Chicago voters stuck with ‘America's Worst Mayor' Brandon Johnson send urgent warning to NYC about Zohran Mamdani
Johnson, dubbed 'America's worst mayor' by the Wall Street Journal editorial board, has drawn comparisons to Mamdani for their shared progressive stances — which have been playing out disastrously in the Windy City.
'What I would say to New Yorkers is do your homework. You have to know who you are supporting, who you are voting for, so people of New York don't walk around feeling the way I do,' said Cata Truss, a Johnson voter and campaigner turned vocal critic.
'I have buyer's remorse in a way that I've never had before,' Truss, 59, told The Post this week.
'Don't be me,' she added. 'Do the research, follow the money. Who is donating to his campaign? Who got him elected? That will be determining where people ought to vote.'
4 Cata Truss, 59, a former Johnson voter and campaigner turned vocal critic, said she has 'buyer's remorse' over her vote, and urged New Yorkers not to make the same mistake.
LP Media
Johnson rose to the mayor's office in 2023, elbowing his disastrous Democratic predecessor Lori Lightfoot out of the primary and ultimately defeating centrist Paul Vallas in a two-man runoff.
His ascent, much like Mamdani's as the Democratic mayoral nominee, was given a major lift by minority and young activist voters, lured in by his adherence to left-wing doctrine, including a 2020 resolution Johnson introduced as Cook County Commissioner that would have defunded the police, a position he later sprinted away from.
Since becoming mayor, Johnson's approval rating has hovered around the high-20s, thanks in part to Chicago spending more than $600 million to address some 50,000 illegal immigrants who have made their way to the city in recent years.
4 Democratic Socialist Zohran Mamdani is leading in the latest NYC mayoral poll by 19 points.
Stephen Yang for the New York Post
'I'm anti-Brandon Johnson because I've seen what he's done to this city. All these resources he's used to take care of illegal citizens is hurting the city,' said Doris Lewis, 81, a retired Chicago high school teacher from Hyde Park.
Chicago's budget woes have already become fodder for attacks in the New York City mayoral race, with ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who is running as an independent, using the crisis to make an indirect dig at the frontrunner Mamdani.
'Chicago is proof that incompetent leadership can turn a deep-dish city into a half-baked mess,' he posted on X last week.
Mamdani and Cuomo, who has been coming in as the November contest's runner-up in recent polls, will also face incumbent Mayor Eric Adams and lawyer Jim Walden, both running as independents, and GOP nominee Curtis Sliwa.
Lewis, the retired schoolteacher, said she voted for Johnson because he was a 'young black man with a family.' But she realized her error once she saw how he was running the city, calling Johnson 'a disaster, a disgrace and a total disappointment.'
4 Brandon Johnson, Chicago's deeply unpopular mayor, is often said to be of a similar mold to Mamdani.
AP
'I've been really angry with myself because going in, I had a general idea that he was pushing an agenda for everybody else except black people,' she said, accusing Johnson of 'playing the race card' to earn the community's support.
'What agenda does Zohran Mamdani have for the black community in New York City since that is who he is courting now?'
Lewis predicted that electing Mamdani — who is the frontrunner in the November general election — 'would be a disaster for New York as it is a disaster for Chicago.'
'Socialism hasn't worked for black people, so I am anti-this guy in New York,' she said.
A February poll by M3 Strategies found just 20% of voters approved of the job Johnson is doing in Chicago. The embattled mayor is facing a handful of recall efforts, as well as multiple PACs raising millions of dollars to ensure he isn't re-elected in 2027.
4 Chicago Democratic Alderman Raymond Lopez likened Chicago and New York duking it out for which city would be more progressive by virtue of their left-wing mayors 'a socialist nightmare.'
LP Media
The anti-Johnson sentiment was echoed among elected Democrats in the city.
Chicago Democratic Alderman Raymond Lopez, a self-described 'middle of the road Democrat' who voted for Vallas and said he supports law enforcement, capitalism and personal responsibility, called on New Yorkers to 'learn from our mistakes.'
'We see a lot of comparisons being made right now. Both are hyper-progressive, hyper-left socialist Democratic candidates,' he said of the oft-made juxtaposition between Johnson and Mamdani.
'Now you have New York and Chicago duking it out for who is going to be the more socialist, the more progressive city in America. It's almost like a socialist nightmare,' Lopez said.
'Learn from our mistakes and pick someone who is more focused on results and common sense than simply burning down the barn because you want to see fire.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
News Analysis: Newsom's decision to fight fire with fire could have profound political consequences
Deep in the badlands of defeat, Democrats have soul-searched about what went wrong last November, tinkered with a thousand-plus thinkpieces and desperately cast for a strategy to reboot their stalled-out party. Amid the noise, California Gov. Gavin Newsom has recently championed an unlikely game plan: Forget the high road, fight fire with fire and embrace the very tactics that virtue-minded Democrats have long decried. Could the dark art of political gerrymandering be the thing that saves democracy from Trump's increasingly authoritarian impulses? That's essentially the pitch Newsom is making to California voters with his audacious new special election campaign. As Texas Democrats dig in to block a Republican-led redistricting push and Trump muscles to consolidate power wherever he can, Newsom wants to redraw California's own congressional districts to favor Democrats. His goal: counter Trump's drive for more GOP House seats with a power play of his own. It's a boundary-pushing gamble that will undoubtedly supercharge Newsom's political star in the short-term. The long-game glory could be even grander, but only if he pulls it off. A ballot-box flop would be brutal for both Newsom and his party. The charismatic California governor is termed out of office in 2026 and has made no secret of his 2028 presidential ambitions. But the distinct scent of his home state will be hard to completely slough off in parts of the country where California is synonymous with loony lefties, business-killing regulation and an out-of-control homelessness crisis. To say nothing of Newsom's ill-fated dinner at an elite Napa restaurant in violation of COVID-19 protocols — a misstep that energized a failed recall attempt and still haunts the governor's national reputation. The redistricting gambit is the kind of big play that could redefine how voters across the country see Newsom. The strategy could be a boon for Newsom's 2028 ambitions during a moment when Democrats are hungry for leaders, said Democratic strategist Steven Maviglio. But it's also a massive roll of the dice for both Newsom and the state he leads. 'It's great politics for him if this passes,' Maviglio said. 'If it fails, he's dead in the water.' The path forward — which could determine control of Congress in 2026 — is hardly a straight shot. The 'Election Rigging Response Act,' as Newsom has named his ballot measure, would temporarily scrap the congressional districts enacted by the state's voter-approved independent redistricting commission. Under the proposal, Democrats could pick up five seats currently held by Republicans while bolstering vulnerable Democratic incumbent Reps. Adam Gray, Josh Harder, George Whitesides, Derek Tran and Dave Min, which would save the party millions of dollars in costly reelection fights. But first the Democratic-led state Legislature must vote to place the measure on the Nov. 4 ballot and then it must be approved by voters. If passed, the initiative would have a 'trigger,' meaning the redrawn map would not take effect unless Texas or another GOP-led state moved forward with its own gerrymandering effort. 'I think what Governor Newsom and other Democrats are doing here is exactly the right thing we need to do,' Democratic National Committee Chairman Ken Martin said Thursday. 'We're not bringing a pencil to a knife fight. We're going to bring a bazooka to a knife fight, right? This is not your grandfather's Democratic Party,' Martin said, adding that they shouldn't be the only ones playing by a set of rules that no longer exist. For Democrats like Rep. Laura Friedman (D-Glendale), who appeared alongside Newsom to kick off the effort, there is "some heartbreak" to temporarily shelving their commitment to independent redistricting. But she and others were clear-eyed about the need to stop a president "willing to rig the election midstream," she said. Friedman said she was hearing overwhelmingly positive reactions to the proposal from all kinds of Democratic groups on the ground. "The response that I get is, 'Finally, we're fighting. We have a way to fight back that's tangible,'" Friedman recounted. Still, despite the state's Democratic voter registration advantage, victory for the ballot measure will hardly be assured. California voters have twice rallied for independent redistricting at the ballot box in the last two decades and many may struggle to abandon those beliefs. A POLITICO-Citrin Center-Possibility Lab poll found that voters prefer keeping an independent panel in place to draw district lines by a nearly two-to-one margin, and that independent redistricting is broadly popular in the state. (Newsom's press office argued that the poll was poorly worded, since it asked about getting rid of the independent commission altogether and permanently returning line-drawing power to the legislators, rather than just temporarily scrapping their work for several cycles until the independent commission next draws new lines.) California voters should not expect to see a special election campaign focused on the minutia of reconfiguring the state's congressional districts, however. While many opponents will likely attack the change as undercutting the will of California voters, who overwhelmingly supported weeding politics out of the redistricting process, bank on Newsom casting the campaign as a referendum on Trump and his devious effort to keep Republicans in control of Congress. Newsom employed a similar strategy when he demolished the Republican-led recall campaign against him in 2021, which the governor portrayed as a "life and death" battle against "Trumpism" and far-right anti-vaccine and antiabortion activists. Among California's Democratic-heavy electorate, that message proved to be extremely effective. "Wake up, America," Newsom said Thursday at a Los Angeles rally launching the campaign for the redistricting measure. "Wake up to what Donald Trump is doing. Wake up to his assault. Wake up to the assault on institutions and knowledge and history. Wake up to his war on science, public health, his war against the American people." Kevin Liao, a Democratic strategist who has worked on national and statewide campaigns, said his D.C. and California-based political group chats had been blowing up in recent days with texts about the moment Newsom was creating for himself. Much of Liao's group chat fodder has involved the output of Newsom's digital team, which has elevated trolling to an art form on its official @GovPressOffice account on the social media site X. The missives have largely mimicked the president's own social media patois, with hyperbole, petty insults and a heavy reliance on the 'caps lock' key. "DONALD IS FINISHED — HE IS NO LONGER 'HOT.' FIRST THE HANDS (SO TINY) AND NOW ME — GAVIN C. NEWSOM — HAVE TAKEN AWAY HIS 'STEP,' " one of the posts read last week, dutifully reposted by the governor himself. Some messages have also ended with Newsom's initials (a riff on Trump's signature "DJT" signoff) and sprinkled in key Trumpian callbacks, like the phrase 'Liberation Day,' or a doctored Time Magazine cover with Newsom's smiling mien. The account has garnered 150,000 new followers since the beginning of the month. Shortly after Trump took office in January, Newsom walked a fine line between criticizing the president and his policies and being more diplomatic, especially after the California wildfires — in hopes of appealing to any semblance of compassion and presidential responsibility Trump possessed. Newsom had spent the first months of the new administration trying to reshape the California-vs.-Trump narrative that dominated the president's first term and move away from his party's prior "resistance" brand. Those conciliatory overtures coincided with Newsom's embrace of a more ecumenical posture, hosting MAGA leaders on his podcast and taking a position on transgender athletes' participation in women's sports that contradicted the Democratic orthodoxy. Newsom insisted that he engaged in those conversations to better understand political views that diverged from his own, especially after Trump's victory in November. However, there was the unmistakable whiff of an ambitious politician trying to broaden his national appeal by inching away from his reputation as a West Coast liberal. Newsom's reluctance to readopt the Trump resistance mantle ended after the president sent California National Guard troops into Los Angeles amid immigration sweeps and ensuing protests in June. Those actions revealed Trump's unchecked vindictiveness and abject lack of morals and honor, Newsom said. Of late, Newsom has defended the juvenile tone of his press aides' posts mocking Trump's own all-caps screeds, and questioned why critics would excoriate his parody and not the president's own unhinged social media utterances. "If you've got issues with what I'm putting out, you sure as hell should have concerns about what he's putting out as president," Newsom said last week. "So to the extent it's gotten some attention, I'm pleased." In an attention-deficit economy where standing out is half the battle, the posts sparkle with unapologetic swagger. And they make clear that Newsom is in on the joke. 'To a certain set of folks who operated under the old rules, this could be seen as, 'Wow, this is really outlandish.' But I think they are making the calculation that Democrats want folks that are going to play under this new set of rules that Trump has established,' Liao said. At a moment when the Democratic party is still occupied with post-defeat recriminations and what's-next vision boarding, Newsom has emerged from the bog with something resembling a plan. And he's betting the house on his deep-blue state's willingness to fight fire with fire. Times staff writers Seema Mehta and Laura Nelson contributed to this report. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Idiot' Trump Aide Called Out for Failed Jab at Gavin Newsom
Gavin Newsom's press office called out 'idiot' White House Communications Director Steven Cheung for his attempted online attack of the California governor. Cheung, in a profane post on X, claimed the Democrat was 'too chicken s--t to take questions from the press' after his speech Thursday about congressional redistricting to counter similar GOP moves in Texas and other red states. Except that's exactly what Newsom did. Less than 15 minutes after Cheung called Newsom a 'coward' and 'beta cuck,' the governor's press office shot back in the replies. 'Questions are streamed here you idiot,' they wrote, linking to a question-and-answer session in which the governor fielded nine questions from reporters. The Newsom account highlighted Cheung's mistake in another post—this one directed to the public. 'Steven Cheung (incompetent Trump staffer) doesn't know how to use his computer. SAD!' they wrote, adopting Donald Trump's style of posting. The White House did not immediately respond to the Daily Beast asking if Cheung plans on deleting or editing his post. The recent trend by Newsom's press team of imitating Trump's tone was the topic of one of the questions Newsom responded to in the Q-and-A. 'I hope it's a wake-up call—the president of the United States, sort of following his example,' Newsom said. 'If you've got issues with what I'm putting out, you sure as hell should have concerns about what he's putting out as president,' he continued. 'So, to the extent it's got some attention, I'm pleased, but I think the deeper question is: how have we allowed the normalization of his tweets and Truth Social posts over the last several years to go without similar scrutiny and notice.' For days, that account has been aiming to make Trump aware of the purpose of Newsom's speech Thursday: announcing a November special election to vote on proposed new maps to nullify GOP-friendly redistricting in red states. Newsom reiterated to reporters Thursday that if states like Texas, Florida, Missouri, and Indiana call off their 'unprecedented, mid-decade, hyper-partisan gerrymander to rig the upcoming midterm elections,' then California's redistricting effort won't be necessary. But there don't appear to be signs of Republicans backing down. 'Gavin Newsom's latest stunt has nothing to do with Californians and everything to do with consolidating radical Democrat power, silencing California voters, and propping up his pathetic 2028 presidential pipe dream,' National Republican Congressional Committee spokesperson Christian Martinez said.
Associated Press
2 hours ago
- Associated Press
Texas Republicans set to resume push for redrawn US House maps
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Texas Republicans on Monday aimed to resume pushing through redrawn U.S. House district maps that would carve out a bigger GOP advantage in the 2026 midterm elections after state Democrats indicated they were ready to end a two-week walkout. In response, California Democrats are also moving ahead with their own reshaping of congressional districts to counteract Texas, putting in motion a potentially widening and unusually timed redistricting battle nationwide. The redrawing began in Texas but has been stalled since dozens of Democrats, who are the minority in each chamber, left the state on Aug. 3, with most of them going to Illinois. The absent lawmakers had signaled they were ready return to Austin after Republican Gov. Greg Abbott ended a first special session and California moved forward with its own plan. The Texas House was scheduled to try convening a quorum again Monday. Abbott put redistricting on the agenda at the urging of President Donald Trump, who wants to shore up Republicans' narrow U.S. House majority to avoid losing control of the chamber, and with it, prospects for Trump's conservative agenda in the later part of his term. It is unusual for redistricting to take place in the middle of the decade and typically occurs once at the beginning of each decade to coincide with the census. Many states, including Texas, give legislators the power to draw maps. California is among those that empower independent commissions with the task. The nation's two most populous states have been at the forefront of the resulting battle, which has reached into multiple courtrooms and statehouses controlled by both parties. On a national level, the partisan makeup of existing district lines puts Democrats within three seats of a majority. Of the 435 total House seats, only several dozen districts are competitive. So even slight changes in a few states could affect which party wins control. Texas' maps would aim to give the GOP five more winnable seats there. California Democrats, who hold supermajorities in both chambers — enough to act without any Republican votes — on Friday unveiled a proposal that could give Democrats there an additional five U.S. House seats. But any changes would first need the approval of state lawmakers and voters. Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom has said that his state will hold a Nov. 4 special referendum on the redrawn districts.
