU

timean hour ago

  • Sky News AU

Nationals Senate leader blasts Foreign Minister as she returns from Washington without a trade deal

Foreign Minister Penny Wong has been accused of returning from the US empty-handed after having failed to achieve a trade deal with the Trump administration or secure a meeting with the president. The Foreign Minister was in Washington DC for the Quad Foreign Ministers meeting and was able to talk with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio - but was unable to secure a carve out from the 10 per cent tariffs or a meeting with President Donald Trump. Speaking to Sky News, Nationals senate leader Bridget McKenzie was scathing about the Foreign Minister's trip to the US. 'She was unable to secure an exemption on our tariffs despite the United Kingdom being able to get an exemption,' she said on Sky News NewsDay. 'She was unable secure a meeting with President Trump for our Prime Minister. 240 days since this guy's been in the White House and we're unable to land a critical and important meeting with our most important ally.' She also went onto accuse the Prime Minister of being closer with Chinese president Xi Jinping, after it was confirmed that Anthony Albanese will meet with him while travelling to the Quad summit. 'Albo's about to get on the plane and head over to see President Xi. So, you know, I think it is very concerning." Mr Albanese has yet to secure a meeting with the US President despite Mr Trump returning to the White House nearly a year ago. The pair were due to have a sit-down meeting at the G7, but Mr Trump cancelled and returned to Washington DC due to the crisis in the Middle East. Ms Wong spoke to AM Agenda Host Laura Jayes in Washington DC and downplayed any concerns around the AUKUS agreement, or on securing tariff relief. 'We're obviously very flexible about those arrangements. The President is a very, very busy man,' Ms Wong said, before adding that Secretary Rubio was hopeful a meeting between Mr Albanese and President Trump takes place. When asked about the tariffs, Minister Wong was pressed on what action had been done by the government to change Trump's mind. 'The US has a trade surplus with us,' she said. 'There's a lot of benefit to the United States from the free tariff arrangements that exist under our Free Trade Agreement.' The scrambling for a meeting with President Trump comes amid concerns Mr Albanese is being snubbed because of US Ambassador Kevin Rudd. The former Prime Minister made statements critical of Mr Trump prior to becoming Mr Albanese's pick to be US ambassador.

Misleading 'ghost stores' haunting Australian consumers
Misleading 'ghost stores' haunting Australian consumers

Perth Now

timean hour ago

  • Perth Now

Misleading 'ghost stores' haunting Australian consumers

Australians have been warned to stay alert for "ghost stores" as shoppers who fall victim have few avenues for recourse. At least four such stores have been noted by the Australian consumer watchdog for misleading shoppers into buying low-quality items. They often claim to be local Australian businesses that are closing down and selling off high-quality goods, when they are actually based overseas and sell poor-quality, drop-shipped clothes and footwear. "This conduct preys on the empathy of consumers who have a genuine desire to support local businesses," Australian Competition and Consumer Commission deputy chair Catriona Lowe said. The commission specifically issued public warning notices about and However, the issue appears to be more widespread with the watchdog receiving at least 360 reports about 60 online retailers since the start of 2025. Many complaints alleged ghost stores were refusing to provide refunds, were offering only partial refunds or were not responding to complaints at all. Normally, Australians could pursue their consumer rights and go to a local store. But because so many of the shops operate overseas, the usual consumer guarantees would not apply, Consumer Action Law Centre legal director Stephen Nowicki said. "There's very little you can do," he told AAP. The commission has urged consumers to contact their bank to see if they can reverse the charge or stop the transaction. While this can be done when Australians fall victim to scams, the situation with ghost stores is less clear because shoppers still receive a product. "It becomes harder in these kinds of situations, compared to an outright scam, to know what is a genuine discount versus what someone is presenting as a discount but is actually something not worth what they are promoting it as," Mr Nowicki said. But there are some potential areas for reform. Though governments could not pass laws that would give consumers jurisdiction against an overseas business, they could try to block and prevent advertising in the first place. Operators generally target Australians through social media ads on platforms like Facebook and Instagram. They make themselves appear local by closing and then rebranding under new names that use different Australian suburbs, towns or cities. The competition and consumer commission has written to Meta, which owns both platforms, and e-commerce giant Shopify, which can be used to host and operate ghost web stores. It has also tried to educate shoppers. Ghost store domains often end with ".com" and not ". and many use AI-generated images. They also generally do not provide a physical address or a means of contact beyond an email address, while their Privacy Policy or Terms of Service sometimes refers to international regulations rather than Australian laws.

Republicans struggle as holdouts stall Trump's tax bill
Republicans struggle as holdouts stall Trump's tax bill

Perth Now

timean hour ago

  • Perth Now

Republicans struggle as holdouts stall Trump's tax bill

Republicans in the House of Representatives are haltingly moved closer to advancing US President Donald Trump's massive tax-cut and spending bill, appearing at one point to overcome concerns over its cost that had been raised by a handful of hardliners. But then the measure stalled again. As lawmakers shuttled in and out of closed-door meetings, a procedural vote was held open for more than seven hours to give Trump and House Speaker Mike Johnson time to convince holdouts to back the president's signature bill. In the end the procedural measure passed 220-212 along party lines on Wednesday, an indication but not a guarantee that Trump might have won over sceptics. Voting then began on another preliminary measure needed to advance the bill to the main vote on the House floor, but Republicans then failed to muster enough votes as five Republican defectors voted against Trump. Trump expressed frustration about midnight, Washington time, as the legislation he has marketed as One Big Beautiful Bill had not yet cleared the procedural hurdle, with voting continuing in the US House of Representatives. "Largest Tax Cuts in History and a Booming Economy vs. Biggest Tax Increase in History, and a Failed Economy. What are the Republicans waiting for??? What are you trying to prove??? MAGA IS NOT HAPPY, AND IT'S COSTING YOU VOTES," Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. A handful of so-called fiscal hawks, who oppose deficit spending, have voted no along with all the House Democrats, who are critical of cuts to social spending. Republicans had appeared more optimistic on Wednesday night. Leaving Speaker Johnson's office, House majority whip Tom Emmer told Reuters progress was being made and, eventually, "we'll vote on the bill". The Senate passed the legislation, which non-partisan analysts say will add $US3.4 trillion ($A5.2 trillion) to the nation's $US36.2 trillion in debt over the next decade, by the narrowest possible margin on Tuesday after intense debate on the bill's hefty price tag and $US900 million in cuts to the Medicaid healthcare program for low-income Americans. With a narrow 220-212 majority, Johnson can afford no more than three defections from his ranks. Earlier, sceptics from the party's right flank said they had more than enough votes to block the bill. Trump, who wants to sign the bill into law by the July 4 Independence Day holiday, met some of the dissenters at the White House. Democrats are united in opposition to the bill, saying its tax breaks disproportionately benefit the wealthy while cutting services that lower- and middle-income Americans rely on. "This bill is catastrophic. It is not policy, it is punishment," Democratic representative Jim McGovern said in debate on the House floor. Republicans in Congress have struggled to stay united in recent years, but they also have not defied Trump since he returned to the White House in January. Any changes made by the House would require another Senate vote. The legislation contains most of Trump's domestic priorities, including extending Trump's 2017 tax cuts, cutting health and food safety net programs, funding Trump's immigration crackdown, and zeroing out many green-energy incentives. It also includes a $US5 trillion increase in the nation's debt ceiling, which lawmakers must address in the coming months or risk a devastating default. The Medicaid cuts have also raised concerns among some Republicans, prompting the Senate to set aside more money for rural hospitals

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store