What to know about President Trump's proposed new census and 2026 elections
President Donald Trump announced his intention to "immediately begin work on a new" census, raising questions about whether the plan would be constitutional and how it would affect the partisan makeup of Congress.
His announcement came amidst Texas Republicans' efforts to perform an unusual mid-decade redrawing of congressional maps, which are normally drawn after the census determines the number of seats in each state's delegation at the beginning of each new decade.
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and the GOP-led state legislature hope to add up to five new seats for their party by redistricting, prompting proposals for Democratic states to redraw their congressional maps in retaliation.
Trump's Aug. 7 social media post said a new survey should be taken "based on modern day facts and figures and, importantly, using the results and information gained from the Presidential Election of 2024," and that people "who are in our Country illegally WILL NOT BE COUNTED IN THE CENSUS."
USA TODAY has reached out to the White House for comment. Neither the U.S. Census Bureau nor the Commerce Department responded to requests for comment.
"I think you would have to see, at some point, do things start moving?" said Shawn Donahue, a political science professor at the University of Buffalo. "Is it something that is more of just a press release, or is there something that the Commerce Department is going to start doing?"
How often is the census taken?
The U.S. Constitution calls for the census to be conducted every 10 years, and in years that end in zero, most recently in 2020. The U.S. Census Bureau, part of the Commerce Department, carries out these resource-intensive surveys and hires temporary staff to conduct outreach to count as many people as possible.
The survey results are used to decide how seats in the U.S. House of Representatives are distributed to each state based on its population, a process called apportionment. Those processes usually take place in the first two years of a decade.
The survey results are also used to determine how much federal funding is distributed to states, and researchers widely cite the demographic research to understand the country.
Who supports conducting a mid-decade Census?
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Republican from Georgia, announced a bill in July that would require a new census to be performed, counting only U.S. citizens, and then direct states to redraw their congressional districts based on the new numbers. "Americans don't feel like they're represented in Washington," she said.
Hans Von Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow for the conservative Heritage Foundation, said he thinks states should redraw their congressional districts every five years, as long as data is available, but it usually isn't. He said the United States has a mobile and constantly increasing population that a survey held every 10 years doesn't capture.
He also pointed to a 2022 report from the U.S. Census Bureau that found 14 states had statistically significant differences between the bureau's count and the actual population. Six states — Arkansas, Florida, Illinois, Mississippi, Tennessee, and Texas — had undercounts. He said better data quality might have led to more congressional seats in Texas and Florida.
Who opposes a mid-decade census?
John Bisognano, president of the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, criticized Trump's proposal as "a comprehensive campaign to flout the U.S. Constitution in order to predetermine election outcomes so he can consolidate his power and avoid accountability to the American people."
Sophia Lin Lakin, director of the ACLU's Voting Rights Project, told National Public Radio that following through "would defy the Constitution, federal law, and settled precedent" and her organization "won't hesitate to go back to court to protect representation for all communities."
Why would Trump want to conduct a new Census?
"The Republicans are so desperate at this point to forestall what's likely going to happen in 2026," said Michael P. McDonald, a political science professor at the University of Florida.
Democrats are widely expected to win seats in the House of Representatives in next year's congressional elections, because the party that occupies the White House usually does poorly. Trump also has low approval ratings. That blue wave could flip control of the House, in which Republicans hold a 219 to 212 majority.
McDonald said if Republicans draw new congressional districts, they might be able to mitigate the number of seats they lose.
For example, the Republican stronghold of Texas saw such rapid population growth when the 2020 survey came out that it gained two additional congressional seats. Republican-leaning states of Florida and Montana, Democrat-leaning Oregon and Colorado, and tightly contested North Carolina each gained one seat.
The Democratic population centers of California, Illinois, and New York each lost one seat; so did Republican-leaning Ohio and West Virginia, and the swing states of Michigan and Pennsylvania.
Are immigrants counted in the census?
Yes. The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution says Representatives shall be apportioned according to the "whole number of persons in each State." This ended the longstanding practice of counting three-fifths of enslaved people for purposes of representation. There is no language in the 14th Amendment that restricts these counts to citizens or people with legal presence in the country.
During his first term, Trump attempted to add a question to the 2020 census asking if the person completing the survey was a citizen. The Supreme Court struck that down in 2019. The following year, Trump issued a memorandum saying undocumented immigrants should not be included in counts that determine congressional representation.
Could Republicans gain more seats if a new census were conducted?
Van Spakovsky said a mid-decade census could result in more congressional seats for Texas and Florida. Both are red states with rapidly increasing populations, and both were undercounted in the 2020 census. Texas, for example, was undercounted by almost 550,000 in 2020 and added another 2 million people by 2024. By comparison, an average of 760,000 people live in each congressional district.
Within hours of Trump's statement, Florida House Speaker Daniel Perez, a Republican, said he's setting up a new redistricting committee.
McDonald said the congressional maps are the fairest they've been in about 40 years, because of redistricting reform efforts across the country to prevent unfairly drawn districts. He said that the congressional maps are already drawn in a way that there are more Republican-leaning districts than Democratic-leaning ones, despite the practice of including undocumented immigrants in the count.
McDonald pointed to South Florida, where he said the current lines place right-leaning Cuban Americans with high voter turnout rates in the same districts as lower-propensity, Democratic-leaning Hispanic voters. If the maps were redrawn to not include undocumented immigrants, as Trump has suggested, he said there would likely be only two congressional seats in the area. "Who's going to be on that game of musical chairs?" he asked.
How would a new census affect 2026 or 2028?
Reapportioning congressional seats affects two things: How many congressional seats each state has and how many electoral votes each state has, because electoral votes are equal to each state's total number of Senate and House seats. House terms last two years, and the elections take place in even years, with the next one coming in 2026. The next presidential election happens in 2028. But this doesn't mean that a new census will take place or that maps will be rejiggered by then.
"It seems pretty unlikely that you could do this for 2026, just because it takes so long," said Donahue. The government also isn't allowed to speed up the process by basing its count on statistical sampling, he said, pointing to a 1999 Supreme Court decision that said people must be counted. "It's not something where you can snap your fingers and it's going to happen."
Von Spakovsky suggested the U.S. Census Bureau update a form it already sends out regularly and use it to perform a mid-decade census survey. "You couldn't get it done this year, but I don't see any reason why you couldn't get it done next year," he said.
Would Trump's order to do a mid-decade census go to court?
"Absolutely," said Donahue. "The Constitution calls for a decennial census. It doesn't say that you can't (have more). But, I mean, it pretty much implies that you're only going to do one every 10 years."
Donahue predicted that Democratic-leaning states would be most likely to challenge a mid-decade census in court. But the administration could argue that the requirement to do it every 10 years isn't a prohibition on doing it more often.
"There's no legal bar in place that says you can't redistrict more than once every 10 years," von Spakovsky said.
Contributing: Francesca Chambers
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Epoch Times
19 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
Why the 747 Is Far and Away Still the Best Option for the New Air Force One
President Donald Trump arrives aboard Air Force One at Pittsburgh International Airport in Coraopolis, Penn., on Jan. 18, 2018. Samira Bouaou/The Epoch Times
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump made his MAGA Fed pick. His next choice will be far more consequential
President Donald Trump recently nominated one of his economic advisers to the Federal Reserve's top ranks, but his next choice will be far more consequential. Plans for picking the next Fed chair are already taking shape. Trump on Thursday nominated White House economist Stephen Miran to temporarily fill a vacant seat on the Fed's Board of Governors, though he still needs to be confirmed by the Senate. Meanwhile, the Trump administration has also been interviewing candidates for an even more powerful role: Fed chair. The current chair, Jerome Powell, has long drawn Trump's ire for his refusal to acquiesce to the president's demands to lower interest rates — and his term expires in May. Just this past week, Trump's search for who will steer the world's most powerful central bank next year took various twists and turns. It shows Trump is leaving no stone unturned, especially considering he has repeatedly said he's regretful of his nomination of Powell. Trump said he is no longer considering Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent for the job. Meanwhile, Christopher Waller, a current Fed governor, unexpectedly gained ground with the president's inner circle, according to people familiar with the matter. And two Republicans named Kevin — former Fed governor Kevin Warsh and White House economist Kevin Hassett — remain on Trump's shortlist. It's also possible that Miran, if he's confirmed, ends up impressing the president so much that he is elevated to lead the Fed. The Wall Street Journal on Friday reported that Trump expanded his list of potential picks for Fed chair, now including former St. Louis Fed president James Bullard. 'It'll be interesting to see how this all plays out because the two Kevins are certainly quite viable, but Waller might be the one that the market forces as a choice,' said Derek Tang, an economist at research and consulting firm LH Meyer/Monetary Policy Analytics. Brownie points for Waller Waller was appointed to the Fed's board by Trump in 2020, and until recently, he had built a reputation for being a key messenger on the Fed's policy moves. After the Fed hiked interest rates aggressively to tame inflation in 2022 and 2023, investors listened closely to Waller's speeches for clues on when central bankers might finally begin lowering rates instead. Fed officials have a tradition of giving Wall Street a heads-up on what they plan to do with rates through their public engagements, known as 'forward guidance.' In recent months, Waller has chosen to set himself apart from the rest of the Fed's rate-setting committee of 12 voting members. Last month, Waller was one of two Fed governors who dissented on the Fed's latest decision to hold borrowing costs steady for the fifth consecutive time, instead backing a rate cut. That was the first time since 1993 that more than one Fed governor dissented on a policy move. In a statement explaining his dissent, Waller said that 'tariffs are one-off increases in the price level and do not cause inflation beyond a temporary increase' and that the Fed should step in with a rate cut to prevent the labor market from falling off a cliff. When pitching Waller to the president, Trump's advisers repeatedly referenced Waller's dissent, according to people familiar with the matter. The dissent undoubtedly boosted Waller's chances for Fed chair, the sources said. The battle of the Kevins When Trump was threatening to sack Powell in the spring, Kevin Warsh quickly emerged as a potential replacement. National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett eventually joined him on the list of potential Fed chairs. Warsh, a longtime Trump ally, has said the president's expansive tariffs won't stoke inflation — a stance that's at odds with the general consensus among economists. During a speech in Stanford, California, in May, Warsh said the Fed would be to blame if it can't combat the persistent impacts of tariff-induced inflation. 'The president clearly trusts Kevin Warsh and thinks highly of him, and as I understand it, his in-laws are close with the Trump family, so there's a personal connection there,' said Brian Gardner, chief Washington policy strategist at investment firm Stifel. (Warsh is married to billionaire Jane Lauder, granddaughter of Estée Lauder, the late cosmetics industry mogul.) Warsh was previously under consideration for Fed chair during Trump's first term, but Powell was ultimately chosen on advice from then-Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin. But before Waller's dissent drove up his stock with Trump, Hassett was seen as a front-runner for Fed chair. Hassett, a PhD economist with a long track record of supporting Republican politicians, has been a key supporter of Trump's sweeping economic agenda. For example, Hassett — like Warsh — has vehemently defended Trump's tariffs. In early April, when Trump unveiled massive tariffs hikes, Hassett told ABC News: 'I don't think that you're going to see a big effect on the consumer in the US,' because countries will be negotiating trade deals with the administration. 'People assume Hassett is eventually going to be nominated because he's at the White House and he definitely scores very highly on loyalty, having been with Trump since his first administration,' Tang said. 'Trump probably feels like he can trust him.' Both Warsh and Hassett have said the Fed should remain independent. CNN's Phil Mattingly contributed to this report. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump brings back dreaded Presidential Fitness Test. Let's see him run a mile.
President Donald Trump is following through on his bold commitment to traumatize all Americans, regardless of age, by reinstating the Presidential Fitness Test for schoolchildren. Many of us look back on this once-mandatory fitness test with fond memories of the fear and anxiety it provoked and the feelings of inadequacy we healthily buried in the deepest recesses of our minds. For me, a middle schooler who wore jeans cruelly labeled 'Husky,' running 1 mile in the Florida heat and finishing close to last while crying undoubtedly forged me into the man I am today: a chiseled physical specimen with fabulously low self-esteem and an abundance of insecurity. The fitness test – which included everything from push-ups to sit-ups to the aforementioned run – started in the 1960s, back when emotionally torturing children was legal. It invariably pitted the jocks against the non-jocks and made those who couldn't excel at the various exercises feel like week-old meatloaf. Obama rightly did away with dreaded Presidential Fitness Test ... President Barack Obama ended the program in 2012, replacing it with an approach to fitness that focused on the abilities of individual students and encouraged healthier lifelong behavior. Opinion: Insecure Trump knows he'll never measure up to Obama. And it kills him. Trump, naturally, wants to return America to its imagined glory days, back when bullying was encouraged and physical fitness centered around exercises we now know can lead to gym-aversion and a lifetime of lower back pain. ... so, of course, Trump is bringing the traumatic test back On July 31, Thursday, the president famous for his love of fast food and riding around a golf course slumped over the steering wheel of a motorized cart proudly signed an executive order telling American schoolchildren to stop being such puny weaklings. 'This was a wonderful tradition," Trump said incorrectly, "and we're bringing it back." Opinion: Trump's mental decline is on vivid display as he rages about Epstein, windmills Because sanity died earlier this year, Trump is putting Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a sentient slab of beef jerky who eats roadkill, in charge of the new test, which one can assume will involve challenges like: drinking a gallon of raw milk then waiting to see if you die from a listeria infection, running away from scientific evidence and swimming a half-mile in a sewage pond. Trump and 'fitness' don't exactly seem to go together As a Presidential Fitness Test victim and survivor, I wholeheartedly endorse Trump's decision to bring back this dreadful idea, under one condition: Donald Trump must run 1 mile on live television. That's it. That's the deal. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. People around Trump are constantly bragging about how healthy and robust and amazing he is, even though he looks like he'd get winded walking to the chicken nuggets chafing dish at the Mar-a-Lago buffet. Fox News host Jesse Watters recently said: "Trump golfs. He has dad strength. You know dad strength? He doesn't look like he's in shape, but when he grabs you – one time my father grabbed me, and I was like, 'Oh, my God this guy is stronger than I am!' " We can delve more into the daddy issues behind that weird comment another time, but for now I say this: Let's see Trump crush a 1-mile run. We can make it a global pay-per-view event and likely make enough to pay down the national debt Trump has swollen with his big, beautiful tax bill. If our "strong" president wants to bring back a dreaded and pointless fitness test, he needs to put his jogging loafers where his mouth is. On your mark, get set ... everybody laugh. Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @ and on Facebook at You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump to traumatize kids with Presidential Fitness Test | Opinion