logo
Julian Epstein says Dems lack ‘moral authority' on Texas redistricting fight

Julian Epstein says Dems lack ‘moral authority' on Texas redistricting fight

New York Post4 days ago
Democrats are fighting tooth and nail to stop Texas lawmakers' plan to redraw the state's congressional map, but critics, including one prominent member of their own party, say they don't exactly hold the moral high ground.
Democrat legislators have fled the state to avoid votes on redistricting, which is expected to add more Republican seats to Congress for the Lone Star State.
They're getting the rock-star treatment as they visit blue states, where several governors have vowed to gerrymander Republicans out of their own Congressional delegations in retaliation for the Texas effort.
However, Democratic strategist Julian Epstein told 'Fox News Live' on Saturday that his party is not immune from criticism, as many blue states have already gerrymandered in a way that limits Republican congressional representation.
'No, I think they don't have the moral authority, and there's a lot of pearl-clutching going on,' he said.
Several blue states, including Massachusetts, Connecticut and New Mexico, have no Republicans in their House delegations.
3 Local democrats' efforts to stop Texas lawmakers' plan to redraw the state's congressional map have drawn tons of criticism, including from Democratic strategist Julian Epstein.
foxnews
And many feature oddly-drawn districts, seemingly crafted to limit GOP representation.
'The Democrats don't have clean hands here. You look at states like Massachusetts, New Jersey[…] Illinois, California, and Democrats have effectively gerrymandered Republicans out of existence,' Epstein added.
Epstein cautioned that the nationwide redistricting battle could create a 'race to the bottom,' and that leaving Republicans and Democrats in states led by the opposite parties could lead to people feeling left out of the democratic process.
Epstein cited New Jersey, in which Trump garnered 46% of the vote in 2024, but Republicans only have three out of the 12 congressional seats.
Meanwhile, Texas state Rep. Brian Harrison, a Republican, told Fox News Digital on Saturday that Democrats are guilty of 'total hypocrisy and faux outrage.'
3 Local Democratic lawmakers fled the state of Texas to avoid voting on a redistricting plan, which will likely increase the number of Republican seats in Congress for the Lone Star State.
Getty Images
'The dirty little secret is Democrats have no problem whatsoever with states redrawing their congressional maps to maximize partisan political advantage. They're just furious that Republican states are starting to redraw their maps,' Harrison said.
'It's because Democrat state after Democrat state, for a decade, has been gerrymandering the hell out of their congressional maps,' he said.
'Massachusetts, Connecticut, Vermont, Rhode Island, Delaware, all of these states have zero. If you're a Republican in those Democrat states, you don't have any voice in Congress,' he added.
'And [there are] many, many more that have given you just one seat, Oregon, I think Maine and Maryland.'
3 Epstein told 'Fox News Live' that the Democrats are not immune from criticism and argues that many blue states have also gerrymandered districts across the nation.
Getty Images
In California, a special election is likely to occur in November to counteract the Texas redistricting plan.
'We are talking about emergency measures to respond to what's happening in Texas, and we will nullify what happens in Texas,' California Gov. Gavin Newsom said on Friday with some Texas state lawmakers.
'We'll pick up five seats with the consent of the people. And that's the difference between the approach we're taking and the approach they're taking,' Newsom added.
'We're doing it on a temporary basis. We're doing it in a fully transparent way and we're doing it by asking the people of the state of California for their consent and support.'
Harrison explained that Texas's redistricting push has numerous reasons behind it, including the population growth in the Lone Star state since the last census.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China hawks skeptical of Trump chip deal
China hawks skeptical of Trump chip deal

The Hill

time21 minutes ago

  • The Hill

China hawks skeptical of Trump chip deal

Trump on Monday agreed to allow tech giants Nvidia and AMD to secure export licenses to sell their advanced artificial intelligence (AI) chips in China in exchange for a 15 percent cut of the profits. The White House said Tuesday that more such deals could be on the table. The unusual deal doesn't just raise legal questions. Experts say the U.S. should be wary of turning over American-made technology that could boost its adversary's AI capabilities, at a time when the two countries are fiercely competing for dominance. The security concerns appear to be a two-way street. China urged tech companies there to avoid any purchase of Nvidia's H20 chip, citing security issues. The move once again has Trump at odds with Congress's China hawks, who argue the administration is shortchanging America's national security interests to make a buck. Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (Ill.), the top Democrat on the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, in a statement said the most troubling part of the deal was a contradiction at the heart of the policy. 'The administration cannot simultaneously treat semiconductor exports as both a national security threat and a revenue opportunity,' he said. 'By putting a price on our security concerns, we signal to China and our allies that American national security principles are negotiable for the right fee.' The same panel's GOP chair, Rep. John Moolenaar (Mich.), said there are 'questions about the legal basis' for such a deal. 'Export controls are a frontline defense in protecting our national security, and we should not set a precedent that incentivizes the Government to grant licenses to sell China technology that will enhance its AI capabilities,' he said in a statement.

NIH cancels mRNA vaccine contracts, citing lack of public trust
NIH cancels mRNA vaccine contracts, citing lack of public trust

The Hill

time21 minutes ago

  • The Hill

NIH cancels mRNA vaccine contracts, citing lack of public trust

National Institutes of Health Director Jay Bhattacharya claims the federal government recently cancelled millions of dollars' worth of mRNA research contracts because the general public does not trust the technology. Bhattacharya explained the reason behind the abrupt contract cancellations, first, during an episode of Republican political strategist Steve Bannon's podcast 'War Room' last week and again in an opinion piece recently published in The Washington Post. In the article, Bhattacharya called the mRNA platform a 'promising technology' and acknowledged that it may lead to breakthroughs in treatment for diseases like cancer. 'But as a vaccine intended for broad public use, especially during a public health emergency, the platform has failed a crucial test: earning public trust,' he wrote. 'No matter how elegant the science, a platform that lacks credibility among the people it seeks to protect cannot fulfill its public health mission.' Bhattacharya's explanation for the administration's pivot away from mRNA technology differs from that of his boss, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Kennedy announced last week the agency would wind down its mRNA vaccine development activities under the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) and cancel $500 million worth of contracts related to the technology. He said that mRNA technologies funded during the pandemic failed to meet current scientific standards and that the federal government would shift its focus to whole-virus vaccines and novel platforms. Bhattacharya expressed concern in the article about mRNA vaccines' ability to direct human cells to produce spike proteins to trigger an immune response. He argues the scientific community does not have a clear understanding of where mRNA product stays in the body, for how long, and whether other proteins are created in the process. Scott Hensley, a microbiology professor at the University of Pennsylvania's Perelman School of Medicine, told STAT that these are also issues with vaccines that use live but weakened viruses like the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine, which federal health agencies have deemed safe and effective. 'This is why we complete human clinical studies before vaccines are widely used in humans,' he told the outlet. 'The mRNA and live attenuated vaccine platforms have both proven to be safe and effective in clinical trials.' He blamed public distrust in mRNA on the Biden administration's COVID-19 vaccine mandates during the pandemic. Bhattacharya expressed concern in the article about mRNA vaccines' ability to direct human cells to produce spike proteins to trigger an immune response. He argues the scientific community does not have a clear understanding of where the mRNA product stays in the body, for how long, and whether other proteins are created in the process. 'Science isn't propaganda,' he wrote. 'It's humility. And when public health officials stopped communicating with humility, we lost much of the public, an absolute necessity for any vaccine platform.'

New Miami U.S. Attorney sworn in by Attorney General Bondi in Washington
New Miami U.S. Attorney sworn in by Attorney General Bondi in Washington

Miami Herald

time21 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

New Miami U.S. Attorney sworn in by Attorney General Bondi in Washington

Former Miami-Dade County Judge Jason A. Reding Quiñones was sworn in Wednesday as the new U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida. But the afternoon ceremony making his appointment by President Donald Trump official didn't happen in the district's home base, Miami, according to tradition. Nor was he sworn in by the district's chief judge, which has been customary for decades. Reding Quiñones was administered the oath of office by U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi at the Justice Department in Washington — indicating that the nation's first top federal prosecutor confirmed by the Senate earlier this month will be an ardent loyalist as the Trump administration carries out its agenda against illegal immigrants, gangs and drug traffickers. 'I think it's unusual, if not rare — in the old days, the chief judge would swear in the U.S. Attorney,' said Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond who carefully follows presidential nominations. 'I'm wondering how the judges in the Southern District will feel about this. It seems like an unnecessary affront to them.' Tobias said the symbolism of Reding Quiñones' being sworn in by Bondi, a former Florida Attorney General, is unmistakable, noting how she has aggressively led the Trump administration's confrontations with federal judges over immigration disputes, higher tariffs and government cutbacks. There has also been widespread speculation that Bondi might move a potential grand jury investigation from Washington to South Florida to look into the Obama administration's role in the FBI probe of Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election, which brought the Trump campaign under intense scrutiny. 'I wondered at first why he would be the first U.S. Attorney to be confirmed by the Senate; it didn't make sense,' Tobias said. 'But I now think it does make sense, making Florida first.' On Aug. 2, Reding Quiñones secured a 52-44 confirmation vote along party lines in the U.S. Senate — Illinois Sen. Richard Durbin was the only Democrat to vote for him. Reding Quiñones, 44, will now head the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida, replacing interim U.S. Attorney Hayden O'Byrne, as he oversees about 250 prosecutors and support staff in one of the busiest districts in the country. READ MORE: Trump picks U.S. attorney in Miami. As criminal prosecutor, he received poor evaluations 'As the son of a Cuban political refugee and a proud Miami native, I am deeply honored by the trust and confidence that President Trump, Attorney General Bondi, and the United States Senate have placed in me,' Reding Quiñones said in a statement. 'As the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, I will work tirelessly to protect the American people, restore impartial justice, and defend the rule of law without fear or favor.' Several colleagues touted Reding Quiñones as the new U.S. Attorney, while others privately questioned whether his loyalties would be to Trump and Bondi or to the federal prosecutors in South Florida. 'I think it's very special that Judge Reding Quiñones was the first U.S. Attorney confirmed by U.S. Senate since President Trump was inaugurated,' said Coral Gables lawyer Jesus Suarez, chairman of the 11th Judicial Nominating Commission in Miami-Dade, which had recommended him as a county judge to Gov. Ron DeSantis. 'I'm confident he will bring the same kind of fearless respect for the rule of law we have seen from AG Pam Bondi and the rest of President Trump's DOJ,' he said. Jon Sale, a prominent white-collar defense attorney and the former First Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of Florida, said: 'That AG Bondi performed the swearing in personally demonstrates that Jason is held in high esteem by the Department of Justice. 'As a result of the confidence shown by AG Bondi, the district will benefit from getting more high visibility cases,' he said. 'Jason's many years in public service, including his time on the bench and protecting our country in the military, show he is up for the challenges of this position and qualifies him to be an excellent U.S. Attorney.' Reding Quiñones, formerly a federal prosecutor in the Miami office, was appointed as a Miami-Dade County judge last year by Gov. DeSantis and is a lieutenant colonel in the Air Force Reserve. After graduating from Florida International University's law school in 2008, he began his career practicing corporate law and then did a stint as military lawyer for the U.S. Air Force before joining the Justice Department in Washington in 2018. Later that year, the U.S. Attorney's Office in Miami hired Reding Quiñones as a prosecutor in the major crimes section, the starting place for most newly hired assistants. During his four years in the major crimes section, which focuses on lower-level felony cases, Reding Quiñones received poor evaluations from supervisors who cited his incompetence, the Miami Herald learned. In turn, Reding Quiñones filed a complaint against the U.S. Attorney's Office, claiming it was discriminating against him as a white man whose temporary work as an Air Force reservist prevented him from performing at the same full-time level as other federal prosecutors in the major crimes section. Reding Quiñones then took an extended leave from the office in 2020-2021 to serve in the Air Force Reserve. When he returned to his prosecutor's job, Reding dropped his discrimination complaint and agreed to be reassigned to the civil division, which deals mostly with non-criminal prosecutions. In the civil division, Reding Quiñones received satisfactory job evaluations. READ MORE: Miami U.S. Attorney, first Haitian-American in post, to resign before Trump takes office

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store