
Young South Korean Women Help Propel Liberal Candidate Lee To Victory
Young women in South Korea voted in droves to help new liberal President Lee Jae-myung win Tuesday's election, reflecting the entrenched gender divide over politics in the country where more young men backed conservative candidates.
Around 58 per cent of women voters in their 20s and 57 per cent in their 30s voted for Lee of the Democratic Party, a joint exit poll by three broadcasters showed, mirroring the 2022 presidential election, while a majority of their male peers picked Kim Moon-soo of the People Power Party and Lee Jun-seok, another conservative candidate.
Young women led the charge against former President Yoon Suk Yeol who was ousted in April by the Supreme Court after being impeached over his short-lived imposition of martial law, triggering the snap election.
They outnumbered their male peers in massive anti-Yoon protests as they waved K-pop light sticks while braving near sub-zero temperatures in the winter.
"I voted for Lee Jae-myung in part because I was a little nervous about candidate Kim Moon-soo climbing in polls towards the end of the election," said Moon Song-hee, a 32-year-old female voter in Seoul.
Mr Kim and his party had failed to distance themselves from Mr Yoon, driving away people like her who were protesting outside parliament soon after the December 3 martial law declaration, she said.
The women-led "revolution" is a starting point for making progress on gender equality that was reversed under Yoon, the Korea Women's Association United said in a statement.
"This is not a simple regime change, but a historical achievement made by the fierce struggle of the people to restore the gender-equal democracy destroyed by the Yoon Suk Yeol regime," the group said in a statement.
The issue of gender inequality has become a lightning rod in the country. South Korea has the worst gender pay gap in the OECD, with women earning about two-thirds of the income of men.
Efforts to redress such inequalities have triggered a backlash among young men, amid perceptions of reverse discrimination, including disgruntlement at the compulsory military service that is not required for women, some experts say.
Former leader Mr Yoon tapped into anti-feminist sentiment by vowing to abolish the gender equality ministry and courted young male voters in the last election in 2022, losing a majority of young women's votes to Lee. The ministry has outlived Yoon, though without a minister.
"I was baffled by the promise to abolish the gender equality ministry. To be honest, I didn't really think that women were on their minds for the past three years," she said after voting for Mr Lee for the second time.
Mr Lee has vowed to expand the role of the gender equality ministry and strengthen punishment for violence against women.
"Young people were driven to extreme competition to the point of fighting between men and women," Mr Lee said as he was sworn in as president on Wednesday, blaming a lack of opportunities and stiff competition for driving a wedge between the genders.
However, Mr Lee has not been a vocal supporter of anti-discrimination legislation and when the Democratic Party first revealed his policies, a lack of gender issues drew criticism.
The Korea Women's Political Network, an activist group, contended that Mr Lee was ignoring gender equality out of fear it would hurt him at the polls, and after his victory, urged him to adopt some of the commitments made by the minor Democratic Labor Party's candidate Kwon Young-kook.
Kwon Seo-hyun, an 18-year-old freshman at Sookmyung Women's University said she took part in anti-Yoon protests following his martial law, but voted for candidate Kwon, who has called himself a feminist.
He was the only candidate who vowed to enact anti-discrimination laws.
"One thing I am a bit frustrated about with mainstream candidates whether Lee Jae-myung or other conservative candidates is they lack policy on women or minority groups," she said.
Gender equality was not among the key policy issues put forward during this election, a stark contrast from the 2022 vote. There were also no female candidates running in a presidential election for the first time in 18 years.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
22 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
WBJEE Results 2025 expected to be out soon, confirms official
Decks have been cleared for the publication of West Bengal Joint Entrance Examination Board (WBJEE) results following the Supreme Court's July 28 order staying the Calcutta High Court's earlier decision to halt the implementation of a revised list of Other Backward Classes (OBCs) notified by the state government, a senior higher education department official said on Wednesday. The WBJEE Results 2025 are expected to be out soon and steps have been taken in this regard, as confirmed by senior education official (Representational image/HT file) "We in the higher education department had already anticipated this and are fully prepared to take appropriate actions immediately," state Education Minister Bratya Basu had said soon after the apex court's order. Asked about the timeline for publication of the WBJEE results, board chairperson Sonali Chakraborty Banerjee remained cautious, though optimistic. "Today (July 30), we received the state government directive. We shall implement the directive and let you know about our decision tomorrow (July 31)," she told PTI. A senior education official told PTI that steps have been taken to publish the results soon. "We have consulted legal experts, and every step has been taken to accommodate candidates' interests. The results will be out soon," he added. Before the Supreme Court's directive, Banerjee had said, "We were ready to publish the results by July 5. But then, the legal developments followed, and the matter became subjudice. We were waiting for the government's directive." The WBJEE exams were held on April 27. On July 28, a bench comprising Chief Justice BR Gavai and Justices K Vinod Chandran and NV Anjaria, while hearing the appeal of the state government, vacated the stay of the HC of the state's OBC policy and said "prima facie, the high court order seems to be erroneous." On June 17, the Calcutta High Court ordered an interim stay on notifications issued by the state government with regard to reservations to 140 subsections under OBC-A and OBC-B categories made by it. The Supreme Court bench took note of the submissions of senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for the state government, and said, "This is surprising. How can the high court pass such an order? Reservation is part of the executive function." The state had prepared the new list after the high court, in May 2024, quashed the inclusion of as many as 77 communities in the OBC list.


News18
an hour ago
- News18
SC Sets Aside Telangana HC Order, Gives Speaker 3 Months On BRS MLAs Defection Case
The court made it clear that the Speaker, while adjudicating disqualification petitions under the Tenth Schedule, acts as a tribunal and does not enjoy constitutional immunity. The Supreme Court on Wednesday directed the Telangana Legislative Assembly Speaker to decide within three months on the disqualification petitions filed against ten Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) MLAs who had defected to the ruling Congress party. A bench led by Chief Justice of India BR Gavai observed that political defections remain a pressing issue in the country and have the potential to destabilise democratic processes if left unchecked. The court allowed the appeal filed by BRS leader Padi Kaushik Reddy, who had sought a direction to the Speaker for a time-bound decision on the pending disqualification pleas. Setting aside the Telangana High Court division bench's order from November 22, 2024, which had interfered with an earlier single judge ruling, the apex court emphasised the need for prompt resolution in such matters. 'We have referred to various parliamentary speeches, including those by Rajesh Pilot and Devendra Nath Munshi, to emphasise that entrusting disqualification proceedings to the Speaker was aimed at avoiding delays that may occur before courts," Chief Justice Gavai noted while reading the judgment. The court made it clear that the Speaker, while adjudicating disqualification petitions under the Tenth Schedule, acts as a tribunal and does not enjoy constitutional immunity. It further directed the Speaker not to permit the MLAs to delay the proceedings and said that adverse inferences could be drawn if any attempts to protract the process are made. The verdict was reserved on April 3, and a detailed judgment is expected to follow. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
India, UK, Canada, Vietnam: Full list of countries slapped with Trump tariffs vs nations that struck trade deals
Trump Tariff List: President Donald Trump is not pushing back an August 1 deadline he set for US tariffs to kick in, with his latest tax blow being on India, which has been slapped with a 25 per cent tariff rate. Donald Trump on Wednesday announced a 25 per cent tariff on Indian imports and threatened an additional "penalty" in response to India's energy purchases from Russia. Not just India, Trump has imposed tariffs on a number of nations, while also announcing trade deal with some others. Here is what you need to know about which countries face Trump tariffs from August 1, and which ones have signed a trade deal with the US. US President Donald Trump on Wednesday slapped a 25 per cent tariff rate on all imports from India, plus unspecified penalties on New Delhi for importing energy from Russia that has failed to stop the war in Ukraine. The surprise announcement came a day after Indian officials said that a US trade team would visit from August 25 to negotiate a trade deal. While Trump later clarified that trade talks are still on, he flagged India's participation at the 'BRICS', calling the coalition 'anti-American'. Doubling down on his attack, Trump on late Wednesday said India and Russia can take their 'dead economies down together', clearly frustrated due to the close ties of the two nations. 'I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care,' he said. The Trump tariffs on India will start kicking in from August 1. India: Tariff rate on April 2 - 26%; Tariff rate from August 1 -25% Mexico: Tariff rate on April 2 - NA; Tariff rate from August 1 - 30% Canada: Tariff rate on April 2 - NA; Tariff rate from August 1 - 35% Iraq: Tariff rate on April 2 - 39%; Tariff rate from August 1 - 35% Moldova: Tariff rate on April 2 - 31%; Tariff rate from August 1 - 25% Libya: Tariff rate on April 2 - 31%; Tariff rate from August 1 - 30% Algeria: Tariff rate on April 2 - 30%; Tariff rate from August 1 - 30% Brunei: Tariff rate on April 2 - 24%; Tariff rate from August 1 - 25% South Korea: April 2 tariff rate - 25%; August 1 tariff rate - 15% EU: April 2 tariff rate - 20%; August 1 tariff rate - 15% Japan: April 2 tariff rate -24% ; August 1 tariff rate - 15% Philippines: April 2 tariff rate - 17%; August 1 tariff rate - 19% Indonesia: April 2 tariff rate - 32%; August 1 tariff rate - 19% Vietnam: April 2 tariff rate - 46%; August 1 tariff rate - 20% UK: April 2 tariff rate - 10%; August 1 tariff rate - 10%