Mass. RMV monitoring potential for ‘phased enforcement' as Real ID deadline looms
'Don't wait until the last minute': Ready for the REAL ID deadline? Here's what you need to know
Registrar of Motor Vehicles Colleen Ogilvie said the federal Transportation Security Administration published a final rule shortly before President Donald Trump took office that could implement a 'phased enforcement' of Real ID requirements.
'That program went through, but then we had a change in leadership at the federal government level. We're awaiting guidance and information on the policy on phased enforcement,' Ogilvie said at a state budget hearing. 'An agency would have to apply with a plan to the federal government to qualify for phased enforcement.'
She added, 'What we've heard from our Transportation Security Administration partners over the last several months is that they would not do any hard stop of somebody that didn't have a Real ID government-issued document upon travel on May 7, that they would ask people for additional identification, hand them a flyer and say, 'You really need to look into, if you don't have an active U.S. passport, to potentially get one of these if you're qualified.' So we don't think there's going to be a hard stop, and we also do not think the [enforcement] date is going to expand.'
Starting May 7, driver's licenses and identification cards that are not Real ID-compliant will no longer be accepted for domestic air travel or for entering federal buildings and nuclear power plants. Those without a compliant ID will instead need to present an alternative such as a passport or passport card.
About 57% of eligible Massachusetts residents have acquired a Real ID, a rate that Ogilvie previously said lags most other states.
She attributed some of the lackluster takeup to the fact that the federal government has extended the rollout several times. Ogilvie recalled that the original checklist for Real ID compliance came out in 2005.
Rep. Todd Smola of Warren told Ogilvie he's worried that more than four in 10 Bay Staters still do not have Real IDs five weeks from the enforcement deadline.
'I can envision all of my colleagues up here getting the telephone calls from constituents who can't get on planes and who can't meet the requirements to get into a federal building of Real ID,' he said.
Download the FREE Boston 25 News app for breaking news alerts.
Follow Boston 25 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch Boston 25 News NOW
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Need a passport? U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson of Louisiana wants to help
U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson of Louisiana has scheduled a passport fair to help constituents secure one of the world's most coveted documents. Johnson's staff will host the event from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. Aug. 26 at the Bossier Parish Courthouse in Benton in conjunction with Clerk of Court Jill Sessions. The speaker's staff said passport help is perhaps the most requested of constituent services. Last year more than 250 constituents attended the speaker's passport fair. 'This is the second year Speaker Johnson's office has hosted a passport fair to help Louisianians renew or acquire their passports," Johnson's Louisiana Press Secretary Elizabeth Kalmbach told USA Today Network. "Obtaining a passport can be tedious, and our goal is to help Louisianians cut through red tape and expedite the process." Passports not only open doors to the world, but they also can be used for air travel and entrance to federal buildings within the U.S. for citizens who don't have Real ID compliant driver's licenses. Click here for details and required documents to bring Aug. 26. Information: 318-840-0309 for Johnson's local staff; 318-965-2336 for direct questions to the Bossier Parish Clerk of Court pertaining to passport applications. More: House Speaker Mike Johnson of Shreveport featured on cover of this iconic news magazine Greg Hilburn covers state politics for the USA TODAY Network of Louisiana. Follow him on Twitter @GregHilburn1. This article originally appeared on Shreveport Times: Here's how Speaker Mike Johnson is helping citizens secure passports Solve the daily Crossword
Forbes
6 days ago
- Forbes
Colorado's AI Hiring Law Faces Shake-Up Ahead Of 2026
Colorado's first-of-its-kind Artificial Intelligence Act (CAIA) may be about to change; or it may not. In less than six months, sweeping new compliance requirements could hit employers using AI in hiring and background checks. A special legislative session convening on August 21 will determine whether the law's February 1, 2026 effective date stands, whether its provisions are refined, or whether lawmakers adopt a hybrid approach that alters timelines and obligations. Governor Jared Polis has signaled openness to changes, but Senate Majority Leader Robert Rodriguez, the bill's original sponsor, has drawn a red line: the law's core consumer protection provisions, including notices, appeal rights, and bias mitigation, are non-negotiable. That means any amendments will likely leave most of the compliance framework intact. Why This Matters to Employers The CAIA applies to both developers and deployers of high-risk AI systems. For employers, a 'deployer' is any business using AI to make or substantially influence consequential decisions about individuals, including hiring, promotion, and other employment actions. In the employment context, high-risk AI can include tools such as automated resume screeners, candidate assessment platforms, and background scoring or adjudication systems that influence hiring decisions. This means many employers could need to stand up CAIA-compliant programs before their AI use is fully mature, or even while piloting tools in live hiring workflows. That's not an insignificant group: according to HireRight's 2025 Global Benchmark Report, nearly one-third of North American employers already use AI or automated decision-making in their background screening processes. Notably, 45% said they were concerned about the impact of emerging AI regulations on their talent acquisition and workforce management programs. In other words, the uncertainty employers feel now could quickly turn into compliance obligations next February. If the law takes effect as written, Colorado employers using these tools will need to: Enforcement authority rests solely with the Colorado Attorney General. There is no private right of action, but violations are treated as unfair and deceptive trade practices. The law provides an affirmative defense for organizations that identify and correct violations through internal review or feedback processes, a structure that rewards proactive compliance. Why the Law Is Back in Play Governor Polis signed the CAIA with hesitation, warning it could impose 'a complex compliance regime' that risks chilling innovation and deterring competition. In early 2025, lawmakers introduced a follow-up bill to narrow definitions, add exemptions for small businesses and FCRA-regulated background checks, and ease operational requirements. That effort failed in committee when consensus collapsed over changes viewed as weakening consumer protections, the same protections Rodriguez has since called untouchable. On August 6, 2025, Governor Polis announced a special legislative session starting August 21. The official reason: closing a $1.2 billion budget shortfall caused by the federal 'One Big Beautiful Bill' (H.R. 1). But among the topics on the table is the fiscal and operational impact of the CAIA on consumers, businesses, and government. Polis has suggested either delaying the effective date, potentially to 2027, or refining provisions to make the law more 'workable and equitable.' Rodriguez has said he never expected the CAIA to be 'over and done' in 2024 and is willing to discuss adjustments, but has made clear that consumer protection mandates will remain. What Could Happen in the Special Session When lawmakers return to Denver, they'll have several choices, but the final outcome is likely to be a blend of political compromise and practical realities. A full delay of the CAIA's effective date to 2027 is possible, especially if it's framed as giving employers and state agencies more time to prepare. However, such a delay would need to avoid any perception of weakening consumer protections to have a chance of passing. Another scenario is a refined law that still takes effect in 2026, but with narrower definitions of what counts as a 'consequential decision' or expanded exemptions for smaller businesses. These changes could remove some lower-risk tools from the law's scope, but most AI-assisted hiring systems would still be covered. Lawmakers could also phase in compliance, delaying certain provisions while requiring partial adherence next February. That approach would give employers breathing room on the most complex requirements, but still demand that they stand up key elements, like consumer notices and appeals, on schedule. And it's entirely possible that the legislature will leave the statute unchanged and rely on the Attorney General's rulemaking process to clarify how it will be applied. That would place the onus squarely on employers to interpret the law conservatively until formal guidance is issued. What's clear is that Rodriguez's position on preserving the CAIA's consumer protection mandates will potentially influence every outcome. Even in the most business-friendly version of this law, employers will still likely need to prepare for transparency, disclosure, and bias mitigation requirements to remain at its core. What Employers Should Do Now With less than six months until the CAIA's scheduled effective date, employers should shift from awareness to execution. The goal isn't necessarily to build every element of a compliance program today, it's to be positioned to move quickly once the legislature's decision is known. Start by identifying your highest-risk areas where AI meaningfully influences hiring or promotion decisions. These systems should be first in line for review and potential modification. Secure vendor cooperation early. Much of the CAIA's compliance burden depends on technical details only your vendors can provide. Opening those conversations now will avoid delays if full compliance is required in 2026. Map out a phased compliance plan. Structure your work so the most complex elements, like system audits and detailed disclosures, can be finalized quickly if the February deadline holds, but without overcommitting resources if definitions or timelines shift. Finally, designate an internal lead for AI compliance to coordinate risk assessments, documentation, and vendor engagement. Centralizing responsibility will make your program more agile if lawmakers create a phased rollout or narrow the scope of the law. Bottom Line for Employers While the debate in Denver will focus on when the law takes effect and how it's enforced, the consumer protection mandates are very likely to remain. Employers should act now to build compliance programs that can withstand a February 2026 launch but keep them agile enough to adjust to new timelines or scope changes. In other words, act as if the clock is still ticking toward February 2026, because it probably is.
Yahoo
12-08-2025
- Yahoo
Canada could be trade winner as U.S. tariffs undershoot global competitors by wide margin, says report
The tariff rate imposed on Canadian exports by the United States is estimated to be the lowest amongst the world's trading countries, meaning that Canada could end up coming out ahead in Donald Trump's trade war, a new report says. Oxford Economics Group Ltd. estimates the U.S.'s current effective tariff rate on Canada is 2.5 per cent, placing it below Mexico at four per cent and well below other major U.S. trading partners. For example, the U.S. tariff rate is 35 per cent on China, 15 per cent on Japan, 13 per cent on South Korea and eight per cent on the United Kingdom and the European Union, based on data from calculated duties as a share of imports, Oxford said. 'If the relatively low tariffs apparently being paid on imports from Mexico and Canada persist, these two economies could pick up some benefits from shifts in supply chains, although uncertainties over the endgame for tariffs and the future of the (Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement) will be near-term drags,' Adam Slater, lead economist at Oxford Economics, said in the report. CUSMA-compliant goods escape U.S. tariffs, though the trade agreement is scheduled to be reviewed in July 2026, but some people, including Ontario Premier Doug Ford, think that deadline could be accelerated. The review also starts the clock ticking on the possible expiration of the agreement in 2036. Still, Slater described the current estimates for the tariff rates 'as something of a puzzle.' One set of trade data from the U.S. Census Bureau — specifically labelled CUSMA — indicates that 56 per cent of goods entering the U.S. from Canada and 47 per cent from Mexico are compliant with the agreement. Other Census Bureau data, based on rate provisions, suggests that 91 per cent and 84 per cent, respectively, are entering duty-free, though Oxford said it can't tell if that is due to CUSMA compliance or 'some other exemption.' 'It may be the case that tariff exemptions for these economies are broader than assumed,' Slater said. Slater said Oxford based its overall 2.5 per cent tariff rate for Canada on a higher level of CUSMA compliance, 'while not directly' adhering to the 91 per cent level. But trade between the U.S. and Canada hasn't escaped unscathed. 'The biggest negative impacts have been in Canada, where imports are down 25 per cent from January levels, and in China, where imports are down 50 per cent from January,' Slater said, adding that 'Chinese data on exports to the U.S. shows a much less dramatic decline of around 25 per cent since January,' possibly due to rerouting of goods through other countries. In Canada, 50 per cent tariffs on aluminum and steel exports to the U.S. persist, as do 25 per cent tariffs on the non-U.S. components of vehicles. Trump also recently hiked the tariff on non-CUSMA-compliant goods to 35 per cent from 25 per cent and announced an increased tariff on softwood lumber to 35 per cent. Oxford's report also warned that overall global trade is shrinking. 'A variety of indicators suggest that world trade is weakening,' Slater said, referencing various measures that indicated monthly global imports slowed three per cent in April and May, while an International Monetary Fund port tracker said growth in international exports declined to less than one per cent. 'Other sea and air freight indicators show similar trends,' he said. Oxford is estimating that world trade volumes shrunk by about three per cent from the second quarter to the first quarter of 2026, with world trade posting its weakest performance in a four-year period since the recession of the early 1980s. Canadian steelmakers need to focus on domestic market as tariffs lock them out of U.S.: Algoma CEO Trump put a tariff on gold — or did he? What you need to know about the bullion confusion It reduced its global gross domestic product estimate to 2.5 per cent — 'historically on the low side' — to 2.8 per cent from 2.9 per cent at the beginning of the year, Slater said. • Email: gmvsuhanic@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
