Cuepacs supports gag order but urges fair implementation
KUALA LUMPUR: There has been a rise in public statements on social media that occasionally distort facts, misrepresent government decisions, or damage the image of public servants and the government as a whole, said Congress of Unions of Employees in the Public and Civil Services (Cuepacs) president Datuk Dr Adnan Mat.
As such, the government's circular issued yesterday, prohibiting public servants from making any public statements, whether orally or in writing, that could undermine government policies, plans, or decisions on any issue, serves as a reminder of existing regulations.
"We view this directive as an important measure to uphold the professionalism, integrity, and accountability of public servants, especially in an era of rapidly evolving digital communication.
"There has been a proliferation of provocative, misleading, or incomplete content shared publicly, which may erode public trust in government policies and direction.
"Thus, this circular is seen as a proactive step to address these issues and safeguard the reputation of the public service," he told the New Straits Times.
He said the circular published yesterday must also be implemented fairly, transparently, and in accordance with due process, without suppressing the right of public servants to voice their concerns through formal and internal mechanisms.
He said that addressing the matter with feedback and constructive dialogue was essential, through proper internal channels.
"Cuepacs is also concerned about the growing trend of public servants engaging in live streaming during working hours, with content that does not reflect the ethics and professionalism expected in the public service.
"Such actions create negative public perceptions and risk further tarnishing the image of Malaysia's civil service, whose primary responsibility is to deliver quality services to the people," Adnan said.
However, National Council of Professors president Emeritus Professor Datuk Dr Raduan Che Rose voiced concern that the circular risks undermining open, constructive policy debate, especially on platforms where scholars contribute alternative ideas to improve governance.
He recommended that the directive be retracted or revised with clear safeguards.
"The council recommends that the directive be revised to distinguish between political commentary and academic or professional policy input, accompanied by guidelines on what constitutes 'undermining' versus 'constructive criticism', and align it with international best practices that uphold professional neutrality while allowing civil servants to contribute meaningfully to public discourse," he said.
Raduan said that if scholars fear consequences for honest analysis, it may result in the erosion of public trust in academic institutions, stifle intellectual innovation, and lead to a lack of checks and balances from the civil service itself.
"Article 10 of the Federal Constitution includes the right to engage in critical inquiry, research, and evidence-based policy discourse, even when such views challenge prevailing government narratives.
"A vague or broadly worded prohibition invites selective enforcement and may infringe constitutional rights," he said.
Nonetheless, Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam) commissioner Ragunath Kesavan did not flag any constitutional violations.
"As an employee, there is a general duty to maintain confidentiality and not to injure the reputation of the employer," he said.
However, he added that the circular does not absolve civil servants of their responsibility to report wrongdoings, criminal acts, dishonesty, or abuse.
"By law, there is a duty to report any purported criminal offence. Not doing so is, in itself, an offence.
"Civil servants must be cautious and vigilant to ensure that they carry out their duties diligently and lawfully. The circular does not apply to cover up wrongdoing," he cautioned, referring to all offences under Malaysian law, including corruption.
Yesterday, the government issued a circular titled 'Prohibition on Making Public Statements Under Subregulation 19(1) of the Public Officers (Conduct and Discipline) Regulations 1993 (P.U. (A) 395/1993)', dated June 19, 2025, and signed by Public Service Department (PSD) director-general Tan Sri Wan Ahmad Dahlan Abdul Aziz.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
A-GC denies flawed prosecution in Najib's SRC case, cites evidence constraints
KUALA LUMPUR: The Attorney-General's Chambers (A-GC) has refuted claims that the prosecution in the money laundering case involving funds from SRC International Sdn Bhd (SRC) was flawed. In a statement, the A-GC said it has consistently upheld the highest standards and quality in discharging its prosecutorial duties, in line with public expectations. "The A-GC remains committed to upholding the rule of law and will continue to carry out its responsibilities under the Federal Constitution with integrity, fairness and respect for judicial processes," the statement read. The statement followed the High Court's decision to grant a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) to former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak over three money laundering charges involving RM27 million linked to SRC. High Court Judge K. Muniandy issued the ruling today after the prosecution failed to furnish the defence with hundreds of documents related to the trial, despite the charges being filed as early as 2019. Addressing the delay in trial proceedings, the A-GC said the case, first registered at the High Court in February 2019, was postponed on five occasions due to various factors, including the Covid-19 pandemic, defence requests and applications by the prosecution itself. The A-GC said that proceedings for the 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB) trial had commenced while the first SRC case was still ongoing at the High Court, Court of Appeal and Federal Court levels. This overlap led to delays in the second SRC trial, as both cases involved the use of key material documents required for the prosecution, it said. Following this, it said, there was no choice but to wait until the documents were made available. "Both cases involved the use of certain material documents that were also intended to be used in the second SRC trial. "As the documents in question are material to the second SRC trial, the prosecution had no choice but to wait until those documents became available, which is after the 1MDB trial proceedings have concluded. "It must be emphasised that the material documents are already available but are currently being used as evidence in the ongoing 1MDB trial," it said. The A-GC also said the prosecution had requested additional time to compile all the material documents to present them as evidence in the second SRC trial.
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Najib's DNAA: Material documents unavailable because held up in 1MDB trial, says AGC
PETALING JAYA: All aspects will be examined and considered before taking any further action on the temporary discharge of Datuk Seri Najib Razak three counts of money laundering involving RM27mil linked to SRC International Sdn Bhd, says the Attorney General's Chambers (AGC). The AGC said there were some documents which were material for the current SRC International trial, and the prosecution had no choice but to wait until the relevant material documents were obtained after the 1MDB trial proceedings were completed. "It should be emphasised that the material documents are already available but are being used as evidence in the ongoing 1MDB trial," the AGC said in a statement on Friday (June 20). "The prosecution has requested time to gather all relevant material documents to be presented as evidence and testimony in the second SRC trial. This delay is not intentional but is to ensure that the integrity of the documents as evidence in the trial is always maintained. "The department is aware that this case has attracted public attention as it involves the former prime minister of Malaysia and throughout the proceedings before the Court, the department has taken action in accordance with the limits of the independence of the prosecution and the legal process. "The case was registered at the High Court on Feb 7, 2019 and has been set for trial five times in June 2020, July to August 2021, March to April 2022, September 2024 and April and May 2025." It said all trial dates of the case have been postponed for the following reasons: (i) Movement control order due to the Covid-19 pandemic; (ii) Application by the accused's counsel; or (iii) The prosecution's own application. The application for adjournment made by the prosecution is because (i) The trial proceedings of the first SRC case were still ongoing at that time at the High Court, Court of Appeal and Federal Court levels until fully completed on March 31, 2023; (ii) At the same time, the 1MDB trial proceedings had also begun while the first SRC case was still pending. Both cases above involved the use of some of the material documents that would be used in the second SRC trial. "This department emphasises that the allegations by certain parties that this department carries out "defective prosecution" are completely unfounded. This department always maintains the highest level and quality in line with the expectations of the people. "This department remains committed to upholding the rule of law and will continue to carry out its responsibilities under the Federal Constitution with integrity, fairness and respect for the judicial process," it said. Earlier, Judge K Muniandy allowed the defence's application for a DNAA over three money laundering charges involving RM27mil from SRC International Sdn Bhd, citing the prosecution's lack of preparedness to proceed with the trial, which has been postponed numerous times since 2019. The court was informed that the prosecution had yet to obtain the necessary documentary evidence. The delay, the judge noted, had denied the accused the right to a fair and timely resolution of the case. A DNAA means the accused is temporarily discharged from the charges but may still be prosecuted for the same offences in the future if the prosecution so decides.
New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Cuepacs supports gag order but urges fair implementation
KUALA LUMPUR: There has been a rise in public statements on social media that occasionally distort facts, misrepresent government decisions, or damage the image of public servants and the government as a whole, said Congress of Unions of Employees in the Public and Civil Services (Cuepacs) president Datuk Dr Adnan Mat. As such, the government's circular issued yesterday, prohibiting public servants from making any public statements, whether orally or in writing, that could undermine government policies, plans, or decisions on any issue, serves as a reminder of existing regulations. "We view this directive as an important measure to uphold the professionalism, integrity, and accountability of public servants, especially in an era of rapidly evolving digital communication. "There has been a proliferation of provocative, misleading, or incomplete content shared publicly, which may erode public trust in government policies and direction. "Thus, this circular is seen as a proactive step to address these issues and safeguard the reputation of the public service," he told the New Straits Times. He said the circular published yesterday must also be implemented fairly, transparently, and in accordance with due process, without suppressing the right of public servants to voice their concerns through formal and internal mechanisms. He said that addressing the matter with feedback and constructive dialogue was essential, through proper internal channels. "Cuepacs is also concerned about the growing trend of public servants engaging in live streaming during working hours, with content that does not reflect the ethics and professionalism expected in the public service. "Such actions create negative public perceptions and risk further tarnishing the image of Malaysia's civil service, whose primary responsibility is to deliver quality services to the people," Adnan said. However, National Council of Professors president Emeritus Professor Datuk Dr Raduan Che Rose voiced concern that the circular risks undermining open, constructive policy debate, especially on platforms where scholars contribute alternative ideas to improve governance. He recommended that the directive be retracted or revised with clear safeguards. "The council recommends that the directive be revised to distinguish between political commentary and academic or professional policy input, accompanied by guidelines on what constitutes 'undermining' versus 'constructive criticism', and align it with international best practices that uphold professional neutrality while allowing civil servants to contribute meaningfully to public discourse," he said. Raduan said that if scholars fear consequences for honest analysis, it may result in the erosion of public trust in academic institutions, stifle intellectual innovation, and lead to a lack of checks and balances from the civil service itself. "Article 10 of the Federal Constitution includes the right to engage in critical inquiry, research, and evidence-based policy discourse, even when such views challenge prevailing government narratives. "A vague or broadly worded prohibition invites selective enforcement and may infringe constitutional rights," he said. Nonetheless, Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam) commissioner Ragunath Kesavan did not flag any constitutional violations. "As an employee, there is a general duty to maintain confidentiality and not to injure the reputation of the employer," he said. However, he added that the circular does not absolve civil servants of their responsibility to report wrongdoings, criminal acts, dishonesty, or abuse. "By law, there is a duty to report any purported criminal offence. Not doing so is, in itself, an offence. "Civil servants must be cautious and vigilant to ensure that they carry out their duties diligently and lawfully. The circular does not apply to cover up wrongdoing," he cautioned, referring to all offences under Malaysian law, including corruption. Yesterday, the government issued a circular titled 'Prohibition on Making Public Statements Under Subregulation 19(1) of the Public Officers (Conduct and Discipline) Regulations 1993 (P.U. (A) 395/1993)', dated June 19, 2025, and signed by Public Service Department (PSD) director-general Tan Sri Wan Ahmad Dahlan Abdul Aziz.
