logo
Wealthy Americans are fleeing Trump's chaos – and Britain's cashing in

Wealthy Americans are fleeing Trump's chaos – and Britain's cashing in

Telegraph03-05-2025
Threats to the car industry, jobs lost and rising taxes – Donald Trump's chaotic first 100 days in office have hardly sparked cheerful headlines in Britain.
However, one unexpected silver lining is emerging that could reverse a historical trend that has persisted since the Second World War.
For decades, Britain's richest and most skilled have been lured to the US by high wages, prestigious institutions and the chance to do business in the world's biggest economy.
But now Americans are nervously eyeing the exit amid growing concerns over their wealth, research funding and general uncertainty related to the Trump administration's policies.
The UK is among the countries most likely to gain from America's loss, presenting a chance to boost the economy by mopping up disgruntled world-class scientists, investors and students who had been destined for Ivy League universities.
Lawyers for the ultra-wealthy say they have been inundated with a deluge of inquiries from US clients since Trump's inauguration.
'The number of inquiries that come into our US team based in London has gone through the roof over the last three, four, five months,' says Ceri Vokes, a tax partner at Withers, a City law firm.
'There is definitely a desire to diversify away from the US. London is a natural place for them to come to because of the common language and similar culture.'
Inquiries from US clients considering relocating to the UK have been three times higher so far in 2025 than the same period in previous years, according to Vokes.
Trump effect
Trump's trade war has triggered trillion-dollar stock market fluctuations and thrown the dollar's safe-haven status into question.
The wealthiest are taking precautions so they can get out fast if the chaos escalates, Vokes says.
'We're seeing an increasing number of US clients looking to buy property here to have a foot in another jurisdiction and somewhere that they could move to,' she says.
Kelvin Tanner, an immigration partner at City firm Charles Russell Speechlys, says inquiries from US millionaires and billionaires so far in 2025 have doubled from previous years.
'I'm dealing with more Americans moving than over the last few years or when President Trump was last in office. There was an increase following last year's election. This then accelerated after the first few months of Trump being in office,' he adds.
'We've had people that have a high profile and wanted to make sure they were set up in the UK, almost as a kind of insurance policy. We're seeing a range of backgrounds – people who work in the technology sector, financial services and so on.'
There are several early signs of a rapid rise in Americans looking to the UK after the US election. Citizen applications from US nationals jumped 40pc to 1,700 in the final three months of last year compared with the same period in 2023.
According to Knight Frank, the estate agency, the share of Americans purchasing luxury property in central London rose to 11.6pc at the end of 2024, making them the largest nationality and overtaking Chinese buyers.
If more Americans take the plunge, it could very helpful indeed for beleaguered Chancellor Rachel Reeves, whose tax changes have prompted a string of high-profile UK exits.
They include Richard Gnodde, Goldman Sachs' most senior banker outside the US, and Nassef Sawiris, Egypt's richest man.
Renewed interest from Americans is helping to plug a gap left by the flight of non-doms, says Rosy Khalastchy, of luxury estate agents Beauchamp Estates.
'[Some] people are leaving but there is a transition period going on. There are still people who value London and the services that are here, and there is turmoil in their country. We are seeing more Americans coming in,' she says.
'Horrendously stupid' attack
While the wealthiest will be the most mobile, research suggests other strata of American society are also feeling increasingly uneasy under Trump.
Figures from Study Portal suggest US interest in British degrees jumped 25pc in March compared with the same month a year earlier.
Meanwhile, a survey of 600 US academics by scientific journal Nature found three in four were considering their future in the country, with many weighing up moves to Canada or the UK.
It comes after the president has made an enemy of America's most highly regarded academic institutions, freezing federal funding for several top universities.
He also threatened Harvard with restricting its ability to enrol foreign students and further funding cuts, demanding a ban on diversity, equity and inclusion practices and a crackdown on protests.
'A grant is at our discretion and [Harvard] are really not behaving well. So it's too bad,' Trump warned on Wednesday.
Mass lay-offs and sweeping cuts to scientific research at top universities have also prompted warnings from academics that the president risks causing economic damage equivalent to a major recession.
The UK would be in a unique position to benefit from a reverse US brain drain because of the shared language and prestigious universities, says Christian Dustmann, an economics professor at University College London.
'It is suicidal what the Trump administration is doing with one of their very biggest assets, and that is the excellence of research and the universities,' he says.
'To attack that in the way they are doing is just horrendously stupid. If those talents are moving away towards, for instance, the UK, this is a huge opportunity for us.'
The competition for these scientists and researchers is already heating up, with countries across Europe quickly rolling out the red carpet in the form of top talent visas and recruitment funds for universities.
An influx of top academics and a surge in interest from students looking for alternatives to Ivy League universities could help boost Britain's higher education sector and the wider economy, says Jamie Arrowsmith, from Universities UK International.
But the cash-strapped sector may struggle to accommodate it amid redundancy drives and speculation that a crackdown on overseas student visas looms, he warns.
'If leading research talent wants to choose the UK, then we should absolutely welcome that. It will make a positive contribution to higher education, to the UK's research base and ultimately growth and prosperity,' Arrowsmith says.
'The big challenge we have to be completely honest is that the UK is not without its own challenges and uncertainties. Prospective students and potential researchers want certainty and stability.'
Another difficulty, immigration lawyers warn, is that even very wealthy Americans may find it tricky to get a visa if they are business owners or investors, as opposed to workers.
It is still too early to say how big and persistent a US brain drain will be. But America's misery may offer a golden opportunity to stagnating Britain – if Reeves chooses to seize it.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The US is right to warn Britain about its free speech record
The US is right to warn Britain about its free speech record

Spectator

time17 minutes ago

  • Spectator

The US is right to warn Britain about its free speech record

Every year the US State Department is required to produce a report on the human rights situation in every country in the world. The report card for the UK came out yesterday. While otherwise fairly anodyne, the US was painfully scathing about our record on free speech. Unsurprisingly, the State Department was unhappy about the Online Safety Act's long-arm provisions affecting US websites, our abortion protest laws and our strict contempt rules (which last year forced the New Yorker to take the drastic step of geoblocking an important and informative article about the Lucy Letby case). It was particularly caustic about the fallout from Southport, where it did not mince its words. It stated, citing widespread arrests and prosecutions for online comments, that 'censorship of ordinary Britons was increasingly routine, often targeted at political speech'. Ouch. Admittedly this appraisal bears strong marks of a Trump administration finger discreetly placed on the scale. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has long seen State Department bureaucracy as too woke and progressive in its approach to human rights abroad: reportedly the order has gone out to backpedal equality and diversity issues and emphasise traditional freedoms instead. Furthermore, the Trump government's own free speech record at home is far from spotless: witness its fairly heavy-handed attempts to browbeat universities, broadcasters and others to toe its line. Nevertheless, this is something we'd be very foolish to ignore. The first point is that, biased or not, the State Department is correct. Britain, or at least the establishment in charge of it, shows worrying signs of seeing free speech as a distraction to be sidelined rather than a value to be pursued. True, the whirlwind state descent on social media following Southport, and the stern warnings from police and others to avoid controversial comment, may not have been secretly ordered from Downing Street in the manner of some Central American dictatorship. But an unprecedented and vicious clampdown it still was, even if it reflected no more than tacit agreement among the great, the good and the courts that something drastic had to be done to stop people speaking out of turn. There were plenty of other things that could have been highlighted in the report, and which would have been an entirely fair cop. Even if the total suppression by injunction of discussion over the Afghan refugee crisis came too late, there were always the 30-plus people a day arrested for social media posts, regular police interventions to silence speakers who might cause offence, and so on. Secondly, it's important that we should take note of how others see us. The slow but steady erosion since about 1990 of our right to speak our mind without state interference has passed many by in the UK who are not free speech enthusiasts. And not entirely surprisingly: gradual political change often presents itself as a fait accompli to a population when it is too late to do much about it. But all this has not escaped foreigners. We should be worried that this country, once seen as a beacon of free speech in an increasingly authoritarian Europe, should now be seen as a serious backslider. Particularly so where this is by the US, a country which retains an instinctive affection for us arising out of shared history and culture. No doubt Uncle Sam would, in its own interests, like to discreetly detach us diplomatically from Europe; nevertheless, we ignore this at our peril. Thirdly, all this should remind us that it is in our interest to keep the free speech issue from hurting our international reputation further. At the moment we are not doing this. We do not endear ourselves to an increasingly online world community when we place large swathes of the internet off-limits to those without VPNs as a result of the Online Safety Act. The government's stern orders earlier this week to websites to preserve online free speech or else will deceive no one and will be seen as the reputation management measure it is. Still less will we win friends when Ofcom, a UK government agency, writes threatening letters on official notepaper to US websites with no connection with the UK at all such as 4Chan, and Kiwifarms. Earlier this year it did just this, demanding promises to comply with UK law and to fill in all sorts of Ofcom paperwork, and menacing them with enormous fines if they did not. (They politely told it to go fish, but by then the damage was done.) Every instinct of this government will be to face down the State Department and carry on referring to keeping the UK internet safe. But it would do well to bear in mind that foreigners can sometimes be right and that taking steps to keep them onside, even at the cost of a little pride, can reap big dividends. This is one such occasion.

Trump and Putin ‘plan West Bank-style occupation of Ukraine' to secure truce – as Zelensky & Europe hold emergency talks
Trump and Putin ‘plan West Bank-style occupation of Ukraine' to secure truce – as Zelensky & Europe hold emergency talks

Scottish Sun

time17 minutes ago

  • Scottish Sun

Trump and Putin ‘plan West Bank-style occupation of Ukraine' to secure truce – as Zelensky & Europe hold emergency talks

Russia would have military and economic control over Ukraine under the plans PEACE PLOT Trump and Putin 'plan West Bank-style occupation of Ukraine' to secure truce – as Zelensky & Europe hold emergency talks Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) RUSSIA and the US are considering a West Bank-style occupation of Ukraine to secure a truce, according to reports. The superpowers have discussed using Israel's occupation of the West Bank as a model for ending the war in Ukraine, sources said. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 President Vladimir Putin welcomes US envoy Steve Witkoff during a meeting Credit: Reuters 2 Trump and Putin will sit down for what the White House calls a 'listening exercise' Credit: Reuters This would give Russia military and economic control of occupied Ukraine, which would run its own governing body, reports The Times. The idea was first raised weeks ago in discussions between US envoy Steve Witkoff and his Russian counterparts, a source close to the US national security council told the paper. Meanwhile, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz says European leaders and Zelensky had a "constructive" meeting with Trump about Ukraine. Zelensky insisted there must be a meeting between all the three leaders of Ukraine, Russia and the US after he was snubbed from Trump and Putin's head-to-head on Friday. He said hopes a ceasefire will be the main topic of discussion in Alaska - and Merz reassured that Trump will make that his "priority". Ursula von der Leyden, European Commission President, said they had a "very good" call with Trump. She said: "Today Europe, the US and NATO have strengthened the common ground for Ukraine. "We will remain in close coordination. Nobody wants peace more than us, a just and lasting peace." More to follow... For the latest news on this story, keep checking back at The U.S. Sun, your go-to destination for the best celebrity news, sports news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures, and must-see videos. Like us on Facebook at TheSunUS and follow us on X at @TheUSSun

US and Russia ‘plan West Bank-style occupation of Ukraine'
US and Russia ‘plan West Bank-style occupation of Ukraine'

Times

timean hour ago

  • Times

US and Russia ‘plan West Bank-style occupation of Ukraine'

Russia and the United States have discussed Israel's occupation of the West Bank as a model for ending the war in Ukraine, The Times has been told. Under this scenario Russia would have military and economic control of occupied Ukraine under its own governing body, imitating Israel's de facto rule of Palestinian territory seized from Jordan in 1967. The idea was raised weeks ago in discussions between Steve Witkoff, President Trump's peace envoy, and his Russian counterparts, according to a source close to the US national security council. Witkoff, who is also tasked by Trump with bringing peace to the Middle East, is understood to support the idea, which the Americans believe circumvents barriers in the Ukrainian constitution to ceding territory without holding an 'all-Ukraine' referendum. President Zelensky has refused to countenance handing over land but the occupation model may be a mechanism to allow for a truce after three and a half years of war. Under the model, Ukraine's borders would not change, just as the borders of the West Bank have remained the same for 58 years, only under Israeli control. The White House has been asked for comment. 'It'll just be like Israel occupies the West Bank,' the source said before Trump's summit with President Putin in Alaska on Friday. 'With a governor, with an economic situation that goes into Russia, not Ukraine. But it'll still be Ukraine, because … Ukraine will never give up its sovereignty. But the reality is it'll be occupied territory and the model is Palestine.' Israel's occupation has been ruled illegal by the International Court of Justice, which is not recognised by the US and only partially accepted by Russia. In March 2022 the court ordered Russia to 'immediately suspend military operations' in Ukraine, by a vote of 13 to two in which the Russian and Chinese judges were opposed. The order is binding on Russia but the court has no means to enforce it. The United Nations has ordered Israel to end its occupation, most recently in a vote of the general assembly last September by 124 nations to 14, with 43 abstentions. The resolution called for Israel to comply with international law within 12 months and withdraw its military forces, immediately cease all new settlement activity, evacuate all settlers from occupied land and dismantle parts of the separation wall it constructed inside the occupied West Bank. Israel, which voted against the measure along with the US, has ignored the resolution, on which Britain abstained. This outcome for Ukraine's occupied territories is seen by some US negotiators as simply reflecting the reality of the war and the refusal by all other nations to become directly involved in fighting Russia. In this view, all that remains is to establish the exact boundaries of Russian occupation, which Putin is seeking to push as far as possible before his talks with Trump in Alaska. The scenario would reflect the US foreign policy world view as expressed by Sebastian Gorka, Trump's senior director for counterterrorism, in an interview in May. 'We live in the real world. The Trump administration lives in the real world,' Gorka told Politico. 'We recognise the reality on the ground. Number one, that's the beginning because we're not utopianists and we're not human engineers. We're not some kind of pie in the sky believers in utopia. 'We recognise the reality on the ground and we have one priority above all else, whether it's the Middle East or whether it's Ukraine. It's to stop the bloodshed. Everything else comes after the bloodshed has been halted.' It remains to be seen just how far the imitation of the West Bank situation would go if the plan is put into effect, since this is a model that has been a basis for discussion on ending the bloodshed and will not replicate factors unique to the West Bank. Israel's occupation has been widely criticised for establishing settlements, seizing land ownership and imposing a two-tier system of citizenship: Israeli civilians living or passing through the West Bank are subject to Israeli law while Palestinian civilians are subject to martial law and not permitted to vote in Israel's national elections. • Not a subscriber? Sign up for more exclusive reporting and expert analysis from The Times

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store