
Explained: What Trump's 50% tariff mean for stock market investors and should Nifty bulls worry
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
What should investors do?
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
The dip-buying opportunity
Indian stock markets are trapped in a deadly waiting game as Trump 's crushing 50% tariff threat may slam the brakes on fresh investment flows, with many investors unwilling to commit fresh capital until a US-India trade deal materializes or a carnage hits Dalal Street, making it attractive enough to buy the dip.While Thursday's Sensex's muted 300-point drop suggests markets had partially priced in steeper tariffs, analysts warn the real carnage in export-facing stocks is just beginning, and the paralysis could persist for months.Trump's punitive tariffs on Russian crude imports have pushed total US duties to levels Nomura calls "similar to a trade embargo." The 50% rate, 20 points higher than China and 21 above Pakistan, threatens a bunch of export sectors worth billions of dollars."This is a tough period to navigate for investors," warns Seshadri Sen from Emkay Global . "The terms of the final trade deal could still be considerably different, though a worst-case, highly damaging scenario has presented itself."The carnage is already being mapped out sector by sector. Sen identifies the most vulnerable: "The most-impacted sectors are textiles (Gokaldas/Kitex), Chemicals (Camlin, Aarti and Atul), and Auto Ancs (BHFC/Suprajit/Sona BLW), with direct export exposure to the US."Nomura's analysis reveals the scale of destruction awaiting: "If effective, the steep 50% tariff would be similar to a trade embargo, and will lead to a sudden stop in affected export products. The lower value addition and thinner margins across a number of industries (textiles, gem & jewellery) could jeopardise operations, especially of smaller firms that will struggle to compete."Also Read | Trump doubles tariff on India to 50% over Russian oil purchase The US accounts for 18% of India's total exports and 2.2% of GDP, with key sectors seeing 30-40% of their global exports heading to America. For textiles, gems & jewelry, and leather companies operating on thin margins, the tariff wall could prove insurmountable.Domestic brokerage firm SBI Securities has warned of collateral damage to Indian companies operating US brands. "Stay away from US brands focussed domestic franchisees, as clamour to boycott US products and follow swadeshi model may grow," the brokerage cautions, naming Jubilant Foodworks (Dominos, Dunkin Donut), Westlife (McDonald's), Devyani International (Burger King), Varun Beverages (Pepsi), and Sapphire Foods (KFC, Pizza Hut) as vulnerable to "temporary enhanced selling pressure."Mahesh Patil of Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC draws parallels with Brazil's experience: 'We are now at par with Brazil, which provides a blueprint, it saw a 6-7% fall from the peak before recovering in local terms.'The rupee's decline, while painful, offers a counterintuitive benefit. 'The immediate casualty is the INR, which will take the brunt—this will provide some respite for exporters. Counterintuitively, a fall in the INR (once it stabilises) is positive for local earnings, and hence equities benefit with a lag,' Patil explains.With export sectors in the crosshairs, the investment playbook is shifting toward domestic consumption. SBI Securities recommends focusing on 'domestic-focused businesses like Cement, Hotels, Telecom, New Age Businesses, EMS players, Auto/Auto Ancillaries, Hospitals, Defence/Railways, and Alcoholic Beverages.'Ajay Sen of Emkay Global maintains conviction in India's structural resilience: 'We see the broader economy staying resilient and remain convinced of a 2HFY26 consumption-led recovery. We would look through any near-term volatility caused by this and buy a substantial dip (of more than 5%).'Several analysts are positioning the crisis as a potential goldmine for patient investors. Sen's four-point survival strategy includes: 'Buy the dip if the market correction exceeds 5% from here. Valuations would then be comfortably below the long-term average, and the direct impact on the listed universe's earnings is negligible.'Dr. V.K. Vijayakumar of Geojit Financial Services strikes a balanced tone: 'The market is unlikely to panic, but weakness will continue in the near term. Since uncertainty is high, investors should adopt a cautious approach.'Your investment strategy depends significantly on your investment horizon and risk appetite. Santosh Meena of Swastika Investmart advises long-term investors to stay the course: 'This development is part of ongoing global trade tensions and shouldn't distract from India's long-term growth potential. But short-term traders should exercise caution.'For long-term investors, the consensus remains surprisingly optimistic. India's domestic consumption story stays intact, with IT, pharmaceuticals, and electronics notably exempt from current tariff announcements.As Patil concludes: 'Any knee-jerk correction in the market would be a good opportunity to increase allocation to equities, as the macroeconomic outlook and long-term fundamentals of India are fairly strong.'The 21-day countdown to tariff implementation has begun. Markets may be paralyzed now, but for those willing to look beyond the immediate chaos, the foundations for the next rally may already be forming.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
11 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Pakistan lost nearly ₹127 crore after closing airspace to India in 2 months: Report
Pakistan has reportedly lost nearly ₹127 crore in over two months since it shut its airspace to India following the suspension of the Indus Waters treaty after the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack. Pakistan shut its airspace to all Indian airlines on April 24 (Unsplash/Representative) According to a Dawn report, Pakistan's the Ministry of Defence has informed the National Assembly that the country lost the amount from April 24 to June 30, and that the loss was in overflying revenue. However, while it submitted the data of the losses, Pakistan's Defence Ministry reportedly said amounts reflected 'revenue shortfalls, not overall financial losses', adding that overflight and aeronautical charges have remained the same. 'While financial losses occur, sovereignty and national defence take precedence over economic considerations,' the Defence Ministry reportedly said in a statement. Pakistan shut its airspace to all Indian airlines on April 24 as it rejected India's decision to suspend the Indus Waters Treaty of 1960. Islamabad had said that any stopping or diversion of water under the pact would be seen as an 'act of war'. Pakistan has since stopped allowing any Indian plane to use its airspace, reducing its transit traffic by nearly 20%, Dawn further reported. The publication also said that a similar closure of airspace back in 2019 led to a loss of ₹235 crore. Pakistan had shut the airspace to India followed by an Indian Air Force strike on a Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) terror camp in Balakot in February, 2019. Both India and Pakistan continue to close airspaces to each other. While New Delhi has extended the closure of its airspace to the neighbouring country till August 23, Pakistan has reportedly extended it till the last week of this month.


Indian Express
11 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Inside Track: Wheeling in Circles
At the start of 2025 we were led to believe that we were Donald Trump's special friend and that India would probably be the first to conclude a trade tariff agreement with the US. Now we are not just back of the queue, but could be blackballed! A close observer of Trump-India relations has a different take from others for the mysterious fallout. It was not initially about Russian oil, Pakistani perfidy or thwarting Trump's Nobel Peace Prize ambitions. Trump was infuriated with India's dilatory tactics in signing a deal, which goes back to his first presidency. His joint appearance with Modi in Texas in 2019 was meant to help seal an agreement, but talks fell through a day later in New York. Time and again, as in Gujarat February 2020, like the traditional smooth-talking Indian trader, our officials assured that a deal was almost through, without confessing candidly that some portions of the deal concerning agriculture and dairy products were non-negotiable. Unfortunately, Trump is focused on just this sector, since his Republican supporters come from the farm belt. As US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick remarked angrily, 'You claim to be such a big country and you can't accept a bushel of American corn.' After being re-elected, President Trump was even willing to overlook past slights. (PM Modi did not call or even telephone Trump during his three visits to the US during the Biden presidency.) But in 2025, once again, despite the head-start in negotiations, the deal has not materialised! Retired IAS officer Subhash Chandra Garg's new book is titled No Minister. The former Finance Secretary does not hold back in recalling riveting encounters with his ministerial bosses, some of whom, in fact, refused to take no for an answer, despite bureaucrats citing the rules and the wishes of the incumbent PM. Garg names P Chidambaram among the naysayers who, as finance minister, threatened then PM Manmohan Singh with his resignation unless his proposal that 60-70 secretary level-posts were allotted to the Indian Revenue Service cadre. In Garg's view, this unbalanced the bureaucratic structure without improving tax collection. Similarly, Andhra CM Chandrababu Naidu, on whom the Vajpayee government was dependent for survival, cornered more than 40 % of the portfolios of Indian projects approved by the World Bank in 1999 and 2000. Despite objections from the government, Naidu forced them to agree to his audacious demand, in disregard of fair Central resource distribution. Similarly, Kamal Nath bullied his way so that 5% of the total pool of government houses in Delhi was part of his discretionary quota, which largely included newly constructed category type VII and VIII bungalows in Moti Bagh. Considering it is an intra-party contest to elect the fairly modest position of secretary (administration) of the Constitution Club, it is surprising that the poll has attracted intense national interest and media scrutiny. In contrast, Rajeev Shukla (Congress) has been elected unopposed as secretary (sports) and Tiruchi Siva (DMK) as secretary (culture) without any rancour. There seems more than meets the eye in the fierce tussle between the two ill-matched adversaries for the post of administrative secretary. The jocular, down-to-earth ex-MP and UP Jat leader Sanjeev Balyan, who only joined the club eight years ago, appears to have been pitch forked into the contest, while Rajiv Pratap Rudy, the suave Bihar MP who has been the guiding spirit behind the club for the last 25 years, is credited with upgrading its facilities, including gyms, saunas, lounges and sports facilities. Balyan's most vocal campaigner is controversial Bihar MP Nishikant Dubey, who is fighting with all the vehemence and caste calculations of a panchayat election and throwing names of powerful central politicians. Pratap, more discreet, is believed to be backed by an influential regional satrap, who has not shown his hand openly. Amidst constant reports of Air India's slipping standards, I am pleased to report my recent personal experience of the airlines, which demonstrates that the staff's spirit of service beyond the call of duty, the hallmark of JRD Tata's original Air India, has not vanished. While flying back from Kenya on an AI flight, the senior air hostess noticed my distress as I rummaged through my carry bag and under the seat for my missing iPad, which had obviously been left behind in Nairobi. I presumed resignedly that recovering my iPad was like looking for a needle in a haystack, but I had not reckoned with the resourcefulness of the very helpful air hostess and the AI Nairobi manager. The latter, with the assistance of his counterpart at the Nairobi airport lounge, located the missing iPad, got it identified through WhatsApp photos and arranged to have it returned to Delhi within a week.


Time of India
11 minutes ago
- Time of India
White House crypto adviser Bo Hines announces departure
Synopsis Bo Hines, head of Trump's Council of Advisers on Digital Assets, is leaving for the private sector after leading efforts to shape US crypto policy. He championed the GENIUS Act, establishing rules for stablecoins.