Liberia anti-corruption: President Boakai suspends top officials for non-declaration of assets
Among those suspended include the ministers for education and health, as well as the special envoys for tourism and investment.They also include officials working for the Executive Mansion, the official residence of the president, and county administrative officials.The law requires all public officers to declare their wealth before taking up their posts and when they leave positions in government.The Liberia Anti-Corruption Commission (LACC) published the list of all the 457 affected public officials, noting it was doing so as prescribed by law.Boakai, who pledged to fight corruption when he came into office last year, said failure to comply undermined efforts to combat corruption and ensure accountability.Who is Liberian President Joseph Boakai?"Public officials are reminded that asset declaration is not only a legal obligation but also a fundamental measure to promote transparency and restore public trust in governmental institution," he said in a statement.Last July, the president announced that he was reducing his salary by 40%, saying he hoped to set a precedent for "responsible governance" and demonstrate "solidarity" with Liberians.The government of his predecessor, George Weah, had faced accusations of corruption and lavish spending, sparking mass protests amid a rise in the cost of living.On Wednesday, some of the suspended officials visited the anti-corruption commission offices in order to comply with the requirement.There has been mixed reaction over the president's move. Political analyst Abdullah Kiatamba was quoted by Liberian newspaper FrontPage Africa as being supportive of the president's anti-corruption stance, but raised concerns about the challenges some officials faced in submitting their asset declarations.Civil society group Solidarity and Trust for a New Day described Boakai's move as insufficient."Suspending these officials for just one month is a meaningless, symbolic gesture - a slap on the wrist that no serious person should take seriously," it said in a statement.
Go to BBCAfrica.com for more news from the African continent.Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
3 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Israel calls up 60k troops for ‘Operation Gideon's Chariots II' to take over Gaza City as defence minister approves plan
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) ISRAEL has called up 60,000 troops as they look to launch "Operation Gideon's Chariots II" to eradicate Hamas from Gaza City. Defense Minister Israel Katz approved the plan which will see the IDF march through the besieged city in a final push to eliminate the terror group and secure the remaining hostages. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 3 An Israeli armoured personnel carrier manoeuvres on the Israeli side of the border with Gaza Credit: Reuters 3 A view of destroyed buildings in Gaza as Israel pushes to finally eradicate the terror group Credit: Reuters 3 Israeli soldiers stand around a military tank in Gaza Credit: Alamy The plan has received international condemnation in recent weeks with experts warning it threatens drastically worsen the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. The IDF has said they will try to move the entire population in Gaza City to the south of the Strip before commencing with an assault. This is said to be over one million residents. It is widely understood the plan will continue in every region in the Gaza Strip under it is entirely under Israeli control. Israel had given civilians in Gaza until October 7 to evacuate before they launched the full military assault to destroy Hamas. October 7 marks exactly two years since Hamas first launched an evil assault on Israeli civilians which killed over 1,200 people. The disturbing premeditated murders sparked a deadly conflict in Gaza as Israel hit back with ground offensives and missile strikes. Palestinians trapped in the now decimated Strip have endured daily gunfire, a lack of food and aid in the 24 months since, sparking global concern. Israel has vowed to continue with their onslaughts until every member of the terror group are wiped out. More to follow... For the latest news on this story, keep checking back at The U.S. Sun, your go-to destination for the best celebrity news, sports news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures, and must-see videos. Like us on Facebook at TheSunUS and follow us on X at @TheUSSun
Press and Journal
10 hours ago
- Press and Journal
Former Aberdeen charity campaigner fined after racist rant at hotel receptionist
A former Labour MP candidate and Aberdeen community charity champion had admitted to racially abusing a hotel receptionist. Sumon Hoque, 42, flew into a rage with the African woman at The Rox Hotel in the city after she didn't give him a napkin. Aberdeen Sheriff Court heard Hoque – who was dropped by the Labour Party a decade ago when he was convicted of drink-driving – told the woman 'go back to your own country' during the racist rant. Hoque, who also has previous convictions for abusive behaviour and was commended for his charity work with Aberdeen Muslims in 2021, admitted one charge of racial abuse. He is no longer associated with that charity. Fiscal Lindsay Shields said Hoque was known to the staff at the hotel, as he was living there at the time, October 30 last year. Hoque had been using a microwave in the reception area when his outburst occurred. Mr Shields said: 'The female receptionist was checking another guest into the hotel when Hoque approached her, asking for a napkin. 'She told him she did not have any and he became verbally abusive – shouting and swearing at her. 'He said she was 'useless at your job' and told her 'nobody likes you here'.' The court was told Hoque then told the woman to 'go back to your own country' and 'go back to Mozambique', Mr Shields added. The fiscal said Hoque was 'pacing back and forth in front of the reception desk' and the woman was frightened for the safety of not only herself, but the other hotel guests too. Hoque pleaded guilty to acting in a manner which was racially aggravated, repeatedly shouting, swearing and being aggressive, whilst uttering racially offensive remarks towards the female. Speaking on his behalf, John McLeod said his client accepted full responsibility for his behaviour, after a phone recording of the incident was disclosed as evidence. Mr McLeod said Hoque was now living and working in Bolton and was able to pay a financial penalty. Sheriff Graham Buchanan said he would impose a fine, as there may be difficulty in imposing and enforcing an order in England. Sheriff Buchanan did not read out the contents of Hoque's background report, but said: 'Your report has various things to say, but it does not amount to mitigation – although it gives an indication of your frame of mind. 'This was obviously quite an unpleasant incident, and I notice that you have previous convictions for abusive behaviour. 'So far as these circumstances as concerned – a significant fine is required.' Hoque, of Bridgeman Street, Bolton, was fined £640 and ordered to repay it at £100 per month.
Leader Live
15 hours ago
- Leader Live
How people in Epping reacted to closure of migrant hotel
Epping Forest District Council was granted a temporary High Court injunction on Tuesday blocking asylum seekers from being housed at the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex. Several protests and counter-protests have been held in the town since Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, a then-resident at the hotel, was charged with trying to kiss a teenage girl, which he denies. Following the decision on Tuesday, a crowd of about a dozen people gathered outside the hotel brandishing flags, shouting 'We've won' and popping sparkling wine, while passing traffic honked their horns at them. A few police cars were parked nearby with officers standing outside the hotel, which is fenced in. Other residents gave a mixed reaction to the injunction, with some saying they were glad to 'see it gone'. But others cited concerns about where the asylum seekers currently housed inside the hotel would be moved to in light of the court's decision. Callum Barker, 21, a construction worker who lives next to the hotel, was handing out leaflets at the protest including the names of three men staying at the Bell Hotel who are alleged to have committed criminal offences. He said he was in favour of the injunction. Mr Barker told the PA news agency: 'Our community's in danger and we don't want these people here. 'I'm ecstatic; I haven't stopped smiling. For five years, this hotel's blighted us. Everyone's had their complaints and reservations about it and I'm really glad to see it gone. 'I think nationally there will be more protests; I hope so. We want people to get out into their communities, get rid of these hotels. 'It's not right they're here on taxpayers' dime while British people struggle. 'They get three meals a day and a roof over their head while kids go hungry in school and have to rely on free dinners and I think it's terrible. The asylum system is broken.' In the town centre, Charlotte, 33, a solicitor living in Epping, said: 'I think it's kicking the can down the road because where are they going to go? 'Personally, I have lived here for four years and I've never had an issue, never noticed any problems with any asylum seekers living in the hotel a mile away. 'With the injunction today, I don't know what the long-term solution is going to be because they have to be housed somewhere so what's the alternative? 'I don't partake in (the protests). I think people are allowed to have a right of free speech but what annoys me about them is I'm on community groups on Facebook and it seems if you're not speaking about it you're presumed to be completely for it when I think a lot of people are in the middle. 'There are extremists at these protests every week.' Michael Barnes, 61, a former carpenter from Epping, said he was happy about the High Court's decision. He said: 'The question is, where does it go from here? I don't love them on my doorstep but, in fairness, they've got to live somewhere. 'I don't think it's all of them, it's just the minority of them that get up to no good.' Gary Crump, 63, a self-employed lift consultant living just outside of Epping, said: 'I was quite pleased it's actually happened. 'I don't think they should be housed in the hotels like they are. 'We haven't got the infrastructure here. The doctors' surgery is filled up in the mornings with people from there with translators. Everything is pushing the limits. We're an island. We're full. 'I've got no reason to be against people coming into the UK but I do think that the reasons given are not true in a lot of cases.' Ryan Martin, 39, who runs a natural health business, said: 'It's a good thing. When people spend a lot of money to live in this area, they want to feel safe. 'Them shutting it down probably happened because of the noise that was made about it and the reaction they saw from people because there was a strong reaction. 'It was taking a while to happen but people finally got up to protest against them being here.'
