World most violent it has been for decades
Last year, varying levels of conflict were reported across at least 50 different countries, from the civil war in Myanmar to extreme violence between drug cartels in Mexico, according to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data (ACLED).
Experts predict that the trend will probably continue throughout 2025 and beyond.
Across the 50 countries, there were at least 56 active conflicts – one of the largest quantities since 1946 – 'with fewer conflicts being resolved, either militarily or through peace agreements', the Global Peace Index estimated.
'The level of violence happening is certainly at one of its highs since the Second World War,' said Clionadh Raleigh, the founder and director of ACLED.
The only year to exceed 56 was 2023, which recorded 59 armed conflicts, according to certain estimates.
'More organised violence is happening in more places – leading us to consider that we are now in a more violent time,' said Ms Raleigh.
Experts estimate that at least one in every six people is exposed to some level of conflict.
This conflict is not only spread out over a larger area, but has become more deadly and more complex, according to The Telegraph's analysis of data from ACLED and the Uppsala Conflict Data Programme.
Between 2010 and 2019, the global death toll resulting from armed conflict was more than 953,000. In only half the time, between 2020 and the end of 2024, the number of fatalities has reached nearly 10.5 million.
The increase can largely be attributed to the eruption of three major conflicts – the military coup in Myanmar in 2021, the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022, and the Israel-Hamas War, which began in 2023.
These conflicts were responsible for more than half the fatalities recorded in 2024.
Since 2021, the annual number of deaths from armed conflict has hovered about 200,000, peaking at more than 310,000 in 2022 following the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
The only other instance in recent history when the global death toll exceeded 200,000 was at the peak of the Rwandan genocide in 1994, when more than 800,000 people were killed in one year.
The number of deaths dropped slightly in 2023, which can largely be attributed to the end of the conflict in Ethiopia's Tigray region, which accounted for 60 per cent of the battle-related deaths in 2021 and 2022.
According to The Telegraph's analysis, the death toll from conflict was most widespread in 2024, meaning every region of the world had a comparable share of deaths resulting from armed conflict – with no single region dominating.
Deaths resulting from conflicts in Europe – largely owing to the war in Ukraine – made up 33 per cent of the total. Fatalities from armed conflict in Africa made up 27 per cent and wars in the Middle East, including the war in Gaza as well as the Sudanese civil war, accounted for 19 per cent.
Europe, the Americas, Asia and Oceania, and Africa (excluding 1994) all recorded higher average death tolls over the past five years than at any other point since 1989, when UCDP started recording data.
The only region where this has not been the case is the Middle East, which recorded higher death tolls between 2014 and 2019 during the peak of the Syrian civil war. Although the death toll in the Middle East has been rising because of the war in Gaza, experts don't expect it to exceed the scale it was at 10 years ago.
While death toll is an important metric in understanding the severity of a conflict, it does not tell the whole story.
Ms Raleigh explained that ACLED's data analysis included other factors, such as dispersion, impact on civilians and fragmentation, which could inform the severity of a crisis.
For example, while Ukraine recorded the most conflict-related deaths at more than 67,000 in 2024, it was ranked 14th on ACLED's index.
Ms Raleigh said that this largely came down to the different groups involved in the war.
'It's not at all a fragmented war – very few classic interstate wars are fragmented,' she said, referring to the number of actors involved in the conflict.
However, in other conflicts, such as in Myanmar – which was ranked second on ACLED's index despite having a lower death toll than Ukraine – there were hundreds of armed groups engaged in dozens of different battles.
'In places like Myanmar, there are 50 new groups that appear every week while others fall out and others reassemble, there's a constant churn,' said Ms Raleigh, adding that the more groups involved, the harder it could be to reach a resolution.
A conservative estimate puts the number of new armed groups in Myanmar, previously known as Burma, close to 3,000 since 2021, though not all remain operational. This figure doesn't include the groups that existed before the coup and have been fighting the central military as well as each other on and off for decades.
The only place to exceed Myanmar on the index was Gaza, which ACLED reported to be the 'most dangerous and violent place in the world in 2024'.
More than 80 per cent of the Palestinian population was exposed to conflict last year and at least 35,000 fatalities were recorded as Israel continued its campaign in Gaza following the attack by Hamas on Oct 7 the previous year.
ACLED is generally seen as the leading source for conflict data, but other organisations have their own methods of evaluating conflict and ranking countries.
The Global Peace Index (GPI), which categorises nations in reverse order – from most to least peaceful – ranked the Palestinian territories as 145th (19th place) and Myanmar as 148th (16th).
Instead, Yemen topped the list as the 'the least peaceful country in the world' in 2024, which GPI attributed to the internal strife exacerbated by the Israel-Hamas War – specifically attacks from the Yemen-based Houthis against Israeli targets, which prompted retaliatory missile, drone and air strikes from the US and UK.
Another metric used to analyse conflict is the impact on civilians, both in terms of the number of civilians killed as well as the number whose quality of life is affected.
Siri Aas Rustad, the research director at Peace Research Institute Oslo, said: 'Most people who are affected by conflict are not killed.
'They lose health facilities, they lose schooling, they live in fear, they suffer food insecurity,' she said, noting that this figure was also trending upward at present.
'The share of people living in conflict has increased substantially and is on the rise since the 1990s. It has doubled from 1990 until now.'
Ms Rustad explained that to understand the rate of conflict today it was important to look back at the early 2000s, which were a 'very peaceful period'.
She said: 'In that period ,the UN worked much better, relationships between states were much better, Russia was not as powerful and expansive as it is now, the US had a different administration so it was easier for the global community to work together.'
Ms Rustad also noted that reporting abilities had improved in the past 25 years, which meant that more conflict was being recorded than it may have been previously.
Conflict scholars have also recently been watching the exchanges between India and Pakistan, which began in late April with an attack in the Indian-controlled part of Kashmir. However, a ceasefire set on May 12 appears to be holding.
While less than halfway through the year, experts expect that the levels of violence will remain high through 2025, potentially even increasing by 20 per cent, according to ACLED's estimates.
Based on previous trends, Ms Rustad predicted that the world was 'heading towards more violence', but that eventually the tide would turn.
'We'll probably see a sustained high level for several years – whether that's two years or five years is hard to say, but it will probably go down,' she said.
'All conflicts end, it just takes time. Think of it in terms of cycles and right now we're in a bad cycle.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
26 minutes ago
- Fox News
Treasury sanctions 'brutally violent' cartel for timeshare fraud in tourist destination, warns Americans
FIRST ON FOX: The Treasury Department sanctioned a network of individuals linked to a "brutally violent" cartel for hundreds of millions of dollars of timeshare fraud targeting Americans in popular tourist destination Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, Fox News Digital has learned. The Treasury Department is now warning current U.S.-based owners of timeshares and those considering the purchase of a Mexico-based timeshare, to conduct "appropriate due diligence." Officials warn that the scams often target older Americans who can lose their life savings. The Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control imposed sanctions on four Mexican individuals and 13 Mexican companies linked to timeshare fraud led by the Cartel de Jalisco Nueva Generacion (CJNG). The individuals linked to the fraud are based in or near Puerto Vallarta. "We are coming for terrorist drug cartels like Cartel de Jalisco Nueva Generacion that are flooding our country with fentanyl," Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent said in a statement. "These cartels continue to create new ways to generate revenue to fuel their terrorist operations. At President Trump's direction, we will continue our effort to completely eradicate the cartels' ability to generate revenue, including their efforts to prey on elderly Americans through timeshare fraud." The three senior CJNG members most involved in timeshare fraud sanctioned Wednesday are Julio Cesar Montero Pinzon (Montero), Carlos Andres Rivera Varela (Rivera), and Francisco Javier Gudino Haro (Gudino). Additionally, Puerto Vallarta native Michael Ibarra Diaz Jr. (Ibarra) was sanctioned. Treasury says Ibarra is "engaged in timeshare fraud on behalf of CJNG." The companies sanctioned are Akali Realtors, Centro Mediador De La Costa, S.A. de C.V., Corporativo Integral De La Costa, S.A. de C.V., Corporativo Costa Norte, S.A. de C.V., and Sunmex Travel, S. de R.L. De C.V. They "explicitly acknowledge their involvement in the timeshare industry." Another company involved in timeshare-related transactions that was sanctioned is TTR Go, S.A. de C.V. They claim only to be a travel agency. Three additional companies were sanctioned for their alleged real estate activities: Inmobiliaria Integral Del Puerto, S.A. de C.V., KVY Bucerias, S.A. de C.V., and Servicios Inmobiliarios Ibadi, S.A. de C.V. "This diverse corporate network also includes tour operators (Fishing Are Us, S. De R.L. de C.V.; Santamaria Cruise, S. de R.L. de C.V.), an automotive service company (Laminado Profesional Automotriz Elte, S.A. de C.V.), and an accounting firm (Consultorias Profesionales Almida, S.A. de C.V.). Cartel de Jalisco Nueva Generacion is a U.S.-designated Foreign Terrorist Organization. Officials said the cartel is increasingly supplementing its drug trafficking proceeds with alternative revenue streams like timeshare fraud and fuel theft. "Treasury has taken a series of actions targeting the diverse revenue streams benefitting the cartels, including fuel theft, human smuggling, extortion, and fraud," the Treasury Department said. "As Treasury and its partners seek to disrupt the cartels' revenue streams, it is important to remind current owners of timeshares in Mexico: If an unsolicited purchase or rental offer seems too good to be true, it probably is." Treasury added: "Those considering the purchase of a timeshare in Mexico should conduct appropriate due diligence." Officials said Mexico-based cartels have been targeting U.S. owners of timeshares through call centers in Mexico staffed by telemarketers in fluent English. Officials said that beginning in 2012, CJNG took control of timeshare fraud schemes in Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco, Mexico, and the surrounding area. The scams often target older Americans "who can lose their live savings," officials warned, adding that the lifecycle of the scams can "last years, resulting in financial and emotional devastation of the victims while enriching cartels like CJNG." Officials said the cartels typically obtain information about U.S. owners of timeshares in Mexico from "complicit insiders at timeshare resorts." "After obtaining information on timeshare owners, the cartels, through their call centers, contact victims by phone or email and claim to be U.S.-based third-party timeshare brokers, attorneys, or sales representatives in the timeshare, travel, real estate, or financial services industries," the Treasury Department said. Officials explained that the fraud may include timeshare exit scams, or resale scams, timeshare re-rent scams, and timeshare investment scams. "The common theme is that victims are asked to pay advance 'fees' and 'taxes' before receiving money supposedly owed to them," officials warned. "This money never comes, and the victims are continuously told to send these 'fees' and 'taxes' via international wire transfers to accounts held at Mexican banks and brokerage houses." After initial scams, officials warn that "re-victimization scams can occur." In July 2024, Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network and the FBI issued a joint-notice on the timeshare fraud associated with Mexico-based cartels and criminal organizations. In the six month period following that notice, FinCEN received more than 250 Suspicious Activity Reports, and filers reported approximately 1,300 transactions totaling $23.1 million, sent primarily from U.S. based individuals to counterparties in Mexico. Based on FinCEN's analysis, U.S. fraud victims sent an average of $28,912 and a median amount of $10,000 per transaction to the suspected scammers since July 2024. The FBI says approximately 6,000 U.S. victims reported losing nearly $300 million between 2019 and 2023 to timeshare fraud schemes in Mexico. But officials said that figure "likely underestimates total losses, as the FBI believes the vast majority of victims not report the scam due to embarrassment, among other reasons."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Teenage killer of Bhim Kohli keeps seven-year sentence at Court of Appeal
A teenage boy who killed elderly dog walker Bhim Kohli in a Leicestershire park will not have his sentence for manslaughter changed, the Court of Appeal has ruled. Mr Kohli, 80, was punched and kicked, slapped in the face with a shoe and racially abused in an attack in Franklin Park, Braunstone Town, near Leicester, on September 1 last year, and died the next day. The 15-year-old, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to seven years' custody in June. The Solicitor General (SG), Lucy Rigby, referred the sentence to the Court of Appeal under the unduly lenient sentence scheme. At a hearing on Wednesday, Lady Justice Macur, sitting alongside Mrs Justice Cutts and Mr Justice Murray, ruled that the boy's sentence was neither unduly lenient nor manifestly excessive. She said: 'We consider that the judge conscientiously executed the necessary sentencing exercise and conveyed his remarks to offender and co-defendant with great skill. 'We do not find that the sentence was unduly lenient.' Of the attempt to reduce the sentence, she said: 'The sentence was a very significant sentence and necessarily so. 'It is entirely warranted by the seriousness of the offence. It is unarguable that the sentence was manifestly excessive.' Paul Jarvis KC, for the SG, said that although the sentencing judge did not identify a high risk of death, he did say there was a high risk of very serious harm. He added: 'We say, if not unduly lenient, most certainly not manifestly excessive.' Balraj Bhatia KC, for the boy, told the court that Mr Kohli's frailty meant 'little or no force was required' to kill him. He said: 'Sadly, the vulnerability of the deceased's neck was such that had he spent a day on his beloved allotment and fallen accidentally, the result would have been the same.' The boy was convicted after a six-week trial in June at Leicester Crown Court, alongside a 13-year-old girl who also cannot be named. She encouraged the attack by filming parts of it while laughing, with video clips showing the balaclava-clad boy hitting Mr Kohli with a shoe. Another clip showed Mr Kohli lying on the ground motionless. The girl took a photograph of Mr Kohli on her phone the week before the alleged incident, but denied she used this to 'target' him, the trial heard. Police also recovered a video from her phone of a group of children 'confronting' an unknown man on a separate occasion, who was hit to the back of the head and called a 'Paki bastard' while she was heard laughing. The girl was sentenced to a three-year youth rehabilitation order by Mr Justice Turner, and her sentence was not referred to the Court of Appeal. Mr Kohli's children found him lying on the ground in agony, and he told his daughter he had been called a 'Paki' during the attack, the court heard during the trial. Jurors also heard the boy say in his evidence that he had a 'tussle' with Mr Kohli over his slider shoe before he slapped the elderly man with it out of 'instinct', which caused the pensioner to fall to his knees, but he denied kicking or punching him. In a letter written by the boy to a woman who had worked with him at the residential unit where he was being looked after, he wrote: 'I f****** hate what I did. I regret it so much. 'I have flashbacks of that day and it just upsets me. I kinda just needed anger etc releasing.'
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Young women in UK face more strangulation and violent threats, says charity
LONDON (Reuters) -Britain is seeing more violent threats to kill or harm young women and girls aged 16-25, with incidents of strangulation and suffocation also increasing, leading domestic abuse charity Refuge said on Wednesday. Refuge, one of the largest specialist domestic abuse organisations in Britain, said 525 young women and girls receiving long-term support from the charity reported experiencing physical violence between April 2024 and March 2025. Around half of them were subjected to strangulation or suffocation — a 9% rise from a year earlier. Nearly half of those reporting psychological abuse — about 615 individuals — said their perpetrator had threatened to harm them, marking a 4% increase. Additionally, 35% said they had been threatened with death. "Domestic abuse often goes unnoticed, yet these new figures reveal the harrowing reality: many young lives are being devastated by this horrific crime," said Refuge CEO Gemma Sherrington. "To actively tackle domestic abuse, there must be a major societal shift towards improved education that shines a light on the many red flags of abuse." Refuge said many young victims were experiencing coercive control, a pattern of behaviour designed to isolate, manipulate, and intimidate. Survivors quoted in Refuge's report described how abuse often began with subtle controlling behaviours and escalated over time. Such behaviours can often be overlooked by authorities as markers of domestic abuse. Reuters reported on Wednesday that Britain would reassess a tool widely used by the police and domestic abuse specialist services to gauge the level of risk faced by victims following criticism that, among other issues, it downplays patterns of coercive and controlling behaviour. Refuge has called for domestic abuse education to be more deeply embedded in schools and for the government's upcoming strategy on violence against women and girls to strengthen support for young people.