
Netflix to remove 'underrated' film with 99% rating this week as it's last chance to watch
Netflix fans are set for disappointment as the streaming giant is pulling the plug on a family comedy that's been hailed as "devastatingly underrated". The platform is giving users only a short window to catch the heartwarming 2023 film.
Are You There God? It's Me, Margaret will soon be unavailable to watch for good. The delightful film is based on Judy Blume's classic novel, and has won over viewers with its authentic storytelling and genuine charm, earning an impressive 99% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
The movie, set in 1970, tells the story of 11-year-old Margaret Simon, after her life is turned upside down when her parents, Barbara and Herb, break the news that they are moving away from New York to a new neighbourhood.
As Margaret struggles to adjust, she begins to ponder life's big questions, navigating the complexities of friendship and growing up.
The film brings the iconic novel to vibrant life, starring Abby Ryder Fortson as the lead character, alongside Rachel McAdams, Elle Graham, Benny Safdie, and Kathy Bates, as reported by the Express.
After premiering at the San Francisco International Film Festival on April 23, 2023, the film opened in the US on April 28, 2023, courtesy of Lionsgate. Although it garnered critical acclaim, it underperformed at the box office, pulling in just $21 million worldwide.
The verdict from Rotten Tomatoes Critics Consensus is unanimous: "Effervescent and refreshingly frank about the travails of puberty, this long-awaited adaptation does full justice to Judy Blume's seminal novel."
The admiration is echoed by a Reddit user who believes Rachel McAdams, who plays Margaret's mum, is Oscar-worthy. The critic penned: "Are You There God? It's Me Margaret is a masterpiece and Rachel McAdams deserves an Oscar."
Popcornmeter, awarding the film an impressive 94%, remarked: "Are You There God? It's Me, Margaret. stays true to the classic book right down to its '70s setting, but the story still feels totally current and relatable."
Despite showered praise from critics, the movie faces removal by Netflix as part of their broad cull of films this month.
The final opportunity to view this touching movie on Netflix is slated for June 16. For those keen to experience this charming movie, it remains available on platforms such as Amazon Prime, Apple TV, YouTube, and Sky Store.
Elsewhere, if you are looking for something to binge-watch Netflix have thrilled viewers with the new "gripping" Scots crime drama Dept Q.
The new series is filmed in Edinburgh, Scotland, and is highly-anticipated to break viewing records upon its release at the end of last month. It's based on Danish book series of the same name by author Jussi Adler-Olsen.
Despite several films adapted from thebooks, Dept. Q is the first English-language take on the popular series.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
18 minutes ago
- BBC News
Hostage: 'Playing the Prime Minister 'changes your perception' of politics' says Suranne Jones
Actress Suranne Jones has taken on the role of many women under immense pressure. In Doctor Foster she suspects her husband of having an affair, in Vigil she investigates a death on board a submarine, and in Gentleman Jack she develops a dangerous lesbian romance. But none of the roles are quite as pressured as her latest - playing a British prime minister whose husband is kidnapped. Hostage, Netflix's new political thriller, sees Jones' character, Abigail Dalton, build an uneasy alliance with French President Vivienne Toussaint - played by Julie Delpy - who is being blackmailed during a London two leaders work together in order to rescue the PM's husband, unmask the kidnapper and blackmailer, and bring those responsible to justice. 'Political with a small p' Given its themes of immigration, the funding of the NHS and public trust, audiences may be tempted to connect Hostage to today's headlines. But, both stars insist the show is less about mirroring today's politics and more about creating a thrilling story set in the political world. "We're entertaining and we're in the political world, but it's in no way a reflection of the world we live in," Jones tells the BBC."It's political with a small p - there's enough that roots us in the real world but the world is too complicated to link it directly and I think it would be inappropriate." Delpy agrees and says: "Things change every day. It's impossible to be in the political moment because tomorrow is something else."The show's writer, Matt Charman, explains that there are some connections to the real world as it's "impossible to write a show that exists in the climate we live in that doesn't end up feeling that it's in dialogue with it". "If you wrote a show that isn't connected to our world it would feel weird," he says, "but I hope the show does have the ability to exist in its own oxygen." It is rare to see two female world leaders sharing the spotlight in a political thriller, but, for Charman, making sure Dalton and Toussaint were women was integral to the way the series was conceived and it was both a creative and political choice. "What was exciting was the idea of women in power and how we explore that," he says, explaining that he tried to explore how each situation the characters face would be different for a woman. "There's a double standard for women, so giving full dramatic freedom to that was very important." Charman and Jones have shared an agent for the past 10 years and Hostage came about because Charman really wanted to work with Jones and the pair settled on creating a political thriller. Jones says she particularly enjoyed exploring "how these two women have to dance around each other"."A female politician is used to dealing with men so it's interesting to see how it plays out when it's two women." While viewers quickly learn about Jones' character - a loving wife and mother who is idealistic about bettering the country - Delpy's character is more drawn out and our opinion of her changes throughout the show."We made sure not to play into the female politician stereotypes," Delpy say. "What I like is that these women actually have some things in common like they both want change and came into office hopeful." The Guardian describe Hostage as "quite unusual" in that it doesn't remind you of any other political thrillers. "It's a little biting but it's not House of Cards cynical, it has a breakneck pace but it's not 24, the dialogue is sharp but never played for laughs," Zoe Williams writes. 'Cost of being in power' To play Dalton convincingly, Jones, who also served as an executive producer on the show, says she really immersed herself in the reality of political life. She visited the House of Commons, spoke to the Speaker of the House and devoured books, podcasts and documentaries. "I'm a bit of a geek when it comes to research," she admits. "I was fascinated by not emulating anyone but by understanding a life I knew nothing about. And it's the cost of being in a powerful position in that way that really struck me."Charman also talks about the extraordinary amount of research that went into creating the show. I ask him whether Dalton or Toussaint were inspired by any real life politicians and he confesses that they are, but he won't say who. "We interviewed a lot of people and Suranne had incredible access to people who had been prime minister who talked about their time in office and the pressure on their family. But it was all agreed that they would speak about this as long as it could remain confidential," he says. Jones won't say which politicians inspired her character but says all of her previous characters are a part of her and she has "a boardroom of personalities" which feed into who she plays. She says all the research into what it's like to be a politician "changes your perception for sure" and makes you realise "the cost of being in a powerful position". One question the show raises is whether or not it's possible for a politician today to stick to their ideals once they come into office and while Jones is unsure, Charman is an optimist. "I wanted to explore how there can be decent people in politics who are fundamentally good but get pushed around," he says. He adds that it's not "inevitable" that people give up their ideals once in office, but "it's definitely tough to keep your morals". Above the thrills and drama of Hostage, Charman says the show explores "what it takes to be a good person in a system that doesn't always reward good people."Delpy is slightly more pessimistic and explains that given "politicians have to be heard, if you're too reasonable you won't be listened to as there's so much noise of both extremes"."If you have a moderate view you get lost in the noise as people are only listening to the loudest."


Spectator
2 hours ago
- Spectator
Glorious: Good Night, Oscar, at the Barbican, reviewed
Good Night, Oscar is a biographical play about Oscar Levant, a famous pianist who was also a noted wit and raconteur. The script starts as a dead-safe comedy and it develops into a gripping battle between the forces of anarchy, represented by Oscar, and the controllers of NBC who want to censor his crazy humour. The backstory is complicated. Oscar has been secretly committed to a mental asylum and his wife gets him released for a few hours so he can do an interview on Jack Paar's TV show. It takes two long scenes to explain this improbable set-up but it's worth it because Oscar (Sean Hayes) is such a lovable character. He's a total wreck, addicted to drugs, suffering from OCD, and afflicted by aural and visual hallucinations that leave him curled up on the floor like a baby. He can't drink a cup of coffee without stirring it clockwise and anti-clockwise eight times. Although he's treated as a star, he has no illusions about his talent. 'Underneath this flabby exterior is an enormous lack of character,' he says. And he finds comfort in his mental health problems. 'Schizophrenia beats dining alone.' Before the interview, he's told by Bob, the network boss, that he mustn't breathe a word about religion, politics or sex. Sure enough, Oscar breaks these rules immediately. He says that a politician is 'a man who will double-cross that bridge when he comes to it'. And he expresses pity for Elizabeth Taylor who can't find the right man to marry. 'Poor Liz. Never the bridesmaid, always the bride.' Then he oversteps the mark by making a coy reference to oral sex with Jayne Mansfield. The show goes straight to an ad break and Bob threatens to pull the interview unless Oscar behaves himself. But that's a moral outrage. Oscar is loved because he dares to say the unsayable. The impasse is resolved by an unexpected angel of deliverance and the story takes off in an unexpected direction. This is a rare and glorious kind of show. An easy-going comedy that has the guts to transcend its material and to gaze into the troubled heart of a creative genius. The visuals are fantastic. Rachel Hauck's interiors are so gorgeous that you want to buy them. There are great performances from the entire cast, especially Hayes who crowns the show by displaying his sensational gifts at the keyboard. A Role To Die For is a comedy about 007 that tackles an uncomfortable truth. Bond is boring. The movies lack suspense because the lead character has to survive every disaster and calamity. Bond is accompanied by three other characters, M, Q and Moneypenny, whose presence is guaranteed as well so it's an ensemble piece with storylines that feel as predictable as episodes of EastEnders or The Magic Roundabout. You know the ending before the movie begins. Bond saunters through a series of car chases, explosions and other excitements while blasting live ammo at his enemies. Every shot fired by 007 is lethally accurate and every shot aimed at him misses by a few inches. That's lucky. And he performs these heroics while dressed as a cocktail waiter from a 1920s Cunard liner – tuxedo, bow tie and a spotless white shirt. He's the dullest serial killer ever created. And because the movies are so stale, the real drama has shifted to the casting of the next Bond. This is the starting point for Jordan Waller's play which features a pair of warring cousins, Deborah and Malcolm, who control the franchise. The script is full of cynical, knowing gags. Malcolm wants his druggie stepson to work as an associate on the new movie but Deborah rules him out because of his heroin problem. 'He's not an addict,' says Malcolm. 'He's an enthusiast.' They reach a decision and find a perfect English hunk, named Dave, to take on the role. But as soon as Dave's identity is released he's accused of molestation by a teenage girl. Throngs of protestors surround Deborah's office chanting: 'No way, paedo Dave.' Deborah turns to her gay son, Quinn, to find a suitable replacement. Quinn nominates a part-time actor, Theo Mackenzie, who holds a degree from Cambridge and has a polished and intelligent manner. But there are two 'problems' with Theo. He's black. And he's about to get married which will damage his status as a heartthrob. Then comes a bombshell. Theo's future spouse is called Luke. A gay Bond? That's not going to work. Deborah and Malcolm deal with fallout while Quinn has to break the bad news to Theo. The show, directed by Derek Bond, is great fun to watch and Tanya Franks has the time of her life playing the prickly and tyrannical Deborah. It's miles better than sitting through another 007 caper but, alas, that's not saying much.


Spectator
2 hours ago
- Spectator
Spectator Competition: Category error
Comp. 3413 was prompted by J.G. Ballard's story 'The Assassination of John Fitzgerald Kennedy Considered as a Downhill Motor Race' (itself inspired by Alfred Jarry's 'The Crucifixion Considered as an Uphill Bicycle Race'). You were invited to consider some event in a category to which it did not belong. It was harder than ever to choose winners; Adrian Fry, Bill Greenwell, Paul Freeman, Martin Brown, Sue Pickard, J.S.R. Fleckney, Nicholas Stone and Sylvia Fairley are a few of the runners-up. The prizes go to those below. The Big Bang considered as a TV baking challenge The initial cosmic oven temperature was unbelievably high. Whoever was responsible for turning it on should have read the thermodynamic instructions with more care. The particle dishes eventually cooled down, while the all-seeing Judge oversaw the creative aspects of the show to ensure things were co-ordinated. The three challenges were: a signature volcanic bake to test creativity; a technical bake which took skill and talent, especially with dark matter ingredients; and finally a showstopper with fruity neutron bombes. Two would-be stars were eliminated due to a surfeit of black holes in their sponges, while another lost out during desert week. Sadly, the baked Alaska dish was not received well. In the later stages, the fundamental forces of the strong and weak came to the fore. Various quirks and quarks combined to form exciting new recipes. Uplifting, like gravity. John O'Byrne Anne Boleyn's death as an RHS seminar Tower Green today hosted an RHS seminar on the early dead-heading of tender young blooms judged to have become expendable following their excessive and unsuitable cross-pollination. The event culminated in a dramatic demonstration given by a visiting French expert who, despite an initial concern over the proper positioning of his main prop, performed his task with admirable speed and neatness which earned him a Patron's Gold Award of some £23. The said Patron, though absent due to a prior engagement, was reported to have been well satisfied with the morning's outcome and confident that it would not deter his country's most respected seedsmen from continuing to supply him with the most desirable specimens from their own exclusive stock. Indeed, an early replacement for the once-fragrant, though apparently unreliable, Rosa Boleynii may be announced very shortly. Martin Parker The first world war as a Netflix crime series The first episode of this much talked-about crime noir opened literally with a bang, the murder of a feathery-hatted aristocrat and his wife. The hit-man is swiftly arrested, but who was behind it all? Cue then a whole range of the usual stock figures, often expendable, to come and try to sort things out, including incompetent Frenchmen who need to be rescued, until things get repetitive and the plot gets bogged down near the unlikely and insignificant river Somme. In a somewhat predictable twist in episode five, the increasingly implausible action requires some entirely new characters, of course American, to tidy it up. In an overly showy final scene set – why? – in a palace full of mirrors, the principal American, apparently called Woody, apportions rewards and blame. Every-one claims it to be 'the end', but it is abundantly clear that we are being set up for a second series. Brian Murdoch The Charge of the Light Brigade as a cricket match Raglan gave the order. From the top of the pavilion he rang the starting bell. When Cardigan trotted out, it was believed he had misunderstood the instructions. He had a bad start. Dancing down the wicket to Starc he missed entirely. Next ball he repeated the madness and was caught in the deep. Raglan looked on in horror. As Australia brought out the big guns things only got worse. The 13th Light Dragoons were hit hardest at first: Duckett, Crawley and Pope all fell before lunch. Later, the 17th Lancers and the 11th Hussars took the brunt, with Brook and Smith gone by 2.30. Only Root held out till tea, when the end of the innings brought a stop to the madness. Still, the question remained. Why had England tried to play T20 cricket in a Test match? David Harris It's the Brexit round of Strictly Come Dancing, the European Union holding the floor as the UK considers a move; will she stay or withdraw? They have long been uneasy partners, out of step, missing the beat, dancing to different tempos as they struggle over who will lead. A brisk comparison of choreography; it may be a case of 'take back control' with the UK as the music starts. Leavers and Remainers begin to tango, pressed close, a passionate, heated dip and rise, a kick or two. Incredible tension. A battle for independence, a flirtation with staying in sync. This may be the last tango in Paris, or anywhere in Europe for that matter. The judges confer, and the Leavers waltz away with the crown, leaving the Remainers feeling slighted, shocked and boxed into a corner with little room to manoeuvre. It's been absolute murder on the dancefloor. Janine Beacham The Annual Budget as a Branch of Mathematics Sturtevant and Yang propose erecting a new branch of maths, to be known as Governmental, Impure or Speculative Mathematics, but there is more to the subject than the commonplace that cancellarian two and two do not usually make four. Consider Cook's Variable Constant, C, (the 'Fudge Factor') defined as modulus (Ng – Nw), where Ng = the number you have and Nw = the number you want. Particularly interesting is the finite summation of an infinite diverging series, so that government borrowing can increase forever without repayment. A further promising development is Quantum Statistics, in which figures can be right and wrong simultaneously. The novel use of infinitesimals, as applied to spending cuts, is more controversial, but a ground-breaking use of pi, as something we can have tomorrow, but never today, exemplifies the useful creativity of the new subject. Frank Upton No. 3416: Throuple You are invited to submit a passage which marries romantasy with a third genre, e.g. political thriller, comic fiction, noir (150 words max, not too rude). Please email entries to competition@ by 3 September.