Cong demands compensation for farmers affected by heavy rains in Gwalior-chambal
Nayak said heavy rains have caused extensive damage to crops in more than 200 villages of these five districts including Sevdha, Bhander, and Datia development blocks. Oilseeds and pulses have been destroyed at many places. Due to this, farmers already burdened with debt are in a serious financial crisis, Mukesh Nayak argued.
"Additionally, hundreds of houses have collapsed or been damaged in urban and rural areas, but no concrete steps have been taken by the state govt and administration," he alleged.
Former minister Mukesh Nayak asked, "When the devastation in the villages is clearly visible, why have the revenue department teams not been sent for survey till now? Why has there been no official damage survey?" He demanded that the administration should immediately send revenue teams to the affected villages and provide compensation to the farmers and affected families as per the Revenue Book Circular (RBC) guidelines.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
This Could Be the Best Time to Trade Gold in 5 Years
IC Markets
Learn More
Undo
The state Congress media cell chief further said, "The BJP govt is limited to announcements only. The farmers on whose strength the country runs are on the verge of devastation today and the govt is a mute spectator."
Congress demanded a transparent survey conducted immediately by revenue teams to all the affected villages. "The families whose houses have been destroyed should be provided rehabilitation and relief camp facilities. The affected farmers should be provided loan waiver and assistance for the next crop," Nayak said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
Maharashtra issues social media guidelines for govt employees, bars criticism of policies
Mumbai: The Mahayuti govt has laid out guidelines for the use of social media by state govt employees, which include a bar on criticism of the current and future policies of the state and other govts in the country. Official documents cannot be shared without approval, and websites and apps banned by the state and central govts cannot be used, sayd the guidelinessay. Violations will invite disciplinary action. The guidelines, which were released on Monday, apply to state govt officers and employees and those in local self-govt bodies, boards, councils and public undertakings. This includes those doing contractual or outsourced jobs. You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai The govt resolution (GR) mentions a wide gamut of social media, including social networking sites like Facebook and LinkedIn, microblogging sites such as X, video-sharing platforms like Instagram and YouTube, instant messaging apps like WhatsApp and Telegram, and collaborative tools like wiki and discussion forums. The GR issued on Monday states that some dangers have been created by the use of social media, such as the dissemination of confidential information, the spreading of false information, and limits in the withdrawal of wrong information. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Mini House for 60 sqm for Seniors with Toilet and Bath (Price May Surprise You) Pre Fabricated Homes | Search Ads Search Now Undo "It has been observed that social media is being misused in ways such as giving adverse comments about govt policies or any political event or person in violation of the Government Service Rules," it said. The Maharashtra Civil Services (Employment) Rules, 1979, have been framed regarding the conduct of govt employees, and these will now apply to social media usage, the govt resolution said. The guidelines ask govt employees to keep their personal and official social media accounts separate and use social media responsibly. Websites and apps banned by the central and state govt should not be used. Only a person authorised by the govt, with the approval of the competent authority, can use govt media for the promotion of govt schemes and public participation. The guidelines say employees cannot share or upload confidential documents or office documents, in part or in full, without approval. Messaging platforms like WhatsApp and Telegram can be used for coordination regarding office work. Employees can post about collective efforts in the success of govt schemes but should take care not to indulge in self-praise. While the use of personal photos is allowed, the use of the govt name, logo, as well as govt property such as vehicles and buildings, should be avoided while uploading photos or videos on personal accounts. Objectionable, hateful, derogatory, and discriminatory content cannot be shared or uploaded. Upon being transferred, the social media accounts related to the office should be handed over immediately. Any employee who violates the guidelines will be subject to disciplinary action under the Maharashtra Civil Services (Disciplinary and Appeal) Rules, 1979.
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
HC questions locus standi of petitioner in Bhoodan case
Hyderabad: In a significant development concerning alleged Bhoodan lands allegedly purchased by IAS and IPS officers in survey no. 194 of Nagaram village, the Telangana high court on Monday heard the vacate petitions filed by senior IAS and IPS officers and questioned the writ petitioner Birla Mallesh about his locus standi in the case. The counsel for the IAS and IPS officers pointed out that Birla Jangamma, the petitioner's mother, had already filed a writ petition in 2024 which was disposed. The petitioner, with the malafide intention of tarnishing the image of senior IAS and IPS officers, has not disclosed the same to the high court, the counsel alleged. Hearing the case, Justice K Lakshman of the Telangana high court questioned the petitioner about the need to make representations on the issue to the Prime Minister, chief minister and various other political authorities. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad The counsel for the IAS and IPS officers further argued that the petitioner, after obtaining interim orders stating survey no. 194 of Nagaram village as Bhoodan land, had changed his stand that the land was in fact govt land. "The petitioner has suppressed various material facts and abused the process of law in order to obtain an interim order by misrepresenting that survey no. 194 of Nagaram village is Bhoodan land," the counsel said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Seniors Are Ditching Finger Pricks with This Breakthrough Monitor Thelifeh Undo Standing counsel for the Bhoodan board then informed the high court that survey no. 194, in which land was purchased by the officers, was never recorded as Bhoodan land. The counsel for the officers stated that the Rangareddy collector had also filed a detailed counter affidavit stating that the survey nos. 194 and 195 of Nagaram village is patta land. Justice Lakshman posted the matter for further hearing on Tuesday. Additional advocate general T Rajanikant Reddy meanwhile said that state has no intention of appointing a commission of inquiry into the case. Justice Lakshman directed the state to furnish to the court the details of Bhoodan land in the area.
Indian Express
36 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Chidambaram questions Pahalgam terrorists' identity, BJP hits back
As Parliament debates Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor, former Union Minister P Chidambaram's recent remarks on the terrorists involved in the killings have kicked up a row. In an interview to The Quint, uploaded on Saturday (July 26), Chidambaram said the Pahalgam attackers 'for all we know could be homegrown terrorists' and 'why do you assume that they came from Pakistan'? He also said that 'there is no evidence' that the terrorists came from Pakistan. To a question on 'what they (government) are trying to hide', Chidambaram said: 'They are hiding the fact. I think. And this is speculation. The CDS hinted at that – that we made tactical mistakes, we restrategised. So, what tactical mistakes were made? What was the re-strategising? Those questions either they (government) are incompetent to answer or they are unwilling to answer… They are unwilling to disclose what the NIA has done all these weeks.' 'Have they identified the terrorists, where they came from? For all we know they could be homegrown terrorists. Why do you assume that they came from Pakistan? There is no evidence of that. They are also hiding the losses,' the Congress leader said in the interview. He said he wrote in a column that in a war, losses occur on both sides. 'I understand that India would have suffered losses. Be upfront. Winston Churchill in World War 2 made a statement every other day. Whatever losses Britain suffered, they made it plain… They (government) are reluctant to admit the losses… I think they think they can put a large shroud on Operation Sindoor.' BJP's national information and technology department in-charge Amit Malviya hit out at Chidambaram over his statement. 'P Chidambaram, former UPA-era Home Minister and the original proponent of the infamous 'saffron terror' theory, covers himself with glory yet again.' Quoting his interview, Malviya said: 'Once again, the Congress rushes to give a clean chit to Pakistan — this time after the Pahalgam terror attack.' 'Why is it that every time our forces confront Pakistan-sponsored terrorism, Congress leaders sound more like Islamabad's defence lawyers than India's Opposition,' asked Malviya. 'When it comes to national security, there should be no ambiguity. But with the Congress, there never is — they always bend over backwards to protect the enemy,' Malviya said on X. Asked about BJP's reaction, Chidambaram said: 'I saw a troll and I have responded to the troll.' In a post on X on Monday, the Congress leader said: 'Trolls are of different kinds and use different tools to spread misinformation. The worst kind is a troll who suppresses the full recorded interview, takes two sentences, mutes some words, and paints the speaker in a black colour!'
