
Questions over Tory peer's support for nuclear company's UK ambitions
A Conservative peer faces questions over her long-running support for a Canadian nuclear technology company hoping to develop the next generation of power stations in the UK.
Olivia Bloomfield has acted in support of the company, Terrestrial Energy, since 2018, including in advisory roles for which she received share options.
She organised for top executives of the company to meet ministers on two occasions in 2018. Later, while a whip in Boris Johnson's government, she helped recruit two fellow peers to the company's advisory board.
Once Lady Bloomfield had stepped down from government, she was given share options, which could prove highly valuable later this year when Terrestrial Energy launches its shares publicly for the first time on an American stock exchange, with an estimated value of $1bn (£770m).
Jonathan Rose, a political integrity expert at De Montfort University, said there were questions 'about whether she has always acted with openness and accountability'.
He said the meetings in 2018 with ministers and Bloomfield's appointment as an adviser shortly afterwards, for which she received share options, raised 'serious questions' about whether she had broken the House of Lords rules, which he said the Lords commissioners for standards 'should investigate as a matter of urgency'.
Bloomfield said she had been 'scrupulous' in her declarations and 'strongly' maintained she did not breach the code of conduct.
Bloomfield, now a Conservative whip and shadow Welsh minister, joined the Lords in 2016 after being nominated by David Cameron when he quit Downing Street. She ran Tory fundraising from 2006 to 2010.
In the House of Lords, Bloomfield developed an interest in nuclear energy and took up a fellowship that provided her with knowledge of and access to the industry.
Her support for Terrestrial Energy appears to have begun around April 2018, when she met the then junior business minister Richard Harrington with executives from the company, including its CEO, Simon Irish, according to official documents gained through freedom of information legislation. The meeting was organised after Bloomfield contacted Harrington. She noted that she had 'no commercial interest' with Terrestrial Energy at that time.
Beforehand, Whitehall officials said they had been 'ambushed' by Bloomfield to hold a meeting. They wrote in an email to the business minister that she 'strongly represents the views' of the company and that it was 'apparent from previous correspondence' she would be 'lobbying [for] the best interests of Terrestrial Energy'.
They noted that Bloomfield had already introduced the company to officials working with Alun Cairns, the then minister responsible for Wales.
Officials' notes of the meeting with Harrington said Terrestrial Energy had pushed for government grants to be given to companies developing reactors.
Two months later, on 5 June 2018, Bloomfield and another Terrestrial Energy executive met Stuart Andrew, a junior minister in the Wales Office. An official's notes show they pressed for Terrestrial Energy's reactors to be developed in Wales.
Bloomfield had helped to secure the meeting with Andrew and sent the Wales Office documents drawn up by Terrestrial Energy to promote its case.
Later the same month, she was appointed an adviser to the company. On 21 June, Terrestrial Energy awarded her share options, a right to buy shares in the company at a fixed price after a set period of time.
She told the Guardian that she took the options for the role instead of a fee because Terrestrial Energy had yet to make a profit.
Members of the House of Lords are not permitted to provide parliamentary services in return for payment.
Bloomfield said she had 'no financial involvement or interest in Terrestrial Energy' when she organised either of the meetings and there was therefore no breach of the House of Lords' rules.
At issue is whether she had started discussing a commercial role with Terrestrial Energy when she attended the meeting with the Welsh minister on 5 June. When asked, Terrestrial Energy and Bloomfield both declined to answer this question.
She described the April meeting with Harrington as purely 'educational' about next-generation nuclear technologies, but declined to provide any details of her meeting in June.
Rose said: 'I think there are serious questions to answer about whether at the time of the June meeting she had agreed to accept a payment or incentive in the form of the share options – particularly given how quickly they were granted after.'
In late July 2019, Bloomfield was appointed to Johnson's government as a Lords whip. Her duties included speaking in debates on behalf of a few departments if their minister was unavailable, including for the energy department.
She said she relinquished the share options and her role in Terrestrial Energy on her appointment. However, she continued to support the company while a minister.
Until February 2020, one of Bloomfield's frontbench colleagues in the Lords was Ian Duncan, a climate minister in the energy department.
She said that when she stood down from the advisory board she 'replaced' herself with Lord Duncan and another peer, John Browne, the former BP chief executive. Duncan's appointment began in October 2020. Browne did not start his role until February 2023.
In April 2021, Anne-Marie Trevelyan, an energy minister at the time, held a meeting with Irish. Trevelyan met the Terrestrial Energy chief executive 'on the recommendation' of Bloomfield, according to an email from an official in Trevelyan's private ministerial office.
A readout of the meeting days later shows Irish asked if the government would consider 'grant/financing opportunities' and adapt the scope of a government-funded programme on nuclear fuel development. Trevelyan, the readout says, expressed interest in his proposal.
Bloomfield said it was 'unlikely' she would have only recommended Trevelyan meet Terrestrial Energy. Trevelyan did hold other meetings with nuclear companies, including with companies that are partners of Terrestrial Energy, but Bloomfield declined to give any further details on other recommendations she may have given.
In April 2022, Bloomfield attended a meeting of the all-party parliamentary group on small modular reactors, which was hearing a presentation from Terrestrial Energy. Bloomfield declared she was formerly on the company's advisory board. She cited having previously introduced Terrestrial to a minister in 2018, 'when there was a very firmly closed door!', according to minutes of the meeting.
Bloomfield returned to the company in August 2023, less than three months after leaving government, and was awarded fresh share options as remuneration for a role as an 'ad hoc consultant responsible for future fundraising and headhunting suitable individuals to join the firm'.
Susan Hawley, a campaigner and director of Spotlight on Corruption, said: 'That she went on to be rehired by the company having played such an apparently useful role to the company as a minister is deeply concerning and suggests that further investigation is in order.'
Bloomfield said she went through 'all the proper channels'. She added that she had received approval from the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments (Acoba), which regulates jobs taken up by former ministers.
Bloomfield said to the Acoba committee she had had no official contact with Terrestrial Energy while a whip. She does not appear to have told the committee about her attendance at the all-party parliamentary group meeting in April 2022 or about her role in hiring two peers to the company's advisory board, while she was a minister.
A spokesperson for Terrestrial Energy said: 'We trust and require that our employees and advisers always operate in line with all relevant laws, ethics policies, regulations and codes of conduct that apply. We would take any breaches of those rules by our representatives very seriously.'
They added they were aware of the Lords code of conduct and had been assured by Bloomfield that she had 'only ever acted for us in accordance with that code'.
From the backbenches, at times declaring her role as an adviser to Terrestrial Energy, Bloomfield has continued to speak in the Lords on the merits of advanced modular reactors, a version of which the company is developing.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Spectator
35 minutes ago
- Spectator
Does David Bull know why people vote Reform?
In a week of high drama, in which Reform lost its chairman and then saw him return 48 hours later, the party could have hoped for a quiet news day. Slim chance of that. After Zia Yusuf returned as party chairman, Reform held a press conference to announce that Yusuf would head the party's DOGE unit to uncover waste at councils – and would be replaced as chairman by Dr David Bull. A former Conservative, Bull is better known than his predecessor was when taking the role, having formerly presented Newsround and Most Haunted, becoming an MEP for the Brexit party in 2019 and the co-host of the TalkTV weekend breakfast show in 2022. As James Heale notes, he is also popular with members, being both 'a gregarious character and a longtime Farage loyalist.' A key part of Bull's role will be in handling the media; but his first steps in the new role, it appears he has already stumbled, stating that 'immigration is the lifeblood of this country, it always has been'.


South Wales Guardian
43 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
MPs call for UK to recognise Palestine after Government sanctions ministers
Foreign minister Hamish Falconer faced repeated cross-party calls from MPs to recognise Palestine at the meeting in New York. In response, Mr Falconer did not rule out the move, saying he had 'no doubt' he would return to the Commons to update MPs. It came as the UK imposed an asset freeze and travel ban on Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, Israel's security minister and finance minister, respectively. The move came alongside Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Norway. When asked about the recognition of Palestine by Liberal Democrat foreign spokesperson Calum Miller, Mr Falconer said: 'The two-state solution conference next week is an important moment we're discussing with our friends and allies our approach to that conference and no-doubt I will return to this house, with your permission Mr Speaker, to discuss further.' Mr Miller had said: 'The time has also come to listen to members on all sides of this House and officially to recognise the independent state of Palestine. Will the Government commit to taking this vital step at next week's summit in New York? 'Recognition will demonstrate the UK's commitment to self-determination but also make clear that, building on today's announcement, the UK will do all it can to wrest control away from the extremes and give both Israelis and Palestinians hope of a lasting peace.' Conservative MP for Herne Bay and Sandwich, Sir Roger Gale, had chastised the Government for not taking more action. He said: 'When the minister came to the despatch box, I had expected to hear something constructive. What we've heard is the sanctioning of two people. The United Kingdom Government could unilaterally recognise Palestine. The United Kingdom Government could show the world and lead.' He added: 'When is the Government going to do something?' Labour MP Abtisam Mohamed (Sheffield Central), who was denied access to the occupied West Bank earlier this year, agreed with the calls. She said: 'Annexation is real. It is happening. Partners in the region are calling for recognition before it's too late.' Ms Mohamed continued: 'Does the minister agree with me that we must not throw recognition into the long grass? That failure to recognise next week at the UN conference implies that Israel does have a veto, and that the Israeli government will continue to annexe and terrorise Palestinians in the West Bank. If we do not recognise now, there will be no Palestinian state to recognise.' Mr Falconer said: 'Recognition is right at the centre of any discussion of a two-state solution.' The minister had earlier told MPs the two-state solution between Israel and Palestine was in critical danger. He said the rhetoric of Mr Ben-Gvir and Mr Smotrich did not represent the majority of Israelis. He said: 'This is an affront to the rights of Palestinians, but it is also against the interests of Israelis, against their long-term security and democracy.' Mr Falconer said settler expansion had increased hugely in recent years, and last year had seen the worst settler violence against Palestinians in the West Bank on record. He added that this year is on track to be just as violent. 'This is an attempt to entrench a one-state reality,' he told MPs. He continued: 'The gravity of this situation demands further action. The reality is that these human rights abuses, incitement to violence, extremist rhetoric comes … from individuals who are ministers in this Israeli government.' Mr Falconer added: 'We have told the Israeli government that we would take tougher action if this did not stop. It still did not. The appalling rhetoric has continued unchanged. Violent perpetrators continue to act with impunity and with encouragement. 'So, let me tell the House now, when we say something, we mean it. Today we have shown, with our partners, two extremists we will not stand by while they wreck the prospects for future peace.' Shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel said: 'The situation in the Middle East and the suffering we are seeing is serious and completely intolerable. Dame Priti added: 'We all want to see a better future for the Israeli and Palestinian people, and the UK must continue to play a leading role in achieving this.' She told MPs the previous Conservative government considered sanctioning the two ministers. 'The minister will be aware that the sanctioning of individuals is always under review, that is the right policy,' she said. 'And in the case of Israel, this has been previously considered even by Lord Cameron, who has spoken of that in the last government.'


North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Planning reforms ‘critical' to 1.5m homes pledge delivery clear Commons
MPs voted by 306 to 174, majority 132, to approve the Planning and Infrastructure Bill at third reading on Tuesday evening. Housing minister Matthew Pennycook said the Bill, which aims to improve certainty and decision-making in the planning system, will help to tackle the UK's housing crisis. Meanwhile, shadow housing secretary Kevin Hollinrake described the draft legislation as 'dangerous' and warned it could lead to 'rows of uninspiring concrete boxes'. Speaking in the Commons, Mr Pennycook said: 'This landmark Bill will get Britain building again, unleash economic growth and deliver on the promise of national renewal. 'It is critical in helping the Government achieving its ambitious plan for change milestone of building 1.5 million safe and decent homes in England in this Parliament. 'When it comes to delivering new homes and critical infrastructure, the status quo is patently failing the country and failing the British people. 'We can and we must do things differently, this Bill will enable us to do so. It is transformative. It will fundamentally change how we build things in this country, and in doing so it will help us tackle the housing crisis and raise living standards in every part of the country.' Mr Hollinrake argued it is not possible to 'concrete our way to community', adding: 'This Bill, in its current form, is not just flawed, it is dangerous. It risks eroding trust in the planning system and widening the gulf between government and the governed. 'We need homes for first-time buyers, for young families, for key workers, for the next generation. But we need the right homes in the right places, shaped by the right principles. 'What are we being offered instead is a top-down model driven by arbitrary targets and central dictats. The result: solar settlements, identikit developments, rows of uninspiring concrete boxes that bear no relation to the history, the heritage or the hopes of the communities they are building.' This comes after Labour MPs rebelled on Monday over the Government's plans to change current nature protections in the planning system. Campaigners have raised concerns the Bill will allow developers to effectively disregard environmental rules and community concerns, increasing the risk of sewage in rivers, flooding and loss of valued woods and parks. Mr Pennycook said the 'suboptimal status quo' for the environment and development is not working, as he pledged to introduce a nature restoration fund to bolster conservation efforts. He added: 'We want to take forward a new strategic approach across wider geographies, ensuring that Natural England bring forward plans that go beyond offsetting harm to driving nature recovery as well as unlocking development.' During the Bill's report stage on Tuesday, Conservative former minister Robbie Moore accused the Government of permitting 'absolute theft' in its compulsory purchase order (CPO) reforms. The Bill will allow an inspector or, where there are no objectors, authorities to remove 'hope value' from land when a CPO is made, meaning any uplift calculated on the basis that a developer could be given planning permission in future is ignored. The MP for Keighley and Ilkley said: 'So-called 'hope value' is not a capitalist trick, it is not a racket, it is not unfair, it is simply the true market value of the property. 'Property rights matter. They are the foundation of our society. 'If the state chooses to use its powers to confiscate property of a law-abiding person and then they must stipulate on how that land must be used, and then tell the landowner how much they are entitled to receive from the state, that is wrong and in my view is an absolute theft of private property.' Labour MP Chris Hinchliff urged the Government to go further, calling for it to remove 'hope value' for any land or property which is being compulsory-purchased for the purpose of delivering housing targets. The North East Hertfordshire MP said his amendment 68 would 'give councils the land assembly powers necessary to acquire sites to meet local housing need at current use value, and so do away with speculative hope value prices, which put taxpayers' money into wealthy landowners pockets'. 'This would finally make it affordable for local authorities to deliver the new generation of council homes. That is the true solution to this nation's housing crisis,' he added. The Government has previously said it will ensure that compensation paid to landowners through the CPO process is 'fair but not excessive' and that development corporations can operate effectively. The Bill will now be sent to the House of Lords for further scrutiny.