
The global AI divide
Empower your mind, elevate your skills
Cassava, a tech company founded by a Zimbabwean billionaire, Strive Masiyiwa, is scheduled to open one of Africa's most advanced data centers this summer. The plans, three years in the making, culminated in an October meeting in California between Cassava executives and Jensen Huang, Nvidia's CEO, to buy hundreds of his company's chips. Google is also one of Cassava's investors.
In May, Sam Altman, the CEO of the artificial intelligence company OpenAI, donned a helmet, work boots and a luminescent high-visibility vest to visit the construction site of the company's new data center project in Texas.Bigger than New York's Central Park, the estimated $60 billion project, which has its own natural gas plant, will be one of the most powerful computing hubs ever created when completed as soon as next year.Around the same time as Altman's visit to Texas, Nicolás Wolovick, a computer science professor at the National University of Córdoba in Argentina, was running what counts as one of his country's most advanced AI computing hubs. It was in a converted room at the university, where wires snaked between aging AI chips and server computers."Everything is becoming more split," Wolovick said. "We are losing."Artificial intelligence has created a new digital divide, fracturing the world between nations with the computing power for building cutting-edge AI systems and those without. The split is influencing geopolitics and global economics, creating new dependencies and prompting a desperate rush to not be excluded from a technology race that could reorder economies, drive scientific discovery and change the way that people live and work.The biggest beneficiaries by far are the United States China and the European Union. Those regions host more than half of the world's most powerful data centers, which are used for developing the most complex AI systems, according to data compiled by Oxford University researchers. Only 32 countries, or about 16% of nations, have these large facilities filled with microchips and computers, giving them what is known in industry parlance as "compute power."The United States and China, which dominate the tech world, have particular influence. U.S. and Chinese companies operate more than 90% of the data centers that other companies and institutions use for AI work, according to the Oxford data and other research.In contrast, Africa and South America have almost no AI computing hubs, while India has at least five and Japan at least four, according to the Oxford data. More than 150 countries have nothing.Today's AI data centers dwarf their predecessors, which powered simpler tasks like email and video streaming. Vast, power-hungry and packed with powerful chips, these hubs cost billions to build and require infrastructure that not every country can provide. With ownership concentrated among a few tech giants, the effects of the gap between those with such computing power and those without it are already playing out.The world's most used AI systems, which power chatbots like OpenAI's ChatGPT, are more proficient and accurate in English and Chinese, languages spoken in the countries where the compute power is concentrated. Tech giants with access to the top equipment are using AI to process data, automate tasks and develop new services. Scientific breakthroughs, including drug discovery and gene editing, rely on powerful computers. AI-powered weapons are making their way onto battlefields.Nations with little or no AI compute power are running into limits in scientific work, in the growth of young companies and in talent retention. Some officials have become alarmed by how the need for computing resources has made them beholden to foreign corporations and governments."Oil-producing countries have had an oversized influence on international affairs; in an AI-powered near future, compute producers could have something similar, since they control access to a critical resource," said Vili Lehdonvirta, an Oxford professor who conducted the research on AI data centers with his colleagues Zoe Jay Hawkins and Boxi Wu.AI computing power is so precious that the components in data centers, such as microchips, have become a crucial part of foreign and trade policies for China and the United States, which are jockeying for influence in the Persian Gulf, Southeast Asia and elsewhere. At the same time, some countries are beginning to pour public funds into AI infrastructure, aiming for more control over their technological futures.The Oxford researchers mapped the world's AI data centers, information that companies and governments often keep secret. To create a representative sample, they went through the customer websites of nine of the world's biggest cloud service providers to see what compute power was available and where their hubs were at the end of last year. The companies were the U.S. firms Amazon, Google and Microsoft; China's Tencent, Alibaba and Huawei; and Europe's Exoscale, Hetzner and OVHcloud.The research does not include every data center worldwide, but the trends were unmistakable. U.S. companies operated 87 AI computing hubs, which can sometimes include multiple data centers, or almost two-thirds of the global total, compared with 39 operated by Chinese firms and six by Europeans, according to the research. Inside the data centers, most of the chips -- the foundational components for making calculations -- were from U.S. chipmaker Nvidia "We have a computing divide at the heart of the AI revolution," said Lacina Koné, the director general of Smart Africa, which coordinates digital policy across the continent. He added, "It's not merely a hardware problem. It's the sovereignty of our digital future."There has long been a tech gap between rich and developing countries. Over the past decade, cheap smartphones, expanding internet coverage and flourishing app-based businesses led some experts to conclude that the divide was diminishing. Last year, 68% of the world's population used the internet, up from 33% in 2012, according to the International Telecommunication Union, a United Nations agency.With a computer and knowledge of coding, getting a company off the ground became cheaper and easier. That lifted tech industries across the world, be they mobile payments in Africa or ride hailing in Southeast Asia.But in April, the U.N. warned that the digital gap would widen without action on AI. Just 100 companies, mostly in the United States and China, were behind 40% of global investment in the technology, the U.N. said. The biggest tech companies, it added, were "gaining control over the technology's future."The gap stems partly from a component everyone wants: a microchip known as a graphics processing unit, or GPU. The chips require multibillion-dollar factories to produce. Packed into data centers by the thousands and mostly made by Nvidia, GPUs provide the computing power for creating and delivering cutting-edge AI models.Obtaining these pieces of silicon is difficult. As demand has increased, prices for the chips have soared, and everyone wants to be at the front of the line for orders. Adding to the challenges, these chips then need to be corralled into giant data centers that guzzle up dizzying amounts of power and water.Many wealthy nations have access to the chips in data centers, but other countries are being left behind, according to interviews with more than two dozen tech executives and experts across 20 countries. Renting computing power from faraway data centers is common but can lead to challenges, including high costs, slower connection speeds, compliance with different laws, and vulnerability to the whims of U.S. and Chinese companies.Qhala, a startup in Kenya, illustrates the issues. The company, founded by a former Google engineer, is building an AI system known as a large language model that is based on African languages. But Qhala has no nearby computing power and rents from data centers outside Africa. Employees cram their work into the morning, when most American programmers are sleeping, so there is less traffic and faster speeds to transfer data across the world."Proximity is essential," said Shikoh Gitau, 44, Qhala's founder."If you don't have the resources for compute to process the data and to build your AI models, then you can't go anywhere," said Kate Kallot, a former Nvidia executive and the founder of Amini, another AI startup in Kenya.In the United States, by contrast, Amazon, Microsoft , Google, Meta and OpenAI have pledged to spend more than $300 billion this year, much of it on AI infrastructure. The expenditure approaches Canada's national budget. Harvard University's Kempner Institute, which focuses on AI, has more computing power than all African-owned facilities on that continent combined, according to one survey of the world's largest supercomputers.Brad Smith, Microsoft's president, said many countries wanted more computing infrastructure as a form of sovereignty. But closing the gap will be difficult, particularly in Africa, where many places do not have reliable electricity, he said. Microsoft, which is building a data center in Kenya with a company in the United Arab Emirates, G42, chooses data center locations based largely on market need, electricity and skilled labor."The AI era runs the risk of leaving Africa even further behind," Smith said.Jay Puri, Nvidia's executive vice president for global business, said the company was also working with various countries to build out their AI offerings."It is absolutely a challenge," he said.Chris Lehane, OpenAI's vice president of global affairs, said the company had started a program to adapt its products for local needs and languages. A risk of the AI divide, he said, is that "the benefits don't get broadly distributed, they don't get democratized."Tencent, Alibaba, Huawei, Google, Amazon, Hetzner and OVHcloud declined to comment.The gap has led to brain drains. In Argentina, Wolovick, 51, the computer science professor, cannot offer much compute power. His top students regularly leave for the United States or Europe, where they can get access to GPUs, he said."Sometimes I want to cry, but I don't give up," he said. "I keep talking to people and saying, 'I need more GPUs. I need more GPUs.'"The uneven distribution of AI computing power has split the world into two camps: nations that rely on China and those that depend on the United States.The two countries not only control the most data centers but also are set to build more than others by far. And they have wielded their tech advantage to exert influence. The Biden and Trump administrations have used trade restrictions to control which countries can buy powerful AI chips, allowing the United States to pick winners. China has used state-backed loans to encourage sales of its companies' networking equipment and data centers.The effects are evident in Southeast Asia and the Middle East.In the 2010s, Chinese companies made inroads into the tech infrastructure of Saudi Arabia and the UAE, which are key U.S. partners, with official visits and generous financing. The United States sought to use its AI lead to push back. In one deal with the Biden administration, an Emirati company promised to keep out Chinese technology in exchange for access to AI technology from Nvidia and Microsoft.In May, President Donald Trump signed additional deals to give Saudi Arabia and the UAE even more access to U.S. chips.A similar jostling is taking place in Southeast Asia. Chinese and U.S. companies like Amazon, Alibaba, Nvidia, Google and ByteDance, the owner of TikTok , are building data centers in Singapore and Malaysia to deliver services across Asia.Globally, the United States has the lead, with U.S. companies building 63 AI computing hubs outside the country's borders, compared with 19 by China, according to the Oxford data. All but three of the data centers operated by Chinese firms outside their home country use chips from Nvidia, despite efforts by China to produce competing chips. Chinese firms were able to buy Nvidia chips before U.S. government restrictions.Even U.S.-friendly countries have been left out of the AI race by trade limits. Last year, William Ruto, Kenya's president, visited Washington for a state dinner hosted by President Joe Biden. Several months later, Kenya was omitted from a list of countries that had open access to needed semiconductors.That has given China an opening, even though experts consider the country's AI chips to be less advanced. In Africa, policymakers are talking with Huawei, which is developing its own AI chips, about converting existing data centers to include Chinese-made chips, said Koné of Smart Africa."Africa will strike a deal with whoever can give access to GPUs," he said.Alarmed by the concentration of AI power, many countries and regions are trying to close the gap. They are providing access to land and cheaper energy, fast-tracking development permits and using public funds and other resources to acquire chips and construct data centers. The goal is to create "sovereign AI" available to local businesses and institutions.In India, the government is subsidizing compute power and the creation of an AI model proficient in the country's languages. In Africa, governments are discussing collaborating on regional compute hubs. Brazil has pledged $4 billion on AI projects."Instead of waiting for AI to come from China, the U.S., South Korea, Japan, why not have our own?" Brazil's president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, said last year when he proposed the investment plan.Even in Europe, there is growing concern that U.S. companies control most of the data centers. In February, the European Union outlined plans to invest 200 billion euros for AI projects, including new data centers across the 27-nation bloc.Mathias Nobauer, the CEO of Exoscale, a cloud computing provider in Switzerland, said many European businesses want to reduce their reliance on U.S. tech companies. Such a change will take time and "doesn't happen overnight," he said.Still, closing the divide is likely to require help from the United States or China.The data center is part of a $500 million effort to build five such facilities across Africa. Even so, Cassava expects it to address only 10% to 20% of the region's demand for AI. At least 3,000 startups have expressed interest in using the computing systems."I don't think Africa can afford to outsource this AI sovereignty to others," said Hardy Pemhiwa, Cassava's CEO. "We absolutely have to focus on and ensure that we don't get left behind."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NDTV
40 minutes ago
- NDTV
6 Ways China Beat Trump At Trade Negotiations - And What India Can Learn
The June 2025 agreement between the US and China to ease export controls marked a significant turning point in their ongoing trade confrontation. Despite President Trump's bluster and maximalist rhetoric, the substance of the deal reveals a Chinese tactical victory. It was Beijing, not Washington, that dictated the pace, terms, and structure of the negotiation. China secured the removal of key US restrictions while offering limited, vague, and easily reversible concessions. There are six key factors that enabled China to extract concessions and stabilise the trade truce on its own terms. Rare Earth Edge First, the most potent lever was Beijing's precise restriction of rare earth exports, especially heavy rare earth elements such as dysprosium and samarium-materials indispensable to US defence systems, EV motors, and advanced electronics. Unlike the 2010s, China has since vertically integrated and state-centralised the entire rare earth supply chain, eliminating wildcat miners and enforcing stringent export licensing under "dual-use" military-industrial clauses. The result: a credible threat of supply chain paralysis for US defence and tech manufacturers. This forced Washington to prioritise the restoration of rare earth flows. Building Pressure Within US Second, China operationalised a suite of new legal instruments, including the Export Control Law and the Anti-Foreign Sanctions Law, to signal that Western companies could face legal jeopardy if they complied with US sanctions. This placed firms in a regulatory dilemma: violate US law or risk penalties in China. The ambiguity and scope of these laws added risk premiums to US restrictions and created stakeholder pressure within the US corporate sector to seek de-escalation. Structural Patience Third, Xi Jinping operates within a system of centralised authority, long-term policy continuity, and near-total control of the narrative. Trump, by contrast, thrives on spectacle, rapid cycles of escalation, and reactive policymaking. China framed the negotiations as a test of national sovereignty and "economic bullying", allowing it to rally domestic support and present any compromise as strategic resistance. The lack of political cost for slow-walking talks gave Beijing structural patience. Building Their Own The fourth lever was state-orchestrated industrial substitution and technological resilience. The Huawei case epitomises this lever. Despite US restrictions on chipmaking equipment and AI accelerators, Huawei launched a 5G smartphone in 2023 using domestically produced chips via chiplet "stacking". The perception that Chinese industry could bypass Western tech reinforced Beijing's credibility and deflated US assumptions about sustained technological chokeholds. This industrial resilience signalled to US negotiators that restrictions were increasingly ineffective and self-harming. Surgical Approach Fifth, China pursued calibrated trade retaliation and tactical concessions. Rather than blanket retaliation, China issued surgical trade restrictions targeting politically sensitive US exports (e.g. ethane) while selectively granting rare earth export licences to European firms (such as Volkswagen suppliers). This fragmented the Western alliance and demonstrated Beijing's capacity to divide pressure coalitions. In contrast, the US suffered from coalition fatigue and domestic backlash from industry groups over export controls. No Longer Dependent On Imports Finally, declining Chinese import demand - especially from the US - provided a kind of strategic insulation. Xi Jinping's shift towards economic self-reliance, emphasising industrial localisation, software substitution, and inward-focused stimulus, has structurally reduced China's import elasticity. China's imports have remained flat, while exports soared 33% since 2022. This makes tariff threats less effective because China no longer needs to import as much. As The Wall Street Journal noted, "China's vision of trade is exporting without importing." This reduces US leverage based on access to its own market. As the US presses India with a "take-it-or-leave-it" offer in bilateral trade negotiations - demanding sweeping access to India's agricultural, dairy, and pharmaceutical markets - New Delhi must draw critical lessons from how China successfully negotiated with Washington in June 2025. Unlike India, which is now reacting to ultimatums, China entered talks with pre-positioned leverage: a monopoly over rare earth exports, retaliatory legal frameworks, and an insulated domestic economy. India must shift its negotiation strategy from defensive tariff retention to assertive, leverage-backed diplomacy rooted in strategic chokepoints, industrial capability, and phased reciprocity. India Has Its Own Strengths First, India must build credible negotiation leverage rooted in operational chokepoints. China controlled the tempo of talks by targeting materials such as dysprosium that the US couldn't easily substitute. India has equivalent strengths in bulk generics, vaccine manufacturing, and digital services - critical nodes in global supply chains. Instead of pre-emptively offering tariff concessions, India should introduce targeted export approval mechanisms or destination-specific licensing for select pharmaceutical categories, such as complex generics and biosimilars, where US import dependence is structurally high. For digital services, India should temporarily pause new cross-border data transfer permissions in sectors such as fintech and health-tech until commercial access and data equivalence frameworks are secured from the U.S. As Good As One Gets Second, India must abandon the concessional mindset in market access negotiations and assert a strict reciprocity-based framework. If the US is demanding tariff reductions and the removal of quantitative restrictions in agriculture, dairy, and pharmaceuticals, India must counter with binding and verifiable commitments in return, such as regulatory streamlining, mutual recognition of standards, and preferential access in US government procurement. These must be structured as enforceable deliverables, not political assurances. China played this game precisely: export licences for rare earths were selectively granted to allies and withheld from adversaries until key concessions were extracted. India cannot allow sensitive sectors to be opened without tangible, sector-matched gains. Concessions must be calibrated and time-bound, with sunset clauses if the US fails to reciprocate. Look Deeper Third, India must confront the regulatory asymmetry embedded in US trade practices. While headline tariffs may appear low, US non-tariff barriers - including sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) standards, drug import protocols, and origin compliance measures - function as covert trade restrictions. Indian consignments are routinely rejected for minor technical infractions, creating a chilling effect on exporters. The recent $500,000 consignment of Alphonso mangoes is one such example. These barriers are opaque, discretionary, and often non-negotiable. India must demand binding transparency commitments, risk-based inspection protocols, and pre-clearance mechanisms as preconditions to any tariff realignment. The US-UK "Economic Prosperity Deal" signed in May is a cautionary example: despite tariff concessions, the US retained core restrictions and gave London little commercial value. India must not accept an outcome where headline wins mask structural losses. Finally, India must impose its own negotiation architecture and sequencing. A modular, multi-phase agreement structure is essential. Begin with trade in services and digital commerce, where India enjoys a surplus and global competitiveness. Reserve tariff liberalisation in agriculture, processed foods, and medical devices for a second or third tranche, contingent on high-value quid pro quo, such as technology access, joint R&D platforms, and strategic investment windows. The US cannot expect a full-spectrum agreement aligned to its electoral timeline. India's objective must be to maximise strategic value per concession, not to rush a deal for diplomatic closure. China won by controlling the tempo and scope of engagement. India must now do the same-with precision, leverage, and a clear-eyed view of national interest.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
42 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Why has China barred Wells Fargo banker from leaving the country?
China on Monday said that a senior executive at Wells Fargo, one of the United States (US)' largest banks, has been restricted from leaving the country because of her involvement in a criminal case. The confirmation comes after reports of the same surfaced last week, according to a report in the South China Morning Post (SCMP). 'Mao Chenyue is involved in a criminal case currently being handled by Chinese law enforcement authorities and is subject to the exit restrictions in accordance with the law,' Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said, as quoted by the SCMP. The spokesperson did not specify what Mao is alleged to have done, nor which law enforcement agency is handling the case. 'She cannot leave the country for the time being,' Guo added, noting that Mao is required to 'cooperate with the investigation pursuant to Chinese laws', the report added. Guo added that 'no matter whether they are Chinese or foreigners, they should abide by Chinese laws in China'. He also said that her 'lawful rights and interests' would be protected while the investigation is ongoing and framed the situation as 'an individual judicial case'. According to her LinkedIn profile, Mao has been a managing director at Wells Fargo since 2012. Wells Fargo suspends business travel to China Soon after reports of Mao's exit ban surfaced last week, the US-based bank suspended all business travel to the country. "We are closely tracking this situation and working through the appropriate channels so our employee can return to the United States as soon as possible," Wells Fargo told Reuters then. Not an isolated Incident China's use of exit bans can further worsen its relations with the United States. These travel restrictions can prevent individuals—both Chinese citizens and foreigners—from leaving the country if they are involved in legal disputes, ongoing investigations, or sometimes for reasons that are not made public. The US State Department has warned its citizens on multiple occasions to reconsider travel to China. "Exercise increased caution when traveling to Mainland China due to arbitrary enforcement of local laws, including in relation to exit bans," it said in an advisory issued in November 2024. According to the SCMP report, another US citizen—an employee of the US Commerce Department's Patent and Trademark Office—had also been blocked from leaving China a few days ago. The individual has reportedly been stuck in the country for several months, allegedly over national security concerns, the report added.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
42 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Tech Wrap July 21: WhatsApp AI summaries, iOS 26 public beta, Vivo OriginOS
WhatsApp tests AI-powered Quick Recap feature. iOS 26 public beta roll out likely this week. Vivo may bring OriginOS to India. DuckDuckGo to let users filter out AI images BS Tech New Delhi 'Quick Recap' will let WhatsApp users scan unread chats in seconds WhatsApp is reportedly developing a new feature called Quick Recap to help users efficiently review unread messages across several chats. As per WABetaInfo, this feature will allow selection of up to five conversations, offering a concise summary of missed messages—eliminating the need to scroll through each individually. Apple is expected to begin rolling out the first public beta of iOS 26 this week, according to MacRumors, which cited Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. Although Apple had earlier mentioned a July release for the public beta, it had not disclosed a specific launch date. Vivo is reportedly planning a global expansion of its OriginOS, which may soon be introduced in India. According to Gizbot, the Chinese smartphone manufacturer could launch the Android 16-based OriginOS with the upcoming Vivo V60 series—its first move to bring the UI outside of China. DuckDuckGo has launched a new tool that gives users the option to exclude AI-generated visuals from search results. As reported by TechCrunch, the update addresses growing user feedback that AI images are cluttering search experiences. The new setting offers more content control, letting users filter in favor of real, human-made imagery. Samsung has introduced the Galaxy F36 5G in India, starting at Rs 17,499. The phone features a sleek leather-patterned rear panel and comes equipped with several AI-powered tools such as Object Eraser, Image Clipper, and Edit Suggestions. It also supports Google's Circle to Search and includes enhanced Gemini AI integration. WhatsApp is reportedly trialling new advertising options on iOS, including Status Ads and Promoted Channels. According to WABetaInfo, these monetisation tools are being tested within the Updates tab—keeping them distinct from private chats, calls, and groups. Both features were earlier available in Android beta versions and are now present in iOS beta version 25.20.10.78. Samsung announced that it received 2.1 lakh pre-orders for its new seventh-generation foldables—Fold 7 and Flip 7—within 48 hours of their launch in India. The new models officially debuted in the country on July 9, 2025. Apple's next iPad Pro lineup may introduce two notable upgrades. Slated for launch later this year, the device is expected to include the new M5 chip and an additional front-facing camera. Bloomberg's Mark Gurman reports that Apple plans to add a second camera on the portrait side to improve usability for selfies and FaceTime in both landscape and portrait modes. The upcoming Google Pixel Watch 4 series is expected to bring incremental improvements. Android Headlines reports that the watches may come with slightly larger batteries, additional colour options, and minor design adjustments aimed at easier repairability. Pricing information has also surfaced via a French coupon site, according to 9To5Google. New leaks about Apple's anticipated iPhone 17 Air suggest changes in design, battery, and screen dimensions. Set to arrive in September 2025 alongside the rest of the iPhone 17 lineup, the Air model is rumoured to replace the current Plus variant in Apple's portfolio. Apple is said to be working on its first foldable iPhone, which may launch by the end of 2026. Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, via Digit, reports that the foldable will adopt a book-style form factor similar to the Galaxy Z Fold 7, which Samsung unveiled earlier this month. Perplexity AI, a startup supported by Nvidia and known for its AI-first search engine, is reportedly in discussions with smartphone manufacturers to pre-install its new Comet browser on devices. Speaking to Reuters, CEO Aravind Srinivas said the move is intended to leverage the familiarity of preloaded apps to encourage user retention and boost usage of the company's AI search offerings. According to MediaTek, India presents a significant opportunity due to its skilled AI workforce and growing adoption of intelligent tech in the EV industry. Rita Wu, Director for Product Marketing – Automotive Platform, told PTI that the company aims to deepen its presence in the country by focusing on scalable SoCs, AI applications, and advanced connectivity solutions for the automotive sector. Microsoft has issued a warning about "active attacks" targeting document-sharing server software used by businesses and government bodies. The company urged affected customers to install the necessary security updates without delay.