US influencer Sam Jones leaves Australia after baby wombat snatching video sparks outrage
Sam Jones, an American influencer, has left Australia after a video surfaced showing her taking a distressed baby wombat from the side of the road and posting the footage on social media. The controversial video quickly sparked outrage across the country.
Australia's Home Affairs Minister, Tony Burke, had previously stated that his department was reviewing whether it could revoke Jones's visa, but sources confirmed that she left the country voluntarily.
In a brief statement on Friday, Burke expressed relief, saying, "There has never been a better time to be a baby wombat," celebrating Jones's departure.
The video, which showed Jones laughing as she snatched the baby wombat from its frantic mother, caused widespread condemnation. In the clip, the baby wombat is seen hissing in distress before Jones eventually returns it to the bush. The incident prompted anger from both the public and Australian leaders, including Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, who called it an "outrage." Foreign Minister Penny Wong also condemned the act as "dreadful."
Opposition leader Peter Dutton described the act as "cruel" and expressed relief that Jones had left the country. An online petition demanding her deportation garnered over 30,000 signatures. However, as Jones had not been charged with any offense and was not deemed a threat, there were no legal grounds to cancel her visa.
Jones, who also goes by the name Samantha Strable, has nearly 100,000 followers on Instagram, where she describes herself as an "outdoor enthusiast and hunter." She has since made her account private and deleted the controversial post.
In a now-deleted comment, Jones defended her actions, claiming that the baby wombat was "carefully held for one minute" and was unharmed upon being returned to its mother. "They wandered back off into the bush together completely unharmed," she wrote. "I don't ever capture wildlife that will be harmed by my doing so."
Despite her defense, wildlife experts have criticized the act as a "blatant disregard" for native species. The Wombat Protection Society expressed shock over what they described as the "mishandling of a wombat joey in an apparent snatch for 'social media likes'." Suzanne Milthorpe, Head of Campaigns at World Animal Protection Australia, called the video "unacceptable," highlighting the trauma the baby wombat must have felt.
Wombats, which are native to Australia, are a legally protected species. Experts say that separating a baby wombat from its mother can be both distressing and harmful, given the strong bond between them.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
India and US advance toward interim trade deal after four-day talks
NEW DELHI: Indian and U.S. negotiators made progress in their latest round of talks in New Delhi on Tuesday on a bilateral trade deal, having focused on market access for industrial and some agricultural goods, tariff cuts and non-tariff barriers, Indian government sources said. 'The negotiations held with the U.S. side were productive and helped in making progress towards crafting a mutually beneficial and balanced agreement including through achievement of early wins,' one of the sources said. The U.S. delegation, led by senior officials from the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, held closed-door negotiationswith Indian trade ministry officials headed by chief negotiator Rajesh Agrawal. Both sides discussed increasing bilateral digital trade, by improving customs and trade facilitation measures, the sources said, adding that 'negotiations will continue' for early conclusion of the initial tranche of the trade pact. U.S. President Donald Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi had agreed in February to conclude a bilateral trade agreement by fall 2025 and to more than double bilateral trade to $500 billion by 2030. India, US push to finalise interim tariff deal as Trump's deadline nears The two sides are expected to sign an interim agreement by the end of the month, before the expiry of Trump's 90-day pause on reciprocal tariffs on major trading partners, including a 26% tariff on India. Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal, currently in Switzerland for talks with European trade partners, said India is prepared to proceed with the deal by first addressing simpler issues. The next phase of negotiations could tackle more complex matters, with the goal of signing the first tranche of the bilateral trade pact by September or October, the officials added. India resisted U.S. demands to open its markets to wheat, dairy and corn imports, while offering lower tariffs on high-value U.S. products such as almonds, pistachios and walnuts, one of the sources said. India also asked the U.S to revoke its 10% baseline tariff. However, the U.S. side opposed this, noting that even Britain was subject to this under its recent bilateral trade agreement. Trump says US doing 'big deals' with Pakistan, India Additionally, India sought an exemption for its steel exports from a 50% tariff. A potential 26% tariff on India would be devastating to Indian goods - including rice, shrimp, textiles and footwear, which together comprise nearly one-fifth of India's merchandise exports - and could severely hit exports and dampen foreign investment inflows. India has pledged to increase purchases of American goods, including energy products like liquefied natural gas, crude oil, coal and defence equipment. India's exports to the U.S. rose 28% to $37.7 billion in the first four months of 2025, while imports increased to $14.4 billion, widening India's trade surplus, according to U.S. government data.
Express Tribune
6 hours ago
- Express Tribune
What is Samarium and why is the US concerned about it?
Listen to article The United States has expressed growing concern over its dependence on China for samarium supplies, a rare earth element vital to defense and aerospace sectors, as Beijing tightens regulations over the global rare earth supply chain amid escalating geopolitical tensions. What is Samarium? Samarium, a silvery metal belonging to the lanthanide group, plays a pivotal role in the production of samarium-cobalt magnets—components prized for their high heat resistance and stability. The rare earth metal boasts unique magnetic, optical, and catalytic properties, with a density of 7.35 g/cm³, melting point of 1072°C, and boiling point of 1900°C. Known for its ferromagnetic properties and high coercivity, samarium's magnetic energy product is crucial to the functionality of samarium-cobalt magnets. The metal typically exists in a stable +3 oxidation state, reacting with oxygen to form a protective oxide layer that prevents further corrosion. Why is the US concerned? American officials have raised alarm over the country's complete dependence on China for samarium supplies, particularly following Beijing's April 4 announcement suspending exports of seven rare earth metals used in military-grade magnets. China's Ministry of Commerce cited "national security" and "international obligations" as reasons for requiring special licenses for future exports. "Without these materials, our ability to replenish modern weaponry is compromised," a senior US defense official told Reuters on condition of anonymity. The concern goes beyond immediate supply disruptions, according to a report on The New York Times website. US law requires military-grade magnets to be manufactured domestically or in allied countries, but raw materials may still be sourced globally - creating a strategic vulnerability that defense officials describe as unacceptable. Strategic military applications These magnets are essential in advanced military hardware such as missiles, jet engines, and precision-guided munitions. Lockheed Martin uses approximately 50 pounds of samarium-cobalt magnets in every F-35 fighter jet, highlighting the metal's critical defense applications. Samarium also has applications in civilian sectors including nuclear reactors, where it serves as a neutron absorber, lasers, and medical imaging. Its controlled radioactive isotopes find applications in cancer treatments, while the metal's magnetic properties are integral to electric motors and aerospace components. China's regulations Some export licenses have been issued to automakers for less strategically critical rare earths like dysprosium and terbium. However, samarium, which has minimal civilian use, remains under strict export control - a move that has intensified US concerns about supply security. The extraction and refinement of samarium is a complex process, typically requiring the mining of minerals like monazite and bastnäsite, followed by extensive chemical processing. The preparation involves sophisticated separation techniques, including mechanical separation and chemical processes like ion exchange. Separating rare earths involves over 100 steps with strong acids, making it both environmentally and economically challenging. Although deposits exist in the US and Australia, the infrastructure for refining remains concentrated in China. Currently, the US is entirely dependent on China for samarium supplies - a situation that has prompted urgent calls for domestic alternatives. "This isn't just about magnets—it's about strategic autonomy," said Dr. Elaine Kim, a materials scientist at the Royal United Services Institute. "Control over these elements can shape the global balance of power." Growing dependence prompted Congressional action as early as 2009. After a two-month Chinese export ban on rare earths to Japan in 2010, the US allocated $1 billion to revive the Mountain Pass mine in California. The site reopened in 2014 but closed a year later amid Chinese competition. China's Baotou region, with lower environmental standards and costs, became the global leader in rare earth production. Historically, Western militaries relied on a French facility to refine Australian ore, but that plant shut down in 1994. MP Materials, which acquired Mountain Pass in 2018, initially shipped ore to China for processing. The Pentagon later granted the company $35 million to build samarium production capacity. MP invested $100 million of its own, though the processing equipment remains in storage. "We felt very burned by the whole thing," said CEO James Litinsky, citing the limited market size for samarium as a barrier to profitability. The administration also awarded $351 million to Australia's Lynas Rare Earths to build a processing facility in Texas, but the project was shelved after Lynas renewed its Malaysian mining license. The company has not responded to inquiries. Diplomatic efforts This week, US and Chinese officials began two days of trade talks in London, with American representatives pressing for a relaxation of rare earth export restrictions. Still, expectations for policy changes remain low. "I don't think that's going away," said Michael Hart, president of the American Chamber of Commerce in China, referring to the new export licensing regime. US law requires military-grade magnets to be manufactured domestically or in allied countries, but raw materials may be sourced globally. Meanwhile, geopolitical events such as US arms shipments to Ukraine and Israel, and escalating tensions over Taiwan, are driving up demand for advanced military components. Strategic implications Former State Department official Jay Truesdale, now CEO of TD International, said rare earth policy has shifted dramatically over the past three administrations—from reliance on World Trade Organization mechanisms during the Obama years to strategic competition under Trump and Biden. "This time, it's not just a trade dispute," Truesdale said. "It's national security policy." Experts agree that while rare earth deposits are globally dispersed, their economic extraction and refinement remain daunting. As global defense spending climbs and geopolitical rivalries deepen, samarium has quietly emerged as a key battleground in the contest for technological and military supremacy.
Express Tribune
10 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Marines deployed in Los Angeles as Trump administration intensifies migrant crackdowns
Listen to article The Trump administration deployed US Marines to Los Angeles on Monday and intensified raids targeting suspected undocumented immigrants, leading to further outrage from street protesters and Democratic leaders, who raised concerns about a national crisis. Around 700 Marines based in Southern California were expected to arrive in Los Angeles by Monday night or Tuesday morning, according to officials, as part of a federal strategy to quell street demonstrations against the immigration raids, which are a key focus of President Donald Trump's second term. Although their mission to protect federal personnel and property is temporary – filling the gap until a full contingent of 4,000 National Guard troops can reach Los Angeles – the deployment represents an extraordinary use of military force in support of a police operation, coming over the objections of state and local leaders who did not request assistance. Meanwhile, US Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem pledged to carry out even more operations to round up suspected immigration violators, continuing a crackdown that has provoked protests. Trump officials have labelled the protests as lawless and blamed state and local Democrats for permitting upheaval and protecting undocumented immigrants in sanctuary cities. The military and federal enforcement operations have further polarised America's two major political parties, with Trump, a Republican, threatening to arrest California's Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, for resisting the federal crackdown. California filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration on Monday to block the deployment of the National Guard and Marines, arguing that it violates federal law and state sovereignty. The top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, Senator Jack Reed, said he was "gravely troubled" by Trump's deployment of active-duty Marines. "The president is forcibly overriding the authority of the governor and mayor and using the military as a political weapon. This unprecedented move threatens to turn a tense situation into a national crisis," Reed said. "Since our nation's founding, the American people have been clear: we do not want the military conducting law enforcement on US soil," he added. Rare use of military US Marines are known as the first American forces to establish a beachhead in US military interventions, and as the last forces to leave any occupation. While military forces have been deployed domestically for major disasters such as Hurricane Katrina and the attacks of September 11, 2001, it is extremely rare for troops to be used domestically during civil disturbances. Even without invoking the Insurrection Act, Trump can deploy Marines under certain legal conditions or under his authority as commander in chief. The last time the military was used for direct police action under the Insurrection Act was in 1992, when the California governor at the time asked President George HW Bush to help respond to the Los Angeles riots following the acquittal of police officers who had beaten Black motorist Rodney King. Newsom contends it is his responsibility as governor to call in the National Guard, labelling Trump's actions as "an unmistakable step towards authoritarianism." Trump, in turn, said he supported a suggestion by his border czar Tom Homan that Newsom should be arrested for possibly obstructing his administration's immigration enforcement measures. "I would do it if I were Tom. I think it's great," Trump told reporters. Four Days of Protests The protests so far have resulted in a few dozen arrests and some property damage. "What is happening affects every American, everyone who wants to live free, regardless of how long their family has lived here," said Marzita Cerrato, 42, a first-generation immigrant whose parents are from Mexico and Honduras. Protests also erupted in at least nine other US cities on Monday, including New York, Philadelphia, and San Francisco, according to local news outlets. In Austin, Texas, police fired non-lethal munitions and detained several people as they clashed with a crowd of several hundred protesters. Before the Los Angeles dispersal, several hundred protesters gathered outside a detention centre, chanting "free them all," waving Mexican and Central American flags, and directing sometimes vulgar insults toward federal officers. At dusk, officers clashed with protesters who had scattered into the Little Tokyo area of the city. As people watched from apartment balconies and tourists huddled inside hotels, a large contingent of LAPD officers and sheriff's deputies fired several flashbangs and tear gas into the streets. Homeland Security reported that its Immigration and Customs Enforcement division had arrested 2,000 immigration offenders per day in recent days, far above the 311 daily average in fiscal year 2024 under former President Joe Biden. "We conducted more operations today than we did the day before, and tomorrow we are going to double those efforts again," Noem told Fox News' "Hannity." "The more they protest and commit acts of violence against law enforcement officers, the harder ICE is going to come after them." Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass opposed the clampdown, telling MSNBC, "This is a city of immigrants." Noem countered that, "They are not a city of immigrants. They're a city of criminals."
