America's foreign student fiasco
And while Harvard is fighting various funding restrictions and bans on foreign student visas, harsher policies on America's borders are creating fear from returning students that they could be arrested by immigration officers and jailed or deported.
International students are big money-makers for universities worldwide – in New Zealand they pay four times the amount in fees as domestic students.
'We could be doing well while doing good,' says the chief economist at the policy think-tank The New Zealand Initiative, Dr Eric Crampton.
'It's amazing that America's throwing all this away.
'We aren't the destination market for the best students in the world. But if the place that is the destination for the best students in the world suddenly says 'We don't want them any more' – my God we'd better be ready for that,' he tells The Detail.
Crampton is Canadian, but spent time in the US on a student visa so knows what it's like to study there. He's also taught at Canterbury University and has experience with exchange students.
He says the American administration has now basically put every student visa under threat, with erratic threats coming from the President, whether over funding or threats to Chinese students on the basis that 'they're all spies or something'.
Trump's move to bar international students from Harvard by blocking their visas has itself now been blocked by a court order, but the situation remains uncertain. At the same time foreign students are getting nervous about leaving the country and trying to get back in, with reports about people getting arrested randomly at the border.
The hit to the US economy is expected to cost billions in revenue, and has been described as an 'anti-intellectual spree'.
'When you live in America on something like a student visa, every interaction with the state you're reminded that you're less than an American. Even in 2002 it was very clear that you are there by their sufferance.
'It would be awful being there now on a student visa because just imagine it … you'd be paying $US50,000 per year in international tuition fees, maybe you've already paid for two years of study and you're coming towards the end of it … and you've got two more years ahead of you … if they cancel your visa you've wasted $100,000 and two years.
'If you're at a place like Harvard, people wouldn't hold it against you, you could continue your studies elsewhere. People would say 'Well, he was admitted to Harvard, he must be really good', but if you're at a mid-tier US university – which is still better than anything New Zealand has – you'll have sunk two years' worth of study and $100,000 worth of cost, and you won't be able to finish your degree.
'It feels like the kind of spot where New Zealand could help. We've always been able to accommodate students on international exchange. We could make it really easy for students to come in that way.'
Universities New Zealand chief executive Chris Whelan says New Zealand is nearly back up to pre-Covid numbers of foreign students, with our eight universities having about 20,000 full-time equivalent students between them.
'International students help, but they're just one of a number of different mechanisms that universities are looking to for making payroll and keeping lights on,' he says.
'We don't want to grow too far … we want international education to be a genuinely quality and value proposition for both domestic students – giving them the ability to rub shoulders with people from different cultures – but also for the international students, to give them a genuine international experience.
'But if any student did want to, or was forced to, discontinue their studies in the US, there are places like New Zealand that I think would welcome them and would make it as easy as possible for them to get here.'
Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here.
You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Officials don't know if NZ is on US priority weapons trading partners list
In April, US President Donald Trump ordered a "list of priority partners" for arms transfers be drawn up within 60 days. Photo: NurPhoto via AFP New Zealand officials say they do not know who is on the United States' list of priority partners for trading weapons with, and have had zero input to it. In April, US President Donald Trump ordered a "list of priority partners" for arms transfers be drawn up within 60 days. His directive talked about giving partners help with financing and more flexible contracts, but also of "priority" partners having to share the cost of production more - "strengthening allied burden-sharing". New Zealand has joined several recent initiatives designed to boost America's military industrial base, but officials did not express any interest in the priority partner list. "Given this is an internal US government directive, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT) is not aware of what countries are on this list," MFAT told RNZ. "We would not speculate further." US diplomatic missions were going to be updated about the priority list, Trump's directive said. These US moves and others to free up space technology trade so far primarily benefit its AUKUS Pillar two partners Australia and the United Kingdom. The NZ Defence Force is competing to get arms under its new $12 billion Defence Capability Plan in a world market where military spending is surging. The NZDF talked with US lawmakers in April about potential opportunities to buy from the US, Official Information Act papers showed. A foreign arms sales taskforce newly set up by Trump said it sought international input before launching its first six initiatives last month, including new legislation aimed to help lower the barriers that limit the proliferation of high-tech arms. MFAT said: "New Zealand has not had any input into the taskforce." Asked if the government was doing anything about getting on the priority list or helping local companies onto it, MFAT said: "New Zealand has not had any input into the US Foreign Arms Sales Task Force, including on the ITAR Licensing Reform Act. "Officials are monitoring developments." The move on ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations - was designed to free up licensing of defence deals primarily between the AUKUS Pillar Two partners Australia, the US and UK, and possibly over time with Canada, official US papers said. The US recently also moved to free up space-related trade, such as in satellites technology. This has substantial overlap with defence but includes science and commercial sectors. It was "taking a bold step forward in fostering a strong space industrial base", an official close to Trump said . "The changes will strengthen international alliances" while maintaining stringer controls on sensitive technology. Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom were again at the front of the queue in these space trade moves, though Canada is not part of AUKUS. However, one move - to remove licence requirements for exports of certain spacecraft components - applied to over 40 allies and partners. It is not clear if NZ was one of those. The government here is closely attuned to the international space trade and has had talks with the US about streamlining and aligning regulations, papers showed. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Otago Daily Times
3 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Letters to the Editor: sea lions, health and Trump
Today's Letters to the Editor from readers cover topics including what comes around for the killers of sea lions, funding our public health system, and a simple solution to Trump. You don't see them in the supermarket queue Several days ago three sea lions were shot at the Waitaki River mouth. To the person/persons responsible for this act, do you go fishing in the vicinity of the river mouth? Were you getting annoyed because the sea lions were catching more fish than you and you decided to do something about them? When you approached the sea lions and stood with your loaded weapon, feeling only anger towards them, why didn't you stop, admire, consider what the consequences of your actions would be and walk past? The sea lion's world is the ocean and this is where they get their food. They take only what they need to survive. You don't see them down the seafood aisle at a supermarket. Your actions have taken away something special from the coast for reasons known only to you. However, what goes around comes around. Carrying the cost In its first days, National gave landlords a $3 billion tax break. Soon after, Finance Minister Nicola Willis announced $14.7b in tax relief over four years—then borrowed $12b to cover the revenue shortfall. Despite this, Willis speaks of "balancing the books" while reframing the narrative to blame the previous government. The reality is that her early decisions created a $17.7b revenue black hole, forcing cuts across essential programmes. These cuts disproportionately harm those on low incomes, people at risk of discrimination, and the most vulnerable in our communities. Jobs have been lost, projects scrapped, and hopes for pay equity abandoned — all because of reckless tax and borrowing choices. Willis' approach prioritises short-term political gain over long-term stability, leaving ordinary New Zealanders to carry the cost. RUCs and reasons Why have a tax specifically for roads at all? We don't do it for other government services such as health, education. The only difference is private industry benefits directly from roads, and use and damage roads more. Scrap RUCs on all vehicles below X tonnes. That makes the majority of private motor vehicles RUC-free; eliminates the need for further public sector staffing, systems and policing. It still ensures the private sector mostly pays their way. The 80/20 rule. Roading is less than 3% of total government spend. Why further bloat and complicate the public service unnecessarily. Is it a jobs scheme for the usual suspects? Lights, revisited Back up the bus, my train of thought has proven to be off track. My previous tale (Letters ODT 22.7.25) may have been a tad too thoughtless. Some sod has turned a sod, well several sods. There is now one worksite in Tomahawk which has broken ground, digging to lay solid foundations. There is one new street light beside the work site, which surely completely justifies the turning on of all 22 new street lights. Although I have yet to hear evidence of workers working by the streetlight. I still wake up early each morning, look out the kitchen window, and ponder the extravagance of lighting fields of green. If we assume 200W of power for each light then 200 x 21 (leaving out one semi useful light) gives us 4.2kW of power running all night. The Aurora website has handy hints for saving power. I know the new lights are LED (an Aurora website recommendation for power saving) but how about switching off the ones not needed? If we want a health system, fund it properly In the last two months I have had to be taken twice to the Dunedin Hospital emergency department. In each case I could certainly see, after the event, that it was not strictly necessary, but that did not seem to be true at the time. On each occasion, the treatment that I experienced was the best I could possibly have expected or wished for. When I tried to thank all the staff that had helped me, on the feedback comments I found that many of the responses that had been received were very critical, almost always in similar ways. For example, 'I had to wait (some long time) to get any help", or "I had to leave before any special treatment had been given to me". We really ought to ask ourselves how a critically under-resourced (and yet extremely good) service can be expected to operate in the way we would like. If we are not prepared to fund our public health service adequately, what do we think will happen? I simply want to acknowledge just how special the doctors, nurses, and other staff are. With friends like these who needs enemies Donald Trump demonstrates a mind-boggling lack of ability to assess character and human values in people. He has befriended two of the world's most dangerous, cruel and evil leaders: Putin and Netanyahu. Irrespective of the rights and wrongs of historical events, they in no way exonerate these heads of state for the atrocities they are now committing. Both dictatorial despots are responsible for the mass killing of thousands of innocent men, women and children and the annihilation of large parts of their countries . Putin invaded Ukraine supposedly only interested in military targets. In his deranged mind he keeps blaming Ukraine. The only plus is that Trump may have realised Putin was playing him for a fool. Netanayhu continues to blast the life and livelihoods out of the Palestinians in the Gaza strip on the pretext of eliminating Hamas and getting them to release Israeli hostages The clumsy method of doing this (indiscriminate bombardment and shelling) is entirely consistent with the "asleep at the wheel" state of the supposedly sophisticated Israeli military allowing Hamas to invade in the first place. Blaming Hamas for the current trickle of aid and food getting to Gaza, the killing of citizens at aid stations , and the malnutrition crisis just demonstrates how mentally deranged and dishonest Netanyahu and his entourage are . Both Putin and Netanyahu are responsible for war crimes and crimes against humanity. Neither of them want peace — they are intent on bludgeoning their target country to submission. Simple solution If Donald Trump is really serious about getting criminality out of Washington DC, there is one simple, effective and incredibly popular action he could take. Five-letter word beginning in L. Address Letters to the Editor to: Otago Daily Times, PO Box 517, 52-56 Lower Stuart St, Dunedin. Email: editor@
1News
13 hours ago
- 1News
Kiwi mum speaks to media after three weeks in US detainment centre
New Zealand mother Sarah Shaw has spoken to media for the first time since her release, describing her three-week stay in a US detainment centre. Shaw and her six-year-old son Isaac were held at the Dilley, Texas facility for three weeks after a mix-up with her visa at the Canadian border. Speaking to King 5 news in her home state of Washington, still wearing an ankle monitor and facing further court dates, she described living in close quarters with dozens of other detainees, six-year-old Isaac constantly with her. "If I needed to go to the bathroom, Isaac was there, yelling at me outside the stall. If I wanted to take a shower, he had to come with me, so we were completely joined at the hip." She was detained on July 24, after driving across the border to Vancouver to put two of her three children onto a direct flight to New Zealand to visit their grandparents. ADVERTISEMENT The issue arose when she tried to re-enter the US, without both parts of her visa renewed. "I'd spoke to my attorney about it, and she'd said, 'You'll be fine, your paperwork's all valid'. She was kind of like, that would be worst-case-scenario. But I really didn't think that was going to happen." Sarah Shaw and her six-year-old son have been detained by US immigration officials after she tried to return to America from a trip to Canada. (Source: 1News) She was detained by immigration officials and flown to a centre in Dilley, Texas – the nearest one which could accommodate families. Her lawyer Minda Thorward told RNZ on Tuesday that Immigration and Customs Enforcement had caved to the pressure, following international media coverage and involvement from New Zealand and US state officials. But she was released with none of her documents and wearing an ankle monitor. She was dropped off in Laredo, Texas, a two-and-a-half-hour drive from San Antonio airport, where her flight home was booked from – only just making it onto the plane because of flight delays. ADVERTISEMENT Now, with more court appearances ahead of her, she was working with her lawyer to get her anklet removed. Customs and Border Patrol told King 5 news: "When someone with an expired parole leaves the country and tries to re-enter the US, they will be stopped in compliance with our laws and regulations. "If they are accompanied by a minor, Customs and Border Patrol will follow all protocols to keep families together, or arrange care with a legal guardian." A GoFundMe page set up to help pay her bills and rent while she was detained had by Wednesday afternoon raised more than NZ$105,000 (more than US$61,000). The page description has been updated thanking people for their support and noting "the fight is not over".
