logo
How Proposed Tariffs Could Disrupt US Drug Prices and Supply

How Proposed Tariffs Could Disrupt US Drug Prices and Supply

Medscape5 hours ago

Pharmaceutical tariffs, as proposed by President Donald Trump, aim to boost manufacturing jobs in the US, curb foreign profits, and bolster national security. However, such tariffs could increase the price and reduce the availability of both branded and generic medications, according to two health policy experts.
In an online press briefing on Wednesday, June 11, Mariana Socal, MD, PhD, and Jeromie Ballreich, PhD — both associate professors in the Department of Health Policy and Management at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore — outlined potential ramifications and responded to journalists' questions.
Pharmaceuticals Are Still Exempt — for Now
To date, pharmaceutical drugs have been exempted from tariffs. However, Trump has stated repeatedly that his administration plans to impose major tariffs on them soon.
'Branded pharmaceuticals only account for about 15% of US prescriptions,' Ballreich said. 'However, they account for nearly 90% of spending.' Over the past 20 years, he noted, much of the manufacturing has shifted overseas, not to low-income countries to save labor costs, but to high-income countries — primarily Switzerland, Ireland, and Germany — for tax benefits.
'Today the US pays three to four times more than other developed countries for the same branded drugs,' Socal said. As a result, 'about 1 in 4 Americans report not being able to afford the medications they need. If tariffs are applied to prescription drugs, one of the most immediate consequences could be price increases.'
The market for generics is separate, she explained. These drugs typically cost much less and account for the vast majority of prescriptions. 'For generics, the biggest issue isn't cost — it's supply shortages. Hospitals report daily struggles to care for patients because there is a shortage of some drug they need.'
Tariffs on generic products may exacerbate shortages, she warned. Because they have lower profit margins and no patent protection, tariffs may discourage production or lead countries to cut corners, increasing the risk for supply disruptions.
If implemented, tariffs could range from 25% to 50%, Ballreich said. 'We expect these tariffs to be passed on to the Medicare program, and ultimately patients will either pay more at the pharmacy or face higher Medicare Part D premiums.'
Signs of Anticipation
In anticipation of potential tariffs, Ballreich said there's already been a surge in pharmaceutical imports. 'To put it in perspective, Ireland — our single largest source of branded pharmaceuticals — saw a fivefold increase in US imports in the month of March year over year.'
While the US does maintain some drug stockpiles, Socal noted these are primarily for bioterrorism or acute emergency response. Proposals have been floated for hospitals to stockpile certain drugs, especially injectable medications frequently in shortage, but the scope remains unclear. 'We cannot have stockpiles over stockpiles for every single drug,' she said. 'Policies to resolve supply disruptions and shortages should be the way to go.'
Unintended Consequences
Socal also pointed to the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, which created the Medicare drug price negotiation program and introduced an inflation rebate penalty for manufacturers who raise prices faster than inflation. That penalty applies to Medicaid prescriptions as well. Penalizing offending manufacturers, she said, 'can have an unintended consequence. If the manufacturer cannot raise prices because the penalty might be too high, one of the possibilities is that the manufacturer may simply want to discontinue a drug.'
US Manufacturing Still Years Away
When asked how long it would take to scale up domestic production of branded drugs, Ballreich said, 'Years.' While most drugs are small-molecule and typically pills, biologics are much more complex, he noted. 'I don't think we're going to see a significant surge in domestic or US manufacturing of branded pharmaceuticals in the near term, that is, within the next year or 2.'
He said reassessing tax policy should be prioritized because 'that's why many of the manufacturers have located outside the US, particularly to other high-income countries. We also have to think about other subsidies and making sure we have a very well-developed, well-trained workforce.'
Socal emphasized that many drugs are already made in the US, but domestic manufacturers still depend heavily on foreign ingredients and raw materials. 'Tariffs on pharmaceutical products coming in from abroad can also hurt our US manufacturers because their prices may then be less competitive in the global market,' she said.
Socal reported receiving research grants to the institution (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health) from the US Department of Defense, Arnold Ventures, the California Department of Health Care Access and Information, and the ERISA Industry Committee.
Ballreich reported receiving consulting fees from RTI International for work related to Medicare price negotiations and research grants to the institution (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health) from the US Department of Defense and Arnold Ventures.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Amazon's Zoox Opens Robotaxi Production Site in California
Amazon's Zoox Opens Robotaxi Production Site in California

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Amazon's Zoox Opens Robotaxi Production Site in California

(Bloomberg) -- Inc.'s Zoox autonomous driving unit opened a robotaxi production facility in California in the latest move by a deep-pocketed tech company to expand the nascent industry. Security Concerns Hit Some of the World's 'Most Livable Cities' JFK AirTrain Cuts Fares 50% This Summer to Lure Riders Off Roads How E-Scooters Conquered (Most of) Europe Taser-Maker Axon Triggers a NIMBY Backlash in its Hometown The site in the San Francisco Bay area city of Hayward will be able to churn out 10,000 purpose-built robotaxis a year once it reaches full scale, Zoox said in a statement on Wednesday. The company expects the plant will create hundreds of jobs in the region as it grows. 'The reality is we are just ready,' Zoox Chief Executive Officer Aicha Evans said in an interview on Bloomberg Tech on Wednesday. The strategy is to start 'putting the capacity in place and then turning it on little by little as we go city by city' with commercial launches, she said. Zoox is one of several companies vying to secure a foothold in the market for autonomous ridehailing. Competitors include Alphabet Inc.'s Waymo unit and Tesla Inc., which plans to begin offering rides in Austin with no driver behind the wheel as early as Sunday. The Amazon-owned company's purpose-built robotaxi is akin to a shuttle and has no steering wheel or pedals, with four inward-facing seats. Zoox would need an exemption from US auto safety rules that require vehicles to have driver controls, though the Trump administration has said it's working on changes to provide those approvals faster. Zoox is 'very grateful' to the administration's work in preparing the US for robotaxis and talks with regulatory bodies are 'going well', Evans said. Zoox is testing or operating robotaxis on a limited basis in San Fransisco and Las Vegas, where it plans to launch its service. Waymo, which uses vehicles made by other automakers that it rigs with self-driving software and sensors, is seen as the market leader and charges fares for rides in multiple US markets. To start, Zoox has a dozen of its robotaxis driving on the Las Vegas Strip, Evans said. The commercial service will launch later in the year and pricing will be competitive with traditional ride-hailing services. (Updates with Bloomberg Television interview starting in the third paragraph.) Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? How a Tiny Middleman Could Access Two-Factor Login Codes From Tech Giants American Mid: Hampton Inn's Good-Enough Formula for World Domination The Spying Scandal Rocking the World of HR Software ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio

Trump Urges SALT Deal as Lawler Stands Firm on $40,000 Cap
Trump Urges SALT Deal as Lawler Stands Firm on $40,000 Cap

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Urges SALT Deal as Lawler Stands Firm on $40,000 Cap

(Bloomberg) — President Donald Trump expressed optimism that lawmakers could reach a compromise on the state and local tax deduction — a sticking point in his 'One Big Beautiful Bill' — even as a key SALT advocate insisted a deal had already been reached. Security Concerns Hit Some of the World's 'Most Livable Cities' JFK AirTrain Cuts Fares 50% This Summer to Lure Riders Off Roads How E-Scooters Conquered (Most of) Europe Taser-Maker Axon Triggers a NIMBY Backlash in its Hometown Trump said Wednesday that resolving the contentious debate over the SALT cap is imperative to passing his multitrillion dollar tax bill. 'It's very difficult, and I understand both sides, but we'll just have to see, hopefully a compromise or something's going to be made,' Trump told reporters at the White House. New York Representative Mike Lawler — one of the House's most vocal supporters of the SALT deduction — said earlier Wednesday he is open to negotiating with the Senate to advance the tax bill, but insisted he would not agree to lower the $40,000 SALT cap deal reached in the House. 'We negotiated,' Lawler said Wednesday in an interview with Fox Business of the House version of the bill. 'That's the deal.' The SALT deduction has been a primary sticking point holding up Trump's legislative agenda. Lawler, one of a handful of Republicans representing districts in high tax states, previously called the Senate version of the tax bill 'dead on arrival' because of its $10,000 cap on SALT. Senate leaders have characterized that figure as a placeholder while negotiations have continued, but have also said there is no desire among Republicans in their chamber to keep the cap at $40,000. GOP Senators are considering a $30,000 cap on SALT as a compromise between the $10,000 currently allowed and the more generous limit in the House tax bill. White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles is scheduled to meet with Senate Republicans on Wednesday to discuss the tax bill, according to a person familiar with the planning. Vice President JD Vance met with senators on Tuesday to urge them to support the legislation. The House and Senate have to agree on a plan before it can go to Trump's desk to become law, giving Lawler and his SALT-focused colleagues leverage to demand their concerns be addressed. Trump warned that making SALT a 'red line' would mean a tax increase. The bill renews many of his first-term tax cuts on households and small businesses, which are set to expire at the end of the year. Instead of agreeing that the SALT cap could be lowered, Lawler listed off costly items in the bill, including the child tax credit and cutting taxes on tips and overtime, that could be negotiated. 'We're not giving you the full boat,' Lawler said. 'I have negotiated in good faith from day one, and I am still willing to work with my colleagues to get this done, but we are not going to be fleeced in New York.' There are other variables that could be negotiated besides the cap amount, including length of time it is in place and the phase out for higher income taxpayers. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer criticized Republican colleagues in the chamber for seeking to minimize the SALT deduction, calling that move a 'a dagger aimed at the heart of blue states.' —With assistance from Erik Wasson and Cam Kettles. (Adds Wiles plan to meet with senators on Wednesday) Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? How a Tiny Middleman Could Access Two-Factor Login Codes From Tech Giants American Mid: Hampton Inn's Good-Enough Formula for World Domination The Spying Scandal Rocking the World of HR Software ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio

Juneteenth festival organizers focus on 'resilience' amid attacks on DEI initiatives

time18 minutes ago

Juneteenth festival organizers focus on 'resilience' amid attacks on DEI initiatives

Juneteenth was established as a federal holiday in 2021 to recommit to "equity, equality, and justice," but this year the holiday comes amid a new political environment marked by a slew of Trump administration federal regulations against diversity, equality and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. The holiday commemorates the June 19, 1865, emancipation of the last African American enslaved people in Texas in the wake of the Civil War. Organizers of Juneteenth celebrations across the country told ABC News that President Donald Trump's push against DEI policies has led to some disturbances in planned festivities -- some of which took place last weekend and others that are scheduled to be held on Thursday and over the coming weekend. Maliya Smith, whose family has been organizing a Juneteenth festival in San Diego for years, told ABC News that the National Endowment for the Arts, which has faced funding cuts under the Trump administration, initially granted her family's foundation, The Cooper Family Foundation. The foundation, which puts on the festival, was to receive a $25,000 grant for the 2025 fiscal year, as they have secured for past celebrations. However, following the Trump administration's new anti-DEI regulations in February, they were notified in an email that they will no longer be receiving the grant, Smith said. "Funding is being allocated in a new direction in furtherance of the administration's agenda. Your project, as noted, although, unfortunately, does not align with these properties," the email said, according to Smith. Norman Harris, executive director of Juneteenth Music Festival Corporation in Denver, Colorado, has been organizing Juneteenth festivals for over a decade but said that this year has been the "most challenging" because 12 major corporate sponsors, who had backed the festival in the past, pulled their support over the past couple of months. Asked if the companies provided a rationale for pulling out, Harris said they did not elaborate, but the loss of support came at the last minute and organizers they didn't have time to 'have those conversations.' "What it made us do was to figure out on the fly, you know, how we were going to sustain this year's celebration," Harris told ABC News. "So what we decided on was that we'd have to shorten the normal two day street festival to one day." The president's executive orders against DEI target both the public and the private sector. Several legal experts who advise companies and institutions regarding their DEI policies previously told ABC News that while the Trump administration doesn't have the legal authority to mandate that private businesses abandon those policies, the executive order's language uses the threat of potential legal action against certain companies to discourage those practices. "The current administration has made it very clear in as many ways as it could that it's no longer friendly to the idea that the country should continue to mark the racial history of the past as something affecting the present. They kind of want to wipe the history away and start from scratch," Jeremy Paul, a constitutional law professor at Northeastern University, told ABC News. The president said in a March 27 executive order targeting the teaching of American history in cultural institutions that depictions of the U.S. as "inherently racist" are "divisive" and called on the institutions to instead "focus on the greatness of the achievements and progress of the American people." "The expressed position of the current administration is very hostile to what they would call DEI or woke events, and certainly, Juneteenth is part of the effort on the part of the country to acknowledge the terrible legacy of slavery," Paul said. Smith's family, which organizes the San Diego Juneteenth celebration, has been celebrating Juneteenth for decades, but she said that this year has been different because they have had to "navigate this new world" and "adapt" to the new regulations. Smith said that this year's Juneteenth "healing" festival will still go on as planned this weekend because the family has been "blessed" to receive enough support from the community, but she expressed concern over fundraising in the coming years. "Next year we don't know how that's going to look because funding is looking different," she said. "We're going to have to figure out how to scale back even more." According to Paul, while there is "no obligation" for the White House, states, cities or companies to celebrate Juneteenth, these federal policies have no impact on its status as a federal holiday. "This was established by statute, meaning Congress voted for it, and President Biden signed it," Paul said. "And that's not changing. There will be no mail that day. Federal offices will be closed."Harris said that while he was "disappointed" that the loss of sponsors led to the scaling back of the Denver festival this year, the spirit of Juneteenth has reminded him of the power of "resilience." "Some of the challenges that African American communities have had decades past, centuries past, which resilience has been the common denominator -- that's helped us overcome the challenges," he said, adding that it has been an "honor" for him to help bring the celebration to the city each year. Smith echoed this notion, saying that "our tradition is still the same." "It's still going to be a Juneteenth Celebration for the community," she said, "and it's still going to be on a scale that is helping and educating and empowering the community."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store