Russian forces take control of three Ukrainian villages across multiple regions, defence ministry says
Official Ukrainian reports of activity along the 1,000-km (600-mile) front disputed part of the Russian account, particularly concerning a key village in the southeast.
Reuters could not independently verify battlefield reports from either side.
The Russian Defence Ministry report named the three captured settlements as Kamianske in the southeastern Zaporizhzhia region, Dehtiarne in northeastern Kharkiv region, and Popiv Yar in Donetsk region, the main theatre of Russian operations.
Russian forces are engaged in a slow advance westward, mainly through Donetsk region, and Moscow announces the capture of new villages almost every day.
Ukrainian military spokesperson Vladyslav Voloshyn told the liga.net media outlet that holding Kamianske, southeast of the region's main town of Zaporizhzhia, was important to keep that city safe from attack.
But Kamianske had been all but flattened by long periods of fighting, he said. Ukrainian forces had moved out of it and successfully attacked Russian troops whenever small groups periodically ventured into it.
"The Russians cannot go into the village and hold it," Voloshyn was quoted as saying. "There is not a single dwelling left intact, not a single wall left standing, nothing to hold, nothing to enable you to take cover."
There was no acknowledgement from Ukraine that Popiv Yar had changed hands - the village lies northeast of Pokrovsk, for months a focal point of Russian attacks in Donetsk region.
For at least a week, it has remained in the "grey zone" of uncertain control as reported by DeepState, a Ukrainian military blog based on open source accounts of the fighting. There was no news from Ukrainian officials of the situation at Dehtiarne.
On Wednesday, Russia's military announced the capture of the village of Novohatske, southwest of Pokrovsk. Another Ukrainian military spokesperson, Viktor Trehubov, told public broadcaster Suspilne on Thursday that the village was in Russian hands.
Moscow controls a little less than 20% of Ukrainian territory and says it has incorporated four regions - Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson into Russia, a move that Kyiv and most Western countries reject as illegal.
In 2014, Russia seized and annexed Ukraine's Crimea peninsula, also a claim widely disputed internationally.
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
Zelensky faces backlash as Ukrainians protest against new anti-corruption law
Ukrainian activists have called for more protests against a law they say weakens the country's anti-corruption bodies, following the first major demonstration against the country's government in more than three years of war. The legislation has also drawn rebukes from European Union officials and international rights groups. President Volodymyr Zelensky, under pressure as the change threatened to endanger his public support at a critical time in the war with Russia, convened the heads of Ukraine's key anti-corruption and security agencies on Wednesday morning in response to the outcry against his decision to approve the new law that was passed by Parliament. 'We all hear what society says,' Mr Zelensky wrote on Telegram after the meeting. But he insisted the new legal framework was needed to crack down harder on corruption. 'Criminal cases should not drag on for years without verdicts, and those working against Ukraine must not feel comfortable or immune from punishment,' the Ukrainian leader said. He said all government agencies agreed to work constructively and respond to public expectations for fairness and effectiveness. A detailed joint action plan is expected within two weeks, aimed at addressing institutional weaknesses, removing legal hurdles, and ensuring justice across the board, he said. Thousands of people gathered in the capital and other cities across Ukraine on Tuesday evening to urge Mr Zelensky to veto the controversial bill. After Mr Zelensky approved it, activists called on social media for another demonstration in the centre of Kyiv on Wednesday evening. The legislation tightens government oversight of two key anti-corruption agencies. Critics say the step could significantly weaken the independence of those agencies and grant Mr Zelensky's circle greater influence over investigations. Fighting entrenched corruption is crucial for Ukraine's aspirations to join the EU and maintain access to billions of dollars in western aid in its fight against Russia's three-year invasion. In a post on X, the EU's enlargement commissioner, Marta Kos, expressed concern over the vote in the Ukrainian parliament, called the Rada, calling it 'a serious step back'. The Ukrainian branch of Transparency International criticised parliament's decision, saying it undermines one of the most significant reforms since what Ukraine calls its Revolution of Dignity in 2014, and damages trust with international partners. It accused authorities of 'dismantling' the country's anti-corruption architecture. Mr Zelensky has been the international face of Ukraine's determination to defeat Russia's all-out invasion, and his domestic troubles are an unwelcome diversion from the war effort. Mr Zelensky said the new law clears out 'Russian influence' from the fight against corruption and ensures punishment for those found guilty of it, after what he said were years-long delays in criminal proceedings involving huge amounts of money. 'The cases that have been lying dormant must be investigated,' Mr Zelensky said in a Telegram post after midnight on Wednesday. 'For years, officials who have fled Ukraine have been casually living abroad for some reason – in very nice countries and without legal consequences – and this is not normal.' He did not provide examples of what he said was Russian interference. Russian officials relished Mr Zelensky's difficulties. Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova mocked Mr Zelensky's claim of Russian infiltration into the anti-corruption agency, noting sarcastically that 'they might just as well pull a couple of bears out of the corner'. Delegations from Russia and Ukraine were set to meet in Istanbul on Wednesday for their third round of direct talks in two months, the Kremlin and Ukrainian officials said. The meeting was not expected to make progress on ending the war and would likely focus on exchanges of prisoners of war. The legal changes in Ukraine would grant the prosecutor general new authority over investigations and cases handled by the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine and the Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office.
Forbes
33 minutes ago
- Forbes
Failed Russian River Crossings Limit Their Summer Offensive
TOPSHOT - A Ukrainian serviceman of the 123rd Territorial Defense Brigade watches an area of the ... More Dnipro River, in an undisclosed location in the Kherson region, on November 6, 2023 (Photo by Roman PILIPEY / AFP) (Photo by ROMAN PILIPEY/AFP via Getty Images) In May 2022, Ukraine destroyed an entire Russian Battalion Tactical Group as they attempted to cross the Siverskyi Donets River. Although Russian forces have made some gains on the battlefield through new tactics and technologies, their ability to conduct river crossings has not improved. This ongoing shortcoming has become a critical vulnerability, effectively stalling several major operations in their current summer offensive. In particular, Russian forces have repeatedly failed in their recent attempts to cross the Dnipro and Oskil Rivers. Russian Attempts to Cross the Dnipro River The Dnipro River, especially where it flows into the Black Sea near Kherson, is a strategic centerpiece of this war. Early in the conflict, Russian forces controlled both banks of the river. In November 2022, Ukraine recaptured the western bank during its counteroffensive when Russian forces abandoned the city of Kherson. Ukraine then pushed across the river and established a bridgehead on the eastern bank in October 2023, but they subsequently withdrew from that position and established a strong defensive posture on the west bank. General view of the damaged Antonivsky Bridge in Kherson, Ukraine, Sunday, Nov. 27, 2022. The ... More bridge, the main crossing point over the Dnipro river in Kherson, was destroyed by Russian troops in November 2022, after Kremlin's forces withdrew from the southern city. (AP Photo/Bernat Armangue) Since then, Russian troops have repeatedly tried to reestablish their foothold along the western bank in an effort to retake Kherson and the surrounding areas. In March 2024, Russian reconnaissance units attempted a crossing near the Antonivskyi Bridge but were driven back under fire mid-river. Russia has also sought control over the islands at the river's mouth, to provide them with forward staging areas for artillery, drones, and logistics. In December 2024, it launched a large assault involving 300 boats to capture several of these islands but were ultimately driven back by Ukrainian artillery and drone strikes. As part of their current offensive, Russian forces have renewed their attempts to take Kherson and the western side of the Dnipro. In June, Ukraine's 30th Marine Corps reported that Russian units have launched daily assaults on the islands and along the west bank, using support from drones and electronic warfare. However, Ukrainian forces continue to maintain fire control over the area, disrupting these landings with direct fire, coordinated artillery, and their own drone attacks. Without the ability to move significant numbers of troops or armored vehicles across the river, Russia will not be able make any meaningful gains along this axis. Russian Attempts To Cross the Oskil River In the Kharkiv Oblast, the Oskil River has also become a vital defensive line for Ukraine, particularly in protecting Kupiansk and nearby logistical corridors. For Russian forces, crossing the Oskil would provide access to key road networks and enable flanking operations toward Kupiansk from the north and east. As such, securing this river line is essential for any sustained Russian advance in the region. A Ukrainian military member of the 114 brigade stands on a destroyed railway bridge over the Oskil ... More River during a scouting mission near the frontline in Kupiansk, Kharkiv region, on December 15, 2024 (Photo by Roman PILIPEY / AFP) (Photo by ROMAN PILIPEY/AFP via Getty Images) Russian efforts to cross the Oskil began in late December 2024 with assaults near Dvorichna, Novomlynsk, and Topoli. All were repelled. In March 2025, Russia employed a new tactic, using drones to identify Ukrainian positions and coordinate fire in support of an infantry crossing. Despite this adaptation, the operation ultimately failed due to Ukrainian counter-drone systems and a lack of coordination between the crossing and the artillery support. As part of its current summer offensive, Russia has escalated its efforts west of the Oskil, focusing on areas between Kupiansk and Dvorichna. By mid-June, geolocated footage confirmed that Russian troops had secured a bridgehead near Krasne Pershe. However, they were unsuccessful in using the bridgehead to raft heavy equipment across the river. In mid-July, Russian forces attempted to build a pontoon bridge to cross the Oskil, but that effort also failed. While some Russian soldiers have crossed the river, the inability to transport armored units has severely limited their offensive capacity and prevented any operational breakthrough in the northeast. The Operational Challenges Blocking Russian River Crossings Assaulting across a river, whether by bridge or raft, is among the most difficult military operations. Soldiers must cross exposed terrain with limited cover, often on platforms that restrict movement and offer little protection. The crossing site becomes a bottleneck, concentrating troops in vulnerable positions and limiting their ability to respond to enemy fire. Even once a force reaches the far bank, only a small number of soldiers are initially present to secure the bridgehead, often against entrenched defenders with superior firepower and elevation. Russian Army engineers unload sections of pontoon bridge in the Crimean port city of Kerch, on May ... More 5, 2014. AFP PHOTO/ YURIY LASHOV (Photo credit should read YURIY LASHOV/AFP via Getty Images) Russia has attempted to use technology to solve many of their battlefield challenges. However, there are no straightforward technological solution to alleviate this challenge. Robotic bridges or rafts still leave soldiers exposed to many of the same risks. The only reliable method for success is to move rapidly and with force, quickly transporting soldiers across the river and following up with an assault to secure key objectives on the far shore. This approach requires well-trained, cohesive units capable of executing complex maneuvers under fire. At this point in the war, Russian units generally lack the collective training necessary to carry out such an operation. High casualty rates have forced Russia to rely heavily on replacement troops who often receive minimal training. These new soldiers typically lack experience and have had little opportunity to train with their assigned units, making coordinated operations such as river crossings extremely difficult to execute. Given current personnel shortages and Russia's desire to sustain its offensive, the military is not in a position to pull units back for collective training exercises. This shortfall is evident across the front, where many Russian attacks are conducted at the small-unit level rather than as part of larger, coordinated operations. As the war continues, the challenges of river crossings will increase for Russian forces. Ukraine's growing fleet of surveillance and attack drones are playing a critical role in identifying concentrations of Russian troops preparing for river crossings and directing artillery and loitering munitions against them. Additionally, new drones are equipped with sensors that can see through smoke and other obscurations intended to conceal the crossings. Ukraine is also deploying unmanned surface vessels to patrol riverways and monitor Russian activity. Although the Russia-Ukraine war is often associated with the rapid introduction of new technologies, traditional challenges like river crossings continue to shape the battlefield. Russia's repeated failures in these operations have resulted in significant losses and now stand as a major barrier to the success of their summer offensive.
Washington Post
33 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Does Trump understand what ‘the West' is? Does the West itself know?
The West urgently needs a definition of 'the West.' Without this, it cannot understand itself, or current and future challenges. If Ukraine is to be saved from dismemberment, and its nationhood not neutered, the nature and stakes of the conflict need to be understood in Huntingtonian terms. Even when political scientist Samuel Huntington (1927-2008) was mistaken, he was penetrating. In 1993, he wrote that 'the likelihood of violence between Ukrainians and Russians should be low. They are two Slavic, primarily Orthodox peoples who have had close relationships with each other for centuries.' Huntington did not foresee the West's magnetic attraction, pulling Ukraine away from the civilization Vladimir Putin intends to enforce.
