
UK luxury brands call on Labour to bring back tourist tax break
Britain's luxury sector has renewed calls for the return of tax-free shopping for tourists as it warned that President Trump's tariff regime risked pushing high-spending American shoppers towards other European countries.
Walpole, the body for British luxury brands including Alexander McQueen, Burberry and Harrods, said the government should urgently reinstate the VAT refund scheme to help the UK stay competitive against countries such as France and Italy amid the tariff chaos.
Helen Brocklebank, Walpole chief executive, said 'more Americans will go on holiday to Europe to do their shopping' because of increased prices caused by new tariffs, 'but we've got a competitive disadvantage because of the lack of tax-free shopping'.
The scheme, which allowed international shoppers to reclaim 20 per cent VAT on purchases, was scrapped in 2021, a move deeply unpopular among the UK's retail and hospitality sectors. Brocklebank said it was a 'crazy, wrong-headed decision' and called on Labour's leadership to reverse it.
'It's still as unpopular today as it was five years ago, but it was made by the previous administration,' she said. 'It's not your decision, Rachel Reeves or Keir Starmer, and it's a really easy way of you showing that you can help these businesses domestically [that are affected by the tariffs].'
The luxury sector, which had already been facing slowing demand and an eroding customer base in the past year, has been further hit by the escalating trade war between China and the US.
The US imports a number of luxury goods from the UK, such as wines and spirits, cheese, chocolate, high-end clothing, furniture and cars. US tariffs on Britain at 10 per cent and the European Union at 20 per cent may cause price increases to be passed on to American consumers, who could in turn cut back on these purchases or travel to Europe to buy the products at a cheaper price.
Brocklebank said reinstating VAT-free shopping would show that the UK is 'open for business and also show businesses that [the government] is doing absolutely everything it can in its power to help them in this time of immense global crisis, when it's getting more and more difficult to get products into the US'.
Lisa Nandy, the secretary of state for culture, media and sport, recently told Elle UK that the government 'could explore' restoring VAT-free shopping after hearing 'very loud and clear' the calls from the industry to scrap the so-called tourist tax. She said that fashion, in particular, was in the 'soul of the nation' and ministers recognised its 'centrality' to the economy.
However, a Treasury spokesman said it had 'no plans to introduce a new tax-free shopping scheme in Great Britain', adding: 'Visitors can continue to claim VAT relief where the items purchased are shipped directly to their home country as exports.'
Under the previous government, Jeremy Hunt ordered a review by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) after hundreds of calls from business leaders for the move to be reversed.
However, he decided not to scrap the 'tourist tax' after the OBR concluded that estimates it made in 2020, which had influenced the initial decision to scrap VAT-free shopping, 'still appear reasonable'. It had estimated that withdrawing the scheme would save the exchequer around £540 million per year by 2025-26, while restoring it would cost the exchequer £2 billion.
An analysis by the Centre for Economics and Business Research found that the removal of tax-free shopping had deterred two million tourists a year from visiting the UK and was costing £11.1 billion in lost GDP.
The luxury sector has warned that the axing of VAT-free shopping for tourists is harming more than just retailers and is affecting the entire tourism ecosystem, including hotels. The removal of the tax-free shopping policy has led to a decrease in overall spending and fewer tourists visiting restaurants and hotels, according to trade bodies such as the New West End Company.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Poundland faces restructure after being sold for ‘nominal' fee
High street discount chain Poundland is set for a 'restructuring' process after it was sold to investment firm Gordon Brothers. The parent firm, Pepco Group, which has owned the brand since 2016, said it has completed the sale of the business for a 'nominal' fee. It comes after an auction by Poland -based Pepco to sell Poundland after a sharp downturn in trading over the past year. Poundland's more than 800 stores and roughly 16,000 employees will be transferred to the ownership of Gordon Brothers, which owns brands including Laura Ashley, as a result. However, as part of the deal, Poundland is set to undergo a restructuring plan. Poundland said the details will be communicated 'in due course'. Stephan Borchert, Pepco Group chief executive, said: 'This transaction will strongly support our accelerated value creation programme by simplifying the group and focusing on our successful Pepco business.' The company had previously said it is looking to offload the brand amid a wider shift away from food and drinks, with a deal expected before the end of its financial year in September. A number of investment firms and private equity groups were understood to be among those to have tabled proposals to buy the business since it was put on the market earlier this year.


Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Reeves pours cold water on Nato demands for more defence spending making clear it WON'T go over 2.5% of GDP before 2029 and hinting 3% will be the limit in the next Parliament
played down the prospects of ramping up defence spending today despite mounting pressure from Donald Trump. The Chancellor stressed that Labour had only committed to hitting 2.5 per cent of GDP in the current Parliament. And she suggested the 'ambition' after 2029 remains to reach a level of 3 per cent - even though Nato states are being asked to agree a target of 3.5 per cent at a summit later this month. The blueprint being pushed by Mr Trump and the military alliance's secretary general Mark Rutte would see countries pledge to hit the higher spending by the early 2030s. A further 1.5 per cent of GDP would be required for 'defence-related expenditure'. A timetable could be set for gradually increasing their allocations. However, there are questions about how the UK would fund such an huge increase - roughly equivalent to an extra £30billion annually. Britain allocated 2.33 per cent of GDP to defence last year, and is set to reach 2.5 per cent by April 2027. The Labour Government has an 'ambition' of increasing that to 3 per cent in the next parliament - likely to run to 2034. In a round of broadcast interviews this morning, Ms Reeves said the Spending Review she laid out yesterday included the 'biggest sustained increase in defence spending since the end of the Cold War'. 'The commitment on defence in our manifesto was 2.5 per cent… we've said 3 per cent in the next Parliament,' she told Sky News. The Chancellor said the spending plans only covered this 'this Parliament'. She said: 'We will set out costed and funded plans in due course, but in this Parliament the commitment was to get to 2.5 per cent.. ' The generous fiscal envelope set by the Chancellor last Autumn has been put under massive pressure by the economy slowing down and Mr Trump 's trade war. That has led analysts and political rivals to argue that more tax increases are 'inevitable' - although the funding gap will not crystalise until the next fiscal package. The US itself missed the proposed Nato target by spending 3.38 per cent of GDP on defence last year - although the sheer size of its economy meant that dwarfed contributions from the rest of the alliance. Countries such as Germany face finding upwards of $60billion a year more for the military. The increase in Italy would be equivalent to around $46billion, Canada $45billion, France £44billion and the UK roughly $40billion. Spain - which has not invested heavily in defence up to now - could need to allocate an additional $36billion despite its economy being much smaller. The UK's Strategic Defence Review, published last week, recommended sweeping changes, including a greater focus on new technology, including drones and artificial intelligence based on rising budgets.


Reuters
37 minutes ago
- Reuters
German economy to grow after two straight years of contraction, IfW says
BERLIN, June 12 (Reuters) - The German economy is expected to grow this year following two consecutive years of contraction, the Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW) said on Thursday. The economic institute raised its forecast to 0.3% growth from the stagnation it had previously envisaged. The revision is due to a better-than-expected first quarter, when the economy grew by 0.4%. "The German economy is seeing some light at the end of the tunnel," the economists said in their new forecasts. They are also more optimistic about next year, raising the forecast for Europe's largest economy to 1.6% growth from the previous forecast of 1.5% in 2026.