
Giant Chinese drone subs to punch holes in US seabed surveillance
This month, Naval News reported that China is expected to unveil two new extra-large uncrewed underwater vehicles (XLUUVs) during a September 3 military parade in Beijing marking the 80th anniversary of the end of the Second Sino-Japanese War.
The unveiling will be the first public appearance of these unmanned assets and will seek to signal China's rapid progress in underwater drone technology.
The AJX002 model, approximately 18–20 meters long with pump-jet propulsion and modular transport features, has been observed uncovered during parade rehearsals. A second, larger design—concealed under tarpaulin—features dual stern masts and X-form rudders, suggesting significant design divergence.
The Chinese Ministry of National Defense has stated the parade will showcase 'improved weapons, equipment,' underscoring an intent to lead in underwater warfare capabilities.
With at least six XLUUVs rehearsed for display, analysts anticipate a clearer read on China's operational priorities and technological maturity once the vehicles roll past Tiananmen.
If war comes, XLUUVs are the logical tools to go after the US-led undersea surveillance grid that hems in the People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) and constrains its freedom of action beyond the First Island Chain.
Desmond Ball and Richard Tanter note in their 2015 book 'The Tools of Owatatsumi: Japan's Ocean Surveillance and Coastal Defense Capabilities' that by the mid-2000s US undersea surveillance in the western Pacific was centered on the Fish Hook Undersea Defense Line, a modern chain of fixed arrays to monitor Chinese submarines transiting between the East and South China Seas and the Pacific.
Ball and Tanter write that the line arcs from Kyushu's Kagoshima down the Osumi Islands to Okinawa, then via Miyako and Yonaguni past Taiwan to the Philippines' Balabac, onward to Lombok in eastern Indonesia and across the Sunda Strait to northern Sumatra and the Andamans with key nodes at Okinawa and Guam and allied sections provided by Japan and Taiwan.
The Fish Hook's purpose is not subtle, and Beijing knows it. Underscoring the threat the network poses to China's submarine force, Ryan Martinson writes in a June 2025 Center for International Maritime Security article that even with rapid modernization, China's submarine fleet remains critically vulnerable to US undersea surveillance.
Citing People's Liberation Army Navy officers in the Military Art journal, Martinson says Chinese submarines face a 'fairly high probability' of detection during peacetime operations, even within the First Island Chain.
He says the US Navy's integrated surveillance system—spanning seabed sensors, satellites, aircraft and unmanned vehicles—can track PLAN submarines from port to patrol. Martinson notes this persistent exposure compromises stealth, submarine warfare's core advantage, and raises doubts about operational viability.
XLUUVs offer a way to take the sensors' eyes and ears offline. To degrade these formidable capabilities, David Axe notes in a July 2025 article for The Strategist that China is exploring means to disable the US undersea sensor network, including deploying remotely operated vehicles to sever cables, autonomous submarines to plant explosives and long-range underwater drones capable of delayed activation via acoustic signals.
Axe notes that these tactics, both overt and covert, aim to neutralize a critical US advantage in seabed surveillance. Were such capabilities fielded at scale, the effect would not be theatrical sabotage but a methodical campaign to blind fixed arrays, snarl repair timelines and force the US and its allies to rely on more expensive, finite and predictable patrol patterns.
The stakes for China's broader war plans are straightforward. Should China manage to neutralize US and allied undersea sensor networks, its submarines could contribute substantially to a blockade of Taiwan, and its undersea nuclear deterrent would be freed from the constraints of a bastion strategy in the South China Sea.
In an August 2024 report for the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), Bonny Lin and others note that Chinese submarines are poised to play a critical role in enforcing a blockade of Taiwan.
Lin and others say that in high-intensity operations, PLAN submarines would conduct covert mine-laying near Taiwan's ports and shipping lanes, disrupt maritime traffic and support joint firepower strikes.
The writers add that stealth enables early deployment to shape the battlespace, while integration with aviation units enhances interdiction. They add that submarines bolster China's ability to maintain persistent pressure, complicate Taiwan's maritime awareness and deter foreign intervention.
Neutralizing the Fish Hook would have equally profound implications for China's nuclear deterrent. China is implementing a bastion strategy in the South China Sea, where its nuclear ballistic-missile submarines can operate inside a protected zone defended by artificial islands, land-based aircraft and warships.
Further, China's nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs) armed with the JL-2 submarine-launched ballistic missile do not have the range to hit the US mainland from the South China Sea, although the longer-ranged JL-3 will allow it to do so.
However, in a bastion strategy, China's SSBNs remain bottled up in a small operational area, which is routinely patrolled by US nuclear-powered attack submarines (SSNs), as opposed to Pacific open-sea patrols that exponentially increase the difficulty of tracking down submarines.
XLUUVs that can harass seabed arrays, complicate acoustic baselines and strike at repair ships would be a force multiplier for any future transition from bastion patrols to broader, less predictable open-sea deterrent patrols.
None of this makes the XLUUVs a silver bullet. The US and its allies have spent decades refining anti-submarine warfare (ASW) and are unlikely to cede the initiative.
While US and allied ASW assets can intercept Chinese submarines, the large size of China's submarine force—60 submarines according to the US Department of Defense's 2024 China Military Power Report (CMPR)—and a huge production base that has outpaced the US at the industrial level make interception with overstretched US and allied ASW capabilities a formidable challenge.
Stressing the shortage of US and allied ASW assets in the Pacific, the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) noted in its 2024 Asia-Pacific Regional Security Assessment that the US and its allies continue to face challenges in sustaining comprehensive maritime domain awareness, even as they expand patrols and sensor networks across the region.
The IISS notes that India and Australia have expanded joint maritime-patrol aircraft deployments, coordinated patrols and coastal radar initiatives with partners, while smaller Southeast Asian states remain reliant on outside assistance. It adds that gaps in ASW and underwater domain awareness persist despite these efforts.
Whether China can turn its growing undersea arsenal into a durable advantage depends more on surpassing US surveillance and exploiting gaps in allied ASW defenses, which are still thin across the Pacific.
Between those facts lies the real test for the drones on parade—whether they can do enough, soon enough, to blind an adversary that has spent decades learning to see under the waves.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


AllAfrica
17 minutes ago
- AllAfrica
China-India relations thaw but no major reset yet
After more than three years, China's top diplomat and Politburo member Wang Yi visited New Delhi this week for the 24th round of India-China Special Representative talks. The last round took place in December 2019, but the Galwan Valley clashes in June 2020 brought the dialogue to a halt. Talks resumed only in December 2023 in Beijing, following a Narendra Modi–Xi Jinping meeting in Kazan, Russia, in October that year. This visit contrasted starkly with Wang's trip to India in April 2022. Then, India gave him a lukewarm reception, largely because he had come directly from Islamabad and made contentious remarks on Kashmir at the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation. There was even speculation at the time about whether he would proceed to New Delhi at all. Now, the tone has shifted, reflecting a cautious and potentially ground-breaking recalibration in India–China relations amid Trump's tariff tantrum toward India. The Kazan meeting between Modi and Xi appears to have created space for tentative re-engagement and a recalibration of ties. Moves were afoot even before Trump's tariff tantrum toward India. In June, India's defense minister and national security advisor visited China, followed by External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar's trip to Beijing in July. That bilateral momentum will build when China hosts and Modi attends the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit in Tianjin this month. Significantly, it will mark the first time Modi has traveled to China since 2018. Still, calling this a full China-India 'reset' might overstate the reality while deep-seated mistrust lingers. What's unfolding is better seen as a cautious inclination toward cooperation in sectors where both nations see mutual benefit — and strategic necessity — in easing tensions amid a turbulent global landscape shaped by Trump's tariff-induced trade frictions and rising geopolitical uncertainty. Wang's inability to meet Modi in March 2022 symbolized the frost between the two sides at the time. But much has changed since. China has recently eased curbs on exports of fertilizers, rare earth minerals, magnets and tunnel-boring machines — all vital inputs for India's manufacturing and infrastructure sectors. India, in turn, has relaxed visa policies for Chinese nationals, reopened limited border trade and begun engaging with select Chinese firms to secure supply chain components needed for its domestic production goals. New Delhi's push for 'Make in India' manufacturing self-reliance depends, in part, on access to Chinese industrial inputs. Beijing, meanwhile, may see an opportunity to leverage tensions in India's ties with the US, aiming to tilt New Delhi away from Washington and reinvigorate the Russia–India–China strategic triangle. This pragmatism reflects mutual recognition of tactical and strategic leverage points. Indian establishment voices in policymaking circles have increasingly urged joint ventures with Chinese firms that hold dominant global positions in manufacturing and supply chains. To be sure, the bilateral thaw is delicate and tentative. Symbolic gestures — resuming direct flights, reopening the Kailash–Mansarovar pilgrimage and loosening investment restrictions — suggest movement toward normalized ties. Yet key irritants persist, including lack of data-sharing on Himalayan rivers, the unresolved issue of the Dalai Lama's reincarnation and, perhaps most crucially, China's strategic axis with Pakistan. While both sides speak of stabilizing borders and how the Xi-Modi meeting last year in Kazan created a 'new environment' for diplomacy, their disputed 3,488-kilometer border means the peace is still fragile and tentative. For India, Modi's Atmanirbhar Bharat (self-reliant India) vision is a key driver. Unlike past Soviet-style licensed production, India today seeks technology transfers to build its manufacturing base. But Chinese companies, like others, will tightly control how much technology crosses borders — and under what conditions. Some joint initiatives are emerging, but asymmetry in economic and technological power remains. India, for its part, wants to diversify its technology and investment sources without becoming overly dependent on either China or the US. And while Beijing may seek to prevent India from drifting too far into US-led geopolitical and supply chain initiatives, their diplomatic-economic-strategic balancing act remains delicate. India continues to see China's close relationship with Pakistan as a limiting factor in bilateral ties. China supplies more than 80% of Pakistan's defense imports and offered intelligence support, including live inputs, during recent India–Pakistan clashes. Wang's scheduled trip to Islamabad after New Delhi — to co-chair the sixth Pakistan–China Strategic Dialogue and review the status of the Belt and Road Initiative-driven China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC)— underscored this reality. New Delhi also recognizes that Beijing may quietly welcome the recent and significant strain in US–India relations. Despite foundational defense agreements and the Initiative on Critical and Emerging Technologies (iCET), Washington remains hesitant to share advanced technologies with India. The Trump administration's renewed protectionist measures, not least his 50% punitive tariff on India over its purchase of sanctioned Russian oil, have made top-tier US tech-sharing even less likely. Wang put the dispute in a broader global context, warning that the world faces 'a once-in-a-century transformation at an accelerating pace,' and must resist 'bullying' tactics — a not-so-veiled critique of Washington that aimed to pull India more deeply into the expanding BRICS bloc of middle powers. Jaishankar echoed a shared call for 'reformed multilateralism,' positioning India and China as powers aligned on global governance, even as their bilateral irritants remain unresolved. Wang's meeting with Modi also laid the diplomatic groundwork for the Indian leader's upcoming China visit, marking perhaps the most consequential upshot of the Chinese envoy's visit. Symbolism — resumed flights, pilgrimage access and border calm — may help restore public perceptions of China-India normalcy. Substantive issues — minerals, joint ventures and tech transfer — will likely evolve more cautiously. Still, this week's diplomacy showed that, despite rivalry, both nations are exploring ways to coexist and cooperate in the fractured global order driven by Trump-era tariffs and 'America First' nationalism. It's for now a modest ambition, but in today's world, modesty itself is an achievement.


RTHK
2 hours ago
- RTHK
China to showcase new weapons, military revamp
China to showcase new weapons, military revamp Wu Zeke says the parade is meant to demonstrate China's national defence capabilities to the world. Photo: RTHK China will showcase a large number of new weapons — and demonstrate a revamped military structure — at a major parade in Beijing next month marking the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War. President Xi Jinping will review the troops lining up in formations along Chang'an Avenue during the September 3 parade. At a news briefing on the parade's preparations, officials said a series of new weapons would be unveiled for the first time — from hypersonic precision-strike missiles to unmanned intelligent equipment operating on land, sea and in the air — along with electronic jamming devices, anti-drone systems, next-generation tanks and carrier-based fighter jets. Officials said the joint armament formations would be arranged to reflect their roles in real-combat scenarios, as the parade debuts a new structural layout of the armed forces. Wu Zeke, a senior officer at the Joint Staff Department of the Central Military Commission, added the parade is meant to demonstrate China's national defence capabilities to the world. 'War is like a mirror to show how valuable peace is. We are commemorating to defend peace in this military review. We're demonstrating to the world our national defence capability, to show to the world that the Chinese people cherish peace and are determined to defend the outcomes of the war,' he said. Xu Guizhong, a senior official at the Political Work Department of the People's Liberation Army Central Theatre Command, said the preparations are being used as a chance to build combat discipline by training command coordination and support capabilities — particularly through high-intensity drills involving new equipment. He added the parade itself helps to enhance PLA's capacity for joint operations by integrating multiple types of equipment and aircraft into single formations. 'Tens of thousands of people, hundreds of aircraft and hundreds of ground equipment will be mobilised for the parade. To ensure perfect alignment, precise coordination and flawless timing, it is no less than fighting in actual battle,' he said. Officials said the 70-minute event will feature 45 formations and stressed that it is being organised in a strictly economical, practical and efficient manner to reduce costs.


South China Morning Post
4 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
As the US and China compete, Asean could play arbiter
As Asean celebrates its 58th anniversary, it is inhabiting a liminal moment, one that straddles the unmarked border between two international eras. One era is lingering but on its way out as another is hobbling its way in. The Cold War is long gone and the subsequent period of American unipolar primacy is drawing to a close, albeit without a new global order to replace it. The great powers are in the throes of an inevitable transition. The United States and China each believe that history is on its side. Southeast Asian countries do not believe that the global highways of military and financial power have bypassed the US forever or that they should put all their eggs in China's basket. History is still in flux. The rules-based global order is like a highway under tensile stress, particularly in the Indo-Pacific region, perhaps the most congested junction on the highway between the US and China. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations stands at the heart of that junction. The safety of the highway depends on its structural integrity. The safety of regions along the highway depends on great powers following the rules of the road. However, there is no longer one set of rules. The traffic laws of international affairs now have many different interpretations. Increasingly, the US and China insist on adherence to a rules-based order on their own respective terms and for their respective interests. Interpretations must be reconciled so international traffic can flow safely and smoothly. Asean can encourage both sides to adopt a common highway code for mutual security. Of course, Asean is no global policeman. But it's precisely because Asean poses no economic, political or military threat to either the US or China, or to anyone else, that it can act as an informal and impartial interlocutor between the two great powers. That should be Asean's diplomatic purpose: to be an arbiter in the Indo-Pacific region. Southeast Asia is still a price-taker in international relations. However, the escalating Sino-US rivalry has turned the world from a seller's market into a buyer's one. The more intense that rivalry gets, the more that great powers feel the need to 'sell' themselves to others.