
Kerala opposes presidential reference on Governors' assent deadlines
Stating that the judgment has neither been assailed nor set aside in any validly constituted proceeding, Kerala submitted that it has attained finality and is binding under Article 141 of the Constitution. Therefore, it cannot be challenged indirectly through the current reference.The state alleged that the Union Government is using the reference as a device to reopen and contest settled constitutional issues, without disclosing that the apex court has already ruled on them.Emphasising Article 144, Kerala asserted that the President and the Council of Ministers are constitutionally bound to act in aid of the Supreme Court, not seek to overturn its judgments by indirect means.Kerala also objected to the claim made in the reference that Article 200 does not prescribe a timeline for Governors to act on bills. The state said the Supreme Court has already interpreted the provision clearly, and the reference attempts to mislead the Court into reconsidering its settled position.Alleging suppression of judicial precedent, misinterpretation of constitutional provisions, and lack of transparency in the reference, Kerala urged the Court to return the reference unanswered.'This Court cannot sit in appeal over its own judgments—nor can that power be vested in it by the President under Article 143,' the state submitted.Kerala further contended that if the foundation of the reference is flawed and the majority of questions aim to overturn existing judgments, the presence of two or three additional questions does not obligate the Court to address any of them.- EndsMust Watch

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


First Post
21 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump Targets Nigerians in Visa Crackdown on Birthright Citizenship Firstpost Africa
Trump Targets Nigerians in Visa Crackdown on Birthright Citizenship | Firstpost Africa | N18G In a renewed immigration crackdown, the Trump administration has issued a warning to Nigerians against traveling to the U.S. with the primary intent of giving birth — a practice aimed at securing automatic citizenship for their children under the U.S. Constitution. Nigeria remains among the top countries involved in so-called 'birth tourism.' The U.S. Embassy in Nigeria has also introduced tougher visa rules, including issuing mostly single-entry, short-validity visas. This move is part of broader restrictions targeting African nations, including higher visa fees, tighter interview rules, and increased digital screening — all under Washington's push to curb immigration loopholes. See More
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Congress kept India united, Gandhi family kept party intact: DK Shivakumar
Karnataka Deputy Chief Minister D K Shivakumar on Saturday said India has remained united because of the Congress and the Gandhi family has kept the party together as he urged party workers to contribute as a team to ensure the exit of the BJP in 2029. He also urged the lawyers community to help protect the right to vote of every Indian by creating legal banks in every constituency, as suggested by Rahul Gandhi. "Congress' history is country's history, Congress' strength is country's strength. The Gandhi family has kept the Congress family united and the Congress has kept the country united. Otherwise our country would have been broken into various pieces," he said. Shivakumar was addressing the valedictory function of the day-long national legal conclave on 'Constitutional Challenges: Perspectives and Pathways'. The eight-time legislator from Karnataka recalled the days when he was lodged in Tihar jail and lauded the role played by lawyers in helping him come out of it. He also thanked Sonia Gandhi for visiting him in Tihar jail when he was there and make him the Karnataka Congress chief after that helped the party break the "double engine government" in the state. "This is not just a political agenda, we all have to join together. Joining together is the beginning and all of you teaming together is progress. You all have to work together and again in 2029 you have to bring back the country back to shape," Shivakumar said as he exhorted workers to come together to fight the BJP. "With lot of commitment, the Congress party has saved this country, the day is not far. You all have to have a proper agenda and in 2029 you should see when Rahul Gandhi becomes the prime minister of the country. This is what your commitment should be," he said. He also lauded the "sacrifice" made by Sonia Gandhi to make Manmohan Singh the prime minister. The Karnataka deputy chief minister said the message by Rahul Gandhi and Mallikarjun Kharge at the conclave was clear that when our Constitution and our right to vote are in big danger, all lawyers who believe in democracy and Constitution have to create a legal bank in every assembly and district, to protect and save the right of every voter. "This is what he is starting his voice on August 5 in Freedom Park in Karnataka," he said about the details of Rahul Gandhi's programme of providing information on alleged anomalies in the voter lists in one constituency in Karnataka that has been investigated by the Congress workers there.


New Indian Express
2 hours ago
- New Indian Express
SC says anticipatory bail cannot be tied to resuming conjugal life, sets aside Jharkhand HC order
NEW DELHI: In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court has set aside an order of the Jharkhand High Court which granted anticipatory bail to a man, allegedly accused of cruelty and attempt to murder of his wife, on the condition that he would resume conjugal life with her and maintain her with dignity and honour. A two-judge bench of the apex court, headed by Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Augustine George Masih, held that conditioning the grant of pre-arrest bail on the accused resuming conjugal life with his wife is improper and not permissible under the law. The court quashed the order passed by the Jharkhand High Court. 'The spouses seemingly, at one point of time, had drifted apart and resided separately for some time. Imposing a condition that the appellant (accused husband) would maintain the respondent no.2 (wife) with dignity and honour is beset with risk in that it can generate further litigation. In such state of affairs, we are of the considered opinion that the High Court should have considered the prayer of the appellant for pre-arrest bail entirely on its own merit instead of imposing a condition,' the court observed in its order. According to the prosecution, the husband, Anil Kumar, was allegedly an accused in a case registered under Sections 498-A (cruelty), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 313 (causing miscarriage without consent), 506 (criminal intimidation), 307 (attempt to murder), 34 (common intention) of the Indian Penal Code, along with Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.