logo
Questions over Tory peer's support for nuclear company's UK ambitions

Questions over Tory peer's support for nuclear company's UK ambitions

The Guardian09-04-2025
A Conservative peer faces questions over her long-running support for a Canadian nuclear technology company hoping to develop the next generation of power stations in the UK.
Olivia Bloomfield has acted in support of the company, Terrestrial Energy, since 2018, including in advisory roles for which she received share options.
She organised for top executives of the company to meet ministers on two occasions in 2018. Later, while a whip in Boris Johnson's government, she helped recruit two fellow peers to the company's advisory board.
Once Lady Bloomfield had stepped down from government, she was given share options, which could prove highly valuable later this year when Terrestrial Energy launches its shares publicly for the first time on an American stock exchange, with an estimated value of $1bn (£770m).
Jonathan Rose, a political integrity expert at De Montfort University, said there were questions 'about whether she has always acted with openness and accountability'.
He said the meetings in 2018 with ministers and Bloomfield's appointment as an adviser shortly afterwards, for which she received share options, raised 'serious questions' about whether she had broken the House of Lords rules, which he said the Lords commissioners for standards 'should investigate as a matter of urgency'.
Bloomfield said she had been 'scrupulous' in her declarations and 'strongly' maintained she did not breach the code of conduct.
Bloomfield, now a Conservative whip and shadow Welsh minister, joined the Lords in 2016 after being nominated by David Cameron when he quit Downing Street. She ran Tory fundraising from 2006 to 2010.
In the House of Lords, Bloomfield developed an interest in nuclear energy and took up a fellowship that provided her with knowledge of and access to the industry.
Her support for Terrestrial Energy appears to have begun around April 2018, when she met the then junior business minister Richard Harrington with executives from the company, including its CEO, Simon Irish, according to official documents gained through freedom of information legislation. The meeting was organised after Bloomfield contacted Harrington. She noted that she had 'no commercial interest' with Terrestrial Energy at that time.
Beforehand, Whitehall officials said they had been 'ambushed' by Bloomfield to hold a meeting. They wrote in an email to the business minister that she 'strongly represents the views' of the company and that it was 'apparent from previous correspondence' she would be 'lobbying [for] the best interests of Terrestrial Energy'.
They noted that Bloomfield had already introduced the company to officials working with Alun Cairns, the then minister responsible for Wales.
Officials' notes of the meeting with Harrington said Terrestrial Energy had pushed for government grants to be given to companies developing reactors.
Two months later, on 5 June 2018, Bloomfield and another Terrestrial Energy executive met Stuart Andrew, a junior minister in the Wales Office. An official's notes show they pressed for Terrestrial Energy's reactors to be developed in Wales.
Bloomfield had helped to secure the meeting with Andrew and sent the Wales Office documents drawn up by Terrestrial Energy to promote its case.
Later the same month, she was appointed an adviser to the company. On 21 June, Terrestrial Energy awarded her share options, a right to buy shares in the company at a fixed price after a set period of time.
She told the Guardian that she took the options for the role instead of a fee because Terrestrial Energy had yet to make a profit.
Members of the House of Lords are not permitted to provide parliamentary services in return for payment.
Bloomfield said she had 'no financial involvement or interest in Terrestrial Energy' when she organised either of the meetings and there was therefore no breach of the House of Lords' rules.
At issue is whether she had started discussing a commercial role with Terrestrial Energy when she attended the meeting with the Welsh minister on 5 June. When asked, Terrestrial Energy and Bloomfield both declined to answer this question.
She described the April meeting with Harrington as purely 'educational' about next-generation nuclear technologies, but declined to provide any details of her meeting in June.
Rose said: 'I think there are serious questions to answer about whether at the time of the June meeting she had agreed to accept a payment or incentive in the form of the share options – particularly given how quickly they were granted after.'
In late July 2019, Bloomfield was appointed to Johnson's government as a Lords whip. Her duties included speaking in debates on behalf of a few departments if their minister was unavailable, including for the energy department.
She said she relinquished the share options and her role in Terrestrial Energy on her appointment. However, she continued to support the company while a minister.
Until February 2020, one of Bloomfield's frontbench colleagues in the Lords was Ian Duncan, a climate minister in the energy department.
She said that when she stood down from the advisory board she 'replaced' herself with Lord Duncan and another peer, John Browne, the former BP chief executive. Duncan's appointment began in October 2020. Browne did not start his role until February 2023.
In April 2021, Anne-Marie Trevelyan, an energy minister at the time, held a meeting with Irish. Trevelyan met the Terrestrial Energy chief executive 'on the recommendation' of Bloomfield, according to an email from an official in Trevelyan's private ministerial office.
A readout of the meeting days later shows Irish asked if the government would consider 'grant/financing opportunities' and adapt the scope of a government-funded programme on nuclear fuel development. Trevelyan, the readout says, expressed interest in his proposal.
Bloomfield said it was 'unlikely' she would have only recommended Trevelyan meet Terrestrial Energy. Trevelyan did hold other meetings with nuclear companies, including with companies that are partners of Terrestrial Energy, but Bloomfield declined to give any further details on other recommendations she may have given.
In April 2022, Bloomfield attended a meeting of the all-party parliamentary group on small modular reactors, which was hearing a presentation from Terrestrial Energy. Bloomfield declared she was formerly on the company's advisory board. She cited having previously introduced Terrestrial to a minister in 2018, 'when there was a very firmly closed door!', according to minutes of the meeting.
Bloomfield returned to the company in August 2023, less than three months after leaving government, and was awarded fresh share options as remuneration for a role as an 'ad hoc consultant responsible for future fundraising and headhunting suitable individuals to join the firm'.
Susan Hawley, a campaigner and director of Spotlight on Corruption, said: 'That she went on to be rehired by the company having played such an apparently useful role to the company as a minister is deeply concerning and suggests that further investigation is in order.'
Bloomfield said she went through 'all the proper channels'. She added that she had received approval from the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments (Acoba), which regulates jobs taken up by former ministers.
Bloomfield said to the Acoba committee she had had no official contact with Terrestrial Energy while a whip. She does not appear to have told the committee about her attendance at the all-party parliamentary group meeting in April 2022 or about her role in hiring two peers to the company's advisory board, while she was a minister.
A spokesperson for Terrestrial Energy said: 'We trust and require that our employees and advisers always operate in line with all relevant laws, ethics policies, regulations and codes of conduct that apply. We would take any breaches of those rules by our representatives very seriously.'
They added they were aware of the Lords code of conduct and had been assured by Bloomfield that she had 'only ever acted for us in accordance with that code'.
From the backbenches, at times declaring her role as an adviser to Terrestrial Energy, Bloomfield has continued to speak in the Lords on the merits of advanced modular reactors, a version of which the company is developing.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kemi Badenoch says she no longer considers herself Nigerian
Kemi Badenoch says she no longer considers herself Nigerian

The Independent

time34 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Kemi Badenoch says she no longer considers herself Nigerian

Kemi Badenoch has said she no longer identifies as Nigerian and has not renewed her Nigerian passport since the early 2000s. Speaking to Gyles Brandreth's Rosebud podcast, the Conservative leader, who was born in London and raised in Lagos and the United States, said: 'I'm Nigerian through ancestry, by birth, despite not being born there because of my parents, but by identity I'm not really." Ms Badenoch explained she felt "home is where my now family is'. The Tory politician was born in Wimbledon in 1980 before her parents took her home to Nigeria. She was one of the last people to receive birthright citizenship because she was born in the UK before these rules were abolished by Margaret Thatcher the following year.

Canada Goose share analysis: up 50% after all-time low
Canada Goose share analysis: up 50% after all-time low

Fashion United

time39 minutes ago

  • Fashion United

Canada Goose share analysis: up 50% after all-time low

With Bain Capital holding a controlling stake and reports suggesting it is considering a sale of its shares, the company's future direction and stock performance are of particular interest to the market. Canada Goose was founded in 1957 in Toronto by Sam Tick under the name Metro Sportswear Ltd. Initially, the company focused on producing woolen vests, raincoats, and snowmobile suits. In the 1970s, Tick's son-in-law, David Reiss, joined the business and developed the down-filled parka, a product designed for extreme weather conditions that would become the brand's cornerstone. Dani Reiss, David's son, took over as chief executive officer in the 1990s and was instrumental in rebranding the company as a luxury label and expanding its global presence. In 2013, the majority stake was acquired by Bain Capital, which provided the capital for international expansion and an initial public offering (IPO) in 2017. Canada Goose has a significant global presence with a direct-to-consumer (D2C) model, alongside its wholesale operations. As of July 2025, the company has 76 permanent stores worldwide. Its products are known for their high price point and premium quality. For example, a men's 'Chilliwack bomber' jacket can cost around 1,500 dollars, a women's 'Shelburne' parka is priced at approximately 1,700 dollars, and a 'Crofton' down jacket can sell for about 1,000 dollars. The company manufactures its core, down-filled products at seven facilities in Canada. (all prices in CAD. 1 CAD = 0,73 USD or 0,63 Euro) Become a year-round luxury lifestyle brand In the past two years, Canada Goose has made a concerted effort to diversify its product portfolio beyond seasonal winter wear to become a year-round luxury lifestyle brand. This strategy is highlighted by the appointment of Paris-based creative director Haider Ackermann in 2024 to lead the 'Snow Goose' seasonal capsule collection and the brand's mainline collections starting with SS26. The company's expansion into lighter outerwear and apparel is a key initiative to achieve this year-round relevance, a move seen as a response to the impact of climate change on winter seasons. Furthermore, the company has also launched a resale channel, Canada Goose Generations, to keep its products in circulation longer. Performance and financial outlook The share price of Canada Goose has shown volatility. The all-time high was approximately 72.00 Canadian dollars in November 2018. At the start of 2025, the stock was priced at 14.33 Canadian dollars, while the all-time low was 9.79 Canadian dollars, reached in April of this year. The company's revenue is on a rise. In fiscal year 2022, revenue was 1.217 million CAD, increasing to 1.333 million CAD in fiscal year 2023, and further to 1.348 million CAD in fiscal year 2024. For the trailing twelve months (TTM) to the first quarter of fiscal year 2025, revenue was 1.368 million CAD. The primary drivers of growth have been the expansion of its D2C channel and its geographic footprint, particularly in Asia. Inhibitors to growth have included a slowdown in consumer spending and the seasonal nature of its core products. In terms of profitability, Canada Goose's EBITDA was 234,7 million CAD in fiscal year 2022, 243,1 million CAD in 2023, and 299,8 million euros in fiscal year 2024. Canada Goose does not currently pay a dividend. Free cash flow has also shown variability. Competitor comparison When compared to its competitors, Canada Goose operates in a competitive luxury performance outerwear market with brands like Moncler and Lululemon. Moncler, an Italian luxury brand, has consistently delivered strong financial performance with a higher brand prestige and a diverse product range beyond outerwear. Its parent company surpassed one billion euros in revenue in the first half of 2023. Lululemon, a Canadian athletic apparel company, while not a direct competitor in the same outerwear niche, is a comparable lifestyle brand with high-performance products. It has a significantly larger market capitalization and EBITDA, demonstrating strong growth and brand loyalty in its segment. These companies generally exhibit higher gross and operating margins, indicating more efficient cost structures and brand pricing power compared to Canada Goose. SWOT analysis Strengths Brand recognition and premium positioning: Canada Goose has established itself as a luxury brand synonymous with high-quality and high-performance outerwear. Direct-to-consumer strategy: The expansion of its D2C channel, including physical stores and e-commerce, allows for greater control over the brand image, customer experience, and profit margins. Product quality and craftsmanship: The brand's reputation for durable products, many of which are manufactured in Canada, is a key selling point for consumers. Weaknesses High dependence on seasonal products: A significant portion of the company's revenue is generated during the winter months, making it vulnerable to warmer seasons and limiting year-round sales. High price point: The premium pricing strategy, while a strength for brand image, limits market accessibility to a niche consumer segment. Past controversies: The brand has faced criticism and campaigns from animal rights groups regarding its use of coyote fur and down, which can impact its reputation and consumer perception. Opportunities Year-round product expansion: The company's strategic push into non-winter apparel, footwear, and accessories can help mitigate seasonal risks and create a more diversified revenue stream. Expansion in emerging markets: There is potential for growth in new markets where the luxury outerwear segment is developing, particularly in Asia. Sustainability initiatives: By further investing in sustainable materials and ethical practices, the brand can appeal to a growing segment of environmentally and socially conscious consumers. Threats Economic downturn: A weakening global economy and reduced consumer spending could negatively impact sales of its high-priced luxury goods. Intense competition: Canada Goose faces stiff competition from established luxury players like Moncler and other performance brands like The North Face, each with their own loyal customer base and brand proposition. Fluctuating raw material prices: The cost of raw materials, such as down and technical fabrics, can impact the company's profitability and margins. Sustainability and ESG Canada Goose has committed to a 'Sustainable Impact Strategy' to address environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors. The company went fur-free in 2022, ceasing all fur production. It has also made progress on its goal to use bluesign approved fabrics and has invested in renewable energy projects. The brand's sustainability efforts include its 'Kind Fleece,' which is primarily made from recycled wool, and its 'Regeneration' collection, which repurposes leftover materials. The company's new resale platform, Canada Goose Generations, is another initiative designed to promote circularity and extend the lifespan of its products. Despite these efforts, the company has faced criticism from animal welfare organizations regarding its historical use of fur and its continued use of down. While the brand has transitioned to the Responsible Down Standard (RDS), this has not entirely appeased all critics. For investors, ESG factors are increasingly important, and the company's ability to navigate these issues will be a key determinant of its long-term reputation and appeal to conscious consumers. Credits: Reuters Conclusion and perspective Canada Goose is a company with a strong brand identity and a history of quality craftsmanship, but it is at a transitional point. The company is actively working to overcome its seasonal limitations and address past controversies. While its financial performance has been subject to market pressures, its strategic shift towards year-round product offerings and D2C expansion offers potential for future growth. In the first two years after the IPO it was considered a high-growth stock. The share might be suitable for a growth investor who believes in the company's long-term strategy to diversify its product line and expand its global footprint. However, this investment comes with risks, including potential economic headwinds that could impact luxury spending, stiff competition, and the ongoing challenge of transitioning its brand perception. Disclaimer: This analysis is based on publicly available information and reflects the current financial and industry landscape. It is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Investors should conduct their own thorough research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

American businesses are running out of ways to avoid tariff pain
American businesses are running out of ways to avoid tariff pain

Economist

timean hour ago

  • Economist

American businesses are running out of ways to avoid tariff pain

CoRPORATE America's profit engine has been remarkably robust over the past few years, even amid stubborn inflation and elevated interest rates. Faced with Donald Trump's assault on global trade, however, it is starting to sputter. Companies from General Motors, a carmaker, to Nike, a sportswear brand, have seen their profits plummet owing to Mr Trump's levies on imports. Goldman Sachs, a bank, reckons that American businesses are absorbing around three-fifths of the cost of the duties.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store