Manitoba Hydro proposes electricity rate hike of nearly 11% over 3 years
The Crown corporation asked the Public Utilities Board afternoon to approve three annual rate hikes of 3.5 per cent, beginning in 2026, according to documents published Friday afternoon.
The hikes would follow a one-year rate freeze promised by the NDP government — but criticized as reckless by consumer advocates and the Progressive Conservative Opposition.
In its application to the Public Utilities Board, Hydro says it must spend $31 billion over the next two decades to improve the reliability of its existing infrastructure and expand its capacity to generate electricity.
Some of the infrastructure along Bipole I and Bipole II, two of Hydro's three main transmission lines, is more than 50 years old, which is "one to three decades past the industry expected service life," and will alone requires billions worth of upgrades in the coming decades, the corporation writes in its rate application.
Hydro also states it must increase its generating capacity by 2030 in order to avoid electrical-capacity shortfalls during peak-use periods in the winter. This winter, the corporation notified the Public Utilities Board of its intention to build a pair of new fuel-combustion turbines at a cost of $1.4 billion to meet this demand.
In its rate application, Hydro warned it may need to build more gas turbines from 2035 to 2045, despite a provincial NDP directive to stop burning fuel to create electricity by 2035.
"The current load forecast does not represent a path to net zero [carbon emissions] and as such there is the potential that additional investments will be needed," the application states. "In addition, inflationary factors continue to evolve and create uncertainty in current and future capital costs."
Hydro is already carrying $24.6 billion worth of debt, which is $940 million higher than the forecast from its last rate application. Hydro revenues were down because of "drought and low water over the last two years," the rate application states.
In a statement issued Friday evening, Hydro noted the proposed rate hikes would be the first for the Crown corporation since rates went up by one per cent on April 1, 2024.
"We realize this is a challenging time for Manitobans already paying higher prices for many goods and services," Hydro president and CEO Allan Danroth said in the statement. "Manitoba Hydro is also facing increased costs and the rates we're requesting will ensure we can continue to provide safe, reliable energy now and into the future."
Hydro has been warning about the need spend billions on infrastructure and new generating capacity since 2023. The provincial NDP nonetheless promised to institute a Hydro rate freeze when it ran for office that fall and has lauded a rate freeze for the 2025 calendar year.
Katrine Dilay, a lawyer representing the Manitoba branch of the Consumers Association of Canada, has repeatedly questioned the fiscal wisdom of a Hydro rate freeze.
Last fall, she warned rate hikes are required to to meet Manitoba's energy and capacity needs over the next decade.
"So from our clients' perspectives, the commitment from the government creates a significant risk for future consumers of higher than necessary rate increases," Dilay said in November.
PC Hydro critic Lauren Stone has also questioned the wisdom of the rate freeze.
In a statement issued late on Friday, NDP government spokesperson Amy Tuckett-McGimpsey said the Hydro rate freeze provided "much-needed relief for families."
The trio of 3.5 per cent rate hikes, which works out to a compound hike of 10.9 per cent over three years, she said, "balances affordability with investments in Hydro to ensure we build our economy for the future."
Hydro is also committed to cutting costs, Tuckett-McGimpsey said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Vancouver Sun
6 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
Opinion: B.C.'s Crown land strategy demands public scrutiny, transparency and accountability
The B.C. government's approach to managing public lands is collapsing under its own contradictions. In the past year alone, First Nations, public interest groups, and industry proponents have all taken the province to court over closed-door decision-making on Crown land. The message from all sides is consistent: The NDP government is failing to uphold transparency, accountability, equal access and fairness. After shelving the proposed Land Act amendments last year due to a public backlash against joint Indigenous-Crown decision making, Premier David Eby promised not to proceed without rebuilding public trust. Yet his government has doubled down on requiring First Nations consent in areas where asserted territory overlaps public lands, citing the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. A daily roundup of Opinion pieces from the Sun and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Informed Opinion will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. For British Columbians who expect their public lands to be managed transparently and in accordance with the law, the NDP's UNDRIP-based process delivers none of the stability or predictability promised by the premier. Nothing in Canadian law requires Indigenous consent over any lands to which Aboriginal title has not been declared by the courts under Canadian law. Yet the government's actions suggest it is operating from a very different premise by assuming Indigenous legal authority and jurisdiction over entire claimed territories, without proof of either in law. The Public Land Use Society was formed in response to growing public concerns over closed-door Crown land decisions. PLUS is non-profit society representing concerned citizens, business owners and local groups who believe that Crown land decisions should be transparent, inclusive, and accountable to all British Columbians. Aboriginal rights and title, as carefully delineated by the Canadian courts, deserve full recognition and affirmation. But what's unfolding under the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act is the imposition of an ideological framework for reconciliation drawn from UNDRIP, a non-legally binding international convention. This approach is secretive, exclusionary, undemocratic and fundamentally inappropriate for B.C. A clear pattern is emerging: the government is negotiating sweeping land-use planning agreements behind closed doors, including arrangements like the Land Use Planning Agreement with the Sḵwx̱wú7mesh Úxwumixw (Squamish Nation), announced on June 26. This 106-page agreement covers a region of major importance to British Columbians. It includes designated recreational sites and, according to the government's own release, places that land 'under direct control' of the First Nation. There is no legal authority for Indigenous 'control' of the territory, and yet the public are said to be bound by it. In some cases, these changes will require modified park management plans that could impact recreational uses. The public has had no say in these changes, which shift long-term control to a system of decision-making and management 'authority' that is in no way accountable to the broader public. To understand why this is a radical departure, consider two key elements of UNDRIP that DRIPA advances: first, the concept of Indigenous 'owned' self-defined traditional territories; and second, the requirement for Indigenous 'consent' for any government action that might affect those self-defined 'owned' territories. UNDRIP's definition of 'owned territory and resources' is very different both geographically and materially from Aboriginal title under Canadian law. Aboriginal title in Canada must be proven in court to take full legal effect and applies only to defined areas. So far, court declarations have recognized Aboriginal title over only small portions of the broader claimed traditional territories. All of this is entirely contrary to Canadian law that has been set out by the Supreme Court of Canada . It is also the exact 'veto' authority Eby has been so consistent in telling the public his government has not promised to First Nations. While PLUS supports thoughtful collaboration with Indigenous governments and the need for long-term planning, these land-use planning announcements and consent-based agreements prioritize political theatre over real-world democratic and transparent governance and seriously undermine the public interest. Planning frameworks must be grounded in clear legislation, defensible timelines, and meaningful public engagement. Public land belongs to all British Columbians, who must now decide whether to remain silent or demand a return to lawful, inclusive, and transparent land-use governance. Warren Mirko is executive director of the Public Land Use Society. Geoffrey S. Moyse, KC, is a senior lawyer with 31 years' experience in Indigenous and public law, including with the B.C. Attorney General's office.
CTV News
21 hours ago
- CTV News
‘Meet people where they are at': Interim federal NDP leader Don Davies has his first Stampede visit
Interim NDP leader Don Davies visited his first Calgary Stampede Sunday -- in addition to an Alberta NDP pancake breakfast -- describing them as an opportunity to hear what's on ordinary people's minds. 'It's about meeting people where they're at,' Davies said. 'And a lot of politics, I think is best communicated culturally and socially. 'And you know, particularly for me, I want to place a big priority on meeting working people,' he added. 'The federal NDP needs to reconnect with the working class in this country --and there's no better place to do that than at a place like the Stampede in our communities, where working people of all walks of life and all professions and occupations are gathering. 'It's a good chance to come and listen and hear what's on people's minds,' he said. 'That's why politicians are here -- because we get to use our mouths less and our ears more.' 'Democratic' In addition to Stampede, Davies was in Calgary to meet with Alberta NDP leader Naheed Nenshi. Among the topics they discussed was the current state of affairs between the federal and provincial wings of the NDP party. 'I know that the Alberta (New) Democrats just had a convention where they extensively debated that issue. I think it's healthy in a democracy. And the second word in our name is democratic -- so I think it's healthy to be reviewing those relationships,' Davies said. 'What's most important is that New Democrats, provincially (and) federally across this country, are working in the same direction for the same goals,' he said. 'And I know that Mr. Nenshi and I and our federal colleagues, we share the same goals, which is to have a strong Canadian economy that works for working people, strong health care systems, good jobs, good families, sustaining jobs for people, and making sure that we have a strong united front against the threats that are coming from south of the border.' 'Share power': Nenshi Alberta NDP leader Naheed Nenshi, the MLA-elect for Edmonton Strathcona, was back in Calgary Sunday, attending the Alberta New Democrat Caucus Stampede Breakfast at the Haysboro Community Association in southwest Calgary. Naheed Nenshi Alberta NDP leader Naheed Nenshi was in Calgary Sunday to deliver a speech at the Alberta NDP Caucus Stampede Breakfast. (Jordan Kanygin, CTV Calgary) Nenshi said that for interprovincial barriers to trade to come down, Canadian premiers must be more willing to cede authority and power to foster collaborations with other provinces. The comments came the day before Alberta premier Danielle Smith and Ontario premier Doug Ford sign a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to facilitate new energy and interprovincial trade infrastructure. 'The things that probably would make the most difference in the short-term are things that provinces have been very reluctant to change,' Nenshi said. 'Yes, there are (restrictive) things on wine and beer across provinces and so on, (but) that's not that big a deal in terms of the economy,' he added. 'What is critical is building codes, labor standards, accreditation and a particular interest in transportation and trucking. 'These are things that provinces, including Alberta, have been very protectionist on over the years.' Nenshi said Stampede is a great opportunity for politicians to hear from constituents, among many others. 'I call it the political petting zoo,' he said, ' I'll let you under the hat a little bit: one of the things that a lot of everyday Calgarians and visitors won't see is, there's a whole circuit of lobbyists and people with particular interests who are trying to get to politicians. 'And in fact, what I really mentioned to my (Alberta NDP) colleagues this time is, yeah, go to a few of those events,' he added. 'You got to kind of show your face -- but I actually want them showing up at every church that's having a pancake breakfast. 'In every community, it's time for us to spend time with real citizens,' he said. 'And I'm really excited that we've got about 3,000 regular people here, just here to have a pancake, meet their neighbors, say hello to their MLA -- and I think that's wonderful.' The former Calgary mayor also answered a question about the state of affairs between the federal and provincial NDP. 'I actually sat down with him (Don Davies) yesterday,' he said. 'I had never met with him before. He's a delightful person, and we had a very good conversation about how we can do a better job representing all Canadians, Albertans, and all Canadians who just want a better future.' With files from CTV's Jordan Kanygin
CBC
a day ago
- CBC
Independent MLAs say work has already begun to rebuild Progressive Conservative Party
Two independent Alberta MLAs revealed more details on Saturday about their work to resurrect the Progressive Conservative brand that held government in Alberta for 44 years. After announcing their plan to re-register the Progressive Conservative Association of Alberta earlier this week, Peter Guthrie and Scott Sinclair held what they billed as an official relaunch of the party in Calgary on Saturday. They explained their aim is to offer an alternative conservative voice that falls closer to the political centre than the governing United Conservative Party or the opposition NDP. Work has already begun, the MLAs explained, to secure signatures to register the party. But Alberta's PC revival isn't official just yet. The party will need to secure 8,819 signatures, representing 0.3 per cent of the province's voting population, by late November. Guthrie argued their push for a new party is to represent what he sees as the mainstream political beliefs of most people in the province, after hearing from a growing number of frustrated voters who felt they didn't have a political home in Alberta. "We have an NDP that seems to be focused on 20 to 30 per cent of the population on the left, and we have the UCP that seems to be focused on the same-sized group on the right," said Guthrie, a former infrastructure minister who's served as MLA for Airdrie-Cochrane since 2019. "Alberta is and always has been a progressive conservative province. One where people value responsible government." The governing UCP are no longer a real conservative party, Guthrie argued, and the PC party he's pitching will offer a more practical and principled voice, he said. Conservative credibility in opposition Guthrie and Sinclair have taken up the PC mantle after both were ousted from the UCP earlier this year. After serving as an MLA in the party for nearly six years, Guthrie resigned from Premier Danielle Smith's cabinet in February citing concerns with the government amid the controversy over procurement practices at Alberta Health Services (AHS). He was then expelled from caucus in April, after pushing for a public inquiry into the AHS issue. Sinclair, on the other hand, was a first-term MLA representing Lesser Slave Lake for the UCP, who was kicked out of caucus in March after publicly criticizing the provincial budget for forecasting significant deficits while spending too heavily on Alberta's major cities rather than its rural communities. Could the re-emergence of the PC Party divide Alberta's right? | The Political Panel 2 days ago Duration 8:19 Two former UCP MLAs are trying to start a new political party under the old Progressive Conservative brand. Scott Sinclair and Peter Guthrie say the United Conservative Party is 'way off base' with Albertans. The Political Panel weighs in on whether a revived PC Party could split the right-of-centre vote. Rob Brown is joined by Conservative strategist Erika Barootes, and Liberal strategist Sabrina Grover. Photo credit: X/PeterGuthrie99 Lori Williams, an associate professor of policy studies at Mount Royal University, said Guthrie and Sinclair are currently the most vocal, and possibly the most effective, opposition members in the legislature. Their status as former party members adds credibility to their criticism, Williams said, adding that regardless of how many seats their party wins, their critiques could be the largest challenge they present to the current government. "When a conservative is saying a conservative government is entitled and corrupt, that's going to resonate in a way that wouldn't for people who either don't have that inside information or that reputation for being committed, principled conservatives," Williams said. The viability of the PC label The Progressive Conservative brand is well-known for holding power in Alberta's legislature from 1971 to 2015, and being led by longtime premiers like Peter Lougheed, Don Getty and Ralph Klein. But its popularity dipped in its final years, and the party faced criticism for its perceived entitlement, leading to the party winning just nine seats in the 2015 Alberta election. Two years later, new party leader Jason Kenney struck a deal with the Wildrose Party to merge and form the UCP. Sinclair argued he and Guthrie have made principled stands resulting in their departure from the UCP, and he drew parallels between criticisms both the current provincial government and the PCs of old faced around excessive spending and investigations into the government. "We were asking questions about accountability, financial oversight, value for money, bloated contracts, and it got us exactly where we are today. I would say there are a lot of parallels between the late PC days … and talking about this existing premier," Sinclair said. But earlier this week, Smith threw cold water on whether the PC brand could legally be revived in Alberta. Smith argued elections law states new parties can't use the name of the former legacy parties that merged to form the UCP, to avoid confusing voters. "We expect the law to be followed, and we're going to be following up with Elections Alberta accordingly," Smith said. On Saturday, Guthrie said Elections Alberta made the party name available after the most recent provincial election. Earlier this week, an Elections Alberta spokesperson said the chief electoral officer would make a final determination on a party's proposed name during the registration process. While the new PC party could also take votes from the NDP if their supporters look for a different alternative to the current government, Alberta NDP Leader Naheed Nenshi said his party remains "the only choice for positive change" in Alberta. "The decision by these two former UCP MLAs to revive the PC party is another clear sign that Albertans are unhappy with this current UCP government and are demanding better for our province," said Nenshi in a statement on Wednesday. Guthrie and Sinclair expect to remain the party's only members until the party is officially registered, and aren't pushing for other MLAs to join. But they said they've had interesting conversations since their plans for their party were announced. There's no evidence more MLAs will follow Guthrie and Sinclair, Williams said, and the UCP is likely to work hard to keep its MLAs in the fold. But she noted the new party creates the possibility Smith may have to respond to a split in her party's centre. Williams points out that while no party outside the UCP and NDP have picked up significant support in polling or electoral results since the 2019 election, what could make the PC party different is if more credible people throw their support behind it, especially if any MLAs cross the floor, or join the party after being removed from the UCP like Guthrie and Sinclair were. "United Conservatives are not terribly united. They disagree on a lot of things. Some of them belong to parties previously that fought against one another in the legislature," Williams said.
